|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 30, 2011 7:27:33 GMT -5
he's kinda hot too! okay, stop creative. anyways i prefer a brilliant mind from a man! now to my point. maybe he could write a book on these two and expose this scam business deal for what it really is. balancing the lies that hold this "couple" together, the ineffectiveness of albert as a leader and the corruption. Girl, that was the first thing I noticed! Not only is he smoking hot (for a man of any age, but I believe he's 55), he also has integirty and a BRAIN - I love those combinations!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 7:34:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 30, 2011 8:08:09 GMT -5
Thanks Paca - REPUTATION is a key word on why this sroty became really big - Albert's versus a respected journalist of a respected news magazine. Stahl has no idea of how deluded she comes across when she screamed how L'Express was harming Albert's reputation. Christiane dear, Albert's reputation is why people believed the story to be true?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 30, 2011 8:31:14 GMT -5
for someone who deals with journalists on a daily basis, she has no idea how they tick. The sad part is, that her job is really not difficult if she was smart. But helas she isn't and she just has no idea how to stop the likes of Bern and Lacoste and Michael Wittstock from blabbing
|
|
|
Post by actarus on Jun 30, 2011 8:49:21 GMT -5
That's was basically what the dagospia author wrote on his/her page about this wedding that nobody cares about, and nicknaming Albert 'Albertino', hinting either at Albert's homosexuality or incompetence. Wondering why my post was deleted. Unfortunately I had no time to translate it yesterday.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 30, 2011 9:59:23 GMT -5
That's was basically what the dagospia author wrote on his/her page about this wedding that nobody cares about, and nicknaming Albert 'Albertino', hinting either at Albert's homosexuality or incompetence. Wondering why my post was deleted. Unfortunately I had no time to translate it yesterday. Ok, I am going to say this for the upteenth time - I DO NOT DELET POSTS! But, I do move posts to another thread that is more appropriate to discuss. In your case Actarus, you posted an article specifically about the L'Express article claim into the thread of Charlene and Albert's photo opp/visit to the preparation of the Jarre concert.
To anyone who is searching for a post that is not in the thread that you originally posted it, just click on your name and under your profile, you will see a listing of your most recent posts.
Again, of course I understand sometimes posters are not sure which threads to post certain information because of the many threads, but I will not allow Royal Opinion be a free for all with no organization. I will say this again, everyone thinks that since it is just one post (theirs) it's ok, but I am moving quite a few posts a day. Trust me please, the threads will have no organization if I allow posters to post information just in any thread that happens to be convenient. The good thing is that most posters are trying their best to also keep the threads organized and the more comments that I have made like this, posters (especially the regulars) do post info in the most appropriate threads. I just wish people understand for me it is about organization - and not my attempt to control opinions.
I need to correct something, in the three months since Royal Opinions have started - I have deleted a post - just one. It was a post with a link to an article that was already posted and being discussed! This particular poster wasn't a frequent poster and tended to come and post links to articles that have already been posted. i will start deleting links if the liuk has already been posted. Actarus, here is where I moved your post - and the subject states where you had originally posted it. It is not necessary to translate articles (but of course always welcomed). Your own summary of the article shows that the thread that you posted it was not the most appropriate one for your information. royalopinions.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=couple&thread=312&page=7#8173
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jun 30, 2011 11:41:00 GMT -5
Another journalist has addressed the same topic of the press's blind coverage as Renaud Revel has. However, RTL add an additional issue - the moral issue and not just the journalistic integrity issue. Eringer has on his blog a great sumamry of a radio (I believe) broadcast from RTl. We have also asked this questions and I think all of the media who are placed in Monaco and who will broadcast live should really consider the moral issues with their glorification of this couple and this wedding. Just because Albert and Charlene have shown the world that they have no soul doesn't mean that the media should follow suit.
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 29, 2011
RTL: A MORAL QUESTION
What happens to Monaco?
The facts are private, and therefore "do not concern us."
Except that the world's media will be present on Friday in the Principality, for the marriage of Prince Albert, and if all this is a vast lie, it's a problem, at least morally, if not philosophically.
Summarize the situation:
Charlene loves Albert. She is supposed to marry him on Friday before the world's television cameras. Yet she decided to leave the Principality. But for mysterious reasons, the aircraft did not take off, and Charlene was returned to Monaco.
And yesterday, they walked Port Hercules, supposedly in love.
Even a philosopher who thinks that journalists produce only a pack of cat shit would dispute this.
On Friday, a party in the Principality. The glamorous couple will walk the streets and kiss. A mass will be celebrated, everyone will mimic happiness, and journalists will comment on the beauty of places, people, things, mountains and marvels.
But I think nobody has thought it through.
The moral question, not philosophical, is this:
If we know that the prince is less wonderful than his legend, and the princess is more depressed than her smile suggests, if this love is a deception, should we report false history as true?
If this marriage is crap, should we spread molasses, and take viewers for morons?
RTL.fr : Vivez l'Info, L'Actualité, Le Sport en Direct Live sur la 1ère Radio de France
POSTED BY ROBERT ERINGER AT 10:24 PM
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jun 30, 2011 13:36:53 GMT -5
Eringer has on his blog a great sumamry of a radio (I believe) broadcast from RTl. We have also asked this questions and I think all of the media who are placed in Monaco and who will broadcast live should really consider the moral issues with their glorification of this couple and this wedding. Just because Albert and Charlene have shown the world that they have no soul doesn't mean that the media should follow suit.
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 29, 2011
RTL: A MORAL QUESTION
What happens to Monaco?
Eringer does have his propose now and again. AdminNote: Reduced length of quoted text
|
|