|
Post by agentf on Oct 17, 2014 17:45:34 GMT -5
When will the 5 years be up? Anyone keeping track? There were rumors around the wedding that there's a marriage contract that CC has to stay married for 5 years and give birth to two kids before she's allowed to divorce or something like that. We don't have proof that this is really true though... IMO it's more than likely that there is a contract because royal families and the rich in general have always contracts to make sure that the ex-partner doesn't run away with all the money and the kids. Apart from that if PA is clever he makes sure that CC won't talk after a divorce. there was the article about the marriage blanche with 5 years, 2 kids via IVF. And I think there was a bonus for boys.... It pretty much fits, except they wanted a more prominent woman.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Oct 17, 2014 20:18:56 GMT -5
Well...i guess it would be in 2016? As they got married in 2011 and i suppose they would start counting from there...if there's any truth to it.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Oct 21, 2014 11:58:41 GMT -5
This site claims that St Charlene is expecting two boys...already guessing what it seems obvious?
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Oct 21, 2014 19:49:15 GMT -5
This site claims that St Charlene is expecting two boys...already guessing what it seems obvious? God the news are so slow! Meanwhile photo ops with her brother's baby is a missed opportunity to make CC appear more maternal IMO. Where's the Paris-Match Wittstock clan interview?! (half-seriously here)(maybe the broody Casiraghis is more like it)(I digress). I'm just curious as to why also no CC & her mother bonding more publicly about this whole maternity. It just all seems so dry and not a wished-for event, the way it's presented. I feel I want a refund on my royal news!? Lol
|
|
|
Post by tops on Oct 22, 2014 6:51:55 GMT -5
This site claims that St Charlene is expecting two boys...already guessing what it seems obvious? God the news are so slow! Meanwhile photo ops with her brother's baby is a missed opportunity to make CC appear more maternal IMO. Where's the Paris-Match Wittstock clan interview?! (half-seriously here)(maybe the broody Casiraghis is more like it)(I digress). I'm just curious as to why also no CC & her mother bonding more publicly about this whole maternity. It just all seems so dry and not a wished-for event, the way it's presented. I feel I want a refund on my royal news!? Lol With no reports of morning sickness and her looking so lofty, gives her the appearance of being a super human. you are right, where is lynette? maybe even the family can't keep a straight face about it! it's popular now for a trusted photographer to be granted a tender (intimate, revealing) pregnancy photo of the parents, but it won't happen. there is something so vapid and suspect.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Oct 22, 2014 16:38:00 GMT -5
This site claims that St Charlene is expecting two boys...already guessing what it seems obvious? God the news are so slow! Meanwhile photo ops with her brother's baby is a missed opportunity to make CC appear more maternal IMO. Where's the Paris-Match Wittstock clan interview?! (half-seriously here)(maybe the broody Casiraghis is more like it)(I digress). I'm just curious as to why also no CC & her mother bonding more publicly about this whole maternity. It just all seems so dry and not a wished-for event, the way it's presented. I feel I want a refund on my royal news!? Lol You are right. It's a clinical event and nothing more. In the meantime Kate is now back in action and the news will turn to her.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Oct 23, 2014 17:49:45 GMT -5
well, considering that she is barely pregnant, she is sporting quite a bump. And considering she has been vomiting these past weeks and always been extremely thin, I wouldn't be surprised to hear that she is expecting twins. The rumour is already out and the bookies have already restricted betting on twins due to suspicions of an insider bet. Anyways, should she have twins (and she is at the age women are more likely to conceive fraternal twins), they will absolutely upstage anything trashy is going to pop out. And she has already delivered a cute baby, so we can be fairly sure they would be cute too and the press would go completely gaga over them. No one would have a thought for trashys offspring except maybe in an afterthought. As they are likely to look like a trashstock, they will not be getting much press, like Claires kids (btw I think the Belgian kids are over all not that attractive, but who knows maybe they will look more interesting as they grow up) or the Danish twins, who are not drawing much attention either (Marys kids look pretty bland too, but her nephews are stunners). But in any case, Kate is out and about again showing off her bump, not hiding it, grabbing all the attention. And she is looking better and better, she clearly doesn't use botox and looks happy. Just like an expectant mother usually looks, if she is happy to be pregnant and things are going well. Not that sad thing trashy has been all these months...
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Oct 23, 2014 18:16:50 GMT -5
Considering that the two known illegitimates kids of Albert have taken after their mothers... maybe we can say the twins will be all trashtock look alikes. Which is not very promising for the good looking family of Monaco. But in 20 years they can have their first esthetic intervention...but if they are boys that wouldn't be that necessary.
George is drawning more and more attention and anything that Kate pops out will too. Imagine if it's indeed twins. Poor Trashy, karma will not give her a rest. Imagine if it's a girl. A new british royal princess versus two trashtocks baby boys...umm no, i still see Kate winning.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Oct 23, 2014 19:20:56 GMT -5
Take note that one of Trampy's more ardent admirers over on the Sugahs (no, it isn't MP) today suggested that perhaps Kate is wearing a prosthetic belly. Hmm ... think she's got the wrong Princess!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Oct 23, 2014 19:38:09 GMT -5
as if Kate needed that. She actually does have real sex with her husband and not via petridishes and seringes. She even had George naturally and not via c section as trashy will.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Oct 23, 2014 19:42:57 GMT -5
Considering that the two known illegitimates kids of Albert have taken after their mothers... maybe we can say the twins will be all trashtock look alikes. Which is not very promising for the good looking family of Monaco. But in 20 years they can have their first esthetic intervention...but if they are boys that wouldn't be that necessary. George is drawning more and more attention and anything that Kate pops out will too. Imagine if it's indeed twins. Poor Trashy, karma will not give her a rest. Imagine if it's a girl. A new british royal princess versus two trashtocks baby boys...umm no, i still see Kate winning. we also know that the trashstocks have dominant genes as all kids look like her dad and her brothers kid looks just like trashy. So they will probably inherit the moms looks and brains and have the misfortune of growing up in a loveless marriage. Just about like their mom, probably being pushed into sports and doping by both parents and maternal grandparents... a shame Rainier didn't live any longer to prevent this tragedy in the making....
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Oct 24, 2014 12:46:25 GMT -5
I think i haven't seen pics of her brother's kids yet. Anybody has any to see? Or where i could find them?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Nov 5, 2014 6:58:23 GMT -5
daddy trashstock talking again. Not sure if the reference fast and furious is a good choice... trashy mom will be there (well there were suggestions that she is the surrogate, so in that case she would have to be there and also I would understand why he doesn't want to be there as who wants to see his wife give birth to his grandkids?) interesting what he says about being strict. He does look the brute... www.bunte.de/monaco/charlene-von-monaco-ihr-vater-verpasst-die-geburt-der-zwillinge-108507.html
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Nov 5, 2014 11:47:49 GMT -5
Papa trashtock and his need of being in the media...fast and the furious. Was that supposed to be funny? So Lynette will be there... Him being strict must be the explanation as to why Charlene is so ambitious...
|
|
|
Post by tops on Nov 5, 2014 22:15:22 GMT -5
Papa trashtock and his need of being in the media...fast and the furious. Was that supposed to be funny? So Lynette will be there... Him being strict must be the explanation as to why Charlene is so ambitious... or why FatAL is so intimidated. (by all of them)
|
|
|
Post by tops on Nov 6, 2014 9:25:12 GMT -5
daddy trashstock talking again. Not sure if the reference fast and furious is a good choice... trashy mom will be there (well there were suggestions that she is the surrogate, so in that case she would have to be there and also I would understand why he doesn't want to be there as who wants to see his wife give birth to his grandkids?) interesting what he says about being strict. He does look the brute... www.bunte.de/monaco/charlene-von-monaco-ihr-vater-verpasst-die-geburt-der-zwillinge-108507.htmlwow, for Lynette to be carrying the precious booty is a very interesting idea!! i thought maybe Victoria S. but the Lynette involvement makes sense. how they ever got her off the sauce for 8 months so far was probably pretty tuff. hope it works. what a head-trip! a bit sick and twisted but "royals" will do anything to survive. I wonder if Charlie or Lynette will be attending (photographed at) the upcoming Monaco National Day on Nov. 19th?
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Nov 6, 2014 12:34:22 GMT -5
I expect trashy to be there, looking the martyr she wants her sugars to believe she is. I mean i think she might appear at the balcony directly skipping the church. But we'll see. I don't think will see Lynette on ND.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Nov 6, 2014 16:21:38 GMT -5
lynette has no place there and if she really is the surrogate as some have suggested way back (which could explain why there has been no sight of her for ages whilst the rest of the family went blabbing to the press), she couldn't show anyways. How would she hide that bump? And yeah trashy my skip the church since she is no real catholic anyways and all the other things she doesn't like and just show on the balcony. Of course if she doesn't in order to hide that she has no signs of pregnany in her face etc, her sugahs will put it down to her suffering etc... so either way the sugahs will put her on their shield...
|
|
|
Post by tops on Nov 9, 2014 14:12:41 GMT -5
lynette has no place there and if she really is the surrogate as some have suggested way back (which could explain why there has been no sight of her for ages whilst the rest of the family went blabbing to the press), she couldn't show anyways. How would she hide that bump? And yeah trashy my skip the church since she is no real catholic anyways and all the other things she doesn't like and just show on the balcony. Of course if she doesn't in order to hide that she has no signs of pregnany in her face etc, her sugahs will put it down to her suffering etc... so either way the sugahs will put her on their shield... i guess the entire palace and staff had to sign a vow of silence on her "pregnancy." I would love it if there was a sighting of her WITH OUT the "strap-on." And of course, no media about any morning sickness, like Kate. Unless she is truly a wonder woman. what a ruse. So 10 days to Monaco National Day and a possible public appearance! of course, the balcony is low enough to show "something" but the "strap on" would just be bigger.
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Nov 10, 2014 9:00:32 GMT -5
This whole thing has been quite weird to say the least. But isn't Lynette about the same age as PA - how could she be a surrogate at 55+?
|
|