|
Post by MyAdia on Dec 7, 2011 20:39:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Dec 7, 2011 21:30:34 GMT -5
I can't believe this. Btw, the links you posted don't work for me. Am i the only one having that problem?
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Dec 7, 2011 21:52:02 GMT -5
I can't believe this. Btw, the links you posted don't work for me. Am i the only one having that problem? I fixed all the links by going to the original pm and clicking and then posting the full URLs. They should work now. They have listed about every photo that we posted. I am responding to ProBaords now. The flunkies are going to regret that they tried to shut us up by preventing us from posting photos. The pen has always been mightier than the sword. Just like when they ran us from royal dish, they gave us a larger forum to voice our opinions here. So, that plan backfired on them and this one will also.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 7, 2011 22:14:15 GMT -5
My opinion only, but this has much more to do with the thread about all the real pictures of Charlene. Charlene can't stand it when reality gets online. It hurts her and the flunkies to think the press might see it. I wish we could edit our own posts. I'd go back and make them links. I hate to think that they'll be lost to the public WHO NEEDS TO SEE THEM.
|
|
|
Post by bobolin on Dec 8, 2011 0:54:20 GMT -5
Once is on Internet, it is there forever. Just like with Wikileaks, they shut him down, but there were thousands of Wikileaks who opened websites right and left! Just copy all the pics you want to keep and post them everywhere else. Sad job she has, to be looking for her pictures in all the websites available!!!!
|
|
|
Post by bobolin on Dec 8, 2011 0:54:44 GMT -5
She should be doing "charity" work and studying French!!!
|
|
|
Post by bobolin on Dec 8, 2011 1:00:17 GMT -5
Now, what I know about this copyright photos, if they have the name of the author (like Getti), as long as you do not remove that, you can post them wherever you want. I have seen those pictures in websites from all over the world in different languages, and there have been no problem at all! This is a direct attack from those flunkies who have complaint about us. I am not happy. This is unfair and since they cannot get us for our opinions, they are trying very hard to find a way to shut us.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Dec 8, 2011 5:17:46 GMT -5
Now, what I know about this copyright photos, if they have the name of the author (like Getti), as long as you do not remove that, you can post them wherever you want. Actually, it is a violation of copyright laws even regardless if the copyrighted photo has the watermark on it or even if you site the source like Conlene's vile flunkie blogger does - unless you have specific permission from the copyright holder to post the photo. OF course these photos are posting on dozens and dozens of royal and non-royal boards without buying rights to the photos or having permissions. It only becomes a problem on these royal message boars in particular when some sugar loonie (or blogger) can not stand your comments. Can you imagine what will happen if we target all these other royal message boards and contact their board/blog sponsors for violation of copyright laws? Can you imagine what will happen if a sugar loonie no longer has a photo to drool over? The first request that I received was based on Monaco's Realis photo agency going to ProBoards because of the photos that we posted from the wedding. I deleted the photos but i also made the mistake of reporting this on the forum which gave the sugar loonies the idea about going to ProBoard themselves. I highly doubt that the follow-up complaints to ProBoards were made by a particular photo agency requesting that their photos be removed, but instead by crazy sugar loonies and Conlene's #1 vile blogger. In two cases, a complaint was made immediately after photos were posted from a particular agency that no one has ever posted photos from before. What are the odds that some Polish photo agency was reading our board at the same time the photo was posted (unless the sugar loonie works for or owns that agency)? But, we know for a fact that he sugar loonies read every single word we write and the complaining photos posted were actually a photo hosting link which I am pretty sure was posted on a sugar board and one of our members posted the links here. ProBoards sponsor for free thousands of forums and I doubt that they actually care about defending any of these forums against attacks like we have always experienced. But, I did respond to them this time and asked them to consider the fair use doctrine which is a limitation to the copyright laws in certain cases.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Dec 8, 2011 5:28:47 GMT -5
She should be doing "charity" work and studying French!!! What you you see happening here is the length that deluded and cunning people will go to protect their lies and fantasies. They should be careful for what they ask for because thus far ever single attempt to shut people up and harness the press has actually backfired big time on Albert and Charlene. It only brings more attention to the information that they are trying to suppress, including earlier photos of Charlene that her flunkies want to pretend that so not exist anymore. I am thinking about starting an editorial forum (or a section on this board) that includes a series of articles documenting with indisputable evidence about some of the more serious claims that we have opined about here that sugar loonies really have a difficult time digesting. There really is a lot of information that the press has glossed over because no one has really paid attention to all Conlene's specific statements made in interviews, her actions and behavior, especially those in 2005 and 2006. also, it will be interesting to have in one place, a response with indisputable evidence to address her lies from the smallest to the largest.
|
|
|
Post by refia on Dec 8, 2011 9:09:40 GMT -5
Whoa! I don´t know if one should be amused or disturbed. I´m still a little bit disappointed about how the Monaco section ended at RD. It was so annoying to see the many posts complaining about how the section was "infiltrated" by members of an old forum and many can´t discuss with them. Ehm.. yes. And now this. Seriously, the internet is not a little, black box, which you can destroy and everything is away. But then we are talking about Charlenes fans.. So it shoudln´t suprise us.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Dec 8, 2011 10:28:18 GMT -5
My opinion only, but this has much more to do with the thread about all the real pictures of Charlene. Charlene can't stand it when reality gets online. It hurts her and the flunkies to think the press might see it. I wish we could edit our own posts. I'd go back and make them links. I hate to think that they'll be lost to the public WHO NEEDS TO SEE THEM. If she is angry because of the old photos what about the last photos in Durban… Total nightmare!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 8, 2011 11:22:55 GMT -5
MyAdia - consider doing it as a blog, not a forum. Those are kept in Google Cache for ever.
As far as the photos. It's illegal for someone to "claim" they are the copyright holder in question. If someone told pro boards they are the copyright holder and they are not (they were instead say a certain sugar loonie) than there is a case for so many days in jail and a fine per picture. Youtube actually has prosecuted someone who went along and did this. You might challenge pro boards to make sure the person IS the copyright holder.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 8, 2011 15:11:29 GMT -5
I think they are under the delusion that they can do a mosley and ride on the tails of the news of the world disaster, getting pics removed from servers etc. Their problem is though that all the pics posted and discussed here have been taken on official outings. There are no real paparazzi pics or compromising pics as in taking her during a sex session with Albert or his croonies. These are all taken in public places or at public events, where she had to expect that her pics have been taken or where they even brought their own photographers along to have it taken. After all the Nebinger guy who did the Nepal bit is working for getty I believe and has been travelling around with them. Just like their own palace photographer. You can't have your pic taken, release it and then complain that people are mocking you, as they did after that terrible wedding kiss which will surely go down in history as the worst ever public kiss along with that SA grimace kiss. They are just not getting modern times. Let's say it as a variation of the google guy: If you don't want us to discuss it and make fun of it, then you probably shouldn't be doing it. ANd if they do it anyways they will just have to live with it. Albert has grown up with it and trashy knew what she was getting into. She had her chance to get out and chose not to. No live with it... It's your job. Stop the public whining. There are people who have to put up with way more then what you are getting. It's only words, not bombs or bullets that are going your direction.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Dec 8, 2011 15:32:19 GMT -5
mrplowfan has it right, if it is not the copyright holder of the photo and it is someone else who try to… than the fake person will lose.
And Yes, paca. The photo’s posted and discussed here have been taken from official outings… and still go around the Internet world. ;D
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 8, 2011 16:33:35 GMT -5
Well, that's what their purpose was to begin with. It is not the pics fault that they are conveying a message that trashy and her dumpster friends don't like.
|
|
|
Post by bobolin on Dec 8, 2011 18:33:41 GMT -5
You are the admin, but is there something we can do to help here? Kind of a massive amount of emails to the RF "headquarters"? Kind of an Internet OWS ? No, I am not part of that.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Dec 8, 2011 19:36:08 GMT -5
Let's play it safe and just post links. It's really not a hassle to click on a link. MyAdia is the one held accountable for this stuff and I would be sad if she had to shut the forum down. Remember guys all for one and one for all. Let's not let flunkies get the better of us.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 8, 2011 20:40:15 GMT -5
worst case, we'll just find another place. Their problem though is that we all get back together, we are getting more, we are gaining credibility and a lot more people are reading our little forum. All of what has been posted here has reoccured in articles in the serious press. It seems that to serious journalists who are assigned a story on MC, we are the more reliable source. Plus whatever they gather from direct sources. But if I was a journalist and had to do sth on MC I would come here too and get my links at the place where I have the least searching to do. These people only have limited time for a piece. So they don't want to waste it on research. There is no need for them to read our opinions, but they can go straight to the sources from here. NOt like in other boards. So let them come after us. They can't make things go away because they do not fit the way they want to be seen. If they want to be seen as a loving couple, then they should be one. If MC wants to be seen as an exemplary state as Albert has promised in the beginning of his reign, then they need to become one. Only toddlers belief that what they want to be reality is reality. I know that both fatty and trashy have the mental age of toddlers, helas most people in this world don't. And when they see corrupt people they call them corrupt and if someone has to butcher their face to become princess, then they will say that the face is butchered. Just because these two are living in the MC fantasy world, where they can manipulate the press and do whatever they please and abuse their privileges unpunished to the detriment of their country, doesn"t mean that the rest of the world has to play along.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Dec 8, 2011 21:43:19 GMT -5
worst case, we'll just find another place. Their problem though is that we all get back together, we are getting more, we are gaining credibility and a lot more people are reading our little forum. All of what has been posted here has reoccured in articles in the serious press. It seems that to serious journalists who are assigned a story on MC, we are the more reliable source. Plus whatever they gather from direct sources. But if I was a journalist and had to do sth on MC I would come here too and get my links at the place where I have the least searching to do. These people only have limited time for a piece. So they don't want to waste it on research. There is no need for them to read our opinions, but they can go straight to the sources from here. NOt like in other boards. So let them come after us. They can't make things go away because they do not fit the way they want to be seen. If they want to be seen as a loving couple, then they should be one. If MC wants to be seen as an exemplary state as Albert has promised in the beginning of his reign, then they need to become one. Only toddlers belief that what they want to be reality is reality. I know that both fatty and trashy have the mental age of toddlers, helas most people in this world don't. And when they see corrupt people they call them corrupt and if someone has to butcher their face to become princess, then they will say that the face is butchered. Just because these two are living in the MC fantasy world, where they can manipulate the press and do whatever they please and abuse their privileges unpunished to the detriment of their country, doesn"t mean that the rest of the world has to play along. Well, it seems we had 446 guests today, so paca you are spot on!
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Dec 8, 2011 22:12:55 GMT -5
You must all be doing something right if the censorship squad is on your back so much. I'm curious, don't other forums post pictures? Do they ALL get permission?? Once it's published in a paper or magazine, it's picked up everywhere. What's more, you're not profiting either by selling copyrighted images or charging a fee for this site. IMO, there's no conflict.
|
|