|
Post by cm7007 on May 27, 2012 18:34:30 GMT -5
Do you think that people with that kind of money would care about what trashy is wearing? With caro some years ago maybe, but then again she wore and wears mostly established designers, as seem to do most women with that financial backing. Or they follow a designer that used to work for a big label and starts his own business. they know the designer, the designers know their clients. Seems like a safe business. In my experience, most rich people do not like to waste money. If they spend a fortune on clothes then they want their moneys worth. With Akris they are not getting it. they are getting dowdy, boring clothes. There is nothing new or exciting about them. It depends on which people with that kind of money you are talking about. There are SO many people today with huge amounts of money that don't have A CLUE about "good taste and real quality", and some of the females who gravitate to the men with big bucks today are uneducated, low class, boarder line call girls - if not actual call girls - that I'd say yes - unfortunately, there are plenty of women who may look to someone like Trashy as a guide. Look at the Kardasians and all these Beverly Hills, Atlanta Housewife type people (and that's just in the US.) This lets find and follow the lowest common denominator "movement" seems to be world wide. It's just horrible! It used to be if a man went to a call girl type, for the most part -unless he was an Al Capone type - he'd move heaven and hell to make sure he was never seen with, or associated with her. No more!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 27, 2012 18:06:17 GMT -5
This dress in currently in the window of the Beverly Hills SAKS FIFTH AVENUE. Saw it yesterday. Akris of course. (Don't like him much at all to begin with - now when I see his stuff I cringe!)
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 27, 2012 17:51:19 GMT -5
Doesn't she get these clothes "gratis"? that's usually how it works when you've agreed to wear the clothes everywhere - it's in exchange for the PR. Obviously Akris is just plain desperate for free PR - I guess he thinks at least his name is getting out there and now some people will buy his things just because they don't know any better and a "Princess" is wearing them. Why else would she be wearing ONLY Akris? My guess is Armani realized she was doing his brand more harm than good. And I bet she gave him hell because her wedding dress didn't get the response from the press and people that she hoped it would!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 26, 2012 20:18:20 GMT -5
More photos opps ... this time with the handicap Prince Albert II of Monaco and Princess Charlene visit the special tribune of handicap people association of Monaco on May 26, 2012 in Monte-Carlo, Monaco.Pic1: Closeup of the happy loving couple Pic2 ** Pic3 ** Pic4 ** Pic5: "Look how much we care about them, once a year we pose with the handicap at the Grand Prix Is it just me, or does pic one look like the shot has been photo shopped a bit to make the belly appear larger - looks touched up to me ... what do you guys think?
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 26, 2012 18:06:14 GMT -5
Oh dear, what happened to the cw & Stahl conspiring to get cw the princess job theory? Or was that someone on Eringer? That was a conclusion made by people because Stahl handled Albert's PR, especially all the wedding PR. But, I always believed a poster name Cote who stated in the beginning that Stahl was a professional who disliked Charlene and Albert's very public relationship with her. Also, Stahl's description about her first meeting of Charlene's in the book that she wrote about Albert shows a person who really disliked Charlene (you had to read between the backhanded compliment she gave her). Stahl immediately saw Charlene for who she really is - pure opportunistic trash. Stahl tried to get Albert to not allow Charlene to play Princess of Monaco all those years - and Charlene hated her for that. Stahl wanted Albert to mold his administration on the traditional tried principles and build a reign on sound governing principles that were good for Monaco. Albert (and especially Charlene) wanted to create a reign based on a glossy image campaign with a theme of a modern couple - hence all Charlene's babbling about modernization in everything that they were doing during the wedding. Eringer hated Stahl and he created a false impression of who Stahl was and what she was doing based on Albert's decisions. Also, Nicole and her sister headed a team of flunkies who roamed the message boards ranting about how Stahl and Charlene were in cahoots. I hate even mentioning them afraid they may come out of their holes that htey have crawled into. Here's a post with a photo of Albert and Caroline at Stahl's going away party
Here's a post with the Richard Kay article about inside information of why Stahl left - Charlene refused to accept Stahl's guidance and she created her own court to do whatever in the hell she wanted.Clearly, Albert should have listened to Stahl. But, Charlene (and her entire family and team of flunkies) won and actually Monaco has lost. Yes, but initially even though Stahl didn't like CW, she felt she would be better able to get things done her way with PA if she had this stupid woman with PA and not some smarter woman who could and possibly would lead PA in a different direction. Stalh believed she had a safer bet with CW and did everything she could to keep other women away. Unfortunately for Stahl she over played her hand and underestimated just how street smart and vicious CW is. Also, I'm sure CW had help from other more lethal sources - ie Russians.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 25, 2012 23:57:50 GMT -5
I heard from someone very politically connected that because of this PR nightmare Mr. Clinton's services will no longer be needed to help (at least publicly) with the re-election efforts. (Maybe it wasn't such an accident after all.)
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 25, 2012 23:49:48 GMT -5
She never looks like the same woman, and not in a good way? For someone who wanted to be famous, for the most part she is not even recognizale--she looks so different everytime you see her, that is if anyone is interested enough to be able to recognize her in the first place? Myadia I just saw your new video footage of Charlene. What is going on there? ;D Is she on drugs or what? I think that's refia's video. It's really great in slow mo! CW was being interview by someone in the palace I believe just before the wedding. refia said where it came from a few posts back.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 25, 2012 19:49:48 GMT -5
So first Bill has a snapshot with pornstars and then Sophie attends an event with a callgirl....MC at its best I guess. The place where Royalty and former presidents rub shoulders with hookers and mobsters.... Wonder why Sophie was there... That is curious. Odd I'd say. She seems so out of place. Her background is PR. Maybe The Queen told her to do something to help these two before they completely embarrass every Royal on the planet - especially since they no doubt will be in London for the Olympics!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 25, 2012 15:57:04 GMT -5
Again you can see the face life scars in her hairline by her temples. A good surgeon know how to hide that well! I absolutely love Charlene's shoe, but the dress (made from the same material as the Oscar gown) is drab and boring. Her hair makes her look even more like a man in drag. Her skin is just nasty looking. all that money ... and this is the results. I guess she thought going braless would make the entire outfit more exciting. Nope. AdminNote: Reduced length of quoted text
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 25, 2012 15:47:15 GMT -5
JMO FaTal only sees her from the back in bed anyway he barks assume the position, she gets down on all fours, it's over in 2 minutes and she goes and tries on designer clothes and he leaves and gets a rub down by the pool boy JMO JMO[/quote] JMO - but it's EXACTLY what I've always thought but never wanted to say 'cause it's really such a terrible image to have in ones head - so you're not alone in thinking this - and since so many of us have responded in kind, it leads me to believe there are thousands of people who think this as well. We're all just not that different!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 25, 2012 6:11:36 GMT -5
Oh I don't seen any difference between trashy and these 2. They are from the same tree. The only difference is that they are honest about what they do. Trashy isn't. I have more respect for prostitutes then I have for golddiggers. I just read an article recently about a golddigger and there really is no difference, they just label it differently. The porn stars actually "work" - it may not be what we would ever consider doing, but they do consider it work. Plus, they are genuine and honest about who they are, and what they do and have done in their lives. They have vastly more integrity, honesty and discipline than Ms. CW ever had, or has! As far as Pres. Clinton, he's just a big jerk and clearly has no common sense and doesn't seem to care to cultivate any. (Or he has such disrespect and anger at his wife he does these kind of things on purpose to hurt and humiliate her. Either way, it's sad.)
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 25, 2012 1:16:37 GMT -5
Y'all catch the herpes on Billy boys mouth?
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 24, 2012 18:29:14 GMT -5
actually I think in the gala pic it looks like her roots are showing even more then in the pics we saw.... It's a horrible photo.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 24, 2012 18:23:42 GMT -5
Do you think this may be the time she says she's had a miscarriage - tying it into her "exhausting trip to England for the Queen's jubilee" - therefore subliminally blaming it on The Queen ...? Or is it too soon for her to do this?
AdminNote: Fixed quotes
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 24, 2012 17:24:27 GMT -5
Refia - girl, I just love the video in your signature - THE REAL BITCHY CHARLENE! Really great video Refia! Wow - watching it in slow motion really makes on ask "what the hell is wrong with this girl"? Geez!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 24, 2012 17:20:25 GMT -5
Countess, Gerard Butler didn't even show...unless he really knows how to avoid the cameras. He would have been too big a name for this thing anyways. I guess all those Hollywood stars they were supposed to attract to Monaco - the explanation given by the suga loonies and flying flunkies why Albert and Charlene were going to the Oscars - didn't panned out! Wasn't Gerald Butler one of the people that Charlene name dropped - they were supposed to be watching some sporting event with him? Not sure. No, that was Russell Crowe who didn't show either. (not that he was mentioned to show.)
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 24, 2012 17:19:03 GMT -5
I just checked for amfar pics. It looks like some of last nights guests are there, but no Assbert and no trashy. Wonder if she wanted to go to amfar because there was greater chances of getting her pic taken and getting it into the magz and Assbert insisted that she would have to show in MC. So maybe they had a fight and Assbert went alone, someone had to be there to auction off that stupid carpet, and in return didn't allow her to go to amfar. She had to do this absolutely silly shake hands with the security instead. I wonder if they are forcing her now to do more jobs in MC, the ones that don't gather much press and she doesn't want that. It'll be fun to see her having to do all of these things, which she hates an Assbert going away, leaving her to do the homefront on her own. Guess what her humour will be like then. Something definitely happened that caused the change of plan of Charlene not attending. Every last one of the press releases stated that Albert and Charlene plus other family members were going to be there. They even discussed that Albert and Charlene would oversee the auction of their wedding carpet. Hey, did y'all notice the piece of the infamous wedding carpet in the backdrop of the Bill and the porn stars. Good lawd this cannot get any better (well, it would be if Al was posing with the porn stars). IN the Monaco Matin article, it was predicted that the carpet should fetch around 50 000 euros/$60,000 (I forgot the exact range that they mentioned) and a personal tour of the palace by Albert and Charlene was also thrown in. IF the carpet would have fetched a lot, I am sure it would have been headlined news. I wondered what the going price was and what flunkie bought it. Should we take bets on whether the carpet shows up in a porn film? That would be really rich! ;D ;D ;D I'm only half joking here! I can just see it now several pron stars rolling around that precious "wedding carpet" doing it every which way one can imagine! Wonderful!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 24, 2012 16:47:02 GMT -5
Unless Clinton posed with the women knowing that they were porn stars, I don't blame Clinton. I blame Albert and the organizers of this gala. Public people pose all the time with guests at events. Should they ask for references , resume and a background check before they take a photo with guests? Albert should not have invited porn stars to this gala if they want to claim it as an elite event. But it seems that Monaco is really desperate to fill spaces and they will take just anyone! This just par for the course of where Albert has taken Monaco - the Charlenification of Monaco. I agree. No matter what side of the aisle one is on politically, it's not Clinton's fault. It's fair to assume when you have a former President of the US speaking at an event, the guests will be of a certain stature, but porn starts at a gala like that? Just when you think it can't get lower, Albert and his fools manage to dig a hole and lower the bar farther down the well. JMO. Agree. As far as I'm concerned Monaco just slapped the US in the face! Clinton, while he is no longer The President, STILL represents the US, and PA and his "people" should have taken the necessary steps to ensure everything would go smoothly and proper protocol would be honored. Not to mention his wife is the CURRENT Secretary of State of the US! (Hilary is going to be really pissed!) Just horrible for all of them. (Except the porn stars! The hit the PR jack pot for them. )
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 24, 2012 3:16:59 GMT -5
Yikes! It's worse than I thought it would be! No one of real note showed - not even for Pres. Clinton. I'm really shocked at that. Goes to show just how damaged Monaco has become since the (joke) "Wedding of The Century"! ;D I can just hear CW complain about how nobody is coming to "her party" so she's not going either! OMG TMZ has just posted a photo of Bill with two porn stars. How degrading but oh so Monaco these days! Mother of God! Just unbelievable!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 23, 2012 19:48:20 GMT -5
Wow, the Con artist doesn't even bother to show up. Did she really skip the gala? It was boys night out Yikes! It's worse than I thought it would be! No one of real note showed - not even for Pres. Clinton. I'm really shocked at that. Goes to show just how damaged Monaco has become since the (joke) "Wedding of The Century"! ;D I can just hear CW complain about how nobody is coming to "her party" so she's not going either!
|
|