|
|
Post by margarita on Feb 21, 2012 17:43:12 GMT -5
IMO -I also think she was most probably fed "enhancing drugs" - with or without her knowledge. But I really don't believe that explains her HUGE bone structure - shoulders, hands and feet. There is something very male in her (?) very structure - in the genes... |
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 21, 2012 21:25:53 GMT -5
I have a hard time believing any athlete who says that they were fed drugs without their knowledge so I'd have an even harder time believing her. When my daughter was in high school (not that CW made it that far) steroids were supposedly encouraged by the coaches and the boys would go far enough to allow "pain" shots and say they didn't "know" what it was....if it gives you energy, grows hair or makes you look like a man (or beast) then it's a duck.
|
|
|
|
Post by paca on Feb 22, 2012 5:56:21 GMT -5
In the GDR children were in training camps and received injections. They were not informed about the content nor of what it would do to them. Decisions were made by coaches and doctors. There have been lawsuits about this and people have been sentenced. None the less I doubt that anything was done to trashy without her dad knowing and approving. He is said to be the driving force behind her swimming.
|
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Feb 22, 2012 6:01:37 GMT -5
In the GDR children were in training camps and received injections. They were not informed about the content nor of what it would do to them. Decisions were made by coaches and doctors. There have been lawsuits about this and people have been sentenced. None the less I doubt that anything was done to trashy without her dad knowing and approving. He is said to be the driving force behind her swimming. Paca - I too think that Charlene took drugs to boost her swimming career. I tend to think so because she did soo much surgery and does't seem to have a problem with manipulating her body (with huge risk for her health!) to reach her goal. (Like some "Princess" previous to her cut a part of her body to fit a certain shoe...) However it seems to me that even without drugs her very nature is very masculine (bone structure, the way she (?) walks), face expression, skin ect. |
|
|
|
Post by paca on Feb 22, 2012 9:31:45 GMT -5
same reasoning here. Cheating to get what she wants is her character. Albert married Cinderellas stepsister  As a girl I think she was just going after the unattractive fathers side. Granny doesn't look feminine either. and if she got hormones in her teens her body developed male rather then female. The whole point was that she would get a male body without being male. Only that way she would be able to have an advantage. Same goes for keeping gymnasts artificially small. They weren't supposed to turn into women due to lack of flexibility in women versus children and the disadvantage a woman with a bust has versus a child. That's why children who are not naturally tiny etc are made into what thy are not. A lot of them are anorectic or bulimic so they look less like women and to stop development. And of course to keep a certain weight whilst forcing the body to perform on high level. High performance sport is in itself unhealthy and if you are not naturally talented and have the natural body to perform the chosen sport, forcing yourself to do it on this level in spite of it, will destroy your body eventually. Most athletes are wrecks by the time they are 30. And the older they get and stay active, the more likely they will be doped. That is a reality in sports today. The only way to change this will be to lower our expectations on performers and our thirst for records to be broken. Humans are unable to run as fast as Bolt naturally. It is scientifically proved. Still people claim that Bolt has not been doped; same goes for Armstrong and many others. If you take a realistic look at the human body and the challenges of the tour de France then you will have to admit that no one is able to physically go through an entire tour de France nowadays without doping. The human race has not evolved to the degree that would explain the performance in sports nowadays. But we do not like to admit that and expect people to run faster each year. |
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Feb 23, 2012 3:58:17 GMT -5
same reasoning here. Cheating to get what she wants is her character. Albert married Cinderellas stepsister As a girl I think she was just going after the unattractive fathers side. Granny doesn't look feminine either. and if she got hormones in her teens her body developed male rather then female. The whole point was that she would get a male body without being male. Only that way she would be able to have an advantage. Same goes for keeping gymnasts artificially small. They weren't supposed to turn into women due to lack of flexibility in women versus children and the disadvantage a woman with a bust has versus a child. That's why children who are not naturally tiny etc are made into what thy are not. A lot of them are anorectic or bulimic so they look less like women and to stop development. And of course to keep a certain weight whilst forcing the body to perform on high level. High performance sport is in itself unhealthy and if you are not naturally talented and have the natural body to perform the chosen sport, forcing yourself to do it on this level in spite of it, will destroy your body eventually. Most athletes are wrecks by the time they are 30. And the older they get and stay active, the more likely they will be doped. That is a reality in sports today. The only way to change this will be to lower our expectations on performers and our thirst for records to be broken. Humans are unable to run as fast as Bolt naturally. It is scientifically proved. Still people claim that Bolt has not been doped; same goes for Armstrong and many others. If you take a realistic look at the human body and the challenges of the tour de France then you will have to admit that no one is able to physically go through an entire tour de France nowadays without doping. The human race has not evolved to the degree that would explain the performance in sports nowadays. But we do not like to admit that and expect people to run faster each year. And isn't it ironic that the Tour de France started in Monaco the summer Albert married that artificial person? Still waiting for some disqualifications... |
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 11, 2012 8:32:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 14, 2012 5:13:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 14, 2012 5:52:07 GMT -5
They clearly have NO IDEA what they are talking about since both photos are post-surgery - and the engagement photo is heavily photoshopped. What we will now see is the re-inventing of what the natural Charlene really looked like. Charlene started her surgery in November 2007 - so they have to look at photos of her before then. |
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 14, 2012 5:59:00 GMT -5
They clearly have NO IDEA what they are talking about since both photos are post-surgery - and the engagement photo is heavily photoshopped. What we will now see is the re-inventing of what the natural Charlene really looked like. Charlene started her surgery in November 2007 - so they have to look at photos of her before then. Right! The only difference of these two pics are the wrinkles. Nobody needed surgery to get more wrinkles yet. People are not all blind - they will see that not surgery but photoshop makes the difference here. |
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 14, 2012 7:00:37 GMT -5
What is she wearing at the opening of the Grace Kelly Exhibition?  And who did the hair? Loved her expressions though! Got to check the photos, don't know if one is allowed to use links nowadays, have not followed the thread, just check zimbio for them... Bettina, we have an separate thread with over 10 pages of posts about Charlene's Australian's trip, please discuss it there. This thread is for discussion about her plastic surgery. |
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Mar 14, 2012 11:34:05 GMT -5
They clearly have NO IDEA what they are talking about since both photos are post-surgery - and the engagement photo is heavily photoshopped. What we will now see is the re-inventing of what the natural Charlene really looked like. Charlene started her surgery in November 2007 - so they have to look at photos of her before then. Right! The only difference of these two pics are the wrinkles. Nobody needed surgery to get more wrinkles yet. People are not all blind - they will see that not surgery but photoshop makes the difference here. You both are just soooo jealous of Charlene! ;D ;D ;D Charlene never had anything done. She is all natural! You jealous bitches!!!! ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 14, 2012 12:41:13 GMT -5
You both are just soooo jealous of Charlene! ;D ;D ;D Charlene never had anything done. She is all natural! You jealous bitches!!!! ;D ;D ;D RP, you are being sarcastic, but they are sugar loonies who say the exact words all the time - and they mean it. |
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 14, 2012 13:13:02 GMT -5
The reason why I was so amused by that article/ opinion poll was not that they didn't notice that the only difference between these pics is photoshop
... but because they state IN THE TITLE that as a matter of fact she had surgery.
|
|
|
|
Post by countess on Apr 10, 2012 11:55:20 GMT -5
we've been saying this about the tranny FOR YEARS www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2127322/Can-plastic-surgery-change-personality-Excessive-cosmetic-procedures-lead-identity-crisis-warn-psychologists.htmlDr Lorenc said if he suspects a request for cosmetic surgery comes from an underlying psychological condition like body dysmorphic disorder, he refers patients to a psychiatrist. majority of patients say the opposite, that rather than looking like a better version of themselves, they want to look like a certain actor or model.
This indicates an inherent desire to become somebody else, a famous person who, in the patient's mind, lives a problem free, seemingly perfect-looking life.
This, said Dr Lorenc, is 'a red flag.' Women who had surgery before this 'new wave of understanding' among doctors, said Dr Diller, now suffer from long-term psychological problems as they enter their fifties and sixties. ;D as if being married to FaTal isn't enough So while going under the knife is usually a means to a beautiful end, enabling patients to feel better about themselves and their appearance, it turns out it might just have the opposite affect. oh i hope so, i really, really hope so ROFL |
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Apr 10, 2012 16:51:48 GMT -5
That goes to the same theory of her being a psychopath. They have no creativity or originality, because they only know how to study and copy people in an effort to impersonate people. Psychopaths also study other peoples actions and reactions, especially people emotions to manipulate people. Her lack of conscience and empathy is what make it easy for her, people can't believe it's possible for other humans to be void of. It makes sense that Charlene tries to completely turn herself into another person that represents and fulfills her own ego. From Charlene's doppleganger posts, she rreally thought she would become Grace Kelly. She thought she would get all and be all that Grace was. She was sure she would receive the same treatment and admiration being a completely different person. She seriously thought the title and the money could change the person that she is, apparently so did Albert and whomever was advising him??  |
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Apr 10, 2012 18:19:27 GMT -5
I wish we could re-post that video of Charlene putting the snake down her friend's back, and then laughing her head off as the poor girl shrieked with fright.
|
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Apr 22, 2012 15:10:02 GMT -5
And of course she is not a good sport herself....she not only cannot stand when someone teases her even a little (a thing I think Abert does to get back at her)....just watch her face in pictures and videos. Charlene takes everything as a personal affront--she imagines she is important enough to people that she claims everyone else in the world has gone out of their way to sabatoge her or snub her, when she herself is her biggest obstacle and enemy.... it'so much easier to claim people are jealous of her instead of actually doing something genuine or selfless (a word not known to Charlene) to make herself more likeable, but then that would mean making an an effort (work)something Charlene has never been willing to do. Look at her pissed off face in every picture at the Oscars--hmm, does she seriusly think these people were jealous of her? ;D This girl is just visably upset for not getting the attention she expected or thinks she deseves for being nothing more than an opportunistic piece of trash....even when crashing an event she has no part in and has no business at! So that often seen pissed off look of hers, in her child mind, is just her way of thinking "she" is "snubbing them", by actling like some kind of ass at a place where people would have no problem taking her for a seat filler--you know, someone who actually has a purpose for being there! In fact Charlene is such a moron, she was probably jealous of the seat filler who not only made it to the front row, but got pointed out and mentioned by the host, no doubt, something in Charlene's own five year old mind that she seriously expected for herself--Do you think she practiced her bow and wave ;D Who do you think the people there liked and respected more? The loyal true "blue" seat-filler or the bitchy mock princess, in sisterwife frock? ;D Sorry, I forget what thread we're on? To get back on track, I'll offer up that I think it is fitting that Charlene's face is forever changing and artifice. Why shouldn't the exterior facade match and telegraph what's inside. |
|
|
|
Post by refia on Apr 29, 2012 12:53:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by paca on Apr 29, 2012 15:43:19 GMT -5
LOL the old aunt who tries to look younger through surgery. Kate only needs to put on a few pounds, trashy can't do anything with all those scars in her face. WHy would she think that scars look better then wrinkles? and then still keep the wrinkles in addition to the scars? Is that her perverted way of what other women do with razors to their body?
|
|
As a girl I think she was just going after the unattractive fathers side. Granny doesn't look feminine either. and if she got hormones in her teens her body developed male rather then female. The whole point was that she would get a male body without being male. Only that way she would be able to have an advantage. Same goes for keeping gymnasts artificially small. They weren't supposed to turn into women due to lack of flexibility in women versus children and the disadvantage a woman with a bust has versus a child. That's why children who are not naturally tiny etc are made into what thy are not. A lot of them are anorectic or bulimic so they look less like women and to stop development. And of course to keep a certain weight whilst forcing the body to perform on high level. High performance sport is in itself unhealthy and if you are not naturally talented and have the natural body to perform the chosen sport, forcing yourself to do it on this level in spite of it, will destroy your body eventually. Most athletes are wrecks by the time they are 30. And the older they get and stay active, the more likely they will be doped. That is a reality in sports today. The only way to change this will be to lower our expectations on performers and our thirst for records to be broken. Humans are unable to run as fast as Bolt naturally. It is scientifically proved. Still people claim that Bolt has not been doped; same goes for Armstrong and many others. If you take a realistic look at the human body and the challenges of the tour de France then you will have to admit that no one is able to physically go through an entire tour de France nowadays without doping. The human race has not evolved to the degree that would explain the performance in sports nowadays. But we do not like to admit that and expect people to run faster each year.
And who did the hair?
