|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 23, 2011 22:21:55 GMT -5
Mr. Plowfan, thank you for writing the detailed explanation, but the above response is why I didn't waste my time. I've been down that road several times and I learned that it is absolutely clearly without a doubt A WASTE OF TIME. Really. Seriously, I have never seen this type of mentality before (to even refuse to believe who is who on the photos befuddles me) - not even with a sugar loonie. The longer I am on these boards the more I realize why they are called loonies. Seriously, like the magazine made it up and Sean didn't accept the award. Obviously the sugars are either embarrassed by the interview or the family is. This is exactly why the press are after them. You can't call people liars forever. These interviews are all taped. The sugars are just begging for the people of YOU to post it. In fact, I hope they do! Monacogate - concocted by the loonies who can't even believe a photo and Charlene's own words.
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 23, 2011 23:48:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bettina on Jul 24, 2011 3:21:42 GMT -5
Mr. Plowfan, thank you for writing the detailed explanation, but the above response is why I didn't waste my time. I've been down that road several times and I learned that it is absolutely clearly without a doubt A WASTE OF TIME. Really. Seriously, I have never seen this type of mentality before (to even refuse to believe who is who on the photos befuddles me) - not even with a sugar loonie. The longer I am on these boards the more I realize why they are called loonies. Seriously, like the magazine made it up and Sean didn't accept the award. Obviously the sugars are either embarrassed by the interview or the family is. This is exactly why the press are after them. You can't call people liars forever. These interviews are all taped. The sugars are just begging for the people of YOU to post it. In fact, I hope they do! Monacogate - concocted by the loonies who can't even believe a photo and Charlene's own words. Even if it is her other brother, who cares, they are all into cashing in!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jul 24, 2011 3:47:26 GMT -5
I just started thinking about my brother's reaction - or any member of my family - including myself - if we were told that we were not allowed to have a FACEBOOK or TWITTER account. It would be the very first thing we would do - even if we had no desire or intention of having one! Just because!!! I don't care how much money I'd lose! (Maybe because we're Americans and we don't cotton to people "DICTATING" to us what we can and can not do in our personal lives.) What an outrageous, pretentious demand!
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jul 24, 2011 6:49:44 GMT -5
Why bashing each other over who is who. Does it really matter? Let's just hope the family no matter who is coming out of the woodwork with articles and interviews like that. The more the jollier for us. If they go on like this it will be a perpetuum mobilis. And no chances of sueing papers for printing this "Oh, we are now so important" BS. Keep cool and let the Monaco PR do the fighting. A wonderful sunday to everybody.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 24, 2011 7:11:34 GMT -5
It is important that we keep to the facts! Otherwise we are not better than the sugar boards. JMO
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 24, 2011 7:19:43 GMT -5
It is important that we keep to the facts! Otherwise we are not better than the sugar boards. JMO true. Let the loonies live out their delusions elsewhere. The web is big enough. The main point of this board is to point out the facts and document the truth rather then tooting the same horn as everyone else. If we do not stick to the facts, we will be just like the sugar loonies, only negative. ANd that would make this irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 24, 2011 7:20:37 GMT -5
Hate to tell you guys, but that article is 100% categorical lies. 1. the photo accompanying that article is of GARETH, not Sean. 2. If the family was still in Monaco-WHY where they seen at Albert and Charlene's SA Oysterbox Party? Really? Besides, as I said before: LYNETTE DOES NOT LIVE IN OR NEAR MONACO. Mike would never allow him out of his sight. The whole family rented a house outside of Monaco from the Grand Prix until the wedding is over. They are all now back in South Africa. Besides-what would she do with a 5-bedroom house for one? Does that make ANY Sense? And Mike said that himself numerous times that the family was not in Monaco, but South Africa. The only two lines believable in that article are about Gareth having a British girlfriend and the thing about the pilot's license (and if it's to fly them around in South Africa, wouldn't it be logical for him to be getting it in South Africa, not Monaco?) And am I the only one to notice that the photo used with that article is GARETH, not Sean? Sorry but the photo is of Sean not Gareth. Can anybody post the two photos of our poster boys side by side so we can see for ourselves. A wedding photo might work for the comparison.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 24, 2011 7:21:58 GMT -5
I just started thinking about my brother's reaction - or any member of my family - including myself - if we were told that we were not allowed to have a FACEBOOK or TWITTER account. It would be the very first thing we would do - even if we had no desire or intention of having one! Just because!!! I don't care how much money I'd lose! (Maybe because we're Americans and we don't cotton to people "DICTATING" to us what we can and can not do in our personal lives.) What an outrageous, pretentious demand! Does anybody know if Jazmin's facebook is still MIA?
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on Jul 24, 2011 7:31:37 GMT -5
It is important that we keep to the facts! Otherwise we are not better than the sugar boards. JMO I agree to and believe in that it is important to keep to the facts. What I meant is that concerning that family it hardly matters who says and does what or lives where. It all comes down to the fact that they live off the fame of their daughter/sister. No one would be talking about them if she had not married PA. They enjoy their getting famous and try to make the most out of it. Money makes the world go round.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 24, 2011 7:33:44 GMT -5
there are several there, so don't know which one you are referring to.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 24, 2011 8:19:29 GMT -5
It is important that we keep to the facts! Otherwise we are not better than the sugar boards. JMO true. Let the loonies live out their delusions elsewhere. The web is big enough. The main point of this board is to point out the facts and document the truth rather then tooting the same horn as everyone else. If we do not stick to the facts, we will be just like the sugar loonies, only negative. ANd that would make this irrelevant. Good lawd, thank you for saying that. I will shut down this board before I start bowing down to some lunatic ideas. This board will become ridiculous like all the other sugar boards if we do not point out the difference between fact and faction - the difference between truth and mental disorders. It is NOT a matter of opinion but a FACT that Sean Gareth who lives in Benoni - not Gareth Wittstock - received the award at the YOU spectacular awards ceremony on July 16, 201 in Johannesburg on behalf of his sister Charlene. It is a fact that Sean Gareth -gave an interview after he received the award to YOU magazine reporter Alet van Zyl. It is a FACT that Gareth and Lynette both live in/near Monaco. The facts do not change on this board becomes someone refuses to accept them. So, yes it does matter which brother it is - well, it matters to me because I am not STUPID nor blind.
|
|
|
Post by duchess1 on Jul 24, 2011 9:12:09 GMT -5
Sean goes on to say " "Everyone's making up their own stories. I can promise you, my sister is very happy," younger brother Sean Wittstock told the latest edition of the country's top selling English weekly magazine YOU. "She and her bridesmaid were in SA on a game farm a week before the wedding. She could have stayed behind if she'd wanted to." It would not be as easy for the former South African Olympic swimmer now, the 27-year-old added. "She's a Roman Catholic now and they don't believe in divorce," he told the newspaper. Here is the link www.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/World/Story/A1Story20110724-290763.html
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 24, 2011 9:21:43 GMT -5
LOL she is a roman catholic now and they don't believe in divorce. Hasn't stopped Caro or STeph has it? Or Antoinette for that matter or Rainiers mom. Maybe the catholics don't believe in divorce, but the Grimaldis do. ANd so do the very Catholic Kennedys. And trashy did not convert because she believes, she converted to get the tiaras. She doesn't even know how to pray nor did she make the cross when offering her bouquet to St devote. The woman is a fraud down to the core.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 24, 2011 9:27:47 GMT -5
More from Sean's interview with YOU magazine. All i can say is that Albert is the BIGGEST Moron in Monaco because he really does not know what a gold digger Charlene truly is and that she NEVER has any intention of EVER giving up her new luxurious famed lifestyle. If she bought a one-way ticket to Sa that was to save face and try to convince her biggest sucker that she was willing to five this up. Albert, The Village Idiot of Monaco NEVER had to send anyone out convince her to return. When Albert did that he gave Conlene more power because he allowed her to think that he and Monaco needed her. If Albert had any common sense he would have realized that Monaco is worse off with this marriage and this Princess. From iAfrica:
Princess Charlene 'happy'
Sun, 24 Jul 2011 Monaco's newly wed Princess Charlene is "very happy", the South African bride's brother told a local magazine, rejecting rumours that her marriage to Prince Albert II is troubled.
"Everyone's making up their own stories. I can promise you, my sister is very happy," younger brother Sean Wittstock told the latest edition of the country's top-selling English weekly magazine YOU.
"She and her bridesmaid were in SA on a game farm a week before the wedding. She could have stayed behind if she'd wanted to."
It would not be as easy for the former South African Olympic swimmer now, the 27-year-old added.
"She's a Roman Catholic now and they don't believe in divorce," he told the newspaper.
Prince Albert and the Monaco government haved lashed out at media spreading what they describe as false rumours and threatened to sue French magazine L'Express.
Rumours that Wittstock tried to leave the principality in a huff just days before the royal wedding have already been rejected by the palace, a lawyer for the princely pair, as well as by Albert himself.
L'Express had reported on its website that Wittstock, now Princess Charlene, interrupted preparations for the lavish celebrations and prepared to take a flight for her home country South Africa.
As for the allegations that Albert fathered a third child out of wedlock while engaged to Charlene, the government head Michel Roger said there was proof that this was false.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 24, 2011 9:37:22 GMT -5
LOL she is a roman catholic now and they don't believe in divorce. Hasn't stopped Caro or STeph has it? Or Antoinette for that matter or Rainiers mom. Maybe the catholics don't believe in divorce, but the Grimaldis do. ANd so do the very Catholic Kennedys. And trashy did not convert because she believes, she converted to get the tiaras. She doesn't even know how to pray nor did she make the cross when offering her bouquet to St devote. The woman is a fraud down to the core. Of course everything about Charlene is a fraud, but Albert, The village Idiot of Monaco doesn't realize this. This story is confusing for most of the public because they do not know Charlene and the history of her relationship with Albert. The public doesn't understand that L'Express can be telling the truth about Charlene buying the one-way ticket AND Charlene can be happy to finally be a Princess. Not one person in the media has broached the idea that Charlene could have bought the ticket in a hissy fit, but had no intention of giving up this lifestyle. Charlene is a fraud, gold digger, con artist, etc. - and no one gets that yet. So, in their minds, if Charlene is happily doing her duties and is really happy now that she is a Princess then the L'Express claims MUST be a LIE. I strongly believe that in time the truth will reveal itself.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 24, 2011 9:43:26 GMT -5
Finally the truth. She never run away! It was a stunt to get attention for the wedding. And she made this world news...
And.. meanwhile, Monaco threaten L'Express with a process.
These are really idiots. They do not really know with whom they are dealing with real journalists!
They really need to keep talking. LOL
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 24, 2011 9:55:31 GMT -5
Finally the truth. She never run away! It was a stunt to get attention for the wedding. And she made this world news... Charlene lived on the sugar boars for years where she loonies judge royals and their relationships by photos, so for her wedding Charlene wanted people to droll over her loving photos - as she stated in her Vogue interview just two hours before she finally got her title. Charlene suffers from a Narcissistic Personality Disorder - she craves adoration. I highly doubt that she made the story up to get NEGATIVE attention. Charlene bought a one-way ticket to save face with Albert and to con him into believing that she does not need him nor his wedding. She has "run away" before and Albert has sent someone after her. If Albert fetched (which is what he is doing - fetching his property) Charlene as early as August 2006, then Charlene knew he would fetch her a week before the wedding. Charlene was trying to wield power of over Albert after being embarrassed and it backfired!
|
|
|
Post by suite583 on Jul 24, 2011 10:09:03 GMT -5
Why bashing each other over who is who. Does it really matter? Let's just hope the family no matter who is coming out of the woodwork with articles and interviews like that. The more the jollier for us. If they go on like this it will be a perpetuum mobilis. And no chances of sueing papers for printing this "Oh, we are now so important" BS. Keep cool and let the Monaco PR do the fighting. A wonderful sunday to everybody. Elektra, you made my day. Karma. ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by suite583 on Jul 24, 2011 10:14:03 GMT -5
I just started thinking about my brother's reaction - or any member of my family - including myself - if we were told that we were not allowed to have a FACEBOOK or TWITTER account. It would be the very first thing we would do - even if we had no desire or intention of having one! Just because!!! I don't care how much money I'd lose! (Maybe because we're Americans and we don't cotton to people "DICTATING" to us what we can and can not do in our personal lives.) What an outrageous, pretentious demand! We know that Charlene has her own Facebook account running updating all her photo ups. What a lie!!!!!
|
|