|
Post by refia on Aug 3, 2011 13:27:33 GMT -5
Maybe he enjoys the attention he wouldn´t normally get and talks and talks and talks.., What an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Aug 3, 2011 14:03:01 GMT -5
Do you feel that the below underlined comment that Albert makes about Eringer, he can also make about anyone of us who voice opinions here about Albert and Charlene? Actually, this is what Chalrene, her family, her friend, her fanatics and many other people on royal message boards say about many of us. This is what was stated about us when the Monaco section was closed down on RoyalDish. MH: Why do you think it take you today as a target? A. II: His obsession and hard on the Principality and myself are pathetic. I did not attack right away thinking that this court case because of its inconsistency and its ridiculous, stop by itself. But I realized that it was not possible when reported to be ready to stop writing his articles defamatory and offensive if it were paid a sum of $ 1 million in return.
This is a person embittered that simply pour his venom and resentment on the Internet. He had said he had other missions and other sources of income.Obviously this is not the case.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Aug 3, 2011 14:09:33 GMT -5
^Hahha, lol, you are right MyaDia! Albert really is a moron, isn't he? And, the possibility of legitimazing any of his offspring...it's odd. Seems like he doesn't want Caroline (or her kids) in the throne. But, sometimes he yet uses them to promote some events...
I think Caroline doesn't want to be the ruler, nor her kids, but i don't see a better solution. Yes, democracy would be ideal, but Albert would have to really screwep up things big time for democracy to be considered. And he is talking about this...what happens, Charlene can't get pregnant yet? If we don't have a pregnancy annuncement in later September-ish, i think they are in trouble. They can't wait too much.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 15:53:03 GMT -5
The way I read it is that if he and Charlene can't have a child they will adopt one - but not one of his illegitimate children because it won't be "Charlene's child". WTF kind of a parent is that?! If he "decides" otherwise then his sisters kids will inherit. WTF? Has he not read the constitution? He can neither adopt or decide who inherits. Exactly his out of wedlock kids can not inherit, nor can any adopted children. If he dies without legitimate issue, Carolines line will succeed. In order to change this he would have to change the constitution and he doesn't have enough political weight to do that. HOw would he possibly argue this? When Louis made Rainier his heir, there was no direct female line, no sisters line to turn to. Distant relatives would have taken over MC. This wasn't the case since Rainier and Antoinette. And now with Caroline it is not necessary either.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 16:53:38 GMT -5
So they are giving explanations well knowing that the rumours about her running away had started before that? ?? How is that supposed to make any sense? Isn't the usual thing that sth happens, for which you have no explanation and that's how the rumour starts? And what was the point then of pointing to a Paris visit and the visit to Athens if they already knew that this was not what the rumour or the l'express article was about? ?? do these people know how little sense they make? Did they all shrink their brains to match trashys or did they need to blow them up?
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Aug 3, 2011 17:10:29 GMT -5
So they are giving explanations well knowing that the rumours about her running away had started before that? ?? How is that supposed to make any sense? Isn't the usual thing that sth happens, for which you have no explanation and that's how the rumour starts? And what was the point then of pointing to a Paris visit and the visit to Athens if they already knew that this was not what the rumour or the l'express article was about? ?? do these people know how little sense they make? Did they all shrink their brains to match trashys or did they need to blow them up? The king is not wearing any clothes. What else can one say.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Aug 3, 2011 17:38:33 GMT -5
So they are giving explanations well knowing that the rumours about her running away had started before that? ?? How is that supposed to make any sense? Isn't the usual thing that sth happens, for which you have no explanation and that's how the rumour starts? And what was the point then of pointing to a Paris visit and the visit to Athens if they already knew that this was not what the rumour or the l'express article was about? ?? do these people know how little sense they make? Did they all shrink their brains to match trashys or did they need to blow them up? The king is not wearing any clothes. What else can one say. Amen, sister!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Aug 3, 2011 18:16:50 GMT -5
The real reason the whole story looks false is that the "story" keeps changing. One excuse after another is offered up as the "reason" for the story. I also don't buy what Albert says about Eringer. He didn't even tell the truth about who can inherit and that's supposedly set in stone by the constitution of his country. I'm starting to believe Albert and Charlene are two peas in the liar pod.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 18:19:46 GMT -5
At the GP trashy was not recognized by the captain? NOw that's interesting. I bet she had a hissy fit. But didn't she go to another place without him and not home as he claims?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 18:30:37 GMT -5
LOL he actually thinks that those not invited to all parts of the wedding were the reasons for the rumours? Who could that possibly be? all those who were invited to sweat for the cameras, but not to the dinner? I think that would make the entire Monegasques population the culprit minus the chosen few who were allowed to attend...Talk about a prince mistrusting his own people...and then he says one day he will know who it was...and he will do what to this or these persons? shoot them? Put them in prison on what grounds? ban them from his country? Steal their property?In a normal court the best he could get would be a fine of a few hundred Euros. And he wants to spend how many thousands on this?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 18:35:47 GMT -5
What Albert says about Barbier and the normalization of MC is actually not correct. Yes on the surface MC is a sovereign state, but the EU commission has stated on several occasions that changes need to be made in order for them to consider MC an independent country. They said that their was progress, but there were a lot of buts on their list. Apparently Albert did not get that memo or it got lost in the mess on his desk...
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 18:52:03 GMT -5
So he thinks there is a conspiracy to destabilize the principality and its citizens? If anyone is unstable it is him in his position as prince and his marriage to a bimbo. People in MC are unhappy with his rule. They don't need anyone from outside to tell them that their prince is without a clou about the job. The only thing that worries them is how the problem can be fixed and who would be best to do the job. For some reason they hesitate with democracy because they have been told all these years that only the prince can look after them and knows what is good for them and MC. Now they have a prince who knows less about politics and the economy then a dishcleaner at Rascasse. And that worries them. And rightfully so. It is dawning on them that they have been fooled, but they are still lacking the courage to do what is necessary. I do believe though that eventually they will see what people in the Arabic countries have seen too: you can change systems and take your fate into your own hands. Democracy does not equal a worse life. Only if you vote for the wrong people. But at least you have a chance of getting rid of them with your next vote, if they are unfit for the job. If Albert truly believes that the people are happy with him as a prince, the way he is doing the job, then why not let them vote for him? In French history the Kings were elected. Why not revive that tradition?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 19:09:15 GMT -5
he feels relieved now that he got it all out? why didn't he take his helicopter to the arboretum he likes so much and have a little scream? official communication is not about pressure relief. What is this man going to do when he has a real problem? get a missile and shoot it off? If he wants to know what a real leader does when his people is looking for guidance, he should have a look at Jens Stoltenberg (btw they share a birthday, so much about horoscopes). If Stoltenberg would have gotten it all out in the media, what do you think would have happened in Norway? ALbert has a talent to turn nothing (a rumour) into sth and sth (Monaco) into nothing. Boy, get your priorities in order or go packing!!!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 19:15:17 GMT -5
he discovered that there are social networks and the internet? wow. when? and he is surprised how fast news travel nowadays? Spent too much time in your jet or on a different planet that you only found that out in 2011? Do the Aliens kidnap you when you are not in MC? is that why you don't get any work done like normal heads of state? Does Scotty beam you to lalala world and keep you shielded from modern technology and the news? Frightening!!!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 19:24:57 GMT -5
Just as a side comment, I think the journalist is not doing such a bad job considering under which circumstances she is doing it. She does ask questions that allow ALbert to reveal his inaptness to his people. Especially the question about why he decided to go public and have a spit, in context of his political role and appropriate behaviour, especially when you consider what he is getting his hissy fit about, show very clearly how little Albert is in control of himself or his communication department. Nothing but Alberts reasoning could have shown more clearly how unfit for the job he is and the journalist is allowing him to do so. That is a very smart move. Especially since this interview has been demanded by the palace and approved for publishing. That alone shows incompetence on all levels in the palace. And once again Stahl has done nothing to protect Albert from harming himself. She approved the questions. If she didn't write them herself that is. If she did, then Albert really has to ask himself if she is truely working for him...
|
|
|
Post by dolcevita on Aug 3, 2011 19:44:52 GMT -5
So, these rumors were started by people who were mad cause they didn't get invited to the wedding? Really? What, are we in junior high school now??
|
|
|
Post by paca on Aug 3, 2011 19:48:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dolcevita on Aug 3, 2011 21:20:50 GMT -5
Maybe those 30,000 people who bombarded the wedding exhibit stole it?? ;D
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Aug 3, 2011 21:39:29 GMT -5
ALL IS FALSE YES, we all know that! "ALL IS FALSE" the love story and your wedding! All is false, fake and farce!
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Aug 3, 2011 21:54:57 GMT -5
MH: Is there something that could have trigger them?A. II: There was an incident on Saturday evening of the Grand Prix. We had gone on the yacht of a friend. I arrived before Charlene. When Charlene came to the bridge, the captain of the boat - who had not recognized her- denied her access because there were already too crowded. At that time, she did not call the boat owner who would have immediately come up. She did not want to insist and preferred to return. Some people were then able to mount this hairpin incident and may be that is how the rumor started. In any case ridiculous.
As for the story of an illegitimate child, I have no idea where this might come. But this is absolutely false. ;D ;D ;D Is this the excuse he had sold to WC about why she was refused entrance to a "private party on his friend's yacht"? ;D The captain didn't recognized the future "Princess" and the "First Lady" of Monaco! Her pictures are plastered all over the Monaco and yet the captain was clueless and couldn't recognize her? ;D Of course Albert couldn't say to media (and WC) that his friend was trowing a bachelor's party for him on his yacht and WC was not invited because they were planing on having fun with Russian prostitutes. What a lunatic, if he didn't mentioned it no one would have known about this incident except for WC. I guess he is still trying to make it up to her and sell her the excuse why she couldn't step on the yacht that night. ;D ;D ;D
|
|