|
Post by Elektra on Jul 12, 2011 12:57:46 GMT -5
what are the bets? trashlene is having more surgery OR she's having in vitro in france OR she's locked in dungeon Oh, no. WC is thougher than that. She is preparing for "High Noon" in Monaco. She has a reputation to defend and an mother in law to copy. WC does not like to be in a soap opera she wants to be in a Shakespearian Drama. Even if she does not understand a single word.
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 12, 2011 13:02:24 GMT -5
what are the bets? trashlene is having more surgery OR she's having in vitro in france OR she's locked in dungeon i'll go with "locked in a dungeon for $500!"
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 12, 2011 13:08:07 GMT -5
what are the bets? trashlene is having more surgery OR she's having in vitro in france OR she's locked in dungeon i'll go with "locked in a dungeon for $500!" I'll go with Surgery for $1,000.
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 12, 2011 13:11:30 GMT -5
dang you hibou!!!!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 12, 2011 13:13:12 GMT -5
I'll take on the phone to the media while having ivf for 1500!
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 12, 2011 13:29:28 GMT -5
You guys are hilarious! Maybe she is having a facelift while doing the IVF , locked in a dungeon.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 12, 2011 13:59:22 GMT -5
You guys are hilarious! Maybe she is having a facelift while doing the IVF , locked in a dungeon. OMG, hilarious Emme - but you are probably right - this is Conlene so anything is possible!
|
|
|
Post by suite583 on Jul 12, 2011 14:29:44 GMT -5
I will send her for ivf of 40 000 to DuPont Laboratories in Paris
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 12, 2011 14:39:40 GMT -5
I'll go for divorce.
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 12, 2011 15:59:41 GMT -5
I'll take on the phone to the media while having ivf for 1500! oooh mrplowfan, you might beat hibou then!
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 12, 2011 16:01:04 GMT -5
emm close but i think "suite" is winning right now! who's going to take it? ??
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 12, 2011 16:45:11 GMT -5
I'll take on the phone to the media while having ivf for 1500! just wandering if they are in an IVF clinic to get the heir business going also known as mission Free Charly, does she need to be present while Albert donates his sperm, will he be present when she delivers her goods and who will supervise the mix to make sure it is all legal and valid with the constitution? I sort of imagine a scenario along the lines of the weekly drawings of the lottery numbers....
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 12, 2011 17:09:20 GMT -5
The partner does not need to be present for the IVF donation. In fact, it can be done in the privacy of your home and delivered to the clinic (that's what octomom did). Yuk. As long as the kids are delivered from her, there's no way to repudiate their birth. They would (theoretically) have his DNA and be born in marriage.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 12, 2011 17:19:05 GMT -5
LOL yes, but remember in ancient times they had the court standing around the couple watching on to make sure the heir is truly his...so really it wouldn't surprise me. Besides accidents happen and people are human, so they would have to have supervision, plus DNA testing after the fact to make sure... somehow I don't think that Rainier in changing the constitution meant by legal heir to get married to a surrogate mom. And I would not be surprised if someone eventually would contest the heir...
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 12, 2011 17:50:20 GMT -5
This whole mess has gone way further south than I ever imagined!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jul 12, 2011 18:01:03 GMT -5
Not sure, but I seem to remember something about the Catholic Church not being on board with IVF. I didn't pay all that much attention to the article - it was about 3 years ago - maybe longer. But it's possible that the Church would contest the legitimacy of such a child - if they wanted to help whoever it is that should actually take over. Also, if the egg wasn't hers - that could be an issue as well - constitutionally -as well as religiously???
WHAT A MESS!!!
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jul 12, 2011 20:00:32 GMT -5
The partner does not need to be present for the IVF donation
but remember in ancient times they had the court standing around the couple watching on to make sure the heir is truly his
ONLY way i'd have his kid JMO i think FatAl likes people to watch, so he'd be cool with that rule.
the catholic church does not sanction IVF, it breaks all the rules for procreation IE: birth control
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 12, 2011 20:01:26 GMT -5
The church, no. The next heir, yes.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 12, 2011 22:20:13 GMT -5
Yeah, well, but what can we expect from this sham of marriage, the "church" let them get married. They will let them have their kid, doesn't matter if it's a robot, they won't care.
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Jul 13, 2011 11:01:32 GMT -5
LOL yes, but remember in ancient times they had the court standing around the couple watching on to make sure the heir is truly his...so really it wouldn't surprise me. Besides accidents happen and people are human, so they would have to have supervision, plus DNA testing after the fact to make sure... somehow I don't think that Rainier in changing the constitution meant by legal heir to get married to a surrogate mom. And I would not be surprised if someone eventually would contest the heir... I think Albert wouldn't mind doing that! ;D ;D ;D
|
|