|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 6:26:24 GMT -5
the problem with idiots is: the y are incapable of learning. They have just seen that the official dementi started an avamanche of press. Now Lacoste denied the existence of a baby and even said that it would be easy for journalists to check wCW was at the airport or not. Obviously they did that before talking to Lacoste as police sources confirmed that CW was held at the airports, had her passport confiscated and she had a one way ticket to SA. A senior Monaco police officer has confirmed this. they do translate Berns statement even as a confirmation of the existence of another child. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2009821/There-love-child-Prince-Alberts-lawyer-denies-father-white-black-baby-days-wedding.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 6:37:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 30, 2011 6:56:00 GMT -5
the problem with idiots is: the y are incapable of learning. They have just seen that the official dementi started an avamanche of press. Now Lacoste denied the existence of a baby and even said that it would be easy for journalists to check wCW was at the airport or not. Obviously they did that before talking to Lacoste as police sources confirmed that CW was held at the airports, had her passport confiscated and she had a one way ticket to SA. A senior Monaco police officer has confirmed this. they do translate Berns statement even as a confirmation of the existence of another child. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2009821/There-love-child-Prince-Alberts-lawyer-denies-father-white-black-baby-days-wedding.html?ito=feeds-newsxml Everyone, it is no longer an allegation or opinion if Charlene's was intercepted at the Nice airport, as Paca mentioned someone who doesn't feel the need to lie or accept bribes from Albert already confirmed that this story is true - a Monaco police officer and a Nice one! Well, I guess there are those who could claim that this source is lying also.Police sources at Nice airport have even confirmed that Miss Wittstock had her passport confiscated to stop her boarding a plane with a one-way ticket.
An unnamed senior detective from Monaco, who was involved in the later stages of the 'incident' at Nice airport, has claimed that 'Charlene had her passport confiscated so that the Prince's entourage could persuade her to stay'. This statement from the Daily Mail reporter sums up Lacoste's competence and how much credence one should give to his denials. Mr Lacoste famously issued fierce denials before DNA tests proved Albert was the father of Alexandre and Jazmin.
Despite his strong denial this time around, Mr Lacoste confirmed that he was taking no action against L'Express, adding: 'I was going to, but said they would withdraw the article.'
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jun 30, 2011 7:04:05 GMT -5
Very interesting! Good one!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 7:15:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 7:22:22 GMT -5
Aren't they friends of Caroline?
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jun 30, 2011 9:02:14 GMT -5
The Pastors are very big landowners there right? Wasn't one of them the one that went out to the airport to negotiate with CW?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 9:27:48 GMT -5
Pastors are one of the most important families in Monaco. They are in realestate, construction, business, brasserie, the Ni hotel restaurant and center and heaps more. Michel was for some time president of ASM. He was also president of the economic chamber. A Pastor was Rainiers personal doctor. Campora is another important family. Then the pallancas. They are related by marriage to the Pastors. Not every Pastor in Monaco though is a member of that particular family though. It is a fairly common name. One of the daughters is married to the son of Johnny Halliday.
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on Jun 30, 2011 9:47:16 GMT -5
Article in Le Monde Monaco : la rumeur aurait été alimentée par des imprudences de la police la fiancée 'aurait voulu interrompre les préparatifs de son mariage et repartir' en Afrique du Sud, en raison de 'la vie privée' de son futur époux. Selon des informations du Figaro jeudi, il se pourrait que la rumeur 'ait été crédibilisée par des imprudences de policiers monégasques'. Dimanche, l'un d'eux 'se serait répandu sur l'intervention de ses collègues à l'aéroport de Nice pour rattraper in extremis la princesse, qui désirait s'en aller'. Ce même policier aurait dit également que le passeport de la jeune femme lui aurait été retiré. www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2011/06/30/monaco-la-rumeur-aurait-ete-alimentee-par-des-imprudences-de-la-police_1542780_3214.html#xtor=AL-32280184As I said before, there is no way she would ever be able to leave Nice airport without being caught. She is now a Monegasque. No more South African passport. She can't escape anymore. She will be given a microchip implant by force with 24/24 tracking. It is now inevitable. She can't escape it. She will be made a slave and a puppet. If she doesn't fit in they will pull out a Diana on her no doubt. This is the price to pay for becoming a princess. It's the same for all of those who marry in all royal families who are not princesses by blood.
|
|
|
Post by scout on Jun 30, 2011 10:05:06 GMT -5
Yesterday, I surfed over to some of the other forums to see how much discussion they had regarding Charlene's 'flight to freedom'. One thing I noted, that is not good for Albert, is that most posters blame Albert's immoral lifestyle for causing Charlene to feel the need to flee to South Africa. Charlene is just the sweet, innocent victim in all this. The fact that Charlene has known for years and years about Albert's lifestyle (and has probably participated in some of it) but has never felt the need to leave before is not acknowledged. Whether the wedding takes place or not, Albert's reputation is much damaged from his association with Charlene. Evidently, she will come off as the innocent victim in all this.
After reading all the news about this, I think that Charlene heard about the new child and decided to STAGE this flight to freedom to get Albert to agree to something that she wants in order for her to agree to come back to the wedding. If she leaves Albert at the altar, it would be very embarrassing for him, particularly after all the money spent. Charlene knows that his reign might not survive something like that. But her blackmail efforts were made public and now everyone has egg on their face. Just part of that you 'reap what you sow' that MyaDia talks about. They wanted everyone looking at them; now everyone is. Just that most people are thinking they are idiots!
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Jun 30, 2011 10:10:40 GMT -5
Yesterday, I surfed over to some of the other forums to see how much discussion they had regarding Charlene's 'flight to freedom'. One thing I noted, that is not good for Albert, is that most posters blame Albert's immoral lifestyle for causing Charlene to feel the need to flee to South Africa. Charlene is just the sweet, innocent victim in all this. The fact that Charlene has known for years and years about Albert's lifestyle (and has probably participated in some of it) but has never felt the need to leave before is not acknowledged. Whether the wedding takes place or not, Albert's reputation is much damaged from his association with Charlene. Evidently, she will come off as the innocent victim in all this. After reading all the news about this, I think that Charlene heard about the new child and decided to STAGE this flight to freedom to get Albert to agree to something that she wants in order for her to agree to come back to the wedding. If she leaves Albert at the altar, it would be very embarrassing for him, particularly after all the money spent. Charlene knows that his reign might not survive something like that. But her blackmail efforts were made public and now everyone has egg on their face. Just part of that you 'reap what you sow' that MyaDia talks about. They wanted everyone looking at them; now everyone is. Just that most people are thinking they are idiots! Watch for the Monaco's (Caroline's) tiara on WC's head on July 2nd. I bet that was her ultimatum: "I want that damn tiara on my head or else!" ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 10:31:59 GMT -5
Yesterday, I surfed over to some of the other forums to see how much discussion they had regarding Charlene's 'flight to freedom'. One thing I noted, that is not good for Albert, is that most posters blame Albert's immoral lifestyle for causing Charlene to feel the need to flee to South Africa. Charlene is just the sweet, innocent victim in all this. The fact that Charlene has known for years and years about Albert's lifestyle (and has probably participated in some of it) but has never felt the need to leave before is not acknowledged. Whether the wedding takes place or not, Albert's reputation is much damaged from his association with Charlene. Evidently, she will come off as the innocent victim in all this. After reading all the news about this, I think that Charlene heard about the new child and decided to STAGE this flight to freedom to get Albert to agree to something that she wants in order for her to agree to come back to the wedding. If she leaves Albert at the altar, it would be very embarrassing for him, particularly after all the money spent. Charlene knows that his reign might not survive something like that. But her blackmail efforts were made public and now everyone has egg on their face. Just part of that you 'reap what you sow' that MyaDia talks about. They wanted everyone looking at them; now everyone is. Just that most people are thinking they are idiots! I heard from someone on the sugar board that people are blaming Nicole for all this. Now I wouldn't put anything past Nicole since she is still convinced Alex should have the throne, but I think Charlene might be shrewd enough to use Nicole and blame her as the source for the 3rd child rumor. None of this is stated as fact. Just the sugars protecting Charlene. So it looks like all out media war with everyone blaming everyone and little sweet Charlene sitting there saying she doesn't understand a word of French. Wow Albert you really are an idiot. I agree with MadameConcorde. Charlene has made her bed. We can expect more of these outbursts as these two finally realize they are trapped by the Church (no annulment) and must live with each other. Diana had problems but I think she was smarter. JMO
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 30, 2011 10:35:18 GMT -5
Trust me, Albert's handlers and friends will not allow Charlene to be seen as they victim and Albert the culprit. If Charlene tries to do that - the flood gate will open spilling all of Charlene's gaffes and real background that the palace has so thus far kept under wraps.
|
|
|
Post by duchesscornflower on Jun 30, 2011 10:54:04 GMT -5
Yesterday, I surfed over to some of the other forums to see how much discussion they had regarding Charlene's 'flight to freedom'. One thing I noted, that is not good for Albert, is that most posters blame Albert's immoral lifestyle for causing Charlene to feel the need to flee to South Africa. Charlene is just the sweet, innocent victim in all this. The fact that Charlene has known for years and years about Albert's lifestyle (and has probably participated in some of it) but has never felt the need to leave before is not acknowledged. Whether the wedding takes place or not, Albert's reputation is much damaged from his association with Charlene. Evidently, she will come off as the innocent victim in all this. After reading all the news about this, I think that Charlene heard about the new child and decided to STAGE this flight to freedom to get Albert to agree to something that she wants in order for her to agree to come back to the wedding. If she leaves Albert at the altar, it would be very embarrassing for him, particularly after all the money spent. Charlene knows that his reign might not survive something like that. But her blackmail efforts were made public and now everyone has egg on their face. Just part of that you 'reap what you sow' that MyaDia talks about. They wanted everyone looking at them; now everyone is. Just that most people are thinking they are idiots! Watch for the Monaco's (Caroline's) tiara on WC's head on July 2nd. I bet that was her ultimatum: "I want that damn tiara on my head or else!" ;D ;D ;D No, just look at all of the fashion shoots making tributes to Grace, I bet that the tiara will be Grace's. I don't think that the palace PR people want to channel Caroline, since she is still at the palace. Who knows, maybe Charlene does not know what it will look like. Grace did not see her bridal tiara until the day that she had to wear it.
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on Jun 30, 2011 10:58:22 GMT -5
Who the heck cares about who will attend or skip or what Mr or Mrs Prince or Princess and their guests will be wearing - with all the recent information that was unveiled?
This wedding is a mockery.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 11:05:49 GMT -5
Who the heck cares about who will attend or skip or what Mr or Mrs Prince or Princess and their guests will be wearing - with all the recent information that was unveiled? This wedding is a mockery. You said it! I'm betting the press will wait until after the wedding to spill the rest of the stuff they've uncovered.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 11:08:09 GMT -5
Trust me, Albert's handlers and friends will not allow Charlene to be seen as they victim and Albert the culprit. If Charlene tries to do that - the flood gate will open spilling all of Charlene's gaffes and real background that the palace has so thus far kept under wraps. It certainly looks like she and LaCoste succeeded in making Albert the culprit on this round. Stahl sounded like an idiot but at least she wasn't blaming Albert like LaCoste and his big mouth about the kids did. I agree that Charlene better watch her back around the palace. She may have just doomed herself to a padded dungeon to be pulled out when needed.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 11:19:28 GMT -5
Article in Le Monde Monaco : la rumeur aurait été alimentée par des imprudences de la police la fiancée 'aurait voulu interrompre les préparatifs de son mariage et repartir' en Afrique du Sud, en raison de 'la vie privée' de son futur époux. Selon des informations du Figaro jeudi, il se pourrait que la rumeur 'ait été crédibilisée par des imprudences de policiers monégasques'. Dimanche, l'un d'eux 'se serait répandu sur l'intervention de ses collègues à l'aéroport de Nice pour rattraper in extremis la princesse, qui désirait s'en aller'. Ce même policier aurait dit également que le passeport de la jeune femme lui aurait été retiré. www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2011/06/30/monaco-la-rumeur-aurait-ete-alimentee-par-des-imprudences-de-la-police_1542780_3214.html#xtor=AL-32280184As I said before, there is no way she would ever be able to leave Nice airport without being caught. She is now a Monegasque. No more South African passport. She can't escape anymore. She will be given a microchip implant by force with 24/24 tracking. It is now inevitable. She can't escape it. She will be made a slave and a puppet. If she doesn't fit in they will pull out a Diana on her no doubt. This is the price to pay for becoming a princess. It's the same for all of those who marry in all royal families who are not princesses by blood. LOL maybe they will do a Jane Eyre, lock her up in the palace attic and one day she will set the whole thing on fire....
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 30, 2011 11:21:52 GMT -5
Who the heck cares about who will attend or skip or what Mr or Mrs Prince or Princess and their guests will be wearing - with all the recent information that was unveiled? This wedding is a mockery. Exactly! So, I am curious to know how the French TV stations personalities who have been sucking up and praising Albert and Charlene as the fairy tale love couple will handle this for five hours. Will they ignore the latest information and continue promoting this marriage as a fairy tale love story?
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jun 30, 2011 11:27:11 GMT -5
I just posted news of the baby over on PA's children thread - Eringer cracked the case.....
|
|