|
Post by paca on Aug 16, 2011 14:52:58 GMT -5
LOL I bet once the pope has left MC trashy will have this preached to Monegasques and residents in church. Eventually she will have Catholicism replaced by the church of Charlene. Xmas will be replaced by Charmas and it will be the day that everyone will be giving to Charlene and Charlene only. She will have her weight measured in diamonds from SA, but she will prefer blood diamonds for the excitement. For the replacement holiday of easter they will have to be eggshaped; good Friday will be remembered as the day the media crucified trashy as runaway bride. But she was resurrected 5 days later to be seated on the throne as the only true princess trash
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 16, 2011 21:56:30 GMT -5
LOL Charmas!! But the most hilarious was this: good Friday will be remembered as the day the media crucified trashy as runaway bride. But she was resurrected 5 days later to be seated on the throne as the only true princess trash Paca: You rule!!
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 17, 2011 7:19:54 GMT -5
LOL I bet once the pope has left MC trashy will have this preached to Monegasques and residents in church. Eventually she will have Catholicism replaced by the church of Charlene. Xmas will be replaced by Charmas and it will be the day that everyone will be giving to Charlene and Charlene only. She will have her weight measured in diamonds from SA, but she will prefer blood diamonds for the excitement. For the replacement holiday of easter they will have to be eggshaped; good Friday will be remembered as the day the media crucified trashy as runaway bride. But she was resurrected 5 days later to be seated on the throne as the only true princess trashOMG, hilarious Paca! Seriously, though, Princess Conlene will expect monuments of worship to her throughout Monaco. Really, she will! The several pieces of jewelry named after her, Akris gray gown called Miss Charlene, the shade of lipstick named Charlene, Chanel's Charlene blue are only the beginning. This woman has a serious disorder - Narcissistic Personality Disorder - and having people worship her is how she gets her kicks.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 17, 2011 12:56:06 GMT -5
Here we have examples of the sugar following very strictly The Ten Commandments of The Holy Church of Charlene:
Now, when the couple appears in public, at the exposition of the wedding, Hercules games and yesterday, the public applauses them a long times, Many people in the south of the france and monaco do not understand why there were so many rumors on them and why the media said so many lies. They support them because they know them, they use to see them and they were very happy to participe to the wedding, the concert of Jean Michel Jarre and the people of neighbours towns could watch the eagles concert. They were very happy to watch the us of this part of the land at this wedding, the clothes of the little flower brides (Nicois dress), the rings on the (coussin), the sainte devote ceremony[/b]
Yes, it is a big bouquet, but she is their princess and big is never inappropriate when it comes to flowers and princesses (loln they are so stupid...)
The weather is very hot during the summer, as you saw it at the wedding day we have to wear something where we can be well in our clothes and it is also hot during the night. All the women here are wearing open tops with a bra or without bra. We have many portraits of the queens of XVII or XVIII centuries with top and dresses without bra, it was normal.I think that this is not the last time we will see Princess Charlene without bra. It is not a shame
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 17, 2011 14:29:00 GMT -5
Emmeline, you can not reason with these people - just the fact that they worship such a trashy person is testament to that . Read again what they wrote about the bra - these are the type of people that worship trash. Please do not frustrate yourself with these people. They are truly not worth it. Oh by the way, we have photos here of empty streets in Monaco on the wedding day - barricades with no one besides them. The people in the Monaco area do not love Charlene! Charlene's flunkies are just like her - they lie also.
|
|
|
Post by refia on Aug 17, 2011 15:18:43 GMT -5
I don´t read the sugar threads, because it´s a waste of energy. If people want to worship her, they should do, but we know better. And in the end she is just a trashy episode in Monaco.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Aug 18, 2011 2:29:30 GMT -5
Here we have examples of the sugar following very strictly The Ten Commandments of The Holy Church of Charlene: Now, when the couple appears in public, at the exposition of the wedding, Hercules games and yesterday, the public applauses them a long times, Many people in the south of the france and monaco do not understand why there were so many rumors on them and why the media said so many lies. They support them because they know them, they use to see them and they were very happy to participe to the wedding, the concert of Jean Michel Jarre and the people of neighbours towns could watch the eagles concert. They were very happy to watch the us of this part of the land at this wedding, the clothes of the little flower brides (Nicois dress), the rings on the (coussin), the sainte devote ceremony[/b] Yes, it is a big bouquet, but she is their princess and big is never inappropriate when it comes to flowers and princesses (loln they are so stupid...) The weather is very hot during the summer, as you saw it at the wedding day we have to wear something where we can be well in our clothes and it is also hot during the night. All the women here are wearing open tops with a bra or without bra. We have many portraits of the queens of XVII or XVIII centuries with top and dresses without bra, it was normal.I think that this is not the last time we will see Princess Charlene without bra. It is not a shame[/quote] I find them hilarious--Thanks emmeline for sharing!
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 18, 2011 21:31:01 GMT -5
|
|
lilae
Full Member
Posts: 110
|
Post by lilae on Aug 19, 2011 17:56:33 GMT -5
Emmeline, you can not reason with these people - just the fact that they worship such a trashy person is testament to that . Read again what they wrote about the bra - these are the type of people that worship trash. Please do not frustrate yourself with these people. They are truly not worth it. Oh by the way, we have photos here of empty streets in Monaco on the wedding day - barricades with no one besides them. The people in the Monaco area do not love Charlene! Charlene's flunkies are just like her - they lie also. I was told people couldn't stay too long in front of sceens because it was to hot. People said the mass was boring.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 26, 2011 17:48:17 GMT -5
This man ( Mad for Monaco) really deserves an award for butt-kissing and medication for his serious delusions. A reporter wrote a lie in the Nice Matin article saying that Albert and Charlene received a long applause (see photos of the crowd showing where most could care less) and this lunatic has used that line as proof that the world is madly in love with Charlene - and Albert and Charlene are madly in love. Get off the crack pipe people - it is destroying the few brain cells that you did have. Does this idiot realize how silly he sounds and how belittling he has made Charlene for praising her to the hilt for getting dressed (mostly with her boobs exposed), getting in and out of a car, receiving flowers, waving and sitting down and trying to smile. Good lawd this man really is MAD!
Princess Charlene, Doing Fine Posted by MadMonarchist FRIDAY, AUGUST 26, 2011
Since her first official engagement at the Red Cross Ball, HSH Princess Charlene of Monaco has been keeping a pretty busy schedule. She and the Sovereign Prince re-opened the Van Cleef & Arpels boutique (which now includes a Charlene Salon), then there was a classic music festival in the neighboring town of Menton (once a part of the Grimaldi dominion many years ago), where the new Princess let her hair down and was given a very warm welcome -and a *very* large armfull of flowers, from the adoring crowd and then, last Friday both attended the 50th anniversary of the Stade Nautique Rainier III where, again, the welcome was exuberant. No gaffes, no stumbles, no "scenes" and not a hint of trouble, just a Prince and Princess of Monaco, comfortable, at ease and still newlyweds who (as you can tell from the many photos of each occasion) still have a hard time taking their eyes off each other. If all of those who were trying to cast doubts and who made a habit of saying unkind things could see just how silly -and sad- they look based on the example of the Princely couple, well, perhaps it would all stop.
What is even more telling, considering all the "doom and gloom" so many were spouting, is the public reaction at every place the new couple have visited, whether in France, Monaco or one of the nearby towns within the 'Monegasque community'. I wonder if the gloomy gus types realize how out of touch they are? On each and every occasion the welcome has been warm and exuberant, even moreso than the always polite and friendly welcome given to the Sovereign Prince, who is a familiar face in these areas, but there are huge cheers for Princess Charlene, very large and very long rounds of applause, shouts of best wishes and as many photographs as possible. In short, the people love them. They see them, up close, they see what a happy couple they are, comfortable and at ease with each other (which they should be by now) and your average person without a heart full of malice is instantly attracted to that. Princess Charlene, despite a great deal of negativity hurled her way right out of the gate, has gotten off to an excellent start as the new Princess of Monaco. She has not let the naysayers get her down but, as the British used to say, has simply kept calm and carried on. Good for her and well done.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Aug 26, 2011 18:07:30 GMT -5
That is embarrassing-it sound like they let Charlene write it!
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 26, 2011 18:16:10 GMT -5
Mad for Monaco...his name is about right, isn't it? But it should be changed to "Mad for Trashy". Love these lines, btw:
HSH Princess Charlene of Monaco has been keeping a pretty busy schedule
LOL busy schedule? Red Cross, so everyone get to see who the Princess is now. It was a narcissistic occasion. VC&A: another narcissistic session, with Charlene Salon include. And what else? The 50 Anniversary of this stadium? That is a busy schedule? My God...
here the new Princess let her hair down and was given a very warm welcome -and a *very* large armfull of flowers, from the adoring crowd
"let her hair down" so she looked more princessy like in a fairy tale, check. "Warm welcome and adoring crowds"? it was Charlene entering, not Gandhi. Which photos did this lunatic see? LMAO
He really tried to make an article based on the adoring crowds and the "long" applauses. Poor guy.
Mad for Monaco STOP SMOKING FROM THE PIPE OF TRASHY! It isn't doing any good to you, really.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Aug 26, 2011 18:23:43 GMT -5
Further proof that if you pay enough money, people will agree to say/write anything that you want!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Aug 26, 2011 19:20:25 GMT -5
talk.baltimoresun.com/showthread.php?p=7237241forums.whyweprotest.net/threads/star-must-identify-anonymous-posters-to-website-judge-rules.77578/I found two websites referring to the same case. Obviously, it can be done. On the other hand. I do not think we have anything to fear. Do we really spread lies or can our posts be considered defamation?I do not think so. In most cases we refer with proper quotes to articles and photos. The rest is opinion or critical review of photos and articles. Especially when we review photos and articles that were done with the consent of the palace and its squatters. It is like doing a critical review of a book or a painting at college. But those books and paintings have usually more depths. I apologize in advance, but I accidentally landed on this page thinking it was a recent post, and I wanted to respond, but now I see it is an old post, but I thought I would chime in on it anyway. So forgive me, but I had started to say something on the Eringer case, but I didn't want to get into it! The thing is Albert does have every right to sue Eringer for Libel and maybe defamation--I really wondered why he didn't do it a long time ago! I clearly saw what could be considered Libel, plus the fact that Eringer worked for Albert adds to it, but I wont go into it all here. But it is just another reason I would not throw in with this guy and could see what a hack he was, but Eringer could be considered a credible source to someone, since he worked for Albert, and that is one difference. I think he makes false claims all over the place, but I imagine Albert did not want to bring more attention to him, since that is really what Eringer was trying to do--what he was doing really could legally be called extortion. I'm sorry myadia I'm getting carried away --I just wanted to show the difference. First of all a Forum called Royal Opinions is just that--See how smart MYadia is! The written word is called libel, you must publish something as a fact, that is false! And you have to show damages. In Albert's case along with many other things Eringer has posted on his site as fact, if he is the one that spread the story about Charlene being a runaway bride, Albert can probably show damages, because of the the fact that the media and the press were reporting it all over the place, that is enough to show damages, and the newspapers have a responsibility to have the facts right, or at least be willing to write a retraction. Is also depends on how they write it--notice how gossip columns are written...as gossip. The people printed that story as fact...I am curious who the three sources are. If Charlene was behind trying to stir up drama, or linked to it, I don't think he would file a lawsuit. You can not just claim Libel if someone says something mean and you can't show damages. For instance you have to show that perhaps it prevented you from getting a job, or losing a job, you usually have to show monetary damage, however in Albert's case, although he might be able to show that too because of his position and the fact that so many people picked up on the story, just the damage it caused him there and his reputation or even Charlene's (cough) since the story was about her--I am sure they have a case! The problem I think Albert has is that his wedding and relationship is it's own sham, so do the two of them really want to open themselves up to who is telling the bigger lie here? Also if this person had the express purpose to cause damage that is another element and there is no denying that Eringer is clearly trying to cause damage to Albert.....unlike us where most of us for six years have been trying to prevent it! Also for instance I would not make statements here like Charlene was taking payments if it had not been published and unchallenged, and if I didn't feel I knew it was true--I feel pretty confident that Charlene indeed took cash payments from Albert. I also feel pretty confident that it was either Charlene or an intimate relative who went to the press with it--no one else would be dumb enough to want to share that information! Anyway Libel is what someone would have to sue for here, and a forum is quite different than a credible newspaper, magazine or broadcast....not FOX news! ;D I'm sorry that this post is probably off topic, but there is a lot of criteria to sue for libel, slander, or defamation of character, or people would be doing it all the time. IT's just that this topic come up a lot and I have not seen anything here that should make anyone nervous.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Aug 26, 2011 19:24:27 GMT -5
A schedule of partying it up! ;D LIndsy Lohan is probably rolling her eyes thinking "and that girl thinks she has a heavy schedule--the nerve!" ;D I love that the size of the bouquet matters, or is it the size of the flowers? ;D Gee if they have to pay someone, can't they do batter than that! ;D Maybe the next event they'll give her a whole tree! ;D I have Big news for this guy, if you have to tell people how popular a person is.....they are obviously not very popular!
|
|
|
Post by suite583 on Aug 27, 2011 7:40:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 27, 2011 8:47:05 GMT -5
I have Big news for this guy, if you have to tell people how popular a person is.....they are obviously not very popular! Exactly Sandsla! Exactly! But, the type of people who worship the likes of a gold digging con artist like Charlene are too dumb to realize this! No one is writing blogs extracting propaganda from a British paper to convince people how poplar Kate is. No one has to do this because Kate's popularity speaks for itself. Good lawd these people are stupid! The Nice/Monaco Matin also wrote before the wedding that all 50 million South Africans support Charlene and are excited about this wedding. I've posted several articles showing that this is a flat out LIE! People in her home town of Benoni could care less, let alone all of South Africa. I wonder if this Mad Ass-Kisser also wrote a blog about that Nice/Monaco Matin quote as proof that Charlene is well loved and very popular in South Africa.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Sept 10, 2011 13:13:59 GMT -5
Why Trashy does have some fans in french forums? She actually pays and/or controls this forum or what? I've been reading bullshit like she looks like Grace, she is elegant...well, you know, all the crap that sugar write. I didn't know that Trashy had french sugars too
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Sept 10, 2011 17:09:49 GMT -5
Why Trashy does have some fans in french forums? She actually pays and/or controls this forum or what? I've been reading bullshit like she looks like Grace, she is elegant...well, you know, all the crap that sugar write. I didn't know that Trashy had french sugars too There is a saying " you can fool some of the people some of the time but not all the people all the time." The question is does Charlene believe her own press? I think if she truly believed she was the fairest of them all she wouldn't be trying to compete with Kate Middleton. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Nov 9, 2011 15:39:13 GMT -5
I'v just found this pic at tumblr. I love how the poor kids look terrified of her. And sugar loonies believe that kids like her! ;D Actually they look scared of both Albert and Shitlene
|
|