|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 25, 2011 8:17:45 GMT -5
They switched from 15.00 on to asking her in English. Her answer what she liked best at Will and kates wedding, was the support of the people....then he asks if it matters that it will be less for her....I think the guy was lucky that the interview had reached its end Can someone please tell us what was the question that Henri asked Charlene about Will and Kate's wedding because I think Henri switched to asking Charlene questions in English because he realized that Charlene doesn't understand a word he is saying. Below is the conversation ( Thanks Taz! I inserted your translation). Notice how Charlene gets another dig at the people in Monaco - clearly she is revealing that the people in Monaco are not supportive of her and Albert and this ridiculous wedding as the British were of William and Kate. God, that must be killing the Narcissistic Con artist that she is not loved like Kate is! Time 14:56 -
Henri: Miss Wittstock, you and Prince Albert went to the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton. Is this for you a good example of harmony of protocol and authenticity to themselves? Charlene: I think so, uh for them yes, absolutely. Yeah. But uh, I think for ours it will be a little bit different.
Henri (in English): What did you appreciate the more in this wedding? Charlene: Uh, I appreciated uh the support of the people, the country and the excitement for the couple.
Henri: There will be uh less people here in Monaco and that’s uh very important? Charlene: I think it’s big enough for me.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Jun 25, 2011 8:20:31 GMT -5
Did I get that right that the mademoiselles d 'honneurs, so the bridesmaids, are not friends but girls from Monaco and the region? ? don't these people have friends and family? She has no friends and would not have dared to ask any of Fat Al's nieces to be bridesmaids because their collective beauty would have overshadowed her. As for her relatives? Hmm .... how many dust clots can build up behind a clothes dryer?
|
|
|
Post by scout on Jun 25, 2011 10:39:28 GMT -5
Time 9:30 - Henri asks Charlene about her involvement in the amfAR gala at Cannes and if this is something or type of event that she will be involved with. Charlene: I think it is one of the events that’s uh highlighted around the world and so I think we would yeah definitely support something that you know definitely needs uh obviously awareness raised to that. Yes, definitely. Such arrogance! She is clueless how she sounds to people listening. Her road show is already old and we are only in the prelims.
|
|
|
Post by taz on Jun 25, 2011 11:06:30 GMT -5
Can someone please tell us what was the question that Henri asked Charlene about Will and Kate's wedding because I think Henri switched to asking Charlene questions in English because he realized that Charlene doesn't understand a word he is saying. This is what I understand... Special olympics question: "Miss Wittstock, you went to South Africa to highlight the Association Special Olympics which unites handicapped athletes. What is the essence of this commitment?" Wedding question: "Miss Wittstock, you and Prince Albert went to the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton. Is this for you a good example of harmony of protocol and authenticity to themselves?"
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 25, 2011 12:29:56 GMT -5
Can someone please tell us what was the question that Henri asked Charlene about Will and Kate's wedding because I think Henri switched to asking Charlene questions in English because he realized that Charlene doesn't understand a word he is saying. This is what I understand... Special olympics question: "Miss Wittstock, you went to South Africa to highlight the Association Special Olympics which unites handicapped athletes. What is the essence of this commitment?" Wedding question: "Miss Wittstock, you and Prince Albert went to the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton. Is this for you a good example of harmony of protocol and authenticity to themselves?" Thanks so much Taz! In Charlene's continuing efforts to fool people into believing that she has always been doing charity work, she comes across as extremely arrogant and selfish. Notice - she has nothing to say about the actual athletes and their dedication, courage and commitment to sports. Oh wait, she actually had a lot more to say when asked the almost same question in an interview with the Special Olympics Communication Director. As I stated when I posted this interview in Charlene's Special Olympics thread, any one who has heard this pea-brain speak will know that these are not Charlene's words stated in a live interview Maureen Rabbitt: Why did you decide to become a global ambassador for Special Olympics?
Madame Charlene Wittstock: Special Olympics is a movement that has always been close to my heart. I have participated in many Special Olympics swimming events in the past in South Africa and it has always been a joy for me to see first hand the power of sport in changing lives for children with intellectual disabilities, not only helping athletes become fitter and stronger, but helping them gain more self confidence, experience joy and make new friends.
I really got so much from these athletes. Most of all they helped me realise that giving is the most beautiful gesture that we can do. I am honoured to be representing a cause dedicated to children and in which sport has its place.
If the above words were really Charlene's, instead of the palace-provided words, Charlene could have expressed this same sentiment just a week later in another interview. I am sure they will have her study the above paragraph so that next time she can spit it out. This is the exact problem that I predicted that the palace will continue to encounter when they pass off other people's words/work as Charlene's. People will then have expectation that Charlene actually posses what ever they are passing off. Even Henri, soon realized that Charlene wasn't comprehending what he was saying in French - only memorizing (rather badly) given "answers." It is repulsive to see this Con Artist in action and repulsive that Albert is an active participant in imposing such a con artist on his people.
|
|
|
Post by scout on Jun 25, 2011 13:06:00 GMT -5
^MyaDia, I really doubt that Charlene can remember answers such as the one given above. All she needs to do is remember the point or idea that the answer is trying to convey and then state such in her own words. Unfortunately, I don't think that she understands what was being said in these paragraphs and her language skills are too limited to be able to communicate any thought of any complexity. Surely Albert can see this problem.
As you have said, she is dumb as a rock and asking her to communicate intelligently with other adults is just asking too much.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 25, 2011 13:20:09 GMT -5
I think the screenshot on top of this page really captures CWs intellect. She looks incredibly stupid with her false cheeks and lips and her dark roots showing. She would do much better with her natural hair colour and a few highlights rather then this. Looks like she get's her hair done in the shopping mall by some apprentice...
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jun 25, 2011 16:31:26 GMT -5
just a thought: Maybe Albert and Charlene have realized by now that they should not get married -for their own sake and Monaco's) ... but are both blackmailed? I mean: Charlene looks so scared and unhappy - I bet she is close to give up, take whatever she can get of the jackpot just to get out of there! There was a quite revealing sentence in the NYT article: "I thought she was one of the most anxious people I have ever met,” said Jenny Crwys-Williams, who interviewed Ms. Wittstock for South Africa’s popular Talk Radio 702 in February. “She was absolutely terrified of saying the wrong thing and falling foul of the terrible women in the palace."Isn't it strange that Charlene was the first and only who got huge media coverage directly after her first appearance with Albert? CW was talking to the media, spoke about "Turin a great place for lovers", gave interviews, had blubs to the media, photo ops right after Turin, told BUNTE her new adress is the Palace ect .... and Albert did not dump her for being indescret. My guess. Stahl and whoever is behind Stahl picked a girl to establish as official companion and instrument. Charlene was casted and picked by Stahl & team - and introduced to Albert. Albert was told that CW was good for him after the Alexandre/Nicole scandal - better an official companion than new women at his side every third month. It would make him look more serious. And CW comes to Monaco to train and compete - he is not obliged to anything and can look for a woman he loves out of the limelight. And he bought that. While CW & Stahl from day one worked on establishing CW as First Lady and PMO. Albert was given the illusion it was he who had chosen CW at this New Years party - like now he is given the impression it was he who decided to marry her. These two are under strong influence of whatever but no good and I think they have noticed. If so: Why not telling Charlene: listen darling - you and me both know we have to get out of this until next Friday. You are always afraid to say or do anything wrong. Do so! Something that makes it impossible to marry but allows a face-saving exit for both. I will give you every assistance to start anew in S.A. or whereever. Well, I'd say whoever did that casting should not make it as a profession. If CW started to get scared in February, then she should have just stayed in SA with her family and called it quits. It's never too late to say I don't and I think she would be given a lot more credit if she would leave now, then waiting for the divorce and do the Diana whining tour. I was in England before the seperation was made public and people where getting really sick of her and said, just get that divorce and shut up. Only her only her early death made her the princess of hearts. If she would have continued the way she did, she would have been topping Fergie on the most disliked royal list. People were fed up with her. A lot of the princess of the hearts things is also the bad conscience of the people talking. NOt because of who she was as a person. Because let's face it: Diana was quite a schemer and could be very bitchy to those she did not like. A lot of the work she did, she did for the photo op and the image. Unlike CW Diana was very savvy with regards to the media. And like Diana- there could very easliy be a TUNNEL in CW's future!!! Get out now kiddo!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jun 25, 2011 16:44:34 GMT -5
"Well, I'd say whoever did that casting should not make it as a profession. If CW started to get scared in February, then she should have just stayed in SA with her family and called it quits. It's never too late to say I don't and I think she would be given a lot more credit if she would leave now, then waiting for the divorce and do the Diana whining tour." Maybe CW doesn't think much ahead and just wants to get through with this "event" - but the torture will ONLY BEGIN with the tiara on her head and the ring on her finger. We know that she doesn't think ahead, she has said so herself. SHe thought she was being clever and that living for the moment was a good trait. Only stupid people do not think ahead and don't watch where they are going. That's why they keep falling flat on their faces; she doesn't think of the past either so she can't learn from her mistakes. Basically she is living in a state of permanent Alzheimer where everything is always new and life is permanent training and having to do it again because she is getting it wrong all the time. If she finds it frustrating and hard now, she will be finding it worse in 3 months. Plus she has to get pregnant asap. In a year she will be in a psychiatric ward or do what a lot of people do in Monaco: commit suicide. CW likes to think of herself as being strong and a fighter. SHe keeps forgetting that she never got an Olympic medal because her mind wasn't there. You lose races in the head. Frazier lost against ALi because of ALis psychological strength not his physical strength. Daley Thompson always beat Juegern Hingsen in direct encounters. the 2m man was a nervous wreck whenever he had to compete against him, although physically he was always in advantage. CW lacks psychologically the strength to get through this. Monaco has already gotten to her and getting her to do all those unnecessary surgeries. And she is still not feeling better and fitting in. It will be worse after the wedding when everyone has legitimate expectations of her. These past years nothing was and could be expected of her. Hence she thought she could pull it off. But after the wedding things are different. And Albert made it quite clear that the reason why he is marrying her is his survival as a prince. That is one hell of a burden to carry and I doubt that her shoulders are big enough for that. Boy PACA- that was brilliantly said. You could probably turn that Country around in a couple of months - and you're right there under their noses!
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jun 25, 2011 18:12:25 GMT -5
^I AGREE! Paca, i love your posts, you are always so right!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 25, 2011 18:58:10 GMT -5
We know that she doesn't think ahead, she has said so herself. SHe thought she was being clever and that living for the moment was a good trait. Only stupid people do not think ahead and don't watch where they are going. That's why they keep falling flat on their faces; she doesn't think of the past either so she can't learn from her mistakes. Basically she is living in a state of permanent Alzheimer where everything is always new and life is permanent training and having to do it again because she is getting it wrong all the time. If she finds it frustrating and hard now, she will be finding it worse in 3 months. Plus she has to get pregnant asap. In a year she will be in a psychiatric ward or do what a lot of people do in Monaco: commit suicide. CW likes to think of herself as being strong and a fighter. SHe keeps forgetting that she never got an Olympic medal because her mind wasn't there. You lose races in the head. Frazier lost against ALi because of ALis psychological strength not his physical strength. Daley Thompson always beat Juegern Hingsen in direct encounters. the 2m man was a nervous wreck whenever he had to compete against him, although physically he was always in advantage. CW lacks psychologically the strength to get through this. Monaco has already gotten to her and getting her to do all those unnecessary surgeries. And she is still not feeling better and fitting in. It will be worse after the wedding when everyone has legitimate expectations of her. These past years nothing was and could be expected of her. Hence she thought she could pull it off. But after the wedding things are different. And Albert made it quite clear that the reason why he is marrying her is his survival as a prince. That is one hell of a burden to carry and I doubt that her shoulders are big enough for that. Boy PACA- that was brilliantly said. You could probably turn that Country around in a couple of months - and you're right there under their noses! LOL but not for very much longer.
|
|
|
Post by duchess1 on Jun 25, 2011 20:27:27 GMT -5
I can't wait for the day she will have to stand up and deliver a speech . She can't avoid what she has signed up for as " Princess Charlene of Monaco" and all the responsibilities that go with the title. She will NOW be held accountable the minute she opens her mouth, and her actions will be scrutinized for as long as she is "Princess". Watching her is going to be so much fun....
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 26, 2011 4:36:23 GMT -5
they will write her a speech. that's one of her least problems. Her problem is that she hears things mentioned, thinks they sound smart and then when someone asks her a question, she wants to sound just as smart and only remembers half of what she heard, messes up the grammar and ultimately looks like the complete fool that she is. Just look at the interview with RTL Belgium where she tried to say that anyone with a mobile phone can be a paparazzi today, but instead she insulted the journalist by saying anyone with a mobile can be a journalist. And that she did in incoherent and incohesive language....
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Jun 26, 2011 5:33:36 GMT -5
CW is a modern woman!!! Charlene's style way to speak seems to be a bad habit of quite a few people today. Just that in her case it is no habit but inability which means that she can't get rid of My fiancé is helding lectures at a University and recently he complained about the decline of language and analytical thinking (which goes hand in hand). It seems more and more common to add phrases one remembers from a certain lesson or context to formulate an "answer" or make a statement. (Politicians and other people do that too - sometimes because they don't want to give a real answer but more and more often I'm getting the impression it is because they are -sorry- unable. And the journalists don't challenge them and ask again! They just hear a keyword answer that leads to a new keyword in a question and so on. But the connection gets lost.) That means they hear a catchword - and like a nejerk reaction they come up with certain words and phrases they put in a sentence without syntax and grammar and real sense and think once they knew the right words to use they know the answer. (I'm exaggerating, of course.) We seem to unlearn to really listen to each other, try to understand, think and give real answers. We forget what it means to have a real dialogue and work out new solutions together. (Wasn't it one thing Albert mentioned in his inauguration speech about states and politics and what MC want's to contribute: understanding and respect? ) Charlene is the crassest example of this negative trend and I don't really want to compare her to people who do real work and have studied ... but once again she shows that she is the opposite of all Monaco needs and of what Albert wanted. Ohhhh - how do I wish Monaco would be an example of skills and habits which sink into oblivion in our loud modern world. The tiny old Principality could be so strong and precious for the big modern world around it and thus get rid of the decadent useless image it has. But they screw everything by promoting CW. Albert - get back on track, get back to yourself and come home!!!
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 26, 2011 8:00:58 GMT -5
I can't wait for the day she will have to stand up and deliver a speech . She can't avoid what she has signed up for as " Princess Charlene of Monaco" and all the responsibilities that go with the title. She will NOW be held accountable the minute she opens her mouth, and her actions will be scrutinized for as long as she is "Princess". Watching her is going to be so much fun.... I know Paca already said this, but i'll repeat it again for the sugar loonies who will probably have an orgasm with delight once Conlene gives her first speech as Princess Conlene: ALL of Conlene's speeches will be written for her - ALL of them! They are already writing her answers to her interviews, so why would anyone believe that Charlene's speeches will be her own words? The major problem for Charlene will be is the higher expectation that people will have for her when she starts spurting out bits of facts and actually start seeming intelligent in her speeches. Charlene won't actually know what she is talking about in these speeches just reading the words, so she will show her real dumb-as-a-rock self when she starts interacting and conversing with people. Look how many of us were fooled about Albert based on his July 12, 2005 investiture speech. Expectations will be Charlene's downfall as it was Albert's. Right now, the pea-brain thinks that she can get by by spending money on her face and body with her dreams of becoming a style icon.
|
|
|
Post by suite583 on Jun 26, 2011 8:45:24 GMT -5
Seriously, has any one Albert trust ever told him that Charlene is dumb as a rock and wrong for his country's image? Anyone? I have not told him but written several times in 2006 and 2007 that Charlene is wrong for his own and his country's image. After that there was a long time she did not made public appearances. He listened me a while.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 26, 2011 8:51:51 GMT -5
Seriously, has any one Albert trust ever told him that Charlene is dumb as a rock and wrong for his country's image? Anyone? I have not told him but written several times in 2006 and 2007 that Charlene is wrong for his own and his country's image. After that there was a long time she did not made public appearances. He listened me a while. Uhhh... ok... I was going to just leave it at huuuhhhh, but I have to ask... Nope, I am just going to leave it at that.
|
|
|
Post by scout on Jun 26, 2011 11:14:28 GMT -5
I agree that her speeches are going to be written for her, but CHARLENE will have to deliver the speech and I doubt that she will be able to do this with much finesse. It takes talent to be able to deliver a speech and make it a success. Albert can't do it and he has been giving speeches for years. And MyaDia, you are right, when people see the disconnect from the words coming out of her mouth in a speech versus when she just talks without assistance in interviews and at public events, it will become obvious she has no clue what those speeches are about. Note some US politicians get in this pickle and they are supposedly more highly educated than Charlene.
Albert did not pick a woman who would be an asset and help him in performing his duties (and he really needs some help). He picked the Last Woman Standing after all the others left when he cheated on them.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 26, 2011 13:47:30 GMT -5
Yes they will be written out in ENGLISH for her, and they will still sound dumb
"Ladies and Gentleman" um "thank you for" um "inviting me here today" um "to talk to you" um "about" um....
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jun 26, 2011 16:22:48 GMT -5
Oh yes, the speech will be full with unnecesaries "uh...and...uh...thanks...uh..."
|
|