|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 18, 2011 15:21:19 GMT -5
There is NO body language analyses to give! There is no connection...
I still find it horrible what Albert wears. The ‘General’ uniform is too long and the pants to big and WTF with those gloves? And she just want to show here nipples... (Women do that when there is no sex - orgasm ;D)
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 18, 2011 16:07:19 GMT -5
I've seen this body language expert - Eyes for Lies - and she's pretty good. Again, based on the comments, Charlene is this poor innocent victim who is being forced to marry this wealthy billionaire. The Eyes for Lies body language expert is analyzing the same St Devote church video. Some info about the expert: Scientists have identified 50 individuals who are able to spot deception with great accuracy after testing more than 15,000 people. Eyes for Lies is one of the 50 people. Eyes has a 96.9% accuracy rate (to date) after identifying truth and deception in 31/32 people before the truth was known by watching media clips. Eyes for Lies is not psychic.
Prince Albert and His Bride
by Eyes Friday, July 15, 2011
If there was ever a strange pair that wed, it would be these two: Prince Albert of Monaco and his now wife, Charlene. I have watched several videos of them and there is no expression of love, tenderness or a bond between these two. The are ice cold together--chillingly so. It appears this is a marriage is another purpose. Some speculate it is to produce a legitimate heir.
A reader asked me if these were tears from a happy or sad bride? I would have to vote sad. She bows her head as if she wants to escape. She never looks up and gives us a genuine smile of joy. Instead she works to keep a frown off of her face. Even Prince Albert was surprised at her tears. I suspect he knew they weren't from joy either.
I find watching these two very painful. They aren't fooling anyone. It doesn't takes eyes for lies to see this!
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 18, 2011 16:25:26 GMT -5
His whole reaction is one of annoyance too.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jul 18, 2011 20:20:41 GMT -5
I didn't even think of it - why I don't know! - but considering all the Botox she'd had - can you imagine how she really would have looked crying like that if she was able to move her face!? Wow.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 19, 2011 8:22:33 GMT -5
Stéphane Bern is truly stark raving mad! That's all I can say right now. S T A R K * R A V I N G * M A D! I wonder if his nose got stuck up Albert's fat ass and Charlene's flat one? Really. From Le Matin:
Stéphane Bern: "Albert and Charlene love each other deeply"
by Bertrand Monnard 16 July 2011
Stéphane Bern, the famous expert on royalty and intimate of the royal couple, denies all the rumors that cast doubt on the sincerity of their feelings. "Albert and Charlene deeply love each other, I know. Charlene recalled in Vogue, saying that everything that was written negative about their marriage was a lie. " These words, Stéphane Bern, which takes us, even going against the current to pass for a sweet naive. Despite the recent denial of Charlene, suspicions continue to weigh on the sincerity of the sentiments linking the couple. The marriage of two weeks ago would have the sole purpose of ensuring a descent to the Rock. The renowned expert on French TV royalty, together with Paris, still indignant at any blanket denial. It is also one of the designers of an exhibition being held until November at the Oceanographic Museum of Monaco, with the full range of marriage: Charlene's dress, the crown offered to him by Albert, the Lexus convertible in which the couple has traveled the principality ... Kiss avoided must say that personally knows Stéphane Bern Albert and Charlene and rubs for years. "Monaco is a small village where any rumor quickly takes an enormous scale. And has always been jealous of horrors have spread into the royal family," he says, sweeping the hiccups that marked the honeymoon in South Africa, recounted this week in the local press. During one stage a few days in Durban in the east, where Albert was attending a session of the IOC, they have not slept in the same hotel - she in a palace on the coast, it downtown to 15 km away. Then, during a kiss before the official photographers, Charlene would have turned his face so as to offer to Albert as his cheek. During this stay, she would have had a real smile, in his meeting with Archbishop Desmond Tutu. "The ability to forgive" Bern prefers to smile. "Obviously we can interpret everything. The IOC, the Prince had meetings every morning at 7 o'clock, why wake up? And believe me, when there are no photographers, Albert and Charlene kiss with pleasure." How much credit he gives to the escape of alleged Charlene shortly before the wedding? After any denial, the Rock had finally accepted that a severe dispute had pitted the couple. "What couple has not played before a wedding as stress is high? From there to imagine an escape, the police confiscated his passport to him, this is total delirium." Albert, in an official speech, hailed by Charlene 'ability to forgive," how to recognize his pranks. "The prince has two children out of wedlock. Charlene was able to override this is proof of intelligence. " Albert stingy with tender gestures, the face of Charlene breathing anything but happiness for most photos: Bern at least he acknowledges that the signs of love between the bride and groom do not die eyes? Hardly. "The prince is 53 years old, he is head of state, it will not blow up like a kid every time he sees it. He loves his own way. As for Charlene, it must be to his new life, to which she was not accustomed unlike his stepsisters. The protocol, the paparazzi into the trees ... Put yourself in his place five minutes. " Monaco worshiped How is it really, what character did, beyond the image without words become commonplace? "Vive, very direct, with a sacred character, Charlene always says what she thinks, and I hope it will not change. In addition to the sport, it has a great interest in spirituality. She gave me a book about Nelson Mandela, telling how to overcome trials. In addition, as Albert has a very Anglo-Saxon humor. " Why does the princess she speaks no French while living in Monaco for a long time? "She understands but refuses to speak, so she does not control, for fear of being misunderstood." It is very close to Stephanie said, but not Caroline. "Stefanie told me: " I inherited a an amazing sister." The two are accomplices. As for Caroline, Charlene has her complete confidence. She has assumed the responsibility of the wedding dinner, at the ceremony. She wore jewelry belonging to Caroline, who was especially the brush her hair. " Albert, in the eyes of Bern, is a prince "warm, funny that the Monegasques love." When will the babies, the long-awaited future dynasty? Charlene, according to his mother, wants five. "It will not be long. But only nature decides. "
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jul 19, 2011 8:49:16 GMT -5
Why do they (S. Bern) have to explain the love of that princely couple? Every word in this matter is a word that makes that situation worse. The more words the more people do not believe. In my opinion this PR crew is a nightmare. They should shut up. Love explains itself and is not made obvious by an outsider's declaration. Unless he - S. Bern - is part of that peculiar relationship that he knows so much about.
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 19, 2011 9:36:11 GMT -5
Only the palace idiots would allow this fool to speak out for them.
Uncredible! I get more and more disgusted by the day!
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 19, 2011 11:37:31 GMT -5
He is French… nobody takes him seriously he can write articles but also read the French comments. Says everything. ;D
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 19, 2011 13:55:51 GMT -5
"If you’re not betting and are just hating then perhaps you should see a therapist and work on the big green monster living inside you. Just saying." - from a lunatic perpetrating as a journalist Here's another stark raving mad journalist who says that Albert and Charlene's marriage is a fairy tale - and anyone who doesn't think so is just plain NASTY. The irony is that Clayton is deriding journalists and calling crazy those who havenn't smoked the Albert-and-Charlene-fairy-tale crack pipe, yet he is the one who comes acrfoss as crazy! What kind of hournalist talk or write like this? Clayton thinks it is "crappy journalism" to actually change your coverage/perspective when presented with evidence that shows this is not a "fairy tale union." Am I the only one who thinks that perhaps Clayton is the one who needs to see a therapist? From the The New Age: Givethem a chance to make a life together, nasty people by Clayton Swanepoel 7 July 2011
The negativity surrounding the marriage of Charlene Wittstock and Prince Albert is awful – you should be ashamed of yourselves!
The wedding hadn’t even taken place and the world already doubted their union. Rumours of Charlene Wittstock frantically trying to book a plane ticket back to South Africa after a dress fitting in France, runaway bride rumours during the week leading up to the wedding and now rumours that she will stay in South Africa after their South African party are putting quite a dampener on a marriage that’s meant to be a fairytale.
Driving to work this morning I couldn’t help but feel nauseous at a headline on a street pole that read, “Charlene 5-1 she stays”. What I find disgusting about this is the fact that she’s not only our first ever European princess and former Olympic swimmer but also that this shows a really dirty side to our media.
Last week the world couldn’t get enough of them – and the publication in question in particular made a massive brouhaha about the wedding. To turn the story 180 degrees this week makes for some sensational and, frankly, crappy journalism. If you were getting married into royalty and came from such a humble background then you may also feel overwhelmed by what’s expected of you, knowing that the entire globe is suddenly watching your every move. She’s bound to be photographed everywhere she goes, while we all watch for her to make a mistake, look sad, happy, confused and any other emotion we can turn into a story.
The two of them make an endearing, albeit unorthodox, royal couple. Shots of her resting her head on his shoulder melted our hearts and should frankly have melted yours too.
So when you pick up a paper slating their marriage, bet some money on the duration of their marriage and whether she’ll return to Monaco or not, stop, think and consider that you may have a gambling problem because honestly who bets money on that in the first place?
If you’re not betting and are just hating then perhaps you should see a therapist and work on the big green monster living inside you. Just saying.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 19, 2011 14:45:45 GMT -5
Let me guess... he was also invited for the free-dinner in South Africa?
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jul 19, 2011 15:05:13 GMT -5
Clayton Swanepoel - long gone are the days when PR can be "controlled" and people believe everything that is seen in photos and is written. Shame on the powers that be in MONACO that even for a nano second thought they would be able to "control" anything, let alone everything, that is reported. The best anyone can ever hope for today - if they want a story out there - is to try and get an interview on TV with Oprah, or Barbara Walters - someone who has a bit of credibility, but who's to say anyone will believe anything that is told to either of them. (Don't know whose going to replace them either. Maybe Diane sawyer - but for how long?) Charlene and Albert are screwed. Plain and simple. They tried and failed and now it's way to late to change what they've done. And they certainly can't change who they are. It's all only going to get worse.
And if this is all Nicole's doing - or any of his ex's doing - then WHO DO YOU SUPPOSE got involved with these women to begin with?! Whose fault is that? Albert must step down. He's a complete and total inept fool and should NOT be in charge of anything let alone Monaco.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 19, 2011 16:01:16 GMT -5
All I can do is laugh!! and these people actually think of themselves as journalists? really! Perhaps they need to take a long hard look in the mirror. The only journalist in this mess is the one from L'Express who did his homework and protected his sources. Charlene and Albert by their own actions created this mess. Albert if he as going to marry her to begin with, should have married immediately after Turin then let her do her Barbie thing. It should have been a swift fast wedding and a swift fast couple of kids before anybody knew anything about her. I don't think Albert really had any plans with this girl. I think he decided to get married on impulse. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jul 19, 2011 16:05:38 GMT -5
Why do they (S. Bern) have to explain the love of that princely couple? Every word in this matter is a word that makes that situation worse. The more words the more people do not believe. In my opinion this PR crew is a nightmare. They should shut up.Love explains itself and is not made obvious by an outsider's declaration. Unless he - S. Bern - is part of that peculiar relationship that he knows so much about. That was my exact sentiment when I read it, and I've spoken of it often, that they are too ridiculous to continue to want to linger and make more of it--they only show that there is a reason they feel it important or have a need to apologize for themselves, by hiring a reporter, or/and giving him access as myadia's post points out, to act as their PR machine, and if they are willing to do that why should anyone believe anything written about them. I so agree I've never seen a worse PR machine ever!! It is creepy for this guy to act like he knows what happens behind close doors in their intimate life and much worse that he feels a need to speak publicly about it, and yet he remains a close intimate of theirs and considering some past stories of Albert's private life, maybe he should zip it on his knowledge of Albert's personal passions. I think these people have a problem if they are out of the press for one minute , which only makes them that much less interesting...if one could say that at all about them. I really don't know why they want to continue to focus on the negative (but then that is the story of Charlene all these years), only if there were some truth to it would they continue to feel a deep need to deny it. It is because they chose to listen to a forum of gold-diggers that have no problem that Charlene was and is a bought and paid for barbie (and I'm being polite here), that they were stupid enough to have assumed that the rest of the world would feel the same and would not care that everything about them and their relationship has anything to do with what most people worth anything admire or care about! The idea that people would enjoy their intelligence being insulted or being used as a tool for Albert and Charlene's own purposes! There is nothing genuine and sincere about them or about Monaco right now and this whole relationship only serves the purpose to confirm that Monaco can't be trusted--the opposite message they needed to send out! I believe that both Eringer or Nicole would try stirring the pot to exact revenge to ruin Albert's wedding, but I love that this guy has gone back on his story now, and actually admits something did happen between them (so much of the denials are not false), and they still think people have any trust in what this guy would write anyway. I can't imagine Charlene would ever walk away, but evidently she is cocky enough "even before the ring went on her finger" to pull some stunt to gain more leverage--I really cannot believe the stupidity of Albert and his team here. I really wish these people a LONG MARRIAGE full of wedded bliss TOGETHER! ;D . They are off to such a great start!
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Jul 19, 2011 16:10:21 GMT -5
"There is nothing genuine and sincere about them or about Monaco right now and this whole relationship only serves the purpose to confirm that Monaco can't be trusted--the opposite message they needed to send out!"
Sandsla - 1001 % agree!!!
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jul 19, 2011 16:13:42 GMT -5
woo woo....JMO but i wonder if it was FAtAl or trashlene that blew him for that story, or there's a new wad of cash in his bank account ROFL they're done>stick a fork in them the flying monkey flunkies are desperate BUT AMUSINg
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jul 19, 2011 17:02:15 GMT -5
Clayton Swanepoel - l ong gone are the days when PR can be "controlled" and people believe everything that is seen in photos and is written. Shame on the powers that be in MONACO that even for a nano second thought they would be able to "control" anything, let alone everything, that is reported. The best anyone can ever hope for today - if they want a story out there - is to try and get an interview on TV with Oprah, or Barbara Walters - someone who has a bit of credibility, but who's to say anyone will believe anything that is told to either of them. (Don't know whose going to replace them either. Maybe Diane sawyer - but for how long?) Charlene and Albert are screwed. Plain and simple. They tried and failed and now it's way to late to change what they've done. And they certainly can't change who they are. It's all only going to get worse. And if this is all Nicole's doing - or any of his ex's doing - then WHO DO YOU SUPPOSE got involved with these women to begin with?! Whose fault is that? Albert must step down. He's a complete and total inept fool and should NOT be in charge of anything let alone Monaco. That is right they were arrogant enough to think everyone could be paid off, because that is the kind of women and people that Albert and the palace are use to dealing with, and that they have always surrounded themselves with....no one that has an ounce of integrity. I remember all the posts by Charlene when we warned her of Charlene not applying herself, including her history and she just said Albert was rich and his money would buy her a new bio and make her flaws disappear, and even the money payments (that were acknowledged) over the years that she had been receiving and probably still is....they just sarcastically and ignorantly asked if we had ever heard of "spin" ::)as if this was a positive and normal instead of realizing "spin" usually refers to people in trouble or a reason to have a need for people to "spin" something. Charlene really thought Albert could control the press and so she did not bother to apply herself because she thought she would never have a need to, because Albert had always consistently rewarded her for being indifferent to the idea of having to do anything that she did not want or care to--Charlene is so self important and conceited that she has always believed she was above others to people--this is probably about the worse position you would put someone with Charlene's character and personality disorders in-- I really think she and Albert has some very harsh lessons to learn in life. i\ I think Albert probably knew though that Charlene was not going to have a honeymoon period for the rest of her life like the one he had been trying to purchase for her for so long, but I don't think he realized how soon and how much heat he was personally going to take for her and his part for introducing and imposing this self serving manipulating woman on people that he is well aware few like, and then of course the final insult if the marriage...I don't know how he could have expected anything else? About Nicole for years I warned about him letting her plant herself down the road (after all that she had done to him) and the problem of letting her hang around Monaco and exploit her relationship to him everywhere--he never reeled her in! It wouldn't surprise me even if Eringer put Nicole up to something, but she is more than capable of anything on her own--Myadia and I predicted she would cause trouble when Albert got married, and joked to each other about her trying to scale the Palace walls--sounds like we might have been pretty accurate about the situation ;D. The way Albert let Nicole continue after all the trouble she caused him and relented to her demands of moving her close to him, just showed what a sucker he is willing to be with Charlene and others that would not think twice in bringing him down or causing him a load of trouble. Rainier was shy and reserved when he was younger and started out, but I don't he ever was ever the sucker that Albert has shown himself to be. After awhile Albert in the end might turn into more of a tyrant like his dad than he ever imagined, after he too becomes afraid to trust anyone because of the type of people he has invited into his life--Albert has no filter for these people.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 19, 2011 17:19:46 GMT -5
Clayton Swanepoel... are we sure he is not a golden member of the charlenettes from the sugah loonie forums? the way he writes...LOL! There's no way a serious journalist could write with those words! There's no way a serious man that has studied the arts of communication could write and try to make a serious article expressing himself like that! LOL! Poor guy, he is the one who needs therapy!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jul 19, 2011 17:33:11 GMT -5
I've seen this body language expert - Eyes for Lies - and she's pretty good. Again, based on the comments, Charlene is this poor innocent victim who is being forced to marry this wealthy billionaire. The Eyes for Lies body language expert is analyzing the same St Devote church video. Some info about the expert: Scientists have identified 50 individuals who are able to spot deception with great accuracy after testing more than 15,000 people. Eyes for Lies is one of the 50 people. Eyes has a 96.9% accuracy rate (to date) after identifying truth and deception in 31/32 people before the truth was known by watching media clips. Eyes for Lies is not psychic.
Prince Albert and His Bride
by Eyes Friday, July 15, 2011
If there was ever a strange pair that wed, it would be these two: Prince Albert of Monaco and his now wife, Charlene. I have watched several videos of them and there is no expression of love, tenderness or a bond between these two. The are ice cold together--chillingly so. It appears this is a marriage is another purpose. Some speculate it is to produce a legitimate heir.
A reader asked me if these were tears from a happy or sad bride? I would have to vote sad. She bows her head as if she wants to escape. She never looks up and gives us a genuine smile of joy. Instead she works to keep a frown off of her face. Even Prince Albert was surprised at her tears. I suspect he knew they weren't from joy either.
I find watching these two very painful. They aren't fooling anyone. It doesn't takes eyes for lies to see this!
This woman never married for love, or has ever cared about it--I don't believe she is sad for any other reason than she is not getting as much glory as she expected for herself! I think Albert recognizes her ruse played out for the world and the press-we warned him the day the ring went on her finger he was had! She didn't even wait for the end of the ceremony--Albert is the louse in the relationship--she wasted no time in working it!
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 19, 2011 20:44:51 GMT -5
They deserve eachother! Can't wait for the next round of messes!
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Jul 19, 2011 23:57:59 GMT -5
Sandsla wrote "After awhile Albert in the end might turn into more of a tyrant like his dad than he ever imagined, after he too becomes afraid to trust anyone because of the type of people he has invited into his life--Albert has no filter for these people."
I agree there is no filter for the wrong people. The point is: The people around Albert ARE A FILTER ... for everyone else.
July 11th, 2011 - AFTER the wedding disaster - when honest advice was needed more than ever - Georges Lisimachio (The Head of Cabinet) wrote to someone who offered Albert pure honesty AND a plan on how to revitalize Monaco (in practice - not in glossy magazines):
"H.S.H. thanks you very much for your letter dated March 14th, 2011. Unfortunately, His Serene Highness is not able to give a positive answer to your request."
I doubt Albert ever received that letter and was given the chance to read it.
The failure of the recent pr-measures (read: PR-wedding) was predicted in that letter to Albert written IN MARCH. Must be nice to read for his inner circle - AFTER the disaster has set it full power and more than we ever imagined ;D.
But do you think the people who created this disaster - with Alberts permission - want let anyone close to him who tells him what total idiots they are?
There is almost no way to get through this filter.
|
|