|
Post by grimnir on Jan 7, 2014 14:01:41 GMT -5
I wasn't suggesting she wouldn't have twins, more kind of counting the time line for having 5 separate births at her time of life. If she would have twins or triplets, 5 kids would be easy. But having 5 single kids... She'd have to be permanently pregnant until her early forties. And I doubt that giving birth and being pregnant again the next month and that five times (well four times actually) in a row would be feasable, let alone advisable. Anyway, it's just daft theorizing. I don't see any baby-barbies happening. Not with Albert in any case. Even several tabloids seem to share this opinion this week. Slow news time, let's make up some sob story about someone. Apparently (ingest salt pot here - a pinch isn't enough) she's been traumatized by the drowning of her cousin. I forgot who was five at the time, the cousin or the barbie but it is being said (by aformentioned tabloid - Frau mit Herz btw) that because of this trauma she now has a psychological obstruction for getting pregnant or wanting kids or something like that. The tabloids have been moved (again) in my magazine store and are now so high up that they're out of reach for easy perusal. I couldn't reach the rest and didn't bother to read what Bunte had to say. But for your entertainment the slow-news-headlines: - Motherly feelings in Monaco - C & A, Hand in hand into baby happiness (Das Neue) - Barbie was a mere ninth in the favourite princess election of Frau im Spiegel. Kate was first and Max second. - Gala (Germany) headlines Charlie's dangerous friend (about Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein, Juan-Carlos's misstress and after the scandals in Spain now suddenly barbie's bff. - 7 Tage writes that barbie's desire for a child grows bigger and bigger and wonders how desperate she is. - Frau mit Herz, as mentioned above, wonders if she won't have a baby out of fear. Nice inclusion of question mark here. Just to avoid litigation. - Bunte states the obvious: after seven years with Albert and two and a half years of -cough, cough- marriage there's still no offspring. The pressure grows. Keep writing that and you'll give them a brilliant excuse in a few years for a divorce: the pressure was too much, the public put too much pressure on her, the tabloids were soooooooo mean to her, poor barbie couldn't handle it, out of the kindness of my heart it's better to let her go, we're still madly in love, but her sanity and heath comes first, blah blah. Now I write it, I can hear Albert say it. And I wouldn't be surprised if they did indeed use this excuse. It makes everybody look good and it has been the standard excuse for the last three years for everything, from her lack of public performances to her inability to speak French: she needs time to find her footing, it's all new to her, it's hard to adapt, she is such a poor fragile thing, more blah and blah. Take note. I said it here first and the printer at the palace is warming up right now to print this out for further reference...
|
|
|
Post by tops on Jan 7, 2014 14:45:58 GMT -5
I wasn't suggesting she wouldn't have twins, more kind of counting the time line for having 5 separate births at her time of life. If she would have twins or triplets, 5 kids would be easy. But having 5 single kids... She'd have to be permanently pregnant until her early forties. And I doubt that giving birth and being pregnant again the next month and that five times (well four times actually) in a row would be feasable, let alone advisable. Anyway, it's just daft theorizing. I don't see any baby-barbies happening. Not with Albert in any case. Even several tabloids seem to share this opinion this week. Slow news time, let's make up some sob story about someone. Apparently (ingest salt pot here - a pinch isn't enough) she's been traumatized by the drowning of her cousin. I forgot who was five at the time, the cousin or the barbie but it is being said (by aformentioned tabloid - Frau mit Herz btw) that because of this trauma she now has a psychological obstruction for getting pregnant or wanting kids or something like that. The tabloids have been moved (again) in my magazine store and are now so high up that they're out of reach for easy perusal. I couldn't reach the rest and didn't bother to read what Bunte had to say. But for your entertainment the slow-news-headlines: - Motherly feelings in Monaco - C & A, Hand in hand into baby happiness (Das Neue) - Barbie was a mere ninth in the favourite princess election of Frau im Spiegel. Kate was first and Max second. - Gala (Germany) headlines Charlie's dangerous friend (about Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein, Juan-Carlos's misstress and after the scandals in Spain now suddenly barbie's bff. - 7 Tage writes that barbie's desire for a child grows bigger and bigger and wonders how desperate she is. - Frau mit Herz, as mentioned above, wonders if she won't have a baby out of fear. Nice inclusion of question mark here. Just to avoid litigation. - Bunte states the obvious: after seven years with Albert and two and a half years of -cough, cough- marriage there's still no offspring. The pressure grows. Keep writing that and you'll give them a brilliant excuse in a few years for a divorce: the pressure was too much, the public put too much pressure on her, the tabloids were soooooooo mean to her, poor barbie couldn't handle it, out of the kindness of my heart it's better to let her go, we're still madly in love, but her sanity and heath comes first, blah blah. Now I write it, I can hear Albert say it. And I wouldn't be surprised if they did indeed use this excuse. It makes everybody look good and it has been the standard excuse for the last three years for everything, from her lack of public performances to her inability to speak French: she needs time to find her footing, it's all new to her, it's hard to adapt, she is such a poor fragile thing, more blah and blah. Take note. I said it here first and the printer at the palace is warming up right now to print this out for further reference... the palace should hire you and a couple of others who are members. they could use some better insight.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jan 7, 2014 15:23:53 GMT -5
I wasn't suggesting she wouldn't have twins, more kind of counting the time line for having 5 separate births at her time of life. If she would have twins or triplets, 5 kids would be easy. But having 5 single kids... She'd have to be permanently pregnant until her early forties. And I doubt that giving birth and being pregnant again the next month and that five times (well four times actually) in a row would be feasable, let alone advisable. Anyway, it's just daft theorizing. I don't see any baby-barbies happening. Not with Albert in any case. Even several tabloids seem to share this opinion this week. Slow news time, let's make up some sob story about someone. Apparently (ingest salt pot here - a pinch isn't enough) she's been traumatized by the drowning of her cousin. I forgot who was five at the time, the cousin or the barbie but it is being said (by aformentioned tabloid - Frau mit Herz btw) that because of this trauma she now has a psychological obstruction for getting pregnant or wanting kids or something like that. The tabloids have been moved (again) in my magazine store and are now so high up that they're out of reach for easy perusal. I couldn't reach the rest and didn't bother to read what Bunte had to say. But for your entertainment the slow-news-headlines: - Motherly feelings in Monaco - C & A, Hand in hand into baby happiness (Das Neue) - Barbie was a mere ninth in the favourite princess election of Frau im Spiegel. Kate was first and Max second. - Gala (Germany) headlines Charlie's dangerous friend (about Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein, Juan-Carlos's misstress and after the scandals in Spain now suddenly barbie's bff. - 7 Tage writes that barbie's desire for a child grows bigger and bigger and wonders how desperate she is. - Frau mit Herz, as mentioned above, wonders if she won't have a baby out of fear. Nice inclusion of question mark here. Just to avoid litigation. - Bunte states the obvious: after seven years with Albert and two and a half years of -cough, cough- marriage there's still no offspring. The pressure grows. Keep writing that and you'll give them a brilliant excuse in a few years for a divorce: the pressure was too much, the public put too much pressure on her, the tabloids were soooooooo mean to her, poor barbie couldn't handle it, out of the kindness of my heart it's better to let her go, we're still madly in love, but her sanity and heath comes first, blah blah. Now I write it, I can hear Albert say it. And I wouldn't be surprised if they did indeed use this excuse. It makes everybody look good and it has been the standard excuse for the last three years for everything, from her lack of public performances to her inability to speak French: she needs time to find her footing, it's all new to her, it's hard to adapt, she is such a poor fragile thing, more blah and blah. Take note. I said it here first and the printer at the palace is warming up right now to print this out for further reference... LOL I think we have all said it one way or the other on this board how they will spin it for divorce. There will be a sob story soon about her trying and failing to get pregnant and they will probably twist it in a way to explain her grumpy looks and frequent absences etc. The tabloids or trashies lot might even invent a miscarriage for that matter. ANd Albert would probably even buy it. Because if she doesn't want to, doctors are not allowed to tell him the truth. Though if she goes to a doctor in MC word will get to him. I bet though that for exactly that reason she only goes for those kind of doctor visits to SA. I really don't see her getting pregnant at all. She is nearing forty and her slim chances are getting slimmer with age. Besides it's getting more dangerous for her and a potential baby. ANd with two aged parents, especially ALbert, chances are lower to have a healthy child. Just remember what happened to Sophie and her pregnancies... And we all know that since ALbert already has 2 healthy children, the blame will always go on her. Same as with getting preggers.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jan 7, 2014 23:19:55 GMT -5
I wasn't suggesting she wouldn't have twins, more kind of counting the time line for having 5 separate births at her time of life. If she would have twins or triplets, 5 kids would be easy. But having 5 single kids... She'd have to be permanently pregnant until her early forties. And I doubt that giving birth and being pregnant again the next month and that five times (well four times actually) in a row would be feasable, let alone advisable. Anyway, it's just daft theorizing. I don't see any baby-barbies happening. Not with Albert in any case. Even several tabloids seem to share this opinion this week. Slow news time, let's make up some sob story about someone. Apparently (ingest salt pot here - a pinch isn't enough) she's been traumatized by the drowning of her cousin. I forgot who was five at the time, the cousin or the barbie but it is being said (by aformentioned tabloid - Frau mit Herz btw) that because of this trauma she now has a psychological obstruction for getting pregnant or wanting kids or something like that. The tabloids have been moved (again) in my magazine store and are now so high up that they're out of reach for easy perusal. I couldn't reach the rest and didn't bother to read what Bunte had to say. But for your entertainment the slow-news-headlines: - Motherly feelings in Monaco - C & A, Hand in hand into baby happiness (Das Neue) - Barbie was a mere ninth in the favourite princess election of Frau im Spiegel. Kate was first and Max second. - Gala (Germany) headlines Charlie's dangerous friend (about Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein, Juan-Carlos's misstress and after the scandals in Spain now suddenly barbie's bff. - 7 Tage writes that barbie's desire for a child grows bigger and bigger and wonders how desperate she is. - Frau mit Herz, as mentioned above, wonders if she won't have a baby out of fear. Nice inclusion of question mark here. Just to avoid litigation. - Bunte states the obvious: after seven years with Albert and two and a half years of -cough, cough- marriage there's still no offspring. The pressure grows. Keep writing that and you'll give them a brilliant excuse in a few years for a divorce: the pressure was too much, the public put too much pressure on her, the tabloids were soooooooo mean to her, poor barbie couldn't handle it, out of the kindness of my heart it's better to let her go, we're still madly in love, but her sanity and heath comes first, blah blah. Now I write it, I can hear Albert say it. And I wouldn't be surprised if they did indeed use this excuse. It makes everybody look good and it has been the standard excuse for the last three years for everything, from her lack of public performances to her inability to speak French: she needs time to find her footing, it's all new to her, it's hard to adapt, she is such a poor fragile thing, more blah and blah. Take note. I said it here first and the printer at the palace is warming up right now to print this out for further reference... LOL I think we have all said it one way or the other on this board how they will spin it for divorce. There will be a sob story soon about her trying and failing to get pregnant and they will probably twist it in a way to explain her grumpy looks and frequent absences etc. The tabloids or trashies lot might even invent a miscarriage for that matter. ANd Albert would probably even buy it. Because if she doesn't want to, doctors are not allowed to tell him the truth. Though if she goes to a doctor in MC word will get to him. I bet though that for exactly that reason she only goes for those kind of doctor visits to SA. I really don't see her getting pregnant at all. She is nearing forty and her slim chances are getting slimmer with age. Besides it's getting more dangerous for her and a potential baby. ANd with two aged parents, especially ALbert, chances are lower to have a healthy child. Just remember what happened to Sophie and her pregnancies... And we all know that since ALbert already has 2 healthy children, the blame will always go on her. Same as with getting preggers. She is such a convenience (cover) for Albert which allows him to continue all his affairs. Albert will keep her around for a while longer is my guess. Speaking of Albert's offspring, the baby mamas have been very quiet since the wedding. I wonder when we are going to hear from them again unless there is a constant flow of money to keep them quiet. Jazmin is now a senior in college (seems like yesterday she was just graduating from high school). I wonder when she will start to turn up in the magazines once she gets a job. I'd love to see a recent shot of Alex. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by tops on Jan 8, 2014 0:00:42 GMT -5
LOL I think we have all said it one way or the other on this board how they will spin it for divorce. There will be a sob story soon about her trying and failing to get pregnant and they will probably twist it in a way to explain her grumpy looks and frequent absences etc. The tabloids or trashies lot might even invent a miscarriage for that matter. ANd Albert would probably even buy it. Because if she doesn't want to, doctors are not allowed to tell him the truth. Though if she goes to a doctor in MC word will get to him. I bet though that for exactly that reason she only goes for those kind of doctor visits to SA. I really don't see her getting pregnant at all. She is nearing forty and her slim chances are getting slimmer with age. Besides it's getting more dangerous for her and a potential baby. ANd with two aged parents, especially ALbert, chances are lower to have a healthy child. Just remember what happened to Sophie and her pregnancies... And we all know that since ALbert already has 2 healthy children, the blame will always go on her. Same as with getting preggers. She is such a convenience (cover) for Albert which allows him to continue all his affairs. Albert will keep her around for a while longer is my guess. Speaking of Albert's offspring, the baby mamas have been very quiet since the wedding. I wonder when we are going to hear from them again unless there is a constant flow of money to keep them quiet. Jazmin is now a senior in college (seems like yesterday she was just graduating from high school). I wonder when she will start to turn up in the magazines once she gets a job. I'd love to see a recent shot of Alex. JMO. does he deliberately paint himself in a corner? so let him pay the price for his general unaccountability. jazmin grace was at the princess grace awards in NYC in oct. 2012.
|
|
|
Post by raatjie on Jan 8, 2014 0:30:15 GMT -5
Apart from the fact that Charlene is getting older and her chances of conceiving are getting slimmer, having babies and successful motherhood actually require WORK, COMMITMENT, RESPONSIBILITY, LOVE and DEDICATION.
|
|
|
Post by grimnir on Jan 8, 2014 4:05:08 GMT -5
Nannies!
Generations of royals have been raised by nannies, (wet) nurses and the likes. No parental efforts required.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2014 17:43:07 GMT -5
we know she is very slow learning things. It took ten years reaching to the Olympics from 11 to 22 years. Looks like she can only count numbers as doubles. So it will be 11, 22 ,33 and 44 putting her big goals in life. 33 was wedding. now she is enjoying for playing with the media until something real big will happen as surprize out of the blue when she has had her 44th birthday. Until that she will test her ideas to the public.
|
|
|
Post by edoep on Jan 9, 2014 1:20:41 GMT -5
I wasn't suggesting she wouldn't have twins, more kind of counting the time line for having 5 separate births at her time of life. If she would have twins or triplets, 5 kids would be easy. But having 5 single kids... She'd have to be permanently pregnant until her early forties. And I doubt that giving birth and being pregnant again the next month and that five times (well four times actually) in a row would be feasable, let alone advisable. Anyway, it's just daft theorizing. I don't see any baby-barbies happening. Not with Albert in any case. Even several tabloids seem to share this opinion this week. Slow news time, let's make up some sob story about someone. Apparently (ingest salt pot here - a pinch isn't enough) she's been traumatized by the drowning of her cousin. I forgot who was five at the time, the cousin or the barbie but it is being said (by aformentioned tabloid - Frau mit Herz btw) that because of this trauma she now has a psychological obstruction for getting pregnant or wanting kids or something like that. The tabloids have been moved (again) in my magazine store and are now so high up that they're out of reach for easy perusal. I couldn't reach the rest and didn't bother to read what Bunte had to say. But for your entertainment the slow-news-headlines: - Motherly feelings in Monaco - C & A, Hand in hand into baby happiness (Das Neue) - Barbie was a mere ninth in the favourite princess election of Frau im Spiegel. Kate was first and Max second. - Gala (Germany) headlines Charlie's dangerous friend (about Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein, Juan-Carlos's misstress and after the scandals in Spain now suddenly barbie's bff. - 7 Tage writes that barbie's desire for a child grows bigger and bigger and wonders how desperate she is. - Frau mit Herz, as mentioned above, wonders if she won't have a baby out of fear. Nice inclusion of question mark here. Just to avoid litigation. - Bunte states the obvious: after seven years with Albert and two and a half years of -cough, cough- marriage there's still no offspring. The pressure grows. Keep writing that and you'll give them a brilliant excuse in a few years for a divorce: the pressure was too much, the public put too much pressure on her, the tabloids were soooooooo mean to her, poor barbie couldn't handle it, out of the kindness of my heart it's better to let her go, we're still madly in love, but her sanity and heath comes first, blah blah. Now I write it, I can hear Albert say it. And I wouldn't be surprised if they did indeed use this excuse. It makes everybody look good and it has been the standard excuse for the last three years for everything, from her lack of public performances to her inability to speak French: she needs time to find her footing, it's all new to her, it's hard to adapt, she is such a poor fragile thing, more blah and blah. Take note. I said it here first and the printer at the palace is warming up right now to print this out for further reference... you should demand royalties for your predictions if they use them some time later!!!!
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jan 25, 2014 17:07:02 GMT -5
I see it more like Hollande. One morning, Albert will be caught by the make of his shoes while on the back of a scooter carrying croissants to his love nest owned by the Corsican mafia, where another French woman (Gayet, Bruni etc) who plastered her breasts all over the media will be poised to become the next First Lady of Monaco.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Apr 17, 2014 21:52:33 GMT -5
I love how, due to the new Hola interview, in a certain forum there are people that defend this woman, say that she is an excellent representative of Monaco, and yet they don't see that she is just like the princess they most hate, or even worse. That princess at least speaks her new country's language quite well, not like this bimbo. When she is around children, she is fake, but when WC is around children, she is sooo natural....i wonder how is that this people don't see what they are writing?
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Sept 6, 2014 14:11:11 GMT -5
I think it's official: sugardish is a pro trashy board and Caro hate board - of course it's main Mary hate board - . Last posts about one and the other speak well for themselves. Not surprised we cannot voice our opinion there withouth always a caro hater jumping saying something idiotic to defend the trashlene.
Sigh. That forum used to be fun. What's wrong with those people? Or should i say with those bullies?
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Sept 7, 2014 2:08:11 GMT -5
do not worry, there are plenty of people who see through Charlene and a baby does not make it any different. JMO the most that like Charlene : is for the clothes - they see no further ... Maybe they believe that the clothes fit better on them? (I think all her clothes are poorly made - no Akris fan here)
Do they have recently seen Caroline?
|
|
|
Post by edoep on Sept 7, 2014 8:20:43 GMT -5
I think it's official: sugardish is a pro trashy board and Caro hate board - of course it's main Mary hate board - . Last posts about one and the other speak well for themselves. Not surprised we cannot voice our opinion there withouth always a caro hater jumping saying something idiotic to defend the trashlene. Sigh. That forum used to be fun. What's wrong with those people? Or should i say with those bullies? simply say 'morons' let's put it this way: the company you keep rubs off. same for the 'company' you idolize / prefer. if you idolize an uneducated plastic-lowlife with no taste, no education, no manners, no style, it tells a lot more about yourself than you think. LOL. the reason why this simple fact hasn't struck the brains of these sugars yet is ... they are a very very very bit slow in the uptake. just like their idol.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Sept 7, 2014 11:22:58 GMT -5
do not worry, there are plenty of people who see through Charlene and a baby does not make it any different. JMO the most that like Charlene : is for the clothes - they see no further ... Maybe they believe that the clothes fit better on them? (I think all her clothes are poorly made - no Akris fan here) Do they have recently seen Caroline? Someone found a video of Caroline and thinks that her way of speak, her english accent is "soooo fake" and compare her to her siblings. And other members seems to agree. And of course messages previous to that one of that particular poster that loves to hate her and call her off spring "trashiraghies" (not very creative, the trashlene came up first, lol) I don't care that they idolize the idiot however they want to, my problem is that you go call her trashlene and instantly a person comes into her defense and say "oh because the trashiraghies" this...and then of course we have others that copy and paste the definition of hate from wikipedia to say you are hater (so what?) But they themselves can't recognize they are full mary haters. Oh no, they just "critizice" her ironically, is not full of hate at all ...lol, the hypocresy. I think i should have posted this on the thread of feel free to express your opinions about the plastic face.
|
|
|
Post by refia on Sept 7, 2014 12:01:09 GMT -5
Lmao either they should allow to diss all royals or stop pretending that they don't have their favs. And Caroline could eat them all alive.
|
|
lilae
Full Member
Posts: 110
|
Post by lilae on Dec 14, 2014 14:39:15 GMT -5
My opinion is : Charlene is a fake. She will never be able to think more than 5 seconds. She is a hanger for clothes, nothing else.
|
|
lilae
Full Member
Posts: 110
|
Post by lilae on Dec 21, 2014 17:02:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by donna on Jul 16, 2015 17:40:46 GMT -5
How can I put this in my signature? Like some posters have ugly pictures of CW in their signature. Can anyone please help. :/
|
|
|
Post by refia on Jul 16, 2015 18:13:00 GMT -5
Profile>Edit Profile>Personal>Signature and here you have to add the url of the photos but with this html
|
|