|
Post by axelle on Jul 15, 2011 7:57:58 GMT -5
This was so dense - did she do a speech? I haven't seen anything?
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 22, 2011 13:03:38 GMT -5
I just had to post this caption: Albert looks pregnant. And....the sugah used to say (and they probably still say) that he was thinner, because of "love" LOL. And this one: even before Barsi comes, she already wanted to cry, it seems:
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 22, 2011 8:49:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by countess on Aug 22, 2011 14:06:18 GMT -5
i still am baffled by her not wearing that "wave" crown at her wedding. if there was anytime to wear it I would think it was at the reception. i wish we knew the whole story to that "creation". do you think VC&A made it thinking he'd pay for it and he wouldn't so now it's just an "exhibit"
it's just so WEird to me there has to be a story why she didn't wear it instead of the diamond antenne thingy that made her look even more alien. (shurg) what do ya'll think???
|
|
|
Post by smt on Aug 22, 2011 17:22:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 22, 2011 18:34:15 GMT -5
This morning, I posted those from the civil wedding in the civil wedding thread - including the one where they posed under Grace's photo..
|
|
|
Post by smt on Aug 23, 2011 9:33:41 GMT -5
This morning, I posted those from the civil wedding in the civil wedding thread - including the one where they posed under Grace's photo.. Thanks, MyAdia!
|
|
|
Post by taz on Sept 16, 2011 5:26:34 GMT -5
Exclusive documents: This is the dress code at the royal wedding of Prince Albert of MonacoTwo weeks before the wedding all guests got this 8-page-document describing the dress code. pic 1pic 2pic 3pic 4pic 5pic 6pic 7pic 8"However, following requests from some of you, we have decided that a dark suit could be allowed. However, this choice will compel us to organise your transport to inside the Cour d'Honneur without passing trough the Porte d'Honneur." "However, this attire entails an out-of-camera access to the religious ceremony and not trough the main door."
So this basically means: "If you don't follow our rules we won't let you in front of the cameras." The blogger also makes fun of this and the whole dress code and I think she's absolutely right. CC and PA are such media whores IMO!
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Sept 16, 2011 5:45:50 GMT -5
Wow, thanks again Taz! They are beyond media whores. This is just more evidence to confirm that the ONLY THING that Albert and Charlene cared about was how this entire farcical wedding was going to play out to the press. The irony is that THEY THEMSELVES made themselves the laugh stock of the worlds - not the guests.
Notice that these set of letters are all in English - I wondered if they were tailored made for Charlene's side of the guest list.
|
|
|
Post by countess on Sept 16, 2011 10:07:46 GMT -5
FIRST OF ALL talk about insulting!! this must have been made up for trashlenes' side of the family with pictures and all , since they're as uneducated as her and cannot read!!!
i think i've found the zodiac killer NO REALLY i was reading about that murderer in san francisco that murdered all those people in the 70's. i saw some of his letters and he used this weird code and i swear one of the letters is the signature in picture 4!!
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Sept 16, 2011 11:02:21 GMT -5
I am not surprised by any of this. Didn't one of WC's invited friends tell the press that WC even offered to by her clothing for the wedding? Which WC's low class friend happily accepted!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Sept 16, 2011 17:02:19 GMT -5
I doubt any of this was sent to the Royals or those who are in the habit of participating at such event. Even a regular, working class Brit would have known how to dress. So I suspect that trashys friends hail from below that social class. In most countries that would be homeless people, but then again they are behaving like stray cats and dogs getting comfy in their new home..
|
|
|
Post by smt on Sept 16, 2011 18:04:27 GMT -5
How embarrasing to receivesuch correspondance. I agree with Paca -- I can't imagine such dribble being sent to the King and Queen of Sweden! As for such correspondance being directed to Trampolina's friends -- sounds accurate except for the fact that only four members of her family attended and she has only "two" friends. I think such crap was for the "hired" guests used to fill-up the chairs!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Sept 17, 2011 8:15:08 GMT -5
The best part is that they actually sent them pictures...for trashys other illiterate, trashy friends.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Nov 27, 2011 16:50:24 GMT -5
According to the Sugahs the Court released two pictures on November 21 ... including this one of the "family" ... I suspect that the Court read our suspicions as to why no family photographs had been released. Now, if they would only listen to our suggestion that these two losers be permanently trashed! Here's the photo ... poor Camille Gottlieb -- you can see only her shoes! img266.imageshack.us/img266/8062/familieportretcharlenee.jpg
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Nov 27, 2011 17:03:39 GMT -5
Interesting ubication of Alexandra...just saying.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Nov 27, 2011 19:33:01 GMT -5
Interesting ubication of Alexandra...just saying. Yes, isn't it though!
|
|
|
Post by smt on Nov 28, 2011 8:16:47 GMT -5
Here is the link to the document about the wedding ceremonies and guests which was released by the Palace on November 21 ... www.palais.mc/monaco/root/bank_mm/pdf/JO8043_Ceremonies_officielles_Mariage_Princier.pdfHere are some of my thoughts: 1.) Me think you doth protest too much! This is just another futile attempt by the Palace flunkies to get people to think this was a genuine and sincere occasion. Rule #1 of PR: never answer your critics directly. The flunkies continue to violate this rule! 2.) Do they want us to count the actual # of guests as proof that there were alot of important people in attendance? 3.) Further proof that this "official" document was hastily prepared and released: the official photographs were taken by Patrick Demarchelier. No photographer whether your local wedding photographer or Demarchelier would EVER release a photograph where the bride wasn't looking directly into the camera, the grooms sister (Stephanie) looks like she's constipated, and the groom's niece (Camille Gottlieb) is completely hidden! What frickin' fools!
|
|
|
Post by smt on Nov 28, 2011 8:17:13 GMT -5
Here is the link to the document about the wedding ceremonies and guests which was released by the Palace on November 21 ... www.palais.mc/monaco/root/bank_mm/pdf/JO8043_Ceremonies_officielles_Mariage_Princier.pdfHere are some of my thoughts: 1.) Me think you doth protest too much! This is just another futile attempt by the Palace flunkies to get people to think this was a genuine and sincere occasion. Rule #1 of PR: never answer your critics directly. The flunkies continue to violate this rule! 2.) Do they want us to count the actual # of guests as proof that there were alot of important people in attendance? 3.) Further proof that this "official" document was hastily prepared and released: the official photographs were taken by Patrick Demarchelier. No photographer whether your local wedding photographer or Demarchelier would EVER release a photograph where the bride wasn't looking directly into the camera, the grooms sister (Stephanie) looks like she's constipated, and the groom's niece (Camille Gottlieb) is completely hidden! What frickin' fools!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Nov 28, 2011 9:42:43 GMT -5
Here is the link to the document about the wedding ceremonies and guests which was released by the Palace on November 21 ... www.palais.mc/monaco/root/bank_mm/pdf/JO8043_Ceremonies_officielles_Mariage_Princier.pdfHere are some of my thoughts: 1.) Me think you doth protest too much! This is just another futile attempt by the Palace flunkies to get people to think this was a genuine and sincere occasion. Rule #1 of PR: never answer your critics directly. The flunkies continue to violate this rule! 2.) Do they want us to count the actual # of guests as proof that there were alot of important people in attendance? 3.) Further proof that this "official" document was hastily prepared and released: the official photographs were taken by Patrick Demarchelier. No photographer whether your local wedding photographer or Demarchelier would EVER release a photograph where the bride wasn't looking directly into the camera, the grooms sister (Stephanie) looks like she's constipated, and the groom's niece (Camille Gottlieb) is completely hidden! What frickin' fools! LOL the best pic thoughis the one where Albert is posing with trashy alone and looks as if he has swallowed a stick. I don't think I have ever seen Albert pose as badly for an official pic. It's been photoshopped as well. trashy looks like a turtle in the eagle pic, the ceremony one, Albetr is sitting with his hands on his knees like a guy getting ready to get up and get out, the pic with the Monegasques does not show the huge constructions every where that spread the crowd and make it look bigger then it is. I have not noticed before, but her dad is as unaccustomed to manners as his daughter. The way he is leading her makes it obvious that he has no idea of how to lend his arm to a woman. Trashy almost needs to jerk her arm in order to hold on to his. And then they chose the pic in front of St devote in which trashy is so obviously not praying or doing anything that is expected of a catholic, underlining once again that she swapped faith just for show. I also find it strange how her family is placed in the pic and that the parents are just part of the crowd and not highlighted. All in all very unprofessional, but I guess the best they can do considering what they have to work with
|
|