|
Post by royalpauper on Jul 21, 2011 16:13:25 GMT -5
Are these two their newly adopted children? If they needed props why not inviting Jazmin and Alex to pose with them? That would have looked more natural...
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Jul 21, 2011 16:16:14 GMT -5
Can someone please tell me why this bimbo wears long gowns to these daytime events?To answer your question, MyAdia: How about swollen legs, water retention due to much of whatever? Or to warm to wear underwear? Or just WC fashion? Have you ever read any fairy-tale where Princess wears anything else but a long dress? ;D
|
|
|
Post by scout on Jul 21, 2011 16:21:20 GMT -5
I find it distasteful that they show up to promote the exhibit at the museum. Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't it weird to promote something that is mainly photos of yourself when YOU haven't done anything, but get married?
And who are these children? Albert's? Why do they use someone else's children as props?
Too bad they couldn't stay away, but it's more fun this way.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jul 21, 2011 16:33:42 GMT -5
Are these two their newly adopted children? If they needed props why not inviting Jazmin and Alex to pose with them? That would have looked more natural... This is the very dress she wore to the South Hampton, NY Fundraiser last year (about this time). So she's recycling - which is fine - only why the long dress? I guess she likes them. What can I say - I think she's an idiot. She doesn't look very happy - that' s for sure - slightly stunned. Maybe Al just introduced her to two more of his children that she didn't know about! The boy looks like he arrived on her watch! ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 21, 2011 17:16:15 GMT -5
She looks high. Maybe she is sedated. She is already tired of all the farse, but as she loves when she reads "PRINCESS Charlene" in the sugah loonie forums, and of course loves the jewels (hey, she is still expecting FatAl to buy a crown for Monaco and her, right? lol) she hangs in there.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Jul 21, 2011 17:35:21 GMT -5
I just done understand her fashion sense -- or lack thereof. The long dresses in daytime? I guess in her fantasy world, it's an O.K. thing. As for the "happy couple" holding hands ... at least our persistent nagging and complaining did something for them!
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 21, 2011 18:16:22 GMT -5
So dense and it is low cut too like a cocktail dress or a beach dress. She does look a bit dazed too.
They look just deliriously in love!!! ROFL
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 21, 2011 19:58:04 GMT -5
"Love this new picture of Charlene in this pretty blue/green flower dress. The couple look very happy"
Typical sugar comment...you can find it in it's proper thread...
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jul 21, 2011 20:24:55 GMT -5
OMG she's FRIeD
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 21, 2011 22:31:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 21, 2011 22:37:51 GMT -5
"Love this new picture of Charlene in this pretty blue/green flower dress. The couple look very happy"Typical sugar comment...you can find it in it's proper thread... Emmeline, Charlene learned all her planed-photo-opp gimmicks from participating on these sugar boards. With her 12-year old intellect and mentality, she believes that she can stage certain photos as proof of their love and happiness. you didn't know - holding hands are absolute proof that a couple is happy and in love.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 22, 2011 0:26:23 GMT -5
?
Like her lips weren’t pumped enough...
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 22, 2011 0:58:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by donna on Jul 22, 2011 4:56:38 GMT -5
She looks high. Maybe she is sedated. I agree, exept the maybe. But I don't think it is the horrible Grimaldi people who are sedating her, but herself, for enabling her to go through this show with that disgusting man beside her. Someday her drug use will catch up on her, and I will be waiting with a "told you so".
|
|
|
Post by donna on Jul 22, 2011 5:00:47 GMT -5
I find it distasteful that they show up to promote the exhibit at the museum. Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't it weird to promote something that is mainly photos of yourself when YOU haven't done anything, but get married? And who are these children? Albert's? Why do they use someone else's children as props? Too bad they couldn't stay away, but it's more fun this way. For Albert it is quite normal to promote an exhibit about your mother, he does it all the time. So this is his new mother and of course he is promoting her, he just happens to be in some of the pictures. He has to thank the creator, of course, for his effort. And what better photo opportunity for the "happy" couple.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 22, 2011 6:51:49 GMT -5
no rings?
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 22, 2011 7:14:44 GMT -5
I was looking for the same thing>>>>>>
The more photos the more that flower dress looks like she is off to the beach. She wore it so she would stand out in the middle of the crowd.
And look odd...
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 22, 2011 7:51:26 GMT -5
The long dress with low cut (in front of children??), shoes (I had to search for them ) and then their hands together. You really do not need a lot of brain to know that this is over the top ridicules. Big Flop
|
|
|
Post by donna on Jul 22, 2011 10:39:03 GMT -5
The long dress with low cut (in front of children??), shoes (I had to search for them ) and then their hands together. You really do not need a lot of brain to know that this is over the top ridicules. Big Flop Vulgar - yes she was off to the beach when they grabbed her to go to yet another photo op.
|
|
|
Post by duchesscornflower on Jul 22, 2011 11:24:07 GMT -5
I find it distasteful that they show up to promote the exhibit at the museum. Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't it weird to promote something that is mainly photos of yourself when YOU haven't done anything, but get married? And who are these children? Albert's? Why do they use someone else's children as props? Too bad they couldn't stay away, but it's more fun this way. Maybe this is a royal tradition: www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/201107225810/kate-wedding-dress-display/
|
|