Board Will Be Closed to Visitors/Copyright Photos Sept 18, 2011 17:39:57 GMT -5
Post by sandsla on Sept 18, 2011 17:39:57 GMT -5
Anyways I agree with those who want this place to stay open. IMO a lot of recent articles have been greatly inspired by this forum and the info we collected, be it by registered users or the odd journalist cruising the net for info. If trashy and her flunkies don't like what they read here, then there are several options: don't read here or change what is being criticized. I recommend to put learning French on top of the list, preferably to the level that Maxima has managed to learn Dutch, which IMO is harder to learn then French.
The reason for stating it came from Eringer if it's posted here is to cover one's a**. He's a lightening rod for Albert and lawsuits.
I am sorry I wrote a giant reply here, I even lopped off some for another post ;D.
Yes Hibou you are right, that is what I meant, but also if people are going to read and take this guy seriously and post something he says seriously, which I have to say really still dumbfounds me. I was just saying posting something that is libel like he does ob his blog should be careful about repeating the same kind of libel remarks here as fact, people should be careful to protect themselves if their going to take Eringer's word as fact. In no way would I ever mean it to help out Eringer in anyway or give him some kind of credit . I was strictly speaking of Eringer because Albert is not the first guy to sue Eringer for libel and win! You can see just how seriously Forbes takes him . Hibou have you really ever done any research on this guy? Something not written by him? Do you know the trail that he has left. His wikipedia page reads just like a personal resume that has his fingerprints all over it . I really love the way he has shaped his history here--the actual facts that he doesn't bother to mention should clue people into what a con man he is. I just had a few minutes the other day to take a look at it because I thought someone may have included parts of the real story--I guess nobody thinks enough of him to bother. I can't tell you how much this guy reminds me of Charlene and his history is just as fictional. Hibou, you have to read the way he tries to state something. For instance in his wiki-resume he thinks it is important to include his high school year at Beverly Hills High ;D, but notice how he skims over his actual college names and experience? Notice the years he includes or more correctly doesn't? But then he goes on to say he did a graduate program from USC in the UK? He doesn't look like he even has a four year college degree, so how did he do a "graduate" program? He is careful nit to say he actually has a degree, but he implies it. My guess is he took a course abroad that is open to anyone for a sum of money through USC. I have plenty of these same type of courses on my own resume from places like Cambridge and Oxford, but it does not mean that I hold a degree from either of these colleges, nor do I pretend that it does on my resume, but you would be surprised at how many people latch on to things like that and act more impressed than they should be. This is how Eringer gets a way with stuff--he over states and over sells and people are eager to believe what he implies or his half truths about being connected to legitimate people, and people want to buy in. If he had a graduate degree, or a college degree, he wouldn't feel it was important to include his freshman High School year...or even his college degree if he even had one, on his wikipage? Is there a reason he should have a wikipage--just like Charlene full of self importance and willing to go on record with what is more than exaggerations about themselves? Look at how he mentions his job status w/o mention8ng the result or the trouble that always ensued after, or why he was fired from these jobs? Notice how he mentions that "MOST" of the "libel suits against him" were dropped. Read what his past employers or people he has dealt with have to say about him when you just dig a little? Read how he had a personal vendetta against some Santa Barbara sheriff or someone like that and how he tried to use that little Santa Barbara paper as his own personal blog to exact some vendetta on him much like he has been doing with Albert now. Eringer was promptly fired from the paper....wrongly of course? It was all in his sad story about being unjustly fired from the papaer? I am sure the SB courts were familiar with Eringer and knew what his lawsuit was about--you don't need to know his history to understand what the lawsuit is about--all you have to do is read it! That is if you can get through it! Hibou please read his lawsuit, expecially before someone had him try to clean it up? Keep in mind what the lawsuit is for, and ask yourself why he would risk looking like a moron to include that drivil that has no bearing on his case? It is not just diplomatic immunity that the case was dropped--Santa Barbara had "no jurisdiction", why would they? It is the same stupid thinking of Tamara? Eringer should be smart enough to know that, but he wants a megaphone and a way to embarrass Albert enough to not only get back at him but hopefully it is not worth Albert's trouble and money and easier to pay him off to go away, and that is why Albert's lawyer called it extortion--that is what any intelligent person would take it for. Eringer exploits everyone and that is what he uses to write his books after about by some unknown publisher. Why would anyone hire him to do spywork when he has done nothing but sing like a canary not only about what he has done, but he always greatly exaggerates his involvement and his own importance-he is forever patting himself on the back with every word he writes or every word out of his mouth....just like Charlene. This is a guy with a huge ego that jumps at anything that makes him feel important...just like Charlene? It is clear how much it meant to him to hold his little job title that someone gave him, or that he invented himself in Monaco. I am sure Albert and his people probably thought sure buddy whatever floats your boat to make yourself feel important--we'll even throw in a little badge for you to flash around. People who actually hold any importance do not need a badge ;D....if they're that important, people tend to know who they are? Obviously his little job working for Albert was VERY important to him, or it made him feel very important, and it has obviously been very painful for him to let go of that identy he had created for himself which sounds just like the women in Alberts life who start feeling entitled to the gravy train and refuse to leave when someone finally shows them the door, usually after they have more than worn out their welcome. Eringer had to be shown the door twice, and he still wouldn't leave. All the trouble he is causing Albert keeps him connected to Alberts's world just like Nicole tried to do? He would have been the first one pregnant if he could have managed it.
I really don't know why he would want to include the Forbes article as a feather in his cap, when they are making fun of him. I didn't read his version since I didn't trust anything annotated by him. He is hoping I guess that no one actually reads the article and will just remember seeing his name connected to Forbes and it will legitimize him in some way. Anyway I could fill up threads about why I think this guy is such a weasel and a low life, but people don't do their homework and they see his name attached to others in some way and on that alone they seem to want to give hims some legitimacy, until they find out about him what the last guy did? To me this is what Albert's responibility and libelity is here.