|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 13, 2011 9:11:47 GMT -5
There is no doubt that Albert and the palace really believe the sycophantic press that Charlene is a style icon and that dressing her up in expensive clothing and featuring her in photo shoots will draw tourists to Monaco. These people are complete morons. The wealthy and educated people of the world - who Monaco is trying to attract - are not interested and definitely not impressed by some expensive dumb-as-a-rock coat hangar that Albert has surgically fixed up. The loonies who salivate over this piece of trash over the Internet and who think this pea-brain is classy and elegant are not the people Moanco care to welcome to Monaco - they already spent too much money on these people (Charlene and her crew). Patrick Demarchelier is the photographer. To me, Charlene still looks like a man in the first photo even with the photo shopping. The second is heavily photo shopped.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 13, 2011 9:18:25 GMT -5
haha they photoshopped d her a waist. now how about getting rid of those huge shoulders (although I think they have made them a bit smaller in comparisson to what they usually look like in proportion with her head; maybe a side by side with a regular pic would be useful). Her shoulders must be twice the size of a regular woman. Besides the swimsuit pic is a bit off for a future princess.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 13, 2011 9:19:35 GMT -5
Here's the July Vogue cover with Emma Watson - no mention of Her Serene Highness Princess Conlene of Monaco - the world's newest style icon - the Savior of Monaco. No mention of Trashlene on Vogue's website either.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 13, 2011 9:25:27 GMT -5
maybe they make a special edition to be sold in Monaco only btw I think the 2nd pic would look ok without the head. Sorry but the hairdo is awful and it just doesn't go with the rest of the set up. It is supposed to look somewhat romantic and soft, but instead it looks like the wicked witch pretending to be Arielle. In both pics she looks hard. SHe better pose as an amazon with arms. maybe that way they could get people into detecting femininity in her
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jun 13, 2011 9:36:52 GMT -5
tranny is a tranny does, those photos are pathetic JMO a princess in a swimsuit looking like a man does moronaco no favors.... GOOD LAWD that pic is horrible ROFL probably the best one of the shoot. she's hopeless, i'm glad she's not on the cover or getting any PR on the website. PR FAIL!!!! "sport is the common denomintor of our relationship" REALLY? ? most couples it's love!!! at least they're proud of their business relationship WHO NEEDS LOVE when one part of the couple closes their eyes to FATal weird perverted twisted ways, the other has the luxury of knowing he can do anything he wants and she's not only participates but doesn't care if he watches (according to several of his "girls") JMOOC
|
|
|
Post by refia on Jun 13, 2011 9:46:05 GMT -5
She looks in the first photo as if she wants to punch someone: "did you looked at me dude?"
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 13, 2011 11:46:05 GMT -5
I'll be on the lookout for that edition and let you all know what's in it. Is it possible that they paid for the photos and then got Anna Wintour to publish them. I wonder what kind of deal they worked and why Wintour would agree to photographer her. I don't think the bathing suit photo makes her look attractive. In fact the caption strong suit they are actually portraying her toughness and then trying to use the other photo to show a softer side, but I don't think they pulled off the soft side. JMO
I just had a chance to have my daughter look at the photos. Here is her reaction: Swimsuit - nothing feminine about her. Tough. The other photo - she looks like she's just doing what she's told - no personality of her own comes through in the photo.
So there you have it.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jun 13, 2011 13:22:39 GMT -5
It is clear that the Palace has paid Vogue to try to sell the wedding to the americans, because nobody there cares for Albert's wedding. So, the negotiation was: "put her in a pic with her a swimming suit, to show that she was an olympic swimmer, and put her in other pic in a princessy dress, and try to make her look like mum. Play with the lights, so she will look more like Grace this way" (Albert said)
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jun 13, 2011 14:58:28 GMT -5
looks like they photoshopped her big fake boobs, instead they should have photoshopped her man hands
5 bucks they had to pay anna commercial rates, she knows a dud when she sees one and i'd be surprised if she wasted vogue resources on this ugly tranny princess digrace JMO
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 13, 2011 15:31:56 GMT -5
my guess is that KL called in a favour plus they probably promised to place a few adds in upcoming editions.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 13, 2011 17:58:44 GMT -5
haha they photoshopped d her a waist. now how about getting rid of those huge shoulders (although I think they have made them a bit smaller in comparisson to what they usually look like in proportion with her head; maybe a side by side with a regular pic would be useful). Her shoulders must be twice the size of a regular woman. Besides the swimsuit pic is a bit off for a future princess. ;D ;D I swear I didn't know the second picture was her! ;D I just thought it was a picture that followed. I agree about the image of her in some of these pictures as far as her in the position as being sold as a soon to be princess? She looks....well not very lady like , her expressions are smug, like a cold hard bitch, and with her reputation already being what is is, is this really the image they want to confirm to the world? If she doesn't have that look going on, she is dressed up like she like a Gangster Mol who thinks that she finally hit the big time! Charlene's image to me is exactly like that of a Jean Harlow crude gum smacking wanna-be gangster Mol. These images of her all dressed up only make her look more like that, but what is worse, the fact that she is just doing ANY interviews or any Photo Ops is in such bad taste, It only make her look more like exactly what she is and what people have already chalked her up as? Actions speaks louder than words! All their lies about her and the relationship fly out the window with the very fact that she is talking and posing for people and she isn't even the Princess of Monaco yet. She looks like a women who is really full of herself desperate for attention, and that is what she is-- the title for her will always only be an add on afterthought every time people see or hear about this woman. I don't know what these people are thinking? I buy Vogue, but I will not buy this issue, just like I did not buy any Town and Country issues that mentioned or featured Charlene, including Vanity Fair and I let them all know it!
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jun 13, 2011 19:03:16 GMT -5
Wonder if she looks like that when she threatens to let PA have it! That is a very odd photo....body language is downright odd.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jun 13, 2011 20:48:28 GMT -5
I would love to know what creative mind opines about this. Anybody knows where is she?
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 13, 2011 21:12:50 GMT -5
I would love to know what creative mind opines about this. Anybody knows where is she? Writing about real people of interest, or at least about people more interesting than these two, which is almost anybody! I don't think anyone more than the people on this forum give these two more energy than we do here, not even the sugarboards--Charlene already got what she wanted. If Albert's PR team think they drum up revenue for Albert for them--good luck to them!! Don't get me wrong I am not knocking anyone here--I completely understand why this girl is a lightening rod for most women, including me--it's just too bad that Albert and his ridiculous team don't get it and how much it's going to cost them! Albert anyway, he is really the only one that will be left holding the bag and that will really suffer. Everybody else....well Albert again is the one paying them!
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jun 13, 2011 21:37:30 GMT -5
^Hahha, you certainly are right. Even in the sugar boards Charlene is not interesting anymore. Not at least as she used to. But RO is an addiction to me, i love your guys comments, and i love to know more about the con artist that scammed Albert big time!
Sadly, we can do nothing to make Albert smell the real coffe...anyway, he deserves what he has.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 13, 2011 21:53:45 GMT -5
^Hahha, you certainly are right. Even in the sugar boards Charlene is not interesting anymore. Not at least as she used to. But RO is an addiction to me, i love your guys comments, and i love to know more about the con artist that scammed Albert big time! Sadly, we can do nothing to make Albert smell the real coffe...anyway, he deserves what he has. Yes it is amazing how those that said they were so anxious for a wedding between these too have completely lost interest after six years of begging for it. Odd indeed! It's not just Albert, the whole country well suffer, that is the even sadder part. Yes, it hard not to get pulled in--I just wished the people we have been talking about were worthy of peoples time and energy.
|
|
|
Post by grimnir on Jun 14, 2011 11:42:31 GMT -5
Isn't that the ongoing trend? Since the official escort became the hired fiancée, media interest (and board interest) has been waning imo. Events that made headlines, frontpages or multiple page articles because she was there, now don't anymore. I predict that that will become the norm. Some boring grey mousiness. There is nothing that makes her interesting and I assume you can't keep on buying magazine space.
Bunte didn't devote as much pages and frontpages to her as they used to and while PDV kept up the PR, it is different than what they did several years back. Then it was news and now it is boring but we were paid to publish it so we have to. Like they don't really believe what they are writing. Too neat, too smooth, too .... PR?
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jun 14, 2011 12:04:32 GMT -5
^I guess... the sugars themselves don't believe what they write. When one points out the obvious, they don't know how to defend their idol, and they begin to write stupid things. They probably know that Charlene is a farse, and they can't keep backing them up as they would want to.
|
|
|
Post by refia on Jun 14, 2011 12:09:32 GMT -5
Bunte cracks me up! So many articles on Kate before the wedding and so many on her after the wedding + Pippa Middleton who isn´t a Royal. And just a few on Charlene. I think the comments show how the people feel abput Charlene: bored. The ydescribe her as cold and it´s obvious they aren´t in love. I think Bunte is already learning.
|
|
|
Post by grimnir on Jun 14, 2011 12:22:27 GMT -5
Refia, That avatar of yours, I keep on thinking it's that Stahl woman. It creeps me out... I'd almost think that all that surgery was to look like Stahl, not like whoever it is on the picture she takes to the surgeon.
|
|