|
Post by agentf on Sept 14, 2020 11:40:37 GMT -5
Actually, forget Spielberg's wife...Kate Capshaw(!). No THIS is what Albert can look forward too soon:
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Sept 16, 2020 16:57:43 GMT -5
LMAO!!! OH that is good!!!
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Sept 17, 2020 14:35:42 GMT -5
I wonder if you kiss her, a real prince appears...🐸 LMAO!!! OH that is good!!!
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Sept 18, 2020 7:53:27 GMT -5
Egad how can these women with means wind up like this!? Sad!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Sept 26, 2020 15:56:58 GMT -5
did anyone read the scathing piece about her in paris match? apparently she spends most of her time in Corsica and turkey on the expense of some oligarchs these days....
|
|
|
Post by paca on Sept 28, 2020 8:40:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 16, 2020 13:20:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Dec 16, 2020 17:05:28 GMT -5
Is she having a Britney Spears meltdown...? 😳 I think she could have opted until there was regrowth rather than have such a penitentiary feel to the side of her skull. Why would she do that with her hair, when she was doing ok at last with a cute bob. Plus her tattooed eyebrows add to the grim effect. Why shave her eyebrows and deliberately look cancer-stricken?? Plain weird.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 16, 2020 19:39:54 GMT -5
you think the brows are tatooed? I thought they were painted like the Kardashians or 100 years ago. btw from the kids birthday pics, it seems she has both sides shaved off. Don't know what she is trying to do but Gloria von Thurn und Taxis already did that ages ago, when she was still in her 20s and her gay husband was still alive. Well, I won't be surprised if she will come out as transgender, rips out those fake boobs and tells the world about her IVF treatments to have the kids. She might actually for once get respect. But then again there is Paris Match article about how she is trying to manipulate via tantrums etc (we did have similar reportings on thred forum about that kind of behaviour), so not sure what is going on there, but it looks a lot like a teenager's behaviour in puberty. Not really what you'd expect of an adult...
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Dec 17, 2020 9:06:06 GMT -5
I haven't read the Paris Match article, I'd love a link. Tantrums for what? I thought they were both resigned and focused on the kiddies. They're a bit of a snooze fest, frankly. Never mind GvTT, CC's whole rebel thing is very Stéphanie and her dad in the 80s, though Albert gets to play the dad with insubordinate child this time. It very well could be hormonal actually but less puberty and more serious since she's not of menopausal age. A neighbour who had a premature hysterectomy because of cancer told me once it immediately launched a woman into early menopause. I believed her, she was such a bat out of hell I used to just exit our tiny elevator when she got on. She stressed me out and my dog. However cancer is serious. Where's her mom in all this? And definitely, if she came out she'd be embraced by the LGBT community pronto. The brows look like henna tattooing but could be microblading, I'm not sure but they're hairless and dyed. you think the brows are tatooed? I thought they were painted like the Kardashians or 100 years ago. btw from the kids birthday pics, it seems she has both sides shaved off. Don't know what she is trying to do but Gloria von Thurn und Taxis already did that ages ago, when she was still in her 20s and her gay husband was still alive. Well, I won't be surprised if she will come out as transgender, rips out those fake boobs and tells the world about her IVF treatments to have the kids. She might actually for once get respect. But then again there is Paris Match article about how she is trying to manipulate via tantrums etc (we did have similar reportings on thred forum about that kind of behaviour), so not sure what is going on there, but it looks a lot like a teenager's behaviour in puberty. Not really what you'd expect of an adult...
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 17, 2020 13:54:10 GMT -5
I trust your expertise on this. And I agree that sth is not right there. She surely has decided to not try to adapt anymore, if she ever did. the article in PM is this one linkIt reminds me of the stories we were told from an MC resident at the time on the red forum when she had to be convinced to attend events and Allavena quitt, because he didn't think it was his jobdescription to babysit Alberts gf
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 17, 2020 13:57:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Dec 17, 2020 14:07:16 GMT -5
Well I'd say the shock effect worked. But it is very weird, And no wedding ring?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 18, 2020 6:02:30 GMT -5
well, Albert was there, so I guess ring or no ring doesn't matter with them. Given that my mother only wore her's on special occasions, for me it is normal. Then again with my mother it was clear that on days she wore her wedding ring, we were safe... These days I guess one could argue that not wearing rings is due to constant disinfecting of hands, which was one of the precautions at the event. You don't want an event with 700 hundred kids (as stated in the article, though I am not sure the number is correct) to be a superspreader event, where the kids not only received gifts but also covid to pass on to the largely aged population of Monaco. Would be a pitty if some of those lowlifes like their friends the Greens would catch it and die... btw. trashy seems to have a great sense of irony, making the woman who plundered arcadia for 1,3 billion the treasurer of her foundation...
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Dec 18, 2020 10:37:39 GMT -5
What a novel that article! I fast forwarded to the last paragraphs to see what the problem is. Something about an empty nest now that the kids go to school, and a lack of input on palace renovations; an old friend numerologist and more passive aggression about her duties. She's perpetually dissatisfied, but the question is: who owes her constant entertainment? The answer is in taking a genuine interest in her duties and other people so her days would be filled and she'd make good alliances so that even if her husband is busy, she'd be contented too wiyh her own life instead of constantly sulking. Seriously. To still be blaming others at this stage 🙄 Try being prevented from being with your mate under the constant threat of death, yours or others', and she'd savour all the shared closeness and see the missed opportunities to be happy that are right there within reach. What a waste (shakes her head). I trust your expertise on this. And I agree that sth is not right there. She surely has decided to not try to adapt anymore, if she ever did. the article in PM is this one linkIt reminds me of the stories we were told from an MC resident at the time on the red forum when she had to be convinced to attend events and Allavena quitt, because he didn't think it was his jobdescription to babysit Alberts gf
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 19, 2020 8:28:39 GMT -5
I haven't read the Paris Match article, I'd love a link. Tantrums for what? I thought they were both resigned and focused on the kiddies. They're a bit of a snooze fest, frankly. Never mind GvTT, CC's whole rebel thing is very Stéphanie and her dad in the 80s, though Albert gets to play the dad with insubordinate child this time. It very well could be hormonal actually but less puberty and more serious since she's not of menopausal age. A neighbour who had a premature hysterectomy because of cancer told me once it immediately launched a woman into early menopause. I believed her, she was such a bat out of hell I used to just exit our tiny elevator when she got on. She stressed me out and my dog. However cancer is serious. Where's her mom in all this? And definitely, if she came out she'd be embraced by the LGBT community pronto. The brows look like henna tattooing but could be microblading, I'm not sure but they're hairless and dyed. You might find your answer here www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9067825/Prince-Albert-Monaco-fight-paternity-claims-love-child.html Wasn't that one of the reasons she wanted to bolt at the wedding? Maybe she is acting up as now with the children she is pretty trapped. I have no doubt she cares for the kids. I still doubt her feelings for Albert. But he is the father of the children and he clearly loves them. But if they break up, the kids will stay with him. Rainier made that clear to Grace and surely Charlene has been made aware too. I don't think that Albert wants to seperate. He is getting older, he enjoys the children, he has plenty to do and Charlene is not threatening his ego. For her things are different. She doesn't like the people in MC and they don't like her. At least not those around her. Should she seperate, no one will like her. All ex partners have been edited out. Privately at least the fathers of the children have been kept close and for the most part have kept a low profile. But publicly they don't exist. Charlene would be the same. So although she will be involved with the children, publicly she wouldn't exist and people in the area would always be loyal to Albert. Only her brother would be there for her , but given that his livelihood depends entirely on Albert and their marriage I am not sure how much support she would get there. All her family these days depend on her marriage to Albert one way or the other. So, yeah I get that she would act out. Especially when the pandemic isolates her more than ever. No holidays in Turkey with oligarchs. just lonely cycling in the med....
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Dec 19, 2020 9:50:00 GMT -5
I missed that, on DM, thanks. So another lovechild? I was just reading about a fast-food chain called "Slutty Vegan", I don't know why that pops up in my mind now as I write but maybe Albert needs to put a knot in it if not a frigging condom 😶 Oyoyoye. Having said that, if (and I agree he won't divorce) he wants to be nice, he should have a truthful conversation with his wife, and apologize. For the sake that his children will not be imbibed by the aura of an unhappy, trapped mother. Because it will perpetuate a cycle where later he'll see resentment and a siding against him by one or both children, and that will be a faultline in his family if not his reign. Respect is sometimes a great remedy for imperfect love. CC has to mature, on the other hand. She too has to be truthful and take stock. She shouldn't play the scorched, wronged woman if her intentions with Albert were self-interested from the start. You can't transpose a fairy tale on top of cupidity, conscious or unconscious. DM is not the most reliable source too, but the pattern with Albert is entrenched by now. In the event they would separate, her craving for attention would be frustrated. People's interest in her, like Megan Markle, is because of who they married. There isn't enough substance there without the husband, mainly because she hasn't taught people about herself since the marriage. She's not made her life's mission known. Cycling on water had a bit of a slavish imagery to it, like a condemned person. She should wallow in her life in a good way, not self-sabotage. Kiddies are exhausting in a good way, they're an endless source of fascination and they provide her with a purpose. She should build on that. What do I know. You might find your answer here www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9067825/Prince-Albert-Monaco-fight-paternity-claims-love-child.html Wasn't that one of the reasons she wanted to bolt at the wedding? Maybe she is acting up as now with the children she is pretty trapped. I have no doubt she cares for the kids. I still doubt her feelings for Albert. But he is the father of the children and he clearly loves them. But if they break up, the kids will stay with him. Rainier made that clear to Grace and surely Charlene has been made aware too. I don't think that Albert wants to seperate. He is getting older, he enjoys the children, he has plenty to do and Charlene is not threatening his ego. For her things are different. She doesn't like the people in MC and they don't like her. At least not those around her. Should she seperate, no one will like her. All ex partners have been edited out. Privately at least the fathers of the children have been kept close and for the most part have kept a low profile. But publicly they don't exist. Charlene would be the same. So although she will be involved with the children, publicly she wouldn't exist and people in the area would always be loyal to Albert. Only her brother would be there for her , but given that his livelihood depends entirely on Albert and their marriage I am not sure how much support she would get there. All her family these days depend on her marriage to Albert one way or the other. So, yeah I get that she would act out. Especially when the pandemic isolates her more than ever. No holidays in Turkey with oligarchs. just lonely cycling in the med....
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 19, 2020 17:47:57 GMT -5
I heard about a child in Italy way before the wedding from one of his friends. I don't think it was this one though. I think it was an Italian woman from a good family who didn't want money. At least that's what I remember from his very gossipy male friend. I think Charlene just has to live with that. I really don't think that it remains 3. There are more out there and Albert has been very careless in that respect. IMO he needs to get over himself and recognize all his children. get it over and done with, handle contact with them in private. The world will keep on turning and people might even respect him more for it. Of course it hurts if one or more was conceived after they started official dating, but as long as none was born after the wedding things are not that bad. They need to change their dating narrative though. If Albert puts it all out there, takes responsibility, then he is still better off then the other Albert. In his case I like how his son handled the matter and invited his half sister with open arms. And obviously made his parents, who looked like hostages, meet her too.
And yes Charlene needs to grow up and get over herself. It was from the start no love relationship. They need to be honest with each other and find a way to live with it.
What bothers me with the article is that the mother off the child was very young. Her age is given as 34. the child is 15. And the mother claims she travelled for years with Albert. Albert attended the same parties as Epstein, Andrew and that french model agent. She would have been a minor if her claims are true. In France and most European countries it would not have been a crime, but given Alberts age at the time it doesn't look too good, legal or not. It makes me wonder if she was one of those young girls shoved around the world as models. A friend of mine had some staying in her appartment in Munich in the 90s and was somewhat mothering them. She also told me how naive, immature and easily impressed they were. Men like those above including Albert could easily take advantage of them. Not mentioning the drugs and alcohol involved. The monegasques have tolerated a lot of acting out of Grimaldis, but I am not sure what would happen should Albert turn out to be an Andrew and have even fathered a child while being at it. It might force him to resign and make Caro regent. She would then even have it in her power to change the law to allow girls to take the throne over younger brothers. If that should happen and she installs her kids as heirs, thanthe gravy train for the Wittstock stops and Charlene could do as she pleases. Albert would still be rich, but not that rich as most of his possesions are tied with the throne. And people wouldn't throw money and gifts at her anymore as they have nothing to gain from her.
Btw I don't believe anything Lacoste says. He said the same before and it always turned out to be a lie. No idea why Albert still employs him. He is outdated. Albert needs lawyers who talk straight to him and tell him that the 80s are over and todays society will oust him, if he doesn't change strategy. Monaco is a metoo playground. It's bad enough to be a taxhaven, but to end up tied to Epstein and the likes would kill of Monaco. Who wants to live or spend their millions in a pedoresort. The whores and drugs during F1 are bad enough, but are being kept under wraps mostly. But aprince travelling with an underage girl and fathering a child with her....
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Dec 20, 2020 10:22:56 GMT -5
Wow! I just read the DM article. Well then the buzzcut is a F*** you reaction I think. Oh boy here we go again!! I believe that many of you have been round since way back in the day before Charlene appeared on the scene. I am not surprised - let's see how this one plays out.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Dec 20, 2020 12:37:41 GMT -5
To be honest, it seems like the pieces are falling into place and the cover up is falling apart. Although in MC people didn't buy it at the time and word about her bolting was everywhere. Even the schoolkids were talking about it. The thing is that Lacoste still works with out of wedlock kid equals scandal, so he sticks to his usual defence. Albert already admitted 2, so no one except maybe charlene cares about it much. People will live with it and I expect most people in MC would embrace the child. There would be empathy and soon enough loyalty as one of theirs. Monegasques may criticise among them and residents, but once you don't live there anymore, you are out of the loop, and they get defensive about the grimaldis. Family members often act the same.They are at each others throat, but if the an outsider makes a similar statement, they turn on him.
Anyways, if the kid is his, which is quickly proven, he would be well advised to quickly recognize her in a brief official statement and keep things quiet and private. Build a relationship with her include her in the family. If it gets into court, there will be records of the relationship and that will be all officially out there. The parties they attended, the travelling, the people who met them.... The kid shouldn't trouble Albert, the age of the mother is the scandal. She was 18 or 19 at the time of birth, so 17 to 18 at the time of conception. And she wasn't a one night stand. Albert was 46 or 47. Like andrew and virginia Giuffre. I am pretty sure the DM knows her name, but not allowed to publish it. I bet they will keep on digging and if there is anything connecting this story to Epstein, than Albert is toast. THAT is not sth Monegasques would swallow. For Charlene they would have empathy and probably understand, if she would want a divorce. For her it would be an easy spin, as she could claim not knowing the mothers age and being hurt just by the baby news at the time of the wedding. With a big tell all interview she could clear herself, gain sympathy, sling a bit of dirt at Alberts hangers on who covered everything up and walk away with plenty of cash and her children, who would no longer be in line to the throne, once the crown council apoints Caroline, lets her run the show and pass it on to her kids. She could return to Africa and live a socialite life there. I'm sure Caro will keep in touch (she has kept in touch with her stepkids, so there would remain ties to MC), so they would always be welcomed in the palace. But they could grow up away from scandal and fairly normal. Albert would probably end up in La Turbie, hoping that his out of wedlock kids would actually still want to be linked to him...
|
|