|
Post by smt on Jun 20, 2011 13:23:01 GMT -5
Hmm .. has my opinion of Trampolina changed??? Only if disliking her more and more every day counts! What a manipulative, cunning, low-class, who-e! The only person of whom I have a lower opinion is Fat Al who believes that Trampolina's in-bed prowess qualify her as a Princess Consort. What a jack a--!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 20, 2011 13:34:15 GMT -5
I think its more we overestimated PA and underestimated trashlene of COnaco. You beat me to it again Paca - I was going to say the exact same thing! I did both, but I believe that I way overestimated Albert more than I underestimated Charlene. ME TOO! There was nothing that was a mystery about Charlene! From the time she went to the press to exploit Albert and her first date, she told all anyone needed to know about her. Of course the first time I saw her was in Turin when my chin hit the floor because I could not believe Albert could be stupid enough to show up with another opportunistic publicity seeking bimbo, on the heels of his very public trouble with "publicity seeking opportunistic bimbos" What away to divert the attention! ;D It was Albert that turned out to be such a disappointment, I had always thought he had a lot more going on. The thing is it just got progressively worse and worse--really sad to watch. Charlene, she has continues to floor me after all these years, she still manages to top herself ;D. After reading her posts all these years and what is in her agenda and mind when she thinks no one knows who she is--I still cannot believe someone like this exist in the world, or could be so brazen and unapologetic about it! I guess in her currant interviews someone is starting to understand what's wrong with her image, but each interview she gives she only continues to confirm it and draws attention to her problems by so perversely lying about it.
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on Jun 24, 2011 9:51:21 GMT -5
I always wished that Opera Diva Anna Netrebko would have become Princess of Monaco. She is incredibly beautiful... incredibly talented... and just plain nice and funny in private. www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwuNqcKUxtoShe would have brought millions of visitors to Monaco... everybody would have treasured Princess Anna... worldwide... errrm.... no... Charlene WitTart was the chosen one...
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Jun 24, 2011 9:55:33 GMT -5
Yes, Madame Concorde - she has energy and soul and talent - THATs what brings would bring people to Monaco. BTW the clip on youtube ... RUSALKA means MERMAID Couldn't someone rush in some days before the event and make clear I'm the one!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jun 24, 2011 14:34:19 GMT -5
I always wished that Opera Diva Anna Netrebko would have become Princess of Monaco. She is incredibly beautiful... incredibly talented... and just plain nice and funny in private. www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwuNqcKUxtoShe would have brought millions of visitors to Monaco... everybody would have treasured Princess Anna... worldwide... errrm.... no... Charlene WitTart was the chosen one... But that would have required someone with a BRAIN and TASTE to think of - and nobody in charge in Monaco seems to possess that! (Besides - something tells me this woman is way to savvy to have bought into this crap!)
|
|
|
Post by khillaree on Jun 24, 2011 14:50:10 GMT -5
no, I did not change opinion on charlene, but there is a thing which evolved : we often speak about soul mates, I think that Albert did not find his soul mate nor Charlene. And I am happy for both persons whom they don't marry, here is two fortunate personn who will not be unfortunate. Because albert would have made unfortunate his soul mate by sleeping with all which moves, as for Charlene, she would have made unfortunate all the men whom she crosses.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 24, 2011 16:40:27 GMT -5
Hmm .. has my opinion of Trampolina changed??? Only if disliking her more and more every day counts! What a manipulative, cunning, low-class, who-e! The only person of whom I have a lower opinion is Fat Al who believes that Trampolina's in-bed prowess qualify her as a Princess Consort. What a jack a--![/b] You know I don't really think she probably even earns her keep there! ?
|
|
|
Post by duchesscornflower on Jun 28, 2011 10:01:06 GMT -5
No my opinion has not changed at all, I still feel sorry for her. That is my opinion - pity. Her life could turn out to be hell on the Riviera. She is marrying into an unforgiving institution. Everything she does wrong will be remembered forever in the press. What she does right will barely make the headlines. Her background does not lend itself to knowing what to do correctly. She is on a very steep learning curve and it won’t be comfortable. If her in-laws decide to not like her, she will be miserable. If the Monegasques’ never warm up to her she will be miserable. What she wants and what she is going to receive may be two different things entirely. Who wants to spend the rest of their life trying to establish their own princess persona while living with the principalities memory of an iconic princess? As the years pass, Grace's image and memory only become more revered and even distorted to present an image of perfection. An image that in reality is entirely unattainable. Albert's wife may spend the rest of her marriage in the shadow of a dead princess, chasing ghosts.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 29, 2011 21:28:26 GMT -5
No my opinion has not changed at all, I still feel sorry for her. That is my opinion - pity. Her life could turn out to be hell on the Riviera. She is marrying into an unforgiving institution. Everything she does wrong will be remembered forever in the press. What she does right will barely make the headlines. Her background does not lend itself to knowing what to do correctly. She is on a very steep learning curve and it won’t be comfortable. If her in-laws decide to not like her, she will be miserable. If the Monegasques’ never warm up to her she will be miserable. What she wants and what she is going to receive may be two different things entirely. Who wants to spend the rest of their life trying to establish their own princess persona while living with the principalities memory of an iconic princess? As the years pass, Grace's image and memory only become more revered and even distorted to present an image of perfection. An image that in reality is entirely unattainable. Albert's wife may spend the rest of her marriage in the shadow of a dead princess, chasing ghosts. Remember she fought for it tooth and nail...she clawed her way right in, and vowed she would never leave! You give this girl too much credit, like any of that matters to her! She was happy to leave her friends and family for fortune and fame long ago to a place she admits to having no friends, after all these years....a place she vowed never to leave! ;D She said it herself, she knows she is not liked there...but all these years has she ever done anything about it? Has she ever even tried "or cared" to endear herself to the people of Monaco? In spite of her desperation to be their princess, the princess of Monaco? Of course not, she would rather believe, "they're jealous of her...," "...and that is to be expected!...." This girl really thinks the world of herself , and she doesn't let anyone get in the way that might burst her bubble! ;D This girl lives in her very own reality of herself and her life. She clawed herself there, and no one but Charlene has anyone to blame for any woes she might have. No doubt if she ever turned into another person ;D and started to care, she would only pitch a fit and blame someone else as she always has. Trust me your pity is wasted on this woman! She is only thinking "Right I'm going to pity myself to the bank"...she is of a different breed and sadly not a very rare one.
|
|
jbc
New Member
Posts: 1
|
Post by jbc on Jul 4, 2011 2:49:26 GMT -5
Wow what a bunch of nasty people you lot are....
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 4, 2011 7:20:29 GMT -5
Wow what a bunch of nasty people you lot are.... Welcome jbc! Would you like to give your opinion of Charlene? On this forum we respectfully disagree on opinions we don't like to attack our fellow posters. You are welcome to voice your opinion of Charlene, but if you came on here to be a troll, well, you're comment will simply be ignored as it contributes nothing. If you have been following Albert and Charlene for years as some of us have ( I met Albert over 20 something years ago) then perhaps you might be in a better position to understand why some posters here dislike them both. You are most welcome to voice your opinion about Monaco but I can assure you attacking posters will go nowhere. If you are American have a happy 4th of July. It's why we are free to speak our minds!
|
|
|
Post by refia on Jul 4, 2011 7:34:34 GMT -5
Amazing how people just join the forum to say this...
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 4, 2011 7:39:07 GMT -5
No my opinion has not changed at all, I still feel sorry for her. That is my opinion - pity. Her life could turn out to be hell on the Riviera. She is marrying into an unforgiving institution. Everything she does wrong will be remembered forever in the press. What she does right will barely make the headlines. Her background does not lend itself to knowing what to do correctly. She is on a very steep learning curve and it won’t be comfortable. If her in-laws decide to not like her, she will be miserable. If the Monegasques’ never warm up to her she will be miserable. What she wants and what she is going to receive may be two different things entirely. Who wants to spend the rest of their life trying to establish their own princess persona while living with the principalities memory of an iconic princess? As the years pass, Grace's image and memory only become more revered and even distorted to present an image of perfection. An image that in reality is entirely unattainable. Albert's wife may spend the rest of her marriage in the shadow of a dead princess, chasing ghosts. Lady Macbeth any one?
|
|
grandduchess
Full Member
The happiest royal couple ever!
Posts: 165
|
Post by grandduchess on Jul 4, 2011 10:43:11 GMT -5
Wow what a bunch of nasty people you lot are.... Do you need a hug?
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 4, 2011 11:22:23 GMT -5
Wow what a bunch of nasty people you lot are.... Do you need a hug? Not necessary, jbc was banned as soon as I read the post. Seriously, it's ok for jbc and any other to register and voice their support of Charlene and disagree with any negative opinion posted here about her. Such a post invokes open discussion. However, jbc did not joined to opine - jbc joined to insult Royal Opinions posters. Posters can voice opinions about possible motivations of posters who have negative opinions of Charlene (the most cited one is jealousy, although the correct word to use is envy), just as some Royal Opinions posters voice opinions about the motives of posters who unconditionally support Charlene's attitudes, behavior and actions. I think this is a fair discussion to have and does not violate Royal Opinions one rule. But, jbc does not want to even have that type of discussion or any discussion - so there is no need for jbc to be a member of Royal Opinions - which is a discussion forum.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 4, 2011 11:27:31 GMT -5
Oh, jbc was probably a member of the sugar board, a relative of Charlene...or a fanatic lunatic of her. Nevermind.
Anyway, if my opinion of Charlene changed, it was for the worst, i mean, she gave this stupid interview the day before her wedding denying that she tried to escape, and said that her photos with Albert were going to be stronger than the rumours...oh well, Trahslene, as usual, it was a big FAIL. Now i think of her as the major whore that she is, and the major gold digger, for marrying the Prince even though he cheated her and have babies with other women in the period of engagement. She had the opportunity to leave, instead she prefered the title. GOLD DIGGER.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 4, 2011 12:27:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rachel on Jul 4, 2011 13:23:44 GMT -5
Hi all, I'm new to the boards - just wondering what is it specifically that you guys dislike about her. I didn't know that much about her until recently, in fact I still don't (although I've learned lots from here since I discovered the board) but the dislike of her here is in strong contrast to the media's view of her. I'd be interested to see what specifically about her makes you dislike her. Normally on boards I am used to seeing two different arguments, but you guys are unanimous about Charlene!
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 4, 2011 15:22:59 GMT -5
hi rachel and welcome to the board. here's kind of the issue. the factual information regarding cw, has been amassed from prior boards. this includes hundreds of articles, photos and also actual interviews with cw where she has, for several years contradicted, schemed and out and out lied, showing many of us who we truly believe she is, thus, the opinions you find on this particular board. various boards have been shut down by threats from her what we call "flunkies" as well as palace henchmen so to speak because they don't like negative views EVER of anything to do with their sovereign, nor cw. i think a number here can speak to the nasty emails we have received via pms on boards that no longer exist because of them and those who ran them shut them down because they were afraid of the threats. i think what might help is to peruse what myadia and others have amassed here -- over many years. much of which some of us old timers have read time and time again and posted ourselves through research. honestly it goes back, what 10 years in terms of his dealings with cw??? [tell me if i'm wrong longtime posters]. but, her story really heated up and the boards [particularly the old royal blue forum which is now defunct got busy after her appearance with prince albert in turin.] while our posts may seem harsh it comes from personal dealings with her via the boards and her flunkies. also the desire of other boards to not allow anything negative of her written whether based in fact or even stated as opinions. only the sugar coating of her story, which the media has depicted inaccurately until recently. over the years i known for myself i've been waiting to see for her to prove otherwise, but again, based on articles she hasn't [including her recent vogue interview the day of the wedding which is ironic because she looks the liar AGAIN because palace officials admit albert will face a paternity test with articles indicating there could be a 2nd child and one baby on the way]. this board is the result of her words, actions [for example: numerous plastic surgeries to look like her now late mother-in-law] and photographed and videotaped behavior by those who don't buy the made up fairytale story of pa and cw refusing to be pushed around. it's made up of people with personal knowledge as well as those who live in monaco, who, along with the cw debacle see a sovereign who needs to step aside due to all of his mishandling and downright dealings with shady characters [which is a whole 'nother topic]. i'd love to post articles and photos but honestly it's slowly but surely being reposted here by myadia and others AND could take me the better part of a few months to repost it all. it's not a matter of differing opinions being allowed, knowing myadia via these boards for years now, she's all about stating your opinion/facts without getting personal with fellow posters. if someone wants to be positive about cw, great, but this board is the result of us not having a place to post our opinions which are by and large negative of cw based on cw's behavior over many years. Sorry if I repeated myself but maybe this gives you an idea. Hope that helps somewhat and again welcome rachel.
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 4, 2011 15:44:07 GMT -5
|
|