|
Post by countess on Jun 18, 2011 15:10:26 GMT -5
Sandsla, I gave up there a long time ago. I only go over there once in a while to view and if need be to defend the few posters remaining who try to be objective about Charlene. You know you can always :-*post here! We aren't the ones with the rose-colored glasses. You have also joined a very elite club -- there are quite a few people here who have been banned, so you are in good company! i'm in the boat too, but my trangression was against...wait for it....HEATHER MILLS ;D i said i hope she found the anna nicole highway when she was in LA. YEA i think it's funny too they're delusional and on the palace payrolls over there, pathetic and i really wish on bad days i had some of what they're on it ain't just koolaid JMO
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 18, 2011 17:08:58 GMT -5
Sandsla, I gave up there a long time ago. I only go over there once in a while to view and if need be to defend the few posters remaining who try to be objective about Charlene. You know you can always :-*post here! We aren't the ones with the rose-colored glasses. You have also joined a very elite club -- there are quite a few people here who have been banned, so you are in good company! i'm in the boat too, but my trangression was against...wait for it....HEATHER MILLS ;D i said i hope she found the anna nicole highway when she was in LA. YEA i think it's funny too they're delusional and on the palace payrolls over there, pathetic and i really wish on bad days i had some of what they're on it ain't just koolaid JMO I rarely went over there--my post there are usually intended for just a few posters there anyway, and I very stupidly let myself take the bait from some ignorant women and let myself get dragged in where I thought I could actually talk some sense to these women women who promote what is most commonly known as escort service or prostitution--women who see nothing wrong with it! ;D How stupid can you be to try to bring up the idea of integrity in any way? Anyway I'll leave Albert's PR team to it over there, I just don't understand what they think they gain from the people who read and post there, especially since one can only come to the same conclusion, how else could one attribute the obvious insane bias to this girl that the people of Monaco find offensive! Somebody's deep inside someone's pockets! No other "royal" there has ever been treated, protected, and coddled the way this silly girl has, That forum has treated this dumb golddigger like she's the second coming of Christ from the moment she showed up with Albert in Turin. She will always be an ignorant wanna-be no matter how much money Albert throws at her or what title he gives her--people are not so stupid that they can't tell what has been going on there and what is going on now!! The self promotion of this wedding production is embarrassing. Years ago we should have seen how obvious it was and what was happening there....Remember Charlene has always been nothing more than a campaign and she is still the same "hard sell" campaign that she has always been this entire six years of promoting her and now the millions they are throwing at this farce of a wedding "starring Charlene Wittstock" it is still the same huge campaign failure of the biggest kind that it always has been. Total insanity. I really don't care anymore, I wasn't going to post after the end of the month anyway. The funny thing is those posters there could not do more damage to her, showing just what kind of people this woman attracts, all of the same ilk. Thanks myadia for transferring the post, I was actually going to suggest it. I didn't knowif it belonged here or the free press and Charlene Wittstock . Also I agree I am never afraid of what I say, because I know what I write is true, and unless they want to open up the can of worms that they are working over time trying to hide--I don't think they want to expose all very publicly. Wouldn't you just love to hear who was the source who went to the tabloid press with how much money Albert was paying Charlene for services rendered each month on top of her living expenses! i would like to hear the courts ask who their source was....that is why Albert hoped it would just go away. Every time someone mentions this, that person gets banned or the post disappears. Do you still have that info about Charlene getting 40,000 euros a month? I can't remember what tabloid it was, where they spelled it out? Anyone else remember, I would really like to read the details again and see it posted here.
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jun 19, 2011 16:33:40 GMT -5
I do not think there is a free press when it comes to WC and PA.
Once in a while I do comment on articles in "Bunte". My comments usually sarcastic stay. But one comment got deleted last week. It stayed online maybe twenty minutes. I commented on that "how mean those bloggers are that tear Charlene up". (Refia quoted that post.)
My comment that did not survive bunte censorship was:
"Unce upon a time there was a french revolution that took the hypocritical mask from the royals. In the process some heads rolled. To prevent that from happening again the royalty of the world keeps magazines like bunte and co. Now the unroyal commoners are beating each other up to support their favourite royal. "
It makes you wonder why they deleted that post.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 19, 2011 16:43:47 GMT -5
Elektra, that's funny. I think the part about heads rolling probably scared Bunte. Actually, Bunte has been pretty fair with allowing negative comments about Charlene to be posted. That wasn't always the case. I will post a passage that was published in Point de Vue and it's an indication that the tabloids and glossies who normally knocked each other over to kiss Charlene's flat ass will start removing heir lips off her ass once she becomes Princess. I think all the negative press and their readers' disinterest are have finally made them realize that perhaps there is more money in printing the truth about Charlene and this relationship instead of that fairytale dribble they have been feeding people for the last six years.
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jun 19, 2011 17:14:23 GMT -5
MyaDia, you are probably right.
It would be nice if they say why they delete posts. After all I referred to a historic event and I compared the past with the present.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 15, 2011 10:20:25 GMT -5
I'm so fed up with this spanish forum...with a newbie, actually. A Charlene newbie fan. He writes:
"In five or six years, there's nothing dark in her past, there's no scandals, princess Charlene is not new in this and is very different to many princesses that did have scandals, that's why i think Albert II knew and choose well. It doesn't matter how many make efforts to talk bad about her, there's nothing and she is only criticezed for having done surgeries, which isn't a bad thing, it's not new, it's not a scandals, it is good because she dedicates her time to be beautiful and glamourus (give me a break, please!). The princess is correct, discrete, beautiful. There's nothing wrong with her. Many want to talk bad about her wants to say mean gossips about her but they can't because there's nothing wrong with her, seek it where you seek it"
"Princess Charlene is discrete 33 year old woman, many of the crown princess of Europe have scandals, have been divorced, have had lovers, had scandls with drugs, had kids of a previous relationship, of their fathers have been involved in corruption (he says that for maxima, mette marit, letizia...) But Princess Charlene is clean, people that don't like her want to seek for something dirty about her and they don't find anything because there's nothing. And she is smart because i can't think of a sovereign without being smart. I insist, a surgery is nothing wrong in this times, there are lots of queens and princesses that have done that and is not bad, is to improve their image. Keep open threads about bad things of Princess Charlene, you won't find anything, because there's nothing dirty about her, seek it where you seek it"
I want to punch him in the face after all that crap.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 15, 2011 10:34:43 GMT -5
Emmeline, I moved your post in this thread which was started by Margarita because of her frustrations about how others express their opinions about Charlene and the lack of freedom on certain boards to express a negative opinion about Charlene.
The Charlene-doesn't-have-any-scandals song was one started by Charlene and continued to be sang by Charlene and her special group of flunkies who roamed the Internet for any negative opinions of Charlene - in order to shut them up. The problem is that this team of dimwits - which are the only type of people who worship this woman - have a very narrow definition of the word SCANDAL. To this day, six years later, Charlene still believes that she is better than most European princess and she is perfectly scandal free. This know-NOTHING, DO-NOTHING, own-NOTHING high school dropout is too dumb to see the obvious flaw in her logic - a woman who prostituted herself in Monaco for 5 years before Albert decided to marry her.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 15, 2011 10:38:11 GMT -5
Emmeline, I moved your post in this thread which was started by Margarita because of her frustrations about how others express their opinions about Charlene and the lack of freedom on certain boards to express a negative opinion about Charlene. The Charlene-doesn't-have-any-scandals song was one started by Charlene and continued to be sang by Charlene and her special group of flunkies who roamed the Internet for any negative opinions of Charlene - in order to shut them up. The problem is that this team of dimwits - which are the only type of people who worship this woman - have a very narrow definition of the word SCANDAL. To this day, six years later, Charlene still believes that she is better than most European princess and she is perfectly scandal free. This know-NOTHING, DO-NOTHING, own-NOTHING high school dropout is too dumb to see the obvious flaw in her logic - a woman who prostituted herself in Monaco for 5 years before Albert decided to marry her. Oups, sorry, i totally forgot about this thread. And you are right MyaDia, but it's so frustrating! You know, if i say this, that she prostituted herself for 5 years, they will want proof. What's a better proof that the result she got! But this people is so dumb... I would love the press to say something about her London adventures...anyone know anything else about this?
|
|
|
Post by countess on Aug 15, 2011 10:41:44 GMT -5
no idea about her past adventures but i'm on record, i bet her past makes heather mills look like a good person. it'll come out when it will make the most money for the secret holders JMO she's trash nothing would surprise me
|
|
|
Post by scout on Aug 15, 2011 11:44:04 GMT -5
no idea about her past adventures but i'm on record, i bet her past makes heather mills look like a good person. it'll come out when it will make the most money for the secret holders JMO she's trash nothing would surprise me I agree, Countess. The only reason that Charlene is "scandal-free" is simply that the press hasn't reported it yet. But with the runaway bride story going, the people who know the truth about this scam artist are going to come forward and start talking and the press is prepared to hear it and report it.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Aug 15, 2011 13:12:12 GMT -5
It doesn't matter if she was a virgin at 33. MyAdia is correct. This woman, who I've met and spent a bit of time with over a dozen times - is just plain intellectually dumb. And she has done absolutely nothing to improve herself except on a physical level and at that it is questionable just how much she has improved herself. She hasn't improved herself on an intellectual level at all - mostly because she is not intelligent enough to actually learn anythi book wise. If she wasn't such a con artist I'd feel sorry for her. She just doesn't have whatever it takes to be able to learn much of anything except how to hold tight and allow herself, and now her family, to be completely degraded so she can make a lot of money. And for her and them - everything is about having money. She's not smart enough to realize money can only give you so much happiness - and many times it only brings pain and unhappiness. for me, this behavior that she and her family have exhibited is a far grater scandal than ANYTHING any of the other Princesses - have done. IMO - You can't do worse than that.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 15, 2011 13:26:24 GMT -5
Thank you CM, I think my point was lost with others. You do not have to look in Charlene's past for scandals - this dumb as a rock con artists lived a SCANDALOUS life in Monaco slurping off of Albert for the last 5 years - and bragging about it! This is what Charlene and her dumb flunkis who roam the internet for her do not understand. Good lawd these people are too dumb for words. It's Charlene's present you idiots that is scandalous - regardless of her past!
|
|
cstone
Junior Member
Posts: 91
|
Post by cstone on Aug 15, 2011 22:17:57 GMT -5
imo her past isnt going to ruin her rep. because her rep isnt pure and she isnt well know or well liked so people dont care about her and her past
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 16, 2011 7:15:22 GMT -5
imo her past isnt going to ruin her rep. because her rep isnt pure and she isnt well know or well liked so people dont care about her and her pastThanks for reminding us about this CStone - I used to say htis in the beginning. Charlene clearly didn't realize this when she boasted all he time how much better press she got than Kate - Charlene's point was that she was better than Kate. Chalrene and her silly flunkies are too DUMB to realize that the press made a big stink about Kate not working was because the UK and William mattered to them. Trashlene is too stupid to realize that NO ONE cared about Albert, Monaco and her so the press didn't care that Albert was dating and most likely to marry (at that time) a dumb-as-a-rock know-NOTHING own-NOTHING do-NOTHING high school dropout living completely off of Albert. Charlene is so stupid and dumb too realize that if William was dating a high school dropout who lived in England completely off of him and could not speak the language of his country - the entire UK (and the commonwealth) would have been in an UPROAR! Charlene dear, the press didn't complain about you like Kate because they had higher standards for Kate. Frankly, you were not and are not worth it to them to look into your background or even keep track of all your statements from all your interviews. . The press thought you were good enough for Monaco. Albert and Monaco deserve someone like you.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 16, 2011 7:19:59 GMT -5
OMG! Emmeline, I just read your signature 10 Commandments - can you please post them in the thread - they are hilarious and so damn true! Really they are. Charlene is loving this that her flunkies (mainly family members and friends) who have built a monument of worship for her on The Royal Fantasies Forum. She really is loving it! This is what she lives for - silly things like that that.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 16, 2011 10:42:57 GMT -5
OMG! Emmeline, I just read your signature 10 Commandments - can you please post them in the thread - they are hilarious and so damn true! Really they are. Charlene is loving this that her flunkies (mainly family members and friends) who have built a monument of worship for her on The Royal Fantasies Forum. She really is loving it! This is what she lives for - silly things like that that. Thanks! I've been thinking is too huge to have it as a signature. What do you think? Is it ok to have it as signature? Here it is: The Ten Commandments of The Holy Church of Charlene:1-You will love Charlene above all things.
2-You will not take the name of Charlene in vain.
3-You will sanctify July 1st and 2nd as The Days of Charlene
4-You will honor Pa Wittstock and Ma Wittstock
5-You will not kill the illusion that Charlene creates as The Perfect Princess
6-You will not never, ever consider other Princess as The Perfect One
7-You will not steal Charlene moments to shine, if you ever have the time
8-You will lie and deliriously defend Charlene above all things.
9-You will not let a sugar brother or sister to fall in reasonable hands.
10-You will not desire everything Charlene has: she is the only One that deserves it.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 16, 2011 10:54:44 GMT -5
Emmeline, not the image again, but the actual words. Can you post just the words from your image, please.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Aug 16, 2011 11:15:44 GMT -5
Emmeline you have outdone yourself. Just brilliant. karma and then some!
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 16, 2011 11:27:51 GMT -5
Thanks! MyaDia, i've just modified my previous post
|
|
|
Post by smt on Aug 16, 2011 11:55:14 GMT -5
OMG! Emmeline, I just read your signature 10 Commandments - can you please post them in the thread - they are hilarious and so damn true! Really they are. Charlene is loving this that her flunkies (mainly family members and friends) who have built a monument of worship for her on The Royal Fantasies Forum. She really is loving it! This is what she lives for - silly things like that that. Thanks! I've been thinking is too huge to have it as a signature. What do you think? Is it ok to have it as signature? Here it is: The Ten Commandments of The Holy Church of Charlene:1-You will love Charlene above all things.
2-You will not take the name of Charlene in vain.
3-You will sanctify July 1st and 2nd as The Days of Charlene
4-You will honor Pa Wittstock and Ma Wittstock
5-You will not kill the illusion that Charlene creates as The Perfect Princess
6-You will not never, ever consider other Princess as The Perfect One
7-You will not steal Charlene moments to shine, if you ever have the time
8-You will lie and deliriously defend Charlene above all things.
9-You will not let a sugar brother or sister to fall in reasonable hands.
10-You will not desire everything Charlene has: she is the only One that deserves it.Brilliant ... but, sad!
|
|