|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 28, 2011 8:20:32 GMT -5
There will be a pile of law suits coming from the Palace. The Prince's lawyers are going to be busy. They better be very careful with any such lawsuits because then people will have to start defending themselves and show what a trashy relationship this is and how much os a pathological gold digger Charlene really is!
|
|
grandduchess
Full Member
The happiest royal couple ever!
Posts: 165
|
Post by grandduchess on Jun 28, 2011 8:32:15 GMT -5
I saw them the other evening at the Saint Jean celebration. They did not look like a happy couple. I am not going to speculate any further on this. Let's wait until wedding time and see what will happen. We will see who Albert will marry. In total honesty, I don't feel the good vibes a wedding should bring about. That's because it is not a wedding. It is a business transaction.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 28, 2011 8:39:45 GMT -5
Please read the L'Express article. It has very detailed information about what happened last week and not this weekend. I believe them. Charlene going through this wedding regardless of Albert's infidelities thrown in her face with a child will show everyone who taunted us Old-Timers posters who watched this gold digger entered the scene in Feb 2006 that we were right! VINDICATION! I know the Link to the L'Express article was already posted, but I will post the article on the site - before the palace lawyers have them take it down.
Albert-Charlene, on peril marriage
By LEXPRESS.fr 28/06/2011 at 11:00
A few days ago, the bride of Prince Albert, Charlene Wittstock, would want to interrupt preparations for his wedding and leave South Africa. But why?
Tension, rumors of discord and clash between two lovers: and if the marriage of the century Monaco was the lame duck? At a time when the rock is finalizing the preparations for the wedding of Prince Albert and Charlene Wittstock, the world's media and an audience of crowned heads are about to occupy the place, the All-Monaco noise last case is in turmoil in recent days-and panic-closed circles most of the Principality.
It all begins, a week ago, with the hasty departure of the future princess to Nice airport where she had decided to board a flight to South Africa. A flight with no return. Shaken, Charlene Wittstock had just learned a few hours earlier, that the privacy of the man she is about to marry and who had publicly confessed in September 2005, the existence of an illegitimate child with Nicole Coste , was not as exemplary as she imagined.
Running away from what the police from the airport of Nice catches after the Palais Royal was reached Monaco has its origin in a revelation. What then told the woman to decide to leave too hurriedly Monaco and draw a line under this marriage? Love affair? More? All the tabloids are on the teeth for several days, and a newspaper has all the elements of a story that threatens to undermine the Principality again.
To bring the bride to reason, it took the Prince Albert and surrounds much of persuasion: a member of the clan Pastor - one of the great families of Monaco - a particular function as an intermediary. Since this episode, Charlene Wittstock, who was in Paris earlier this week to try her wedding dress, openly sulking meetings and family celebrations. A "minimum service" that worries a few days before a ceremony that will see the cameras around the world scan the features of the young woman - on which, today, all the rumors and all the questions converge.
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jun 28, 2011 8:41:43 GMT -5
Now they have the attention of the media they wanted all that time and were even willing to pay money for. Now they get all the attention for free. What more do they want? I think they planned it.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 28, 2011 8:45:25 GMT -5
Funny statement of Stahl. The rumours are due to jealousy. Jealousy by whom? That surely is not the motivation.
IMO l'express would not do itself a favour if they had nothing to back up. they know how trigger happy the Grimaldis are with lawsuits. Plus they would lose on reputation. They are a news magazine not a tabloid.
Lacoste says this has been going on for 3 weeks. Then if that is the case someone from the media did approach them and ask and they chose not to react. I said before that I am certain that Paris Match went to the palace before printing their Alex story and the palace decided to sit it out. They could have easily handled it better then they did at the time. I elaborated at length on that in other forums. If indeed they had been approached 3 weeks ago, then they had plenty of time to see how they can handle this. Making a statement days before the wedding is another sign of their incompetence. They are drawing extra attention to this and you can bet that during the ceremony and the commentary it will be all discussed and every single gesture will be scrutinized to see, if it is true or not. If they heard of it whilst still doing one interview after the other, they should have used the chance to make a statement there. They should have allowed CW to answer questions with regards to the children. Seeing that they were not once mentioned, and I am sure that journalists wanted to know about that, sends the message that it's a difficult topic and another child would be a problem. As usual they have been practicing the ostrich method; Things do not go away because you do not wish to talk about it.They just get bigger, out of hand and can't be handled. Things like this, especially in Monaco, you need to address when they are still small and manageable. 3 days before the wedding you can no longer control things. The PR is absolutely ludicrous and incompetent. They have no idea about communication. If there is an inch of truth to this, then they will have to put this on halt. Have one of them go ill and then deal with it. EHEC or sth related would be a good excuse right now. Going ahead will taint the wedding IMO. Afterall, they probably get more media attention with a cancelled wedding, then with the wedding. And they will stay. It's summer. the media don't have much to do. They'll report on the runaway bride and Monaco til September. With new details every day. Their wedding would not stir that much attention. Rags would be full with them, pictures all over and analysis of every detail, indication etc.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 28, 2011 9:04:08 GMT -5
Please read the L'Express article. It has very detailed information about what happened last week and not this weekend. I believe them. Charlene going through this wedding regardless of Albert's infidelities thrown in her face with a child will show everyone who taunted us Old-Timers posters who watched this gold digger entered the scene in Feb 2006 that we were right! VINDICATION! I know the Link to the L'Express article was already posted, but I will post the article on the site - before the palace lawyers have them take it down.
Albert-Charlene, on peril marriage
By LEXPRESS.fr 28/06/2011 at 11:00
A few days ago, the bride of Prince Albert, Charlene Wittstock, would want to interrupt preparations for his wedding and leave South Africa. But why?
Tension, rumors of discord and clash between two lovers: and if the marriage of the century Monaco was the lame duck? At a time when the rock is finalizing the preparations for the wedding of Prince Albert and Charlene Wittstock, the world's media and an audience of crowned heads are about to occupy the place, the All-Monaco noise last case is in turmoil in recent days-and panic-closed circles most of the Principality.
It all begins, a week ago, with the hasty departure of the future princess to Nice airport where she had decided to board a flight to South Africa. A flight with no return. Shaken, Charlene Wittstock had just learned a few hours earlier, that the privacy of the man she is about to marry and who had publicly confessed in September 2005, the existence of an illegitimate child with Nicole Coste , was not as exemplary as she imagined.
Running away from what the police from the airport of Nice catches after the Palais Royal was reached Monaco has its origin in a revelation. What then told the woman to decide to leave too hurriedly Monaco and draw a line under this marriage? Love affair? More? All the tabloids are on the teeth for several days, and a newspaper has all the elements of a story that threatens to undermine the Principality again.
To bring the bride to reason, it took the Prince Albert and surrounds much of persuasion: a member of the clan Pastor - one of the great families of Monaco - a particular function as an intermediary. Since this episode, Charlene Wittstock, who was in Paris earlier this week to try her wedding dress, openly sulking meetings and family celebrations. A "minimum service" that worries a few days before a ceremony that will see the cameras around the world scan the features of the young woman - on which, today, all the rumors and all the questions converge.
the l'ouest france link is already not working with me
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 28, 2011 9:14:33 GMT -5
one serious magazine goes public and it is spreading... www.popsugar.com/Charlene-Wittstock-Wedding-Rumors-False-18054863 As I said, issuing a dementi is silly and utterly stupid, as now that they have an official statement, those who did not publish the rumour feel free to publish the dementi Has no one ever taught Stahl that a dementi is an absolute no go in PR? No journailst believes a dementi. Ever. They go according to the rule, where there is smoke there must be fire. A dementi always achieves the opposite of what it wants to achieve. they should have let the journalists address it in the interviews and then reacted lightly if there is nothing to it. If it is true then it is better to get it over with quickly. This dementi launches an avalanche of publications. Stahl really needs to lose her job. As does Lacoste.
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on Jun 28, 2011 9:22:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by duchesscornflower on Jun 28, 2011 9:26:42 GMT -5
I saw them the other evening at the Saint Jean celebration. They did not look like a happy couple. I am not going to speculate any further on this. Let's wait until wedding time and see what will happen. We will see who Albert will marry. In total honesty, I don't feel the good vibes a wedding should bring about. What do you mean? There will be a change of the bride? Not Charlene at the wedding? Oh my!
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 28, 2011 9:32:32 GMT -5
one serious magazine goes public and it is spreading... www.popsugar.com/Charlene-Wittstock-Wedding-Rumors-False-18054863 As I said, issuing a dementi is silly and utterly stupid, as now that they have an official statement, those who did not publish the rumour feel free to publish the dementi Has no one ever taught Stahl that a dementi is an absolute no go in PR? No journailst believes a dementi. Ever. They go according to the rule, where there is smoke there must be fire. A dementi always achieves the opposite of what it wants to achieve. they should have let the journalists address it in the interviews and then reacted lightly if there is nothing to it. If it is true then it is better to get it over with quickly. This dementi launches an avalanche of publications. Stahl really needs to lose her job. As does Lacoste. Exactly Paca! Stahl's public denial actually made this more of a news story than ever before. Remember the palace denial that Caroline and Ernst August weren't separated. Thye even stated that the rumours are categorically false. Remember the palace and Lacoste denials about Eringer - they first claimed that Eringer NEVER worked for Albert and Albert never gave him money - they practically admitted in their response to their lawsuit by claiming he was paid enough that essential both of their earlier denials were lies. Recall, the palace even sued magazines for saying that Charlene was even the Prince girlfriend and that they weer living together. Now, obviously from their own interviews we know this to be a lie. The funnest part of Stah;'s denial is that the media is trying tio ruin the Prince's reputation. Good lawd these people are complete absolute morons if they actually believe that Albert has a good reputation to even ruin! I am sure right now all the dozens of interview Albert and Charlene have done ion the last month will not be pulled out and analyzed bit by bit to show that this is not a love match. I wouldn't be surprised now if some heads of state and royals start coming down with some sudden illnesses or pressing business that will disallow them to make the wedding. If you are a head of state and a royal, would you want to be a part of this farce by attending this bling-bling wedding?
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jun 28, 2011 9:37:09 GMT -5
This morning had no time to post. But it is on many internet sites. 'PlasticFace leaving Albert'. This is again a PR-stunt… because nobody cares about PlasticFace. And yet still a last attempt to ‘World News’ from PlasticFace-PR-team? ‘Yep, the perfect girl of South Africa that is perfect and is fully transforms herself in a try-to-be-the---PLASTIC--- ‘Grace’. Charlene wake up no one believed you! You are nothing but TRASH! ;D Go Home! And let the PARTY Start!
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jun 28, 2011 9:39:36 GMT -5
this "arrangement' between fatal and bitchstock has been has been a clusterf_ _k from the get go! regardless of the absolute truth, partial truth, etc ... these articles are FANTASTIC and so well deserved!
p.s. paca have you reserved your spot on the sidewalk for this circus? lol
p.p.s european media -- don't wuss out on this -- keep the articles coming
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jun 28, 2011 9:43:24 GMT -5
That's why there were holding hands so desperately in the last couple of weeks. She looked more like a naughty child that was dragged along by its father.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 28, 2011 9:51:29 GMT -5
As I stated before, of course Albert cheated and cheats on Charlene Wittstock - but this gold digging con artist is not going no where! Eringer made his mistake by spinning this story as Charlene is the victim - because he likes Charlene because she is just like him. He knows we are right about Charlene (we meaning the women he calls catty girls), but he will never acknowledged it because he then will have to admit that we are right about him also. Eringer in his attempt to destroy Albert and the media in their attempt to sell a non-existing love story all passed up on the really big story - how a pathological lying plastic surgery addicted high school dropout con a Head of State and a country into making her their country's new flagship - the new image of Monaco - bring me your uneducated , your liars, your trashiest look and we will worship you. You have my vote on this one. Although as I've said before, if Eringer makes Albert and his cronies p*** off then I don't care what he does. It might be good for Monaco if Albert steps down and takes his new bride with him. I like paca's theory that they planted the story themselves, but we know she did try to leave that summer of the yacht girls, so I would not put it past her to pull this now in order to renegotiate the pre-nup for more money. The girl is not stupid just uneducated.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 28, 2011 9:53:12 GMT -5
Voici is trying to play "holier than thou" by saying that they heard the rumors but decided to ignore them since it was all gossip. However, while they are insulting L'Express on one hand for publishing this story, they are practically publishing it also. Voici knows that unlike them, L'Express actually has detailed information with I am sure concrete sources to back them up. but even writing this article, Voici is acknowledging L'Express as a serious news magazine and should not easily be ignored. See below: Without concrete evidence or testimony other than that of the man who saw the man who saw the bear, we have chosen to overlook this rumor, arrived on Twitter this weekend with the tweet of a journalist France 3, have continued to investigate and bring you concrete evidence that could support the story.
This morning, L'Express has not taken such precautions and published a long paper containing the information that turned thin . After a moment of stunning audacity to even the unconsciousness of our colleagues, the fabric ignites: Atlantico evokes the trail of a media plan for Endemol orchestrated by the Rock to captivate the public who is interested not much to this union feeble beside that of William and Kate and Plurielles , in a paper since deleted , dared to mention an element of the case virtually ignored by L'Express.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jun 28, 2011 10:16:59 GMT -5
So i read the Palace denied officially that the Charlene didn't try to escape...if the Palace said so...it's probably because SHE DID try to escape! LOL this is so fun, is just like it's been mentioned before, like Caroline and Ernst....
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on Jun 28, 2011 10:32:30 GMT -5
Here's another law suit for Thierry Lacoste Le mariage d’Albert de Monaco sera-t-il annulé ?Coup de tonnerre sur le rocher monégasque !! Charlene Wittstock, la fiancée du Prince Albert de Monaco, qu’il doit épouser la semaine prochaine, serait sur le point d’annuler le mariage royal. La jeune femme aurait découvert des détails compromettants sur la vie privée de son futur mari… 24heuresactu.com/blog/2011/06/28/le-mariage-dalbert-de-monaco-sera-t-il-annule/
|
|
|
Post by refia on Jun 28, 2011 10:33:16 GMT -5
XD what a story...
But IF it´s true then I would have new respect for Charlene. But this story is nonsense IMO.
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on Jun 28, 2011 10:46:43 GMT -5
Something in the air... True or not, the whole thing will make the wedding look BAD. This is not good publicity for them, certainly not for Monaco. I would NOT want to be in her shoes if she does walk up to the altar.
|
|
|
Post by actarus on Jun 28, 2011 10:47:40 GMT -5
And if the Grimaldi curse would have been fulfilled with Charlene taking flight, their curse would have turned into Monaco's salvation.
|
|