Post by grimnir on Mar 18, 2012 14:38:23 GMT -5
Mighty interesting interview with marketing expert Martin Lindstrom. I only translated the royal bit.
Q: You are also brand advisor to an European royal house.
A: "I can't tell you which one, you understand. In our culture, royalty is the highest to aim for on the ladder of fame. But it doesn't happen on its own. Even a royal family is a brand, a posh brand, build up very carefully. And the royal image too is all about the delicate balance between fantasy and reality. A royal house may not be too haughty, because it gives the public the feeling the royals aren't theirs anymore. But being too approachable isn't good either. I've experienced it myself; the more time you spend with a princess, the more common she becomes. The brand crumbles so to speak. That is why interviews or royal visits seldom last more than 20 minutes. The distance has to remain in place. The magic has to be maintained. "
Q: This royal house had a brand issue?
A: "It had turned into nothing more than an advertising banner for the country. We thought up that this family should focus on promoting national values, unity and optimism. We sought new charities for the members of the royal house ans I looked for old rituals in the national history that could be revived. People are loyal and attached to brands that are surrounded by rituals. I am actually a big advocate of royal houses, especially in countries as Denmark and the Netherlands, where religious belief has crumbled. Here, especially, we want something to believe in. A royal house gives us a feeling of home and hope. A royal house represents a dream world.
Source: Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant, March 6, 2012. Translation by yours truly. Couldn't find the article online at the time or I would have posted a link.
So, which royal house is it? And why?
My money is on the Dutch somehow. A lot changed there in the nineties and zeros when the younger generation got married. They went from grey mice to prominence. Plus they are run like a tight business, professionally, look at the media code. Nothing comes out unless approved. They use everything and anything to gain and strengthen their sympathy and support. They give me that feeling of underhanded influencing that is also such a big part of marketing. And more of those things that he talks about in the interview.
Obviously not Albert and Co. They ended up with that Stahl woman.
Q: You are also brand advisor to an European royal house.
A: "I can't tell you which one, you understand. In our culture, royalty is the highest to aim for on the ladder of fame. But it doesn't happen on its own. Even a royal family is a brand, a posh brand, build up very carefully. And the royal image too is all about the delicate balance between fantasy and reality. A royal house may not be too haughty, because it gives the public the feeling the royals aren't theirs anymore. But being too approachable isn't good either. I've experienced it myself; the more time you spend with a princess, the more common she becomes. The brand crumbles so to speak. That is why interviews or royal visits seldom last more than 20 minutes. The distance has to remain in place. The magic has to be maintained. "
Q: This royal house had a brand issue?
A: "It had turned into nothing more than an advertising banner for the country. We thought up that this family should focus on promoting national values, unity and optimism. We sought new charities for the members of the royal house ans I looked for old rituals in the national history that could be revived. People are loyal and attached to brands that are surrounded by rituals. I am actually a big advocate of royal houses, especially in countries as Denmark and the Netherlands, where religious belief has crumbled. Here, especially, we want something to believe in. A royal house gives us a feeling of home and hope. A royal house represents a dream world.
Source: Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant, March 6, 2012. Translation by yours truly. Couldn't find the article online at the time or I would have posted a link.
So, which royal house is it? And why?
My money is on the Dutch somehow. A lot changed there in the nineties and zeros when the younger generation got married. They went from grey mice to prominence. Plus they are run like a tight business, professionally, look at the media code. Nothing comes out unless approved. They use everything and anything to gain and strengthen their sympathy and support. They give me that feeling of underhanded influencing that is also such a big part of marketing. And more of those things that he talks about in the interview.
Obviously not Albert and Co. They ended up with that Stahl woman.