whitelilies2
Junior Member
I LOVE to follow this gang via my iphone as I travel. They are my second family! XoX
Posts: 93
|
Post by whitelilies2 on Nov 22, 2011 19:50:35 GMT -5
At least Kim K keeps it interesting. Her acting on her wedding Day was more believable then Pa&Cw. Oh that kiss at the altar is the typical movie kiss when 2actors do not want to get "to close". At least Kim and her Ex did a believable job. Even in the divorce procedures. It is more interesting than wannabe Barbie-Grace and "prince charming" Jmo
|
|
lilae
Full Member
Posts: 110
|
Post by lilae on Jan 1, 2012 16:06:20 GMT -5
I don't really know who is Kim K and I don't care. I'm not used with royals and not really interested in tabloids or royal weddins, royal babies, royal events. I came on Monaco board (blue forum, red forum... ) when I saw Charlene on french TV. (bal de la croix rouge monegasque 2006) I have friends in Monaco, I asked them about their opinion and so on. They were very buzzy trying to work "around GPrincier" They said to me, that were bored about Albert travelling too much, about him not able to rule. They didn't care about another gold digger near Albert because their country was the most important thing. They don't beleive anything about Charlene or Albert being able to restore Monaco's reputation, glamour or to go away with the economic crisis that we are going through. PR try to sell us a love story and a glamour story but you can't sell dust-love-glamour-tinpot prince or princess. There is a deep economic and financial crisis all over the world and in Monaco too. Don't forget that there are a lot of banks here. It's not Albert's fault, but for sure he was not able to have good advisors. People who you are partying with may be bad economists or decision makers. Charlene is nothing else than a middle swimmer who met a prince. This prince had childs, lovers and mistresses. She stayed around, kept sometimes her mooth closed, spoke sometimes to tabloids, (her or closed friends) She had nothing else but this man and his money... IMO, she's a fake princess, a fake body (now ;D) with no brain but an iron will.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jan 1, 2012 18:36:09 GMT -5
I don't really know who is Kim K and I don't care. I'm not used with royals and not really interested in tabloids or royal weddins, royal babies, royal events. I came on Monaco board (blue forum, red forum... ) when I saw Charlene on french TV. (bal de la croix rouge monegasque 2006) I have friends in Monaco, I asked them about their opinion and so on. They were very buzzy trying to work "around GPrincier" They said to me, that were bored about Albert travelling too much, about him not able to rule. They didn't care about another gold digger near Albert because their country was the most important thing. They don't beleive anything about Charlene or Albert being able to restore Monaco's reputation, glamour or to go away with the economic crisis that we are going through. PR try to sell us a love story and a glamour story but you can't sell dust-love-glamour-tinpot prince or princess. There is a deep economic and financial crisis all over the world and in Monaco too. Don't forget that there are a lot of banks here. It's not Albert's fault, but for sure he was not able to have good advisors. People who you are partying with may be bad economists or decision makers. Charlene is nothing else than a middle swimmer who met a prince. This prince had childs, lovers and mistresses. She stayed around, kept sometimes her mooth closed, spoke sometimes to tabloids, (her or closed friends) She had nothing else but this man and his money... IMO, she's a fake princess, a fake body (now ;D) with no brain but an iron will. Hi Lilae! Good to see you posting again! Thanks for your insight and info.
|
|
|
Post by bobolin on Jan 4, 2012 10:54:27 GMT -5
Lilae, you said something really true! She does have an iron will! Got to give her that.
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL!!! I am sooo excited about this year! It will be the year in which Caroline is going to take over :-) oh! I am sleep-typing ...
|
|
|
Post by angel1988 on Jan 8, 2012 10:50:06 GMT -5
Hey,
I'm new on here. I actually found out about this forum at the Fashion Spot, where I was looking at Charlene's thread.
I admit I'm primarily interested in fashion and contrary to most people on here, I do think some of Charlene's outfits are nice. I like some of her bustier gowns aand the bustier top she wore at the concert before her wedding. And I think that with her body type (very broad shoulders and tiny waist) that sort of dresses are the most flattering. I don't like everything she wears, but of all princesses I like her style most, together with Kate's and Charlotte Casirachi's.
I must also say that I don't think she needs to pay for her clothes, certainly not Akris. She might even get paid to wear it because she's famous and gets photographed a lot. That would explain why she almost never wears any other designers.
Also, it's really not the most expensive brand, it's still RTW, not haute couture. Charlotte Casirachi and her mother wear much more haute couture (Chanel). Not that I have anything against it, I LOVE Chanel. I can't help myself to think that Charlene simply never wears Chanel anymore because she has to pay for it, and she's too vain to pay for something another person gets for free.
Now, about her personality. I really don't know to be honest. I watched a part of the wedding on tv and thought she looked very sad and Albert barely looked at her. When he did, he seemed to command her. So I find it hard to see her as a dominating person. My first impression was that she loved him, but he was tired of her and only married her for his image, and that's why she was crying.
And the reason she did marry him, knowing he didn't love her, was to get a 'consolation price' (money and a title). And then she cried because she realised money doesn't make you happy. It helps, but she'll never have a 'real' boyfriend or husband, someone who really loves her.
Does anyone think this is a possible hypothesis?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jan 8, 2012 15:56:19 GMT -5
Not in view of what we know.
|
|
|
Post by donna on Feb 5, 2012 9:33:32 GMT -5
Not in view of what we know. I agree with Paca.
|
|
|
Post by countess on Feb 5, 2012 13:06:46 GMT -5
JMO she's a money grubbing wh..... concubine, always has been, always will be! they deserve each other
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Feb 5, 2012 18:38:35 GMT -5
Oh I wouldn't say we hate her. That's much too strong. No, I would say we find her to be unqualified for the job. After all if she got a job that suited her abilities, we wouldn't have much to say about her. Also it's not Charlene we are disappointed in, it's Albert for being so stupid. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Feb 5, 2012 19:16:28 GMT -5
She's unqualified and unwilling to do anything to correct this deficiency. It's her unwillingness which we find so offensive. The only thing she is willing to do is "go under the knife" ... :-[sad
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Feb 5, 2012 20:34:10 GMT -5
She's unqualified and unwilling to do anything to correct this deficiency. It's her unwillingness which we find so offensive. The only thing she is willing to do is "go under the knife" ... :-[sad Good point, and on that she is an expert!
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Feb 6, 2012 10:47:50 GMT -5
Not in view of what we know. I agree with Paca. Inside knowledge over the years! Correct.
|
|