|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 8:25:12 GMT -5
Good lawd people Strabuck's latte are expensive and yo are making me spit up all my coffee! This is hilarious, I haven't clicked on the article yet - but Paca,you have to be kidding that they stated that. LOL nope they wrote that. Note that 9/11 and the Berlin wall are level 8 so the freed French journalists are on 4 in France and 1 in the rest of the world, but that is only because they are journalists. if they had been French plumbers they would have been on level 2 And here comes the Monaco part: L’affaire Georges Tron se place également au niveau 2, en étant très charitable, à la même hauteur que le prochain mariage de Monaco, sauf si Charlène se barre en courant en pleine cérémonie. Là, on passerait au niveau 3, à condition qu’elle balance sur un site Internet sud-africain les éventuelles turpitudes du prince Albert. She would pass on level 3, but under the condition that she dishes on ALbert on an SA internet site ;D and in case you are not aware who George Tron is: he was secretary of public affairs, before he tripped over a private one en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Tron
|
|
|
Post by khillaree on Jun 30, 2011 8:30:03 GMT -5
leplus.nouvelobs.com/contribution/156085;pourquoi-vous-aimeriez-tant-que-charlene-ait-voulu-fuir-monaco-et-albert.htmlPourquoi vous aimeriez tant que Charlene ait voulu fuir Monaco et Albert L'Express annonce sur son site que le mariage monégasque est en péril et vous voilà tout frétillant, avide d'assister à l'annulation rocambolesque d'un mariage princier. Mais peut-on pour autant qualifier votre attitude de voyeuriste ? Sélectionné et édité par Daphnée Leportois Nous ne savons pas ce qui se passe dans la tête de Charlene Wittstock. Donc difficile de savoir ce qui pourrait motiver une annulation des noces à la dernière minute. Il est d'ailleurs aussi périlleux de dire si cette information est vraie. Que ce soit une rumeur ou pas, ce qui paraît le plus intéressant est de noter l'impact de tels événements sur l’imaginaire de chacun. Charlene Wittstock et Albert II de Monaco Cet intérêt qui frise la fascination, montre combien les célébrités concentrent pour le commun des mortels comme nous, toute la grandeur mais aussi tout le tragique de l'existence. Leurs malheurs ont même quelque chose de grandiose. Les célébrités traversent à la puissance cent, nos joies comme nos malheurs. Nous vivons ainsi à travers elles, ce que nous vivons mal, pas assez ou pas du tout. Elles sont des modèles puissants d'identification. Et princes et princesses ont été pour à peu près tout être humain, dans l'enfance, des personnages imaginaires auxquels on a aimé s'identifier et qui nous ont aidés à grandir. L’intérêt mondial suscité par la moindre rumeur les concernant montre le puissant besoin humain de rêves, de légendes et d’histoires. Les célébrités, bien au-delà de la réalité, sont ainsi des écrans aux projections des fantasmes du public. Une idée a déjà été discuté au sujet de la relation du Prince Albert avec Charlene Wittstock : en l'épousant, il retrouverait sa mère qui lui ressemblait étrangement. Or se marier avec sa mère, cela porte un nom : ça s'appelle le "complexe d’Œdipe". Voilà peut-être pourquoi l'on frissonne en imaginant un inceste prochainement retransmis à la télévision. Quant à la rumeur que Charlene Wittstock va tout arrêter, c'est aussi le rêve de beaucoup. Tout plaquer d'un seul coup, se ficher des conséquences, même quand le monde entier vous attend au tournant, c'est farouchement téméraire, bien différent des petits défis que l'on se lance dans nos vies monotones. Cela aurait été un geste de liberté et d’absolu, terriblement romantique ! Nous leur laissons faire ce que nous n'osons pas, mais en contrepartie nous leur demandons de pouvoir les regarder, et tout savoir. Ces rebondissements font partie des scénarios de films et des légendes dont nous avons besoin. Ce serait un incroyable coup de théâtre, comme les tragédies grecques savaient en réserver. En fait, c'est une sorte de conte de fée (les mêmes que l'on nous racontait avant de s'endormir) qui s'écrit sous nos yeux, en direct live, relayé par les papparazzi et les journaux à scandales. Éric Corbobesse & Laurent Muldworf, auteurs de Succès Damné (Fayard).
|
|
|
Post by khillaree on Jun 30, 2011 8:32:33 GMT -5
tvmag.lefigaro.fr/programme-tv/article/people/62806/albert-stephanie-un-lien-fusionnel-.htmlAlbert-Stéphanie : « Un lien fusionnel » Spéciale mariage princier sur le Rocher samedi sur TF1 avec Jean-Claude Narcy Tags : Albert de Monaco , Charlene Wittstock , TF1 Noces princières à Monaco À voir le 02/07/2011 à 16h00 surCe programme TV de TF1 Quatre jours avant le mariage du prince Albert et Charlene Wittstock, la princesse Stéphanie a accepté de répondre aux questions de Jean-Claude Narcy. Le journaliste raconte cette rencontre, dont une partie seulement a été diffusée dans le JT hier soir. L'intégrale sera proposée en exclusivité durant la spéciale de samedi. Jean-Claude Narcy : avez-vous senti chez elle un peu d'appréhension ?Elle n'en a aucune. Elle ne pense qu'à une chose : le bonheur de son frère. Elle m'a répondu avec beaucoup d'émotion, y compris sur l'actualité. Je l'ai trouvée très touchante et on sent bien qu'il existe un lien fusionnel entre elle et Albert, qu'elle admire. Elle le considère comme un citoyen du monde, très engagé dans la protection de la planète et, comme elle, dans la lutte contre le sida. Elle m'a confié enfin que, chez les Grimaldi, le fait de donner aux autres était inscrit dans les gènes. Comment réagit-elle aux dernières rumeurs de tensions entre son frère et Charlene ?Elle répond simplement que ce n'est pas la première fois, qu'il y en a toujours eu sur le Rocher, qui suscite souvent des jalousies. Elle se dit très triste face aux rumeurs même si elle y est habituée. S'est-elle impliquée dans l'organisation de cette cérémonie ?Elle ne s'implique aucunement, car elle pense que cela est l'affaire des futurs époux. Elle n'a pas voulu s'en mêler. D'ailleurs, elle n'a donné aucun conseil à son frère et se dit très complice de Charlene. Pourquoi ce mariage n'est-il pas célébré dans la cathédrale de Monaco ?Stéphanie m'a expliqué que, compte tenu du fait que ses parents sont inhumés en ce lieu, il n'était pas pensable sentimentalement d'y associer un événement joyeux, comme ce mariage. Elle a aussi souligné que son frère souhaite apporter un vent de modernité sur le Rocher : il a donc préféré organiser une cérémonie en plein air pour les Monégasques et tous les spectateurs du monde entier. La robe, le diadème... A-t-elle pu surprendre quelques secrets du mariage ?Non, elle ne le souhaite pas parce qu'elle considère que Charlene a le droit d'offrir cette surprise à tout le monde au dernier moment. À savoir La principauté de Monaco s'apprête à vivre 48 heures de fête et d'émotion sur le Rocher. Au-delà de la présence de centaines de journalistes (près de 1 000 sont annoncés) et de nombreuses têtes couronnées, l'événement veut être également une immense fête populaire pour de nombreux Monégasques et touristes.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 8:36:06 GMT -5
LOOOOL the wedding an incest transmitted live on TV. NOw THAT is a good one.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 30, 2011 8:39:06 GMT -5
since when is a wife supposed to protect her husband.Yes she is goal orientated: she wants the title and the tiara. I suppose they had this interview before the runaway incident got public. I cannot wait until more truth is revealed about Charlene and this relationship. I wonder then what all the ass-kissers and mouth pieces who told us for years how wonderful and honest Charlene is and how in love Albert and Charlene are - will say then. Notice all the people blabbing how great Charlene is and how in love the couple is are Charlene's confidants. Charlene plays these people - she did to them what she tried to do to Pedro Almodóvar at the Rose Ball. In just a short time that she me him, she was telling him how much she loves Albert. Pedro immediately saw straight thorough Charlene's little con game - unlike these other idiots.
Lagerfeld: "Charlene will protect Albert" THURSDAY, 30TH JUNE 2011 Karl Lagerfeld is convinced that Charlene Wittstock is the right woman for Prince Albert II. "Charlene is sincere, honest and unerringly, they will protect Albert," said the fashion designer of the French magazine "Point de Vue." The prince of Monaco could trust the 33-year-old South African woman completely. While some media talk about a marriage of convenience between Albert and Charlene, Lagerfeld is of the opinion that it is true love. "No one forces them to marry each other except their love. The two know exactly what they are doing, "added the Frenchman choice, one of the guests to the wedding.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Jun 30, 2011 8:57:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 8:57:23 GMT -5
How sad that Lagerfeld has fallen this low. He's lost his edge and his touch. At least Armani has kept his mouth shut. he knows the whole stinking truth.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 9:00:23 GMT -5
personally I think that KL has lost his marbles. I have seen several interviews with him and he sounds more and more bizarre. He actually thinks that the male model he is promoting is intelligent. If you look into the guys eyes you can tell that not all lights are on. And THAT I find highly unattractive. I don't think the guy is better looking then a lot of others you can see, but then again KL lives in a world of its own which has nothing to do with the real world. He is amusing to listen to uf you don't take him seriously, but he is not a great intellectual himself, so I don't give his opinion that much weight. KL is a master of self promotion. That's how he got were he is. But a lot of things he does, like his photography is not as good as he thinks. Good enough to sell things and for his purpose, but they are no art, as he would like them to be considered.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Jun 30, 2011 9:00:53 GMT -5
This is a very common tactic in crisis communications -- line-up 3rd party people to speak on your behalf. We will know how desperate they really are when some combination of Caroline, Stephanie, Casiraghi Trio, and/or members of Kelly family make public statements about these two "love birds."
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 9:09:23 GMT -5
This is a very common tactic in crisis communications -- line-up 3rd party people to speak on your behalf. We will know how desperate they really are when some combination of Caroline, Stephanie, Casiraghi Trio, and/or members of Kelly family make public statements about these two "love birds." I missed the Kelly family statement! Good God this just confirms that the whole story is true. We know the palace PR people are idiots. All they had to do is have Albert with Charlene standing next to him smiling away issue a brief statement and take no questions. Posing a few moments before he reads his statement. How dumb are these people. Instead LaCoste and Stahl have succeeded in pouring gasoline on the fire. If they wanted media attention, they got it. I suppose Albert and Charlene are now very happy that they FINALLY got media exposure -- but at what cost. The next interview she gives she's going to have to explain and saying people are jealous is not going to cut it. I want Katie Couric to do the interview. She'll cut her down to size quickly. Of course the palace won't grant that one!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 9:13:09 GMT -5
she won't be giving any interviews for quite some time, unless people are willing to stick to the script.
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jun 30, 2011 9:26:30 GMT -5
bourgeois mean white trash in Texan LOL boy the writer NAILED IT! ;P this weekend in Monaco for the royal wedding BETWEEN Prince Albert and the bourgeois former swimmer Charlene Wittstock. for some reason it won't link
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 9:30:18 GMT -5
she won't be giving any interviews for quite some time, unless people are willing to stick to the script. I think once she's got the tiara on her head she's going to have to answer at some point even if it's curbside like Lindsey Lohan. I don't think this story is ever going to be buried. It's now permanently inked next to their wedding date.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Jun 30, 2011 9:30:23 GMT -5
This is a very common tactic in crisis communications -- line-up 3rd party people to speak on your behalf. We will know how desperate they really are when some combination of Caroline, Stephanie, Casiraghi Trio, and/or members of Kelly family make public statements about these two "love birds." I missed the Kelly family statement! Good God this just confirms that the whole story is true. We know the palace PR people are idiots. All they had to do is have Albert with Charlene standing next to him smiling away issue a brief statement and take no questions. Posing a few moments before he reads his statement. How dumb are these people. Instead LaCoste and Stahl have succeeded in pouring gasoline on the fire. If they wanted media attention, they got it. I suppose Albert and Charlene are now very happy that they FINALLY got media exposure -- but at what cost. The next interview she gives she's going to have to explain and saying people are jealous is not going to cut it. I want Katie Couric to do the interview. She'll cut her down to size quickly. Of course the palace won't grant that one! Hibou -- no one from the family has made a public statement about this fiasco. I suggested that we will know the depth of the desperation when/if they do make a statement. Sorry if I was misunderstood.
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jun 30, 2011 9:32:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 9:32:18 GMT -5
I missed the Kelly family statement! Good God this just confirms that the whole story is true. We know the palace PR people are idiots. All they had to do is have Albert with Charlene standing next to him smiling away issue a brief statement and take no questions. Posing a few moments before he reads his statement. How dumb are these people. Instead LaCoste and Stahl have succeeded in pouring gasoline on the fire. If they wanted media attention, they got it. I suppose Albert and Charlene are now very happy that they FINALLY got media exposure -- but at what cost. The next interview she gives she's going to have to explain and saying people are jealous is not going to cut it. I want Katie Couric to do the interview. She'll cut her down to size quickly. Of course the palace won't grant that one! Hibou -- no one from the family has made a public statement about this fiasco. I suggested that we will know the depth of the desperation when/if they do make a statement. Sorry if I was misunderstood. My fault -- reading too quickly! Vicky must just want to disappear! This is not what the McNeil family would want. I was fond of her Father and he would just cringe at this stuff.
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jun 30, 2011 9:39:53 GMT -5
excellent and snarky, they got in the 70 million for a wedding, used pre plastic surgery pictures, didn't show flattering (guess they're hard to find) shots of her. overall IMO PR FAIL
|
|
|
Post by khillaree on Jun 30, 2011 15:24:40 GMT -5
www.purepeople.com/article/albert-de-monaco-sa-fiancee-charlene-wittstock-a-fugue-pour-fuir-le-mariage_a82667/1"Sur l'Illustré.ch, la journaliste Françoise Boulianne-Redard publiait dernièrement un brûlot hélas plein de sens, intitulé Charlene, princesse de la tristesse, et débutant ainsi : "Il y avait un moule pour fabriquer une épouse à Albert II de Monaco, l'ex-nageuse sud-africaine s'y est laissé enfermer. Qu'a-t-elle gagné? Un futur mari vieillissant et coureur, une principauté aussi glamour qu'un supermarché moscovite et un mariage marketing." I love these sentences : "What did she win ? A future ageing husband and a runner, a principality so glamorous as a Moscow supermarket and a marketing marriage."
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Jun 30, 2011 15:46:39 GMT -5
Thanks for finding and posting this khillaree! ;D WOW - if I where her I would run too...
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 30, 2011 19:32:51 GMT -5
I missed the Kelly family statement! Good God this just confirms that the whole story is true. We know the palace PR people are idiots. All they had to do is have Albert with Charlene standing next to him smiling away issue a brief statement and take no questions. Posing a few moments before he reads his statement. How dumb are these people. Instead LaCoste and Stahl have succeeded in pouring gasoline on the fire. If they wanted media attention, they got it. I suppose Albert and Charlene are now very happy that they FINALLY got media exposure -- but at what cost. The next interview she gives she's going to have to explain and saying people are jealous is not going to cut it. I want Katie Couric to do the interview. She'll cut her down to size quickly. Of course the palace won't grant that one! Hibou -- no one from the family has made a public statement about this fiasco. I suggested that we will know the depth of the desperation when/if they do make a statement. Sorry if I was misunderstood. Silence is golden! That says everything!
|
|