|
Post by taz on Jul 23, 2011 13:29:21 GMT -5
Another question for Mr. Roger...He said that rumors of "the third alleged illegitimate son of the Sovereign" are false. I thought that Albert only had ONE son, Alex. If the one from the rumor is the " third son of the Sovereign", then who is the SECOND? Or is Mr. Roger saying that Alex is second, the latest one from the rumor is the third...which means that the one from Germany (teenager) was indeed his first son?! Can you Mr. Roger clarify...because now I am confused.... I think the translation is wrong. "Figlio" can of course mean "son" but in general "terzo figlio illegittimo" means "third illegitimate child".
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 23, 2011 14:15:51 GMT -5
Another question for Mr. Roger...He said that rumors of "the third alleged illegitimate son of the Sovereign" are false. I thought that Albert only had ONE son, Alex. If the one from the rumor is the " third son of the Sovereign", then who is the SECOND? Or is Mr. Roger saying that Alex is second, the latest one from the rumor is the third...which means that the one from Germany (teenager) was indeed his first son?! Can you Mr. Roger clarify...because now I am confused.... I think the translation is wrong. "Figlio" can of course mean "son" but in general "terzo figlio illegittimo" means "third illegitimate child". Thanks Taz!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 23, 2011 19:11:45 GMT -5
Kate is IMO a well programmed robot, I don´t see anything special on her. But the BRF likes this I guess. Oh I have to disagree on Kate. I watched the videos of their Canadian trip and from what I saw, she does have the ability to connect with people, and she and William did not take a bad step that whole trip. Twelve days of high media scrutiny would have left cracks in the door to see if she as just a programmed walkie talkie or has a brain and functions well in the job. I agree she doesn't have the charisma of a Diana but then few do, that's why they are icons. Any way, back on topic -- compare her to Charlene and you have a plastic Barbie. JMO Di didn't have charisma to start with. It was her story and her tragic end that made her into who she is said to be nowadays. It has nothing to with who she was as a person or how she was perceived at the time. Kate is a much more together woman then Di ever was.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 23, 2011 19:18:40 GMT -5
AlCha has their days count...this reality show is the best i've ever seen in my life!! LOL. Go Team Caroline!! LOL Alcha sounds like ulcer ;D
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 23, 2011 19:32:08 GMT -5
AlCha has their days count...this reality show is the best i've ever seen in my life!! LOL. Go Team Caroline!! LOL Alcha sounds like ulcer ;D Hahah, as you see, all the nicknames are fit to them!!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 23, 2011 19:36:43 GMT -5
Albert realized that he made a fool of himself yesterday is now he is getting everyone in Monaco to join him. Good lawd, this is such a big mistake! LOL as if residents cared. All they are here for is saving tax and doing dodgy business. Albert and ass. are trying to create a common enemy to get Monegasques back in line. This is not about the media, this is to deflect from the criticism they are getting back home. There are people wanting answers about who is footing the bills for this farce. They want to know why their entire country is being ridiculed by an incompetent prince and his uneducated golddigging vulture wife. This is once again to save Alberts fat butt. Just like Proust had to do it. Don't fall for the trap and getting hung up on the media and the lawsuits. That's just sand in peoples eyes. Stick to what is important and that is that Alberts government has no plan to bring Monaco back on track. For over a year they have tried to sell the wedding as an economic boost. But the streets are empty. They have wasted state money on a farce which should have gone into bettering the lives of people living in Monaco. Instead things are getting worse. And to round things off the entire world is laughing at Monaco and its ruling couple. Even people who never wasted a thought on them. Monegasques were not happy with the image Monaco had. Albert promised them to change that. And yes he successfully kept his promise, the only one he did keep. Unfortunately he changed it for worse...
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 23, 2011 20:00:06 GMT -5
A Serious Question: Do you believe that Charlene is telling the truth and the airport story NEVER happened and it is all "categorical lies"? I have always called Charlene a pathological liar - because she is one! But, do you really feel that she will lie about something as SERIOUS as this and about something that several others can actually verify - if indeed she went to the airport? Monaco is really going to war about the L'Express article (read the article here)which stated that Charlene bought a one-way ticket to South Africa and she was stopped from flying. The Minister of State Michel Roger has his facts wrong about what L'Express actually wrote - which is really scary when governmental officials are asking hthe entire country to rally behind their Prince and Princess. The key thing is that on Tuesday, June 28th, L'Express stated that htis incident happened a week ago. Yet, Roger is strongly believing that L'Express is referencing Charlene's Saturday trip to Greece on that Saturday June 25th. The level of ineptness of Monaco's officials are truly scary. Really scary. From L'Express on Tuesday June 28th: It all begins, a week ago, with the hasty departure of the future princess to Nice airport where she had decided to board a flight to South Africa. A flight with no return. Shaken, Charlene Wittstock had just learned a few hours earlier, that the privacy of the man she is about to marry and who had publicly confessed in September 2005, the existence of an illegitimate child with Nicole Coste , was not as exemplary as she imagined. personally I don't think that they actually know what evidence l'express is holding. We had daddy witchstock saying that she went to paris with her mom and now Roger saying she was in Greece. And he is wrong in saying that the pics of her in Greece were not published. They were. l'express never gave a precise date to the incident. All media referring to the article were either guessing the possible date or simply taking the weekend before the publishing of the article as reference. l'express has never stated a date or given a reason for the incident; They only stated that it did happen and that they have proof for it. They did not in the least touch the private life of a public couple. They explicitly stated that they would leave it to their colleagues of the yellowpress to guess or write on the reasons. There is no chance that any judge would rule in favour of the Monaco Ulcer. and they know it. otherwise they would have done so 4 weeks ago
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jul 24, 2011 10:46:04 GMT -5
I wonder who is next to attack the rumors. Let's see, we had the couple itself, the Wittstocks defending their cashflow, Roger and Bern, probably just doing the same as the Wittstocks. Now I am waiting for the the husband's family speaking up to defend the true love. I wonder why that corner is so quiet right now.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 24, 2011 11:00:04 GMT -5
Steph will be next. Caro won't comment unless they threaten one of her kids. She never comments on these things. She only defended EA once in an attempt to save her marriage and then had to do it again as she had previously testified to save face. Other then that she ignores what she doesn't want to see. SHe surely has an opinion in private, but she keeps these things private. STeph is as dumb as the brother she thinks she is protecting and if he asks her to go public, she will. You will probably soon see the three of them together laughing etc to show how great they all get on and how in love the divorcebirds are and how happy Steph is for them. Also Donatella might come forward. All these years she did not get to sit at the red cross with the family. Last 2 years at least she got to walk in with them, but she never ever was noticed by the press. this year might be her chance and since she is naturally better looking, as is her husband, she might hope to catch some media light for herself.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 24, 2011 15:10:05 GMT -5
Steph will be next. Caro won't comment unless they threaten one of her kids. She never comments on these things. She only defended EA once in an attempt to save her marriage and then had to do it again as she had previously testified to save face. Other then that she ignores what she doesn't want to see. SHe surely has an opinion in private, but she keeps these things private. STeph is as dumb as the brother she thinks she is protecting and if he asks her to go public, she will. You will probably soon see the three of them together laughing etc to show how great they all get on and how in love the divorcebirds are and how happy Steph is for them. Also Donatella might come forward. All these years she did not get to sit at the red cross with the family. Last 2 years at least she got to walk in with them, but she never ever was noticed by the press. this year might be her chance and since she is naturally better looking, as is her husband, she might hope to catch some media light for herself. 100% agree! Stephanie, Donatella, and all the morons that hang out with AlCha have their days count.
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jul 24, 2011 15:49:36 GMT -5
www.vox.de/cms/sendungen/prominent/prominent-videos.htmlMore or less making fun of the love birds. They refer to PA's press conference and his being "hurt by the press and the rumors". And they point out that he did not refer to the rumors about the paternity test only about the pratical reasons for the separate rooms in South Africa. The so called society reporter states that they were really sweet with each other at a private party in South Africa where she was invited. Oh well, when you are invited to a private party would you say something bad about your host? Especially when you are a reporter?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 24, 2011 20:06:46 GMT -5
the journalist is only telling what trashys friend told her. She says they were at Monaco airport to go to Paris and see KL. Monaco does not have an airport, it has a heliport. A tiny one as that. And it is on MC territory, so there would not have been french police involved. These people ought to get their lies straight before going public. btw why would anyone invite a reporter to a private evening on their honeymoon? I don't even think that this woman is a society reporter. SA does not have society that German mags would be particularly interested in. if you google her then you get a Dagmar Schumacher who is writing travel books. they are not particularly expensive so I doubt that she can live well with it (I know how little they pay at this price; you need to be a big gun in the business to get a decent price for your work). I assume that she gets freelance work for mags on occasion and the extra money from ZDF and RTL/VOX is welcome too. not mentioning the publicity she gets for herself. Not sure what she is otherwise living off, but if there is no husband to support her in the back groung, then I doubt that she will be living the highlife. she will probably trying to get as many journalist freebies as possible.Lucky for her there are plenty around. and people like Monaco ulcer have good use for the likes of her. Throw her a free meal on occasion and she will make sure a few nice things will be said. woman got to pay her bills
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jul 25, 2011 10:28:05 GMT -5
Hi Paca, the only time I came across this Dagmar Schumacher reporter was a in a clip - I think by Vox or that ZDF documentary about the couple where she said with almost the same words "they were so sweet together" but this time she was refering to the party in 2005/2006 in South Africa. I have the feeling she belongs to the WC entourage.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 25, 2011 15:16:52 GMT -5
Prince Albert and Charlene Sue French magazine L'Express Oh dear the idiots.
Thierry Lacoste, the lawyer. As filed at the Court of Nanterre, in the Paris region, with deals with 'infringement of private life' and the 'publication of incorrect facts in connection with the private life '.
Editor-in-Chief Christophe Barbier explained earlier that the editors about 'information from three different and reliable sources'. According to Barbier would be a departure from Charlene a 'political fact' and is therefore not an infringement of private life.
And there is again an earthquake...
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 25, 2011 16:03:16 GMT -5
Just keep pouring oil into the fire. Albert already can't stand the heat. There are papers that do not like being sued for doing their job. this will get the serious media worldwide against them. Where ever Albert will go he will be shredded to bits. They will show his environmental endeavors for what they really are. Everything that is outside tabloid range will be attacked and he will be shown to his people in public as the incompetent ruler he is.
Who does he think his French military people are working for? Him? Really? who has given Jayet a new mission just after leaving the wedding in a huff? I know for a fact that Sarkos office has been personally keeping an eye on the Odeon project. Our mayor has been arrested and incidentally a Ducruet is a vice mayor...Albert has no idea what is going on around him.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 25, 2011 17:17:41 GMT -5
I think what is really driving Albert and LaCoste mad is not knowing who the sources are. I don't know French law but in the US the sources would be named in the depositions unless the media claim them as anonymous and can provide reason not to name them. I wonder if they are after the names of the sources in order to ruin their lives. I hope France has a law to protect the sources. I agree with paca. The serious news agencies are going to be watching this case. I have a feeling that Albert and Charlene won't win. First of all she is a public figure, and secondly I believe they also have French officials who said it happened. They also had the palace PR department admit it happened, and as pointed out, the palace had various people issue statements contradicting themselves trying to hide the facts. If Albert looses this one, L'Express is really going to go after him lock stock and barrel. It will become open season. Stay tuned!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 26, 2011 17:48:43 GMT -5
Dlisted: "Prince Pierced Peen doth protests a lot - Lainey Gossip" From Lainey Gossip: laineygossip.com/Prince_Albert_and_Charlene_to_sue_LExpress_over_rumours_about_their_wedding_26jul11.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0Her Serene Highness Princess Charlene and her husband Prince Albert of Monaco don’t appreciate that we keep thinking that she’s being held prisoner in a white castle. They insist that Charlene did not try to escape three times before her wedding and eventually had her passport confiscated and have filed papers in French court against L’Express Magazine for fuelling what they call “false rumours” about their relationship.
Why is the monarch dickhead feeling so brave? Well, there’s the whole News of the World situation which has emboldened him against the press. And some say he’s worked out a little arrangement with the third baby mother who said he was the father. One pro-Albert version of the story will be publicised, the other will be taken care of with a big cheque.
What?
The media may not be allowed to get away with everything. But rich people? Obscenely rich heads of state? Almost always.
As for those “false rumours” – let’s watch again, let’s watch their Highnesses show us that that was the happiest day of their lives.
(link to a video of the Saint Devote crying fiasco)
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 26, 2011 18:01:00 GMT -5
^Haha, lol! dickhead monarch
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 26, 2011 18:36:28 GMT -5
Dlisted: "Prince Pierced Peen doth protests a lot - Lainey Gossip" From Lainey Gossip: laineygossip.com/Prince_Albert_and_Charlene_to_sue_LExpress_over_rumours_about_their_wedding_26jul11.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0Her Serene Highness Princess Charlene and her husband Prince Albert of Monaco don’t appreciate that we keep thinking that she’s being held prisoner in a white castle. They insist that Charlene did not try to escape three times before her wedding and eventually had her passport confiscated and have filed papers in French court against L’Express Magazine for fuelling what they call “false rumours” about their relationship.
Why is the monarch dickhead feeling so brave? Well, there’s the whole News of the World situation which has emboldened him against the press. And some say he’s worked out a little arrangement with the third baby mother who said he was the father. One pro-Albert version of the story will be publicised, the other will be taken care of with a big cheque.
What?
The media may not be allowed to get away with everything. But rich people? Obscenely rich heads of state? Almost always.
As for those “false rumours” – let’s watch again, let’s watch their Highnesses show us that that was the happiest day of their lives.
(link to a video of the Saint Devote crying fiasco) I do not believe they will win this case. There are too many people who are willing to tell the truth. Plus L'Express might not have to reveal it's sources which is what I think they are really after. LaCoste has made a mess of this already. It's only going to get worse for Albert. JMO
|
|
|
Post by dolcevita on Jul 26, 2011 20:57:02 GMT -5
I agree, I really think the lawsuit is about finding out the source... I don't think they are really trying to get a retraction and apology... just a name...
|
|