|
Post by mrszinck on Mar 18, 2012 7:08:59 GMT -5
So what's the game plan here? 2. She signed a pre-nup and there must be a clause in there where she gets to keep the cash and title and walks away after a certain period of time, so why not set up the exit in advance. I have heard that it is the same for all new princesses. They must stay for 10 years in marriage. After that they get money ... no title. But I don't see Charl’s leaving. Where would she go? Only the people can force Albert… but people are not interested in her. I think she has no game plan anymore just shopping and spend money.
|
|
|
Post by vamilkshake on Mar 18, 2012 9:12:35 GMT -5
Albert has to just figure how a way how to spin this his way, and then dump her. I think people would be sympathetic and he should try again with someone else. Someone educated. Someone giving. Someone good.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 18, 2012 9:37:46 GMT -5
I don't know if anyone notice, but magazines have basically stopped putting Charlene on their covers. Even her favorite media flunkies who are still covering her do not place her on their covers anymore - not even a small insert on the cover! Occasionally, she will make a tabloid cover, but it is mostly negative. Last month France Dimanche had both she and Albert on the cover - but negative. The humiliation is the reference to Charlene Wittstock being a run-away bride in the American TV show Gossip Girl. France Dimanche, 17 February 2012, Charlene, A New humiliation!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2012 12:21:02 GMT -5
MyAdia, thanks to your video signature of PPDA!
|
|
|
Post by grimnir on Mar 18, 2012 13:33:34 GMT -5
A more recent front page to add to the collection: Shocking news - He speaks of separation ++what Albert said exactly ++ how it happened++ Weird eyes btw, after all that surgery, she didn't bother to do anything about the wonky eye? Content of article: Monaco wonders why Albert got married in the first place. (Don't we all?) The undynamic duo does some performances together, hold hands, but don't look particularly happy together. The marriage seems to have been a mistake from day 1. And still no sign of any baby. Albert doesn't even pretent anymore and goes happily off on his own. Albert parties like he used to when he was a bachelor. (Insert nice pic of Albert partying here) cw doesn't cope alone in the palace, flew recently to Milan and found comfort in the arms of a friend. Why? Because Evil Albert had the nerve to tell Blick that everyone needs time alone or with their friends and to make matters worse he told the Tiroler Tageszeitung that one has to learn to daily live under the same roof together. (And what a big roof it is! I bet they could live there both and not bump into eachother for days. Excuse me, I'm crying so badly, I can't even see my keyboard anymore. Off to find a hanky. ;D)
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Mar 18, 2012 14:14:39 GMT -5
thanks grimnir and myadia for these covers.
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 18, 2012 14:51:24 GMT -5
a - die aktuelle has a new headline on the title: Alberts has no more patience with Charlene.
The article ... with one of Charlenes recent "contemplative" pics from China* ... says she is sooo sad and alone, went to Australia alone, a loving Albert would have travelled with her to warm Australia ... meanwhile Albert prefered to stay in cold Europe and attented different events without Charlene (pictures of happy Albert) ... being happy without his wife and not seeming to miss her. *didn't we say her 'look at me! I'm soo serious and concerned about the poor children' pics will backfire? If the palace is trying to sue A Die Aktuelle as well as it done the LExpress Not if THEY are now preparing a way out: They just couldn't manage to share this hard life in the public eye together, too many duties, they lost touch and love was gone but respect remains. Poor sensitive Charlene couldn't stand the pressure and the mean media. I mean ... the "Wedding of the century" did not bring glamour and any image boost to Monaco. It was a media disaster. Charlene and Albert are not attrative for the media - they are simply undynamic and no baby would change that. Albert looks like a way figure next to botoxed Charlene trying to look serene. He looks MUCH better solo or next to anyone intelligent. WITH a baby they would have to keep Charlene around for a couple of more years in Monaco ... until everything is destroyed Rainer&Grace ever build up AND: With Charlene as First Lady NOBODY takes Albert serious anymore, simply NOBODY of substance. BUT MONACO NEEDS PEOPLE OF SUBSTANCE LIKE OXYGEN! IT HAS NO OIL AND GAS and huge territory ect. ONLY human resources. With Charlene as Flag ship they attract gold digging uneducated, uncultivated workshy people with dirty money or seeking dirty money. The wedding with Charlene did not only NOT CAUSE an economic boom - this marriage will forever make it impossible to ever happen. Not that energy... So the very, very, very last chance is to let her go now. And if Charlene is not the totally dump blond ... she manages to take this very last exit (and the money, and a face-saving explanation like "poor sensitive Charlene" and the off-time for lifetime with no media pressure). Hej - does this make sense to anyone? The pull off a show at the Oscar's red carpet and then ... go separate ways for so many weeks and events?? I mean: IF there is a media strategy, they give very contradictory signals and even evident signals of "we don't really live together" (see Albert's Tirol interview speaking of separate ways...) Looks like preparing people for a new message.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2012 16:22:50 GMT -5
I found the article of Tyroler Tageszeitung here that writes he was there without the wife. The first version in English and the next in original.
YOG-Splitter: Prince returns, Tyrolean falls out injured 15/01/2012 Tiroler Tageszeitung Prince Albert of Monaco at the weekend, the Alpine Ski competitions of the Youth Games viewed Patscherkofel. Of having his wife Charlene monarch had traveled and more time Olympian in bobsled left. Although Innsbruck on Sunday traveled to competitions in bobsleigh week but back on.
YOG-Splitter: Fürst kommt wieder, Tiroler fällt verletzt aus 15.01.2012 Tiroler Tageszeitung Fürst Albert von Monaco hat sich am Wochenende die Ski-alpin-Bewerbe der Jugendspiele am Patscherkofel angesehen. Der ohne seine Frau Charlene angereiste Monarch und mehrfache Olympiateilnehmer im Bobfahren verließ Innsbruck zwar am Sonntag wieder, reist für die Bob-Bewerbe in einer Woche aber wieder an. www.tt.com/csp/cms/sites/tt/Nachrichten/4149606-6/yog-splitter-fürst-kommt-wieder-tiroler-fällt-verletzt-aus.csp[img src=" www.tt.com/csp/cms/sites/tt/resources/images/elements/transparent.gif"]
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 21, 2012 6:17:29 GMT -5
Die Neue and Neue Post have titles with Charlene and Albert. One: Going seperate ways. The other: Charlene: so happy and relaxed without Albert. Articles with more or less the same pisc. Sad Charlene with Albert in Hollywood, hsppy alone in Bendigo. Only 9 month after wedding...
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Mar 21, 2012 9:12:54 GMT -5
A more recent front page to add to the collection: Shocking news - He speaks of separation ++what Albert said exactly ++ how it happened++ Weird eyes btw, after all that surgery, she didn't bother to do anything about the wonky eye? Content of article: Monaco wonders why Albert got married in the first place. (Don't we all?) The undynamic duo does some performances together, hold hands, but don't look particularly happy together. The marriage seems to have been a mistake from day 1. And still no sign of any baby. Albert doesn't even pretent anymore and goes happily off on his own. Albert parties like he used to when he was a bachelor. (Insert nice pic of Albert partying here) cw doesn't cope alone in the palace, flew recently to Milan and found comfort in the arms of a friend. Why? Because Evil Albert had the nerve to tell Blick that everyone needs time alone or with their friends and to make matters worse he told the Tiroler Tageszeitung that one has to learn to daily live under the same roof together. (And what a big roof it is! I bet they could live there both and not bump into eachother for days. Excuse me, I'm crying so badly, I can't even see my keyboard anymore. Off to find a hanky. ;D) He's an idiot! What more can one say. She's painted him into a corner and now just has to wait out the pre-nup to collect her retirement package. JMO. Thanks for the articles!
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Mar 21, 2012 11:53:54 GMT -5
Albert has to just figure how a way how to spin this his way, and then dump her. I think people would be sympathetic and he should try again with someone else. Someone educated. Someone giving. Someone good. He's hopeless. He got what he deserved. In fact the two of them got what they deserved. She has successfully painted herself as a victim of his callous ways which in these interviews he reinforces by saying they had to learn to live under one roof. Of course she's been around for 5 years. How long does it take to learn? Apparently in their case the answer is impossible to learn. They both knew what they were getting into. Albert took the path of least resistance an married her. There is no moral high ground for either of these two self-absorbed people. No nice, giving, intelligent woman would marry him, especially after this mess of a marriage. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 21, 2012 16:44:49 GMT -5
Albert has to just figure how a way how to spin this his way, and then dump her. I think people would be sympathetic and he should try again with someone else. Someone educated. Someone giving. Someone good. He's hopeless. He got what he deserved. In fact the two of them got what they deserved. She has successfully painted herself as a victim of his callous ways which in these interviews he reinforces by saying they had to learn to live under one roof. Of course she's been around for 5 years. How long does it take to learn? Apparently in their case the answer is impossible to learn. They both knew what they were getting into. Albert took the path of least resistance an married her. There is no moral high ground for either of these two self-absorbed people. No nice, giving, intelligent woman would marry him, especially after this mess of a marriage. JMO. I think you're 100% correct here, Hibou. It's sad, but unfortunately true. Albert is hopeless, and I can't imagine any woman (or man for that matter) with an ounce of self-respect giving him a nano second of time or attention after this hideous marriage mistake.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2012 17:05:25 GMT -5
Albert has to just figure how a way how to spin this his way, and then dump her. I think people would be sympathetic and he should try again with someone else. Someone educated. Someone giving. Someone good. He's hopeless. He got what he deserved. In fact the two of them got what they deserved. She has successfully painted herself as a victim of his callous ways which in these interviews he reinforces by saying they had to learn to live under one roof. Of course she's been around for 5 years. How long does it take to learn? Apparently in their case the answer is impossible to learn. They both knew what they were getting into. Albert took the path of least resistance an married her. There is no moral high ground for either of these two self-absorbed people. No nice, giving, intelligent woman would marry him, especially after this mess of a marriage. JMO. She is having fun with fatal and being stubborn to others.
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Mar 21, 2012 20:25:43 GMT -5
Albert has to just figure how a way how to spin this his way, and then dump her. I think people would be sympathetic and he should try again with someone else. Someone educated. Someone giving. Someone good. He's hopeless. He got what he deserved. In fact the two of them got what they deserved. She has successfully painted herself as a victim of his callous ways which in these interviews he reinforces by saying they had to learn to live under one roof. Of course she's been around for 5 years. How long does it take to learn? Apparently in their case the answer is impossible to learn. They both knew what they were getting into. Albert took the path of least resistance an married her. There is no moral high ground for either of these two self-absorbed people. No nice, giving, intelligent woman would marry him, especially after this mess of a marriage. JMO. It proves that for the last five years they never lived under one roof. She lived stashed in a small apartment waiting for him to whistle at her, while he was living by himself doing what he always did. Now they have to learn to live under one roof (and that is one big roof ) on those few days a month when they both happen to be in the town. Something is telling me that is going to take a long, long time...if ever! ;D
|
|
|
Post by grimnir on Mar 24, 2012 10:01:40 GMT -5
Some more frontpages for the collection: "Separate ways - why does one always see them alone?" (The Monegasques say this, they find that... I really do wonder if even one Monegasque got asked about his or her opinion for this article. ) "So happy - without Albert." ;D So true.
|
|
|
Post by duchess1 on Apr 7, 2012 21:44:08 GMT -5
Articles even today are still appearing with questions being asked regarding this marriage. I can't believe however that british historian and royal biographer said at the time that, “When they got her into that Catholic Church and got her married, they really trapped her so far as the Catholic Church is concerned,” British historian Robert Lacey told ABC News. “It would be very difficult now for her to get a divorce.” Read more at Jacksonville.com: jacksonville.com/news/metro/2012-04-07/story/fact-check-denials-all-around-about-reports-runaway-bride#ixzz1rPepjx6x Surely they can divorce? If not, I feel so sorry for monaco. Maybe others can enlighten us on this ?
|
|
|
Post by duchesscornflower on Apr 7, 2012 22:13:31 GMT -5
Articles even today are still appearing with questions being asked regarding this marriage. I can't believe however that british historian and royal biographer said at the time that, “When they got her into that Catholic Church and got her married, they really trapped her so far as the Catholic Church is concerned,” British historian Robert Lacey told ABC News. “It would be very difficult now for her to get a divorce.” Read more at Jacksonville.com: jacksonville.com/news/metro/2012-04-07/story/fact-check-denials-all-around-about-reports-runaway-bride#ixzz1rPepjx6x Surely they can divorce? If not, I feel so sorry for Monaco. Maybe others can enlighten us on this ? Robert Lacey is not an expert on the Roman Catholic church. I am not an expert either. But I do know that making vows in a Catholic church does not make a marriage un-divorceable. Lots of Catholics get divorced. Princess Caroline divorced her first husband and they were married in the church. Charlene is a convert to the Roman Catholic faith. Grace was born Roman Catholic and if the rumors about her strained marriage were true (or false) Grace never divorced, she moved to Paris for a few years. Grace's last film appearance was in the Vatican and was a documentary about praying the rosary, her faith was very solid. What would make a divorce from a current reigning Prince of Monaco difficult would be children. In Grace's marriage contract it was reported that if Rainier and Grace divorced, the children went to Rainier. This was true with Rainier's parents, Prince Pierre and Princess Charlotte. Prince Pierre did not have custody of his children. So Robert Lacey is not making any kind of sense. I think that a princess of Monaco and the wife of a reigning prince would feel trapped if she was very very serious about catholics not divorcing or if she had children with the prince.
|
|
|
Post by bellabunny on Apr 7, 2012 23:32:23 GMT -5
The church has always been very good at finding ways to turn a civil divorce into an annulment at least for rich, influential people. A favourite way is finding proof that they weren't mature or honest or serious when it came to the wedding vows, especially the issue of having children which is supposed to be the most important thing. Isn't that how Caroline eventually got an annulment?
So if as many here say, Charlene is so determined to use botox despite being warned not to become pregnant because it can damage the baby, that's Al's excuse right there - she didn't accept everything involved in getting married when she made her wedding vows, therefore they were never valid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2012 5:01:27 GMT -5
Charlene is ILL, mentally and physically and the relationship wise.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Apr 8, 2012 8:42:52 GMT -5
Albert won't want an annulment because it's the perfect excuse for why he can't re-marry which of course leaves him free to do as he pleases, as always. I don't think Charlene wants a divorce. I think she is quite happy to go her own way with all the money and perks included. Neither gives a damn what the other does. Albert has shown that he is happy to drop millions just to do what he pleases. It was an end to a means for both of them. JMO
|
|