|
Post by paca on Jul 29, 2011 8:45:14 GMT -5
I don't think it's the angle. Her skin is torn. They must have tried to get rid of the wrinkles around her eyes and to make her eyes look bigger. She might as well have used sticky tape considering how bad it has been done. I don't think that any part of her photographs well unless you are taking pics for a book on plastic surgery gone wrong and why to avoid it at all costs. She looks a freak and her husband seems to be following suite. Wonder when he will get his hair transplants, seeing that a brain transplant for both of them is apparently beyond their budget
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jul 29, 2011 8:58:45 GMT -5
i'm positive with the "investment insider magazine" of europe starts making fun of the non dynamic duo.....it's DONE gala, bunte, hello all those tabs that's their bread and butter but an investment magazine kiss it good bye. wasn't that the plan to "sell" it as a good place for investment and travel. i'm pretty sure the readers of an investment magazine should be the "brands" intended customers (not the poor delusional sugahs that go to water parks on vacation) woooooo WOO oooooooooooooo another PR FAIL! this is deadly IMO this is just as big as the monaco FBpage erasing their image, something is going on......this trainwreck is much bigger than i expected WORTH the price of a ticket LOL ;D
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jul 29, 2011 12:58:11 GMT -5
Re: weird eyebrow picture Maybe there was a fight after all. The Question is: when, where, why, who was involved. I found it kind of strange that all those interviews were done during a very short period of time just before the wedding.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jul 29, 2011 19:55:42 GMT -5
Re: weird eyebrow picture Maybe there was a fight after all. The Question is: when, where, why, who was involved. I found it kind of strange that all those interviews were done during a very short period of time just before the wedding. We've noticed that eyebrow thingy before - a few months ago. We thought it looked a bit like one of those thread lifts things they are doing. But whatever it is - it is just terrible! I don't understand what the hell all these celebrities are doing to themselves - not just CW - I was looking at a tabloid magazine at the drug store last night while I was waiting for something and they had before and after shots of celbs who had work done - OMG - WTF are these people thinking - WTF are the doctors thinking?! Just hideous!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 30, 2011 8:41:04 GMT -5
I think these doctors hate women and that's why they are doing it. A serious doctor helps those in need after an accident, they don't cause the accident to get rich themselves; sorry I have no respect for these people doctors and clients alike
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jul 30, 2011 16:27:35 GMT -5
I think these doctors hate women and that's why they are doing it. A serious doctor helps those in need after an accident, they don't cause the accident to get rich themselves; sorry I have no respect for these people doctors and clients alike Sadly, I think you're right.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 31, 2011 11:52:38 GMT -5
Normally I would put all of Paris Match's articles about Charlene and Albert in their separate threads since Paris match has acted sine day one as Charlene's mouthpiece, but this articles revels some new information about Albert's hissy fit/temper tantrum to the press. This article is written by the Paris Match correspondent who lives in Monaco and who constantly published what Charlene wants people to know. First and very important, Charlene had a prepared statement that she was supposed to make - but she didn't! Any thoughts on why? Second, this article reveals more information about ALbert's rage at those who started the rumor and what he did to retaliate - Albert really comes across as a dictator with his actions and treats. Third, the article reveals statements that Albert got from his police to show that the L'Express cliams was a lie. But recall, L'Express never revealed its sources so how can ALbert get a so-called source to write a denial statement? That';s why they waited to sue. Honestly, do they really expect a court to take such a statement seriously, especially when Albert threatens imprisonment? From Paris Match:
PRINCESS CHARLENE SILENT A thousand rumors, everyone is talking about, except her. Is she happy?
Ghislaine Ribeyre - Paris Match Sunday, July 31, 2011 In front of her wedding dress, she freezes. The last time Charlene saw this white dress, created especially for her by Giorgio Armani, she was to say "yes" to Albert and his destiny as princess. It was July 2, a few weeks ago, an eternity ago. This Thursday, July 21, back from his honeymoon in Mozambique, she found her dress on a model of clear plastic placed next to another model who wears the uniform of Albert II. Charlene, in a print dress and gold sandals, bridal silhouette that looks disembodied. "It's beautiful, but it's weird! "She whispered to her husband. The couple at the Oceanographic Museum, a favorite of Albert II in Monaco to visit the exhibition "The history of royal wedding." The bride and groom in convertible car crown through the candy offered to guests, there is plenty to delight the most obsessive fan. The place gives the exhibition an air wildly offbeat: the crown throne as a giant octopus, the wedding dress next to a submarine and silverware for dinner near a huge whale skeleton. Nevertheless, the Oceanographic Museum has become a must for tourists from the Principality in the footsteps of marriage. After visiting the palace to see the courtyard which was held the religious ceremony, then the church Sainte-Devote ("where the princess cried," as recalled by his troops a serious guide English), we just admire the large and small objects of marriage. The exhibition is a success. The Prince and Princess are the 46 206th 46 207th and visitors, proudly points out the museum's director, Robert Calcagno.Displays in shop windows, Charlene and Albert stroll hand in hand when they get caught by the size. However, between smiles, Charlene has sometimes seem absent. I must say that - is it a habit or compliance with the Protocol? - Monaco attention turns first to "Monsignor". It surrounds him, he is party, we try to catch her eye before you remember, with a start, there is now a princess at his side ... At the end of the visit, the Prince expressed the wish to a detour to the aquarium of the museum by diving with Charlene, during their honeymoon, he thought spot a scorpion fish, and would like to verify that it has correctly identified. This is the case: he did well to prevent his wife to touch the beast, particularly venomous. The newlyweds then make a detour to the nursery, in a part of the museum closed to the public, to get to know new arrivals, five baby sharks come straight from Indonesia. Albert and Charlene relax a little. These sharks then have at least the advantage of being parked behind a glass wall. For Monaco whole has become these days a strange aquarium, which swim and float gossip, gossip and noises: Charlene would have tried to escape before the wedding, the couple is in crisis, the prince would be the point to recognize a third illegitimate child ... So, Albert returned from honeymoon decided to take things in hand. Back in Monaco at 6:00 am, Tuesday, July 19, he convened a crisis meeting. Present the Minister of State Michel Roger, his chief of staff, his lawyer and childhood friend, Thierry Lacoste, and her counselor, Christiane Stahl. On the palace, rarely has the Prince as angry. He usually refuses to comment on his private life has this time decided to issue an official statement. Words slam, "It's more bearable." He's hurt, especially because it blames his wife: "For decades, my family is the target of unfair attacks, or objectionable. I want to protect the Princess Charlene, unaccustomed to such violence media." Albert mocks rumors "that only the jealousy and poor feeding. "CHARLENE SEEMS TO HAVE DECIDED THAT HIS ACTIONS SPOKE FOR HERIn the statement, he calls the "heavy responsibility" of those "who like to spread them and maintain them." Privately, he is more threatening: "There are a Monaco or persons who seek to harm me," he said. In secret, he prepares the attack against: the Palace would have included a letter from the State Police stating that at no time Charlene has been "stopped" at the airport or prevented from boarding an aircraft. Two days later, Roger Michel who is sent to the front. This official French, more accustomed to speak on the state of the Monegasque economy, began to deny the rumors one by one. The attempted escape of the Princess before marriage? Faux said he. Of course, Charlene flew on June 25, but it was to go - as Paris Match was then reported, supporting photographs - the Special Olympics in Athens." She went alone, without the prince, then we actually saw one this weekend then at the airport in Nice," said Minister of State. As for another illegitimate child of Albert, born as the prince was already engaged to Charlene, "there is evidence that this is wrong." Wanting to close once and for all the subject of rumors, Michel Roger provides a little awkwardly, "They are all wrong ... the ones I know, anyway."Such a beautiful summer visitors would have fallen asleep in the sun, the Principality wakes up with the leather significantly. Monegasques are looking for any gesture, any evidence that would refute - or confirm - the sounds. When the lawyer Thierry Lacoste slip in the program "C in the air" on France 5, Alexander, son Albert had with the former flight attendant Nicole Coste in 2003 and recognized in 2005, could one day be legitimized and therefore access to the order of succession, the Rock does not believe his ears. The Constitution was amended in 2002 by Rainier, precisely to prevent this kind of situation. Article 10 provides for what can only claim the throne "direct and legitimate offspring of the reigning prince." In other words, children born in wedlock. If there are not "succession operates for the benefit of brothers and sisters of the prince," says the article. Alexander to claim the throne, it would still change the Constitution."Why mention this possibility when the prince is to marry for, as we all hope, legitimate children, which will automatically be rulers?" Asks a Monegasque, completely disoriented. Once again, Albert had to clarify things: "There is no question of legitimacy of children born out of wedlock," he said. The Grimaldi forget their old quarrels to find their reflex crisis: they block. Princess Stephanie was the first to step into the breach, before marriage, to denounce rumors "stupid and evil." Princess Caroline does not want to speak publicly, but it is "upwind," says the palace is: beware the one who dares to peddle gossip before it. Mike Wittstock, Charlene's father, tells anyone who will listen that her daughter is "very happy". Wittstock family has already made arrangements for the future. Lynette's mother, Charlene, plans to keep much of the year in their new home in La Turbie, while Michael will probably go back and forth between Benoni and Monaco. Gareth, a brother of Charlene, has already chosen: he settled on the Rock, close to the palace with his girlfriend.Charlene? She remains silent. Shortly before her marriage, she told the magazine "Vogue" that the rumors were "a lie from beginning to end." Since then, she is silent. Even when he was offered the opportunity to speak. When Albert summoned the press Monaco, Wednesday, July 20, to submit a statement, she decided at the last minute not to pronounce the phrases she had prepared: "I think that says it all, "says she Just when her husband gave him the floor. His entourage sometimes blows hot and cold. When his brother Sean ensures a South African magazine that she is "very happy", he added that, anyway, "she is now Catholic, and Catholics do not accept divorce" ... Charlene seems to have decided that his actions spoke for her: after all, it is there, smiling alongside Albert, July 22, to attend an athletics meeting. On the lawn of the Stade Louis-II, it carries with it two medals of Monaco Special Olympics, games for the mentally handicapped, she never fails to promote. On a more glamorous, it also has its mark on the next ball to the Red Cross, which will be his first as a princess. But it will take more than smiles on red carpet to calm things down. Monaco looks forward to his new princess finally broke the silence.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 31, 2011 12:36:01 GMT -5
This isn't exactly a sycophant piece. It sounds more like Albert having a temper tantrum. He's really out of touch to say jealousy. That's just so lame. It has no substance and only makes people laugh at him for being a spoiled brat. Charlene brought this on herself by her actions. Had she stayed below the radar and not courted the press, no one would have paid attention to her comings and goings. Plus if she really was shopping in Paris I would think she would have alerted the press so she could be photographed just like Kate (Kate's every move was photographed even buying a bikini and some personal items were noted). I seriously doubt she was in SA a week before the wedding. Not this girl - she likes to be pampered. They aren't even good liars. I don't know whose more the village idiot, Albert or LaCoste.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 31, 2011 15:42:39 GMT -5
and why would she be at a game farm when she is supposed to be vegetarian.Stealing their food?
|
|
|
Post by dolcevita on Jul 31, 2011 21:49:00 GMT -5
Me thinks she was resting after having the finishing touches completed on her new face!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 1, 2011 4:40:48 GMT -5
so you think she goes to SA to get her face done?
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Aug 1, 2011 7:26:27 GMT -5
so you think she goes to SA to get her face done? LOL well that would certainly explain a lot. Also good point about the game farm and her supposedly vegetarian diet.
|
|
|
Post by dolcevita on Aug 1, 2011 9:12:31 GMT -5
so you think she goes to SA to get her face done? Maybe to keep the gossip down and avoid being seen with the bruises, etc...
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 1, 2011 9:49:44 GMT -5
yeah, since no one knows her in SA it's probably the best place to go
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 1, 2011 9:59:30 GMT -5
The scariest thing for me about this article is that Albert had his police chief write a statement that stating that at no time Charlene has been "stopped" at the airport or prevented from boarding an aircraft. hat kind of weight does he expect such a letter to carry. Besides the fact that the man would write anything to keep his job, but how does Albert know that his police chief is one of L'Express's three very credible sources?
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Aug 1, 2011 10:09:17 GMT -5
The more they explain and deny the more I am convinced and maybe not only I that something serious had happened they are trying to cover up now.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 1, 2011 12:42:13 GMT -5
The scariest thing for me about this article is that Albert had his police chief write a statement that stating that at no time Charlene has been "stopped" at the airport or prevented from boarding an aircraft. hat kind of weight does he expect such a letter to carry. Besides the fact that the man would write anything to keep his job, but how does Albert know that his police chief is one of L'Express's three very credible sources? it wasn't MC police chief. They said police national which is French police. They did not say who exactly made the statement. MC has the carabiniers du prince and the surete public. France has police national and gendarme, who are also police, but belong to the military. They are responsible for motorways, whereas municipal is the police within the city also he doesn't say that the chief is the source of l'express. They don't know who is. so they are getting people whom they think have the best reputation to make statements. They will have to provide these statements to the lawyer of l'express. It is more likely that l'express got their statements from the officers involved. They probably filed reports on the incident and made copies for themselves. The original might very well have disappeared.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 1, 2011 12:57:30 GMT -5
Thanks Paca fpr the correction. But, getting such a statement still doesn't make any sense since they do now know who are L'Express's sources. Also, if they have a statement from France's national police chief, it gives the impression that they are intimidating any line officer who may be the source. This has the potential to backfire on Albert BIG TIME with the French! Albert doesn't have an social capital, goodwill or prestige to be trowing his weight around (literally throwing his weight around in a hissy fit).
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Aug 1, 2011 13:23:33 GMT -5
Plus it's going to tick off France because these people have better things to do with their time than bail out Albert. I think they are still fishing for who L'Express's sources are and this is one way to do it, and as stated intimidate the real sources. I think paca makes a good point that the real sources probably provided copies of the incident report or an internal memo. I'm sure that the editor of L'Express asked for some kind of hard proof before printing the story. I'm sure they didn't just rely on verbal statements. Verbal descriptions would not be enough for an organization like L'Express to print a story. They must have something pretty solid and very creditable because they knew full well what could happen down the road for printing it. I believe they are well prepared with the facts. JMO
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 1, 2011 13:44:39 GMT -5
Thanks Paca fpr the correction. But, getting such a statement still doesn't make any sense since they do now know who are L'Express's sources. Also, if they have a statement from France's national police chief, it gives the impression that they are intimidating any line officer who may be the source. This has the potential to backfire on Albert BIG TIME with the French! Albert doesn't have an social capital, goodwill or prestige to be trowing his weight around (literally throwing his weight around in a hissy fit). of course it doesn't make sense. Does their PR ever? that's like my ex getting statements from people who have never met my kids or seen him with them to say what a great dad he is and that he should be granted custody.It's sand in the eyes.He is the one with the weaker case. And so is Albert. therefore he gets a lot of useless statements when they do not even know which exact date l'express is referring to.
|
|