|
Post by hibou on May 17, 2011 16:19:48 GMT -5
I'm waiting for the tabloids to come out with some kind of explosive story -- right before or right after the wedding - which ever they think will sell more newspapers. At some point, one of the big tabloids is going to find a story that's just too good to pass up.... Explosive story about his homosexuality or other matters, do you? Explosive anything, but I tend to think his personal life would be more what the tabloids would be interested in. On the other hand, if bank accounts in Monaco with the name Osama bin Laden were found, that might do it.
|
|
|
Post by suite583 on May 17, 2011 17:44:43 GMT -5
Explosive story about his homosexuality or other matters, do you? Explosive anything, but I tend to think his personal life would be more what the tabloids would be interested in. On the other hand, if bank accounts in Monaco with the name Osama bin Laden were found, that might do it. I love your answer. Karma to you.
|
|
blue j
Full Member
Charlene: I hit the Jackpot, the sucker prince Albert.
Posts: 231
|
Post by blue j on May 18, 2011 1:05:01 GMT -5
This thread is really entertaining. I'm with myadia that I have to see a man coming forward & admitting he had sex with Albert or see picture(s) to believe he's gay/bi. BTW, Eringer didn't state Albert was gay/bi, he actually witnessed and described some situations where Albert ignored his job, because he was busy with some female bimbo. I see some scandal coming but after trashy wedding, selling scandal is always better after wedding. Some consenting goat coming forward with some juicy detail would be interesting.
|
|
lilae
Full Member
Posts: 110
|
Post by lilae on Jun 2, 2011 14:34:35 GMT -5
Very nice! Who wouldn't want a husband like that? Lucky Charlene...but on the other hand I am sure she will have plenty of body guards and chauffeurs to chose from as well...yeah, a true fairy tale. Just wait until her mother get into the mix too. That is going to be worse then Mexican novellas. Because he's rich abd she's a sl**
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jun 2, 2011 15:33:07 GMT -5
Well, if only Albert would admit he is gay...he would be more popular. Imagine, the first Reigning Gay Prince (or at least that has it assumed) would be a catapult to fame and that would be a way to boost that economic image he so wants to do with this so called mariage du sècle. But, as he might be bi, i don't see him doing it. Pity, it would be entertaining. Well, rethinking about it, i don't know if it would work...Vatican ties, not everybody is so mind-open...but it worths the try, i mean, he is about to marry the trashy, my advice can't be worst lol
|
|
grandduchess
Full Member
The happiest royal couple ever!
Posts: 165
|
Post by grandduchess on Jun 2, 2011 18:49:51 GMT -5
Well, if only Albert would admit he is gay...he would be more popular. Imagine, the first Reigning Gay Prince (or at least that has it assumed) would be a catapult to fame and that would be a way to boost that economic image he so wants to do with this so called mariage du sècle. But, as he might be bi, i don't see him doing it. Pity, it would be entertaining. Well, rethinking about it, i don't know if it would work...Vatican ties, not everybody is so mind-open...but it worths the try, i mean, he is about to marry the trashy, my advice can't be worst lol Emm, Fat Al possibly has as much bad taste in men as he as in women. If he was openly gay, he would probably end up dating Jason Mewes.... ;D www.listal.com/viewimage/1354086
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 2, 2011 23:51:37 GMT -5
This thread is really entertaining. I'm with myadia that I have to see a man coming forward & admitting he had sex with Albert or see picture(s) to believe he's gay/bi. BTW, Eringer didn't state Albert was gay/bi, he actually witnessed and described some situations where Albert ignored his job, because he was busy with some female bimbo. I see some scandal coming but after trashy wedding, selling scandal is always better after wedding. Some consenting goat coming forward with some juicy detail would be interesting. I have to agree, if he can't keep all these bimbo women and people like Eringer trying to blackmail him, I doubt he would have been so successful with some tidbit like this! Plus Eringer would have done his best to at least elude to that, if he thought he could.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 3, 2011 9:41:17 GMT -5
This thread is really entertaining. I'm with myadia that I have to see a man coming forward & admitting he had sex with Albert or see picture(s) to believe he's gay/bi. BTW, Eringer didn't state Albert was gay/bi, he actually witnessed and described some situations where Albert ignored his job, because he was busy with some female bimbo. I see some scandal coming but after trashy wedding, selling scandal is always better after wedding. Some consenting goat coming forward with some juicy detail would be interesting. I have to agree, if he can't keep all these bimbo women and people like Eringer trying to blackmail him, I doubt he would have been so successful with some tidbit like this! Plus Eringer would have done his best to at least elude to that, if he thought he could. Eringer implies that there isn't much Albert hasn't done. He's very careful in how he words this stuff. The meaning is implied but never outright said.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 4, 2011 16:15:53 GMT -5
I have to agree, if he can't keep all these bimbo women and people like Eringer trying to blackmail him, I doubt he would have been so successful with some tidbit like this! Plus Eringer would have done his best to at least elude to that, if he thought he could. Eringer implies that there isn't much Albert hasn't done. He's very careful in how he words this stuff. The meaning is implied but never outright said. Exactly!!! He "Implies"!!!!!!For good reason! Many legal! Eringer chooses his words in the same way Charlene chooses hers! They ONLY "imply" something--they do not to prove, or state with facts something. Why not? You can't get sued if something is true! Even we try to back up what we say here with Charlene's actions and words and her past history--something that can be pointed to! Most us us all know it all by now, so it's not necessary for us to repeat it anymore to each other, but just like there are still people on other forums who have no source of reference or history or knowledge of this girl, but still are just chiming in because they read what someone says, with what "Charlene says" and they now think they have all the information they need in passing judgement....."women must be jealous if they have a problem with this poor girl!" They buy the hype of everything that is "implied" about this girl by what "Charlene says", "Charlene says" she was very involved with philanthropy before Albert, but she never states what organizations she worked for or what she did? She can't, (she chooses her word carefully) because it's not true, a nything more than what "Charlene says" can be fact checked! This is a woman who has never had a source of income ever, the idea that she could have the money or the the time to ever be philanthropic must escape people? After all she claimed she never had the time to even get a high school diploma? She is hoping people will take it at face value with what " she says" and run with it! Just like many have done with Eringer! Eringer twist words to get the reaction that he wants....he seems to be successful with that, because many seem to lap it up with a spoon, and hang on his every word of his! But who is he? Does anyone question this man's reputation, credentials, his past history and experiences, his professionalism, or his agenda! There is nothing this guy writes that could be considered good journalism. "Eringer say's" and? So, who is Eringer? Why would anyone ever hang on this man's every word? The fact that he is talking at all should tell you something about who this man is? Have you seriously done any real research on this guy? You might want to, because he certainly is not someone that anyone respects or admires or should feel comfortably quoting. Albert was nuts to ever involve himself with this guy, but he is is a magnet for scheming, blackmailing, self centered lowlifes that believes the world always owes them--people who do not have a shred of dignity or any evidence of a conscience. Eringer's own blog has made it obvious that he is not a man that has any skill or talent that is much in demand by anyone that might help to add that he has any kind of reputable reputation--his own actions would suggest the opposite? Look at the trail that he's left....is there anyone that has anything good to say about this guy? He is a man who lives in his own world and in his own mind, looking for dumb people he can manipulate, not unlike what Albert and the Palace are doing now, so I don't know why he is complaining so hard about someone or something that he seems to have so much in common with? There may be some "opinions" of Eringer's that some (myself included) might find accurate, but that still doesn't make him credible. Just on what you can already tell about his character without knowing anything about him or his history, is this really the kind of guy you want to align yourself with, or quote as a source of information? A journalist might be intrigued with something he has to say, but you know that they would first research the facts themselves to substantiate his words....their own factual research would be their source, not heresay by anyone, especially with someone who has Eringer's history and reputation. Hibou, I'm sorry, but I really think you would be better served to rely on your own good sense instead of the words of a guy with questionable character who has made no secret that he his own vindictive agenda--It is the point of his blog! I'm sorry but I jut think Eringer is trying to use these forums and the people on them as his own personal tool and I can't help but to be bothered by that. The manipulation done by Charlene and her crew worming herself in there, and then Albert and the Palace regrading this ridiculous relationship and what it is suppose to be is bad enough. Pointing to something brought up by Eringer is one thing, but to not question what is being said, or why it's being said....not questioning Eringer's motivation (as MYadia has questioned). Just like the rape thing--it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what is really going on there? There is nothing credible about that woman's story, and the fact that with Eringers' involvement that it is being revisted, is not a mystery (IMO). If he was smart he would understand that his own involvement would undermine the validity of the case, even if he was going to try to find her and put her up to it. Albert could be bi or like bi sex,, but as unlucky as this guy is, it is very odd that someone wouldn't be blackmailing him for big bucks, especially Eringer--if he had something he would use it! He has tried to spill the beans about everything else with a megaphone, so why not the one thing that he would really have him over a barrel? He wouldn't need a blog or to bring a lawsuit!
|
|
whitelilies2
Junior Member
I LOVE to follow this gang via my iphone as I travel. They are my second family! XoX
Posts: 93
|
Post by whitelilies2 on Jun 4, 2011 18:14:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 4, 2011 19:09:01 GMT -5
I just read a tidbit on Eringer where he states that Monaco does not publish its numbers. Too bad that Eringer is just as dumb as trashy and speaks as much French, otherwise he would have found his way to the gouvernment page with the relevant numbers www.gouv.mc/devwww/wwwnew.nsf/1909$/8c4d991f24e57b15c1257707002d487dfr?OpenDocument&Count=10000&8Fr . The text is French and Eringer admitted that after all those years he does not speak it. He actually turned rather nasty when probed. The man sells gossip. And he hates when people point it out to him. He turned pretty nasty on my and actually posted my avatar in his anonymous Q&A. His motives towards Albert and Monaco are the same as Sarah Lawson towards George Clooney and all the other sad people who can't take rejection and the fact that not everyone thinks that they are great. In any case I think that it does not matter to anyone but the person himself and the potential partner whom they would like to have sex with, how they like it etc. As long as all members involved are consenting I don't have a problem. Only when someone feels obliged or feels forced into doing sth they would normally not be willing to do, then things get problematic. Other then that anyone the way it pleases them.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 4, 2011 19:16:38 GMT -5
Just wanted to point out one thing about Eringer. He is suing for an unpaid bill, not for wrong termination and yet, he never received any termination paper. so technically he could still be employed by His Majesty.... he only had a verbal contract and received his dismissal verbally he knew that his services were no longer wanted as soon as Albert had no more time for him....It would be silly of him to claim that he was still employed by Albert, when he stated in his blog that Albert fired him. And why should he receive a termination paper, when he hasn't received a contract to begin with. He was foolish to have nothing stating that he was working for ALbert and under which conditions. How is a judge to decide whether Eringer ever provided what he claims not to have been paid for? I don't think that Eringer will get anything out of this apart from publicity. But I guess that's all he is interested anyways.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 4, 2011 21:13:43 GMT -5
I am not so quick to dismiss him. He does have an agenda. It's obvious and it's to destroy Albert. I can't dismiss this because we all know Albert is incompetent and Eringer is out to take him down. He is a gatherer of information. He throws a line out there to see what fish he can catch. I have learned quite a bit from reading his blog. I take some of the posts and research the info they mention. Sometimes it seems pretty accurate, sometimes not, but it does get me thinking about things. I do not take what is posted there "hook, line and sinker". I look at what is said and then dig into it to see what it really is. He does not always answer questions or chooses to answer only a part of a question. I find that just as interesting. Albert as we all know needs to step down, and if Eringer makes this happen, the better for Monaco. Allbert was a fool not to get a confidentiality agreement from him. Had he done so, there would be no Eringer blog or Q & A.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 5, 2011 7:20:40 GMT -5
Albert was a fool to let Eringer near him. That's what bothers me the most about people who are supposed to look after him. Eringer would not have gotten anywhere near Rainier and I believe he never got near Caroline either. Trashy would not have gotten close to someone like Rainier and while he was around she did not stand a chance. SHe had to bide her time until he died. If Rainier had lived a few years longer, this woman would be touring reality shows by now for lack of any qualification for a decent job. Or she would be a swimming instructor at your local pool.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 5, 2011 9:05:51 GMT -5
Albert was a fool to let Eringer near him. That's what bothers me the most about people who are supposed to look after him. Eringer would not have gotten anywhere near Rainier and I believe he never got near Caroline either. Trashy would not have gotten close to someone like Rainier and while he was around she did not stand a chance. SHe had to bide her time until he died. If Rainier had lived a few years longer, this woman would be touring reality shows by now for lack of any qualification for a decent job. Or she would be a swimming instructor at your local pool. This is why Eringer is not so bad. He may get Albert to step aside. Monaco at this point needs a democracy. Rainier was a brilliant and shrewd businessman. Albert is anything but. Allevana I thought was a very good man. Smart, honest, decent. He didn't even last a year around the people Albert chose to surround himself with. Monaco is in economic peril right now and it needs a competent leader which Albert is not. So if Eringer succeeds in getting Albert to step down, it will be the best thing for Monaco. JMO
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 5, 2011 9:31:08 GMT -5
If Albert steps down, which he won't, Eringer would not be the one to credit. There are others at work, who are just biding their time...but I am certain that Eringer would boast about it. The man is scum and knows nothing that is not publicly available. But only if it is in English or someone does the translation and the finding for him. He can't even find the INSEE numbers and probably has no idea who that is...you are giving the man way too much credit. Any hairdresser in Monaco knows more about what is going on then Eringer ever did. Sorrt hibou, but the man is a fraud. ANd a nasty one at that
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Jun 5, 2011 10:04:25 GMT -5
If Albert steps down, which he won't, Eringer would not be the one to credit. There are others at work, who are just biding their time...but I am certain that Eringer would boast about it. The man is scum and knows nothing that is not publicly available. But only if it is in English or someone does the translation and the finding for him. He can't even find the INSEE numbers and probably has no idea who that is...you are giving the man way too much credit. Any hairdresser in Monaco knows more about what is going on then Eringer ever did. Sorrt hibou, but the man is a fraud. ANd a nasty one at that Might this be the reason Albert didn't want to meet him and follow his suggestions any more? Then he is not that dump and can get rid of people (not in the best way - but anyway...)?
|
|
|
Post by grimnir on Jun 5, 2011 11:22:55 GMT -5
Allbert was a fool not to get a confidentiality agreement from him. Had he done so, there would be no Eringer blog or Q & A. Someone once asked about that and he answered that it was understood from the first that he (Eringer) would write a book about it. (Whatever "it" is. ) I always thought that a bit odd and very stupid, seeing that Albert had hired Eringer to find things out. Chances are, at least some of it is nasty and who wants to publish his own dirty undies for the whole world to read? BTW, Eringer didn't have a specified task right? Just random finding things out, whatever it is? Anything, everything? Things I noticed about Eringer: especially in the beginning, he came across as a ten-year-old playing spy. It all looked so... childish and primitive. Straight from a children's book. All those nicknames are so tiresome, especially for nonlocals. One of the reasons I quit reading most of his stuff. What is the point if you can't figure out who the Mule, the Croc, sycophant #1, #2 and #3 are? He hasn't much to tell about Monaco anymore, all those global issues that get dragged into what started out as an all Monaco blog. This is why Eringer is not so bad. He may get Albert to step aside. Monaco at this point needs a democracy. Rainier was a brilliant and shrewd businessman. Albert is anything but. Allevana I thought was a very good man. Smart, honest, decent. He didn't even last a year around the people Albert chose to surround himself with. Monaco is in economic peril right now and it needs a competent leader which Albert is not. So if Eringer succeeds in getting Albert to step down, it will be the best thing for Monaco. JMO I think Eringer has had his 15 minutes of fame and is yesterdays news. I think Eringer is going to go the same way as his much beloved Jazmin: quietly disappearing into the background. The Monaco pieces are fewer these days and unless he comes up with something really shocking and really credible soon, I think his time is over. Even the Nice rape case made only brief ripples on the internet and never made it into paper/tabloid print.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 5, 2011 12:23:31 GMT -5
If Albert steps down, which he won't, Eringer would not be the one to credit. There are others at work, who are just biding their time...but I am certain that Eringer would boast about it. The man is scum and knows nothing that is not publicly available. But only if it is in English or someone does the translation and the finding for him. He can't even find the INSEE numbers and probably has no idea who that is...you are giving the man way too much credit. Any hairdresser in Monaco knows more about what is going on then Eringer ever did. Sorrt hibou, but the man is a fraud. ANd a nasty one at that e He might be. Let's just hope that Monaco has a better future than it does right now, because if things keep going the way they are, Monaco may end up part of France or just a ghost town.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 5, 2011 12:43:57 GMT -5
I agree and the nicknames are Eringer specific, not nicknames people in Monaco would have given. Eringer has created his own little world of an old man who has never managed to grow up and is angry that someone stole his favourite toy. I did read a few things, but what I read was mostly printed years ago in MC Matin or common knowledge to anyone living in or around Monaco. Of course you would need to speak French which Eringer as per his own admittance does not.
|
|