|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 7, 2012 6:18:46 GMT -5
Also at the beginning of the article , El Pais ask the question, "Are you at risk the glamor of the family, tourist magnet and motor of the Principality? (bad google translation of: ¿Está en peligro el 'glamour' de la familia, imán turístico y motor del Principado? ) Albert really should get his head out of the sand and start facing reality and stop allowing the hanger-ons in his life to continue suckering him with the manufactured press about how Charlene is so good for Monaco by restoring its glamour - which is beyond ridiculous. I believe the Spanish El Pais is the first to say what a lot of the serious press really feel about Charlene's supposedly allure (which is why Albert married her) and the future of Monaco's attraction as a glamorous luxurious place for people who are seeking exclusivity. The serious press sees that Monaco is going down hill yet the Jackass of Monaco is still doing more of the same - making Charlene the worldwide image of the new Monaco. It is so sad to see this man destroy what his father toiled and sweated to achieve all his life. Albert and Charlene were also mentioned in this March 2, 2012 El Pais article in which shallow couples in seeming loveless relationships are discussed (based on their lack of chemistry on the red carpet - Albert & Charlene and George Clooney and Stacy Keibler. Stacy Keibler is actually positively portrayed while nothing of substance is stated about Charlene.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 7, 2012 6:31:52 GMT -5
The French news magazine Le Figaro wrote a short piece two weeks before Albert and Charlene's trip. I wonder if this reporter really believed that Albert's trip was going to be a success in Hollywood just because he is Grace Kelly's son or was he writing tongue in cheek, especially since no one in their right mind (which excludes sugar loonies and Charlene's flunkies) could think that Albert and Charlene could top William and Kate's trip to Hollywood. I think comments like the one below by the serious press is trying to get Albert to understand that he should have a clear purpose for a trip like this and a way to measured its success - otherwise they will look like two fame-whoring fools.
Le Figaro - Confidential by Yves Thréard Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Albert of Monaco and Charlene will, Feb. 26, in Los Angeles, the special guests of the Academy Awards. Guaranteed success when the son of Grace Kelly and Princess Charlene pose for photographers. Will they be as successful as Kate and William, who last summer had caused a sensation over dinner in Beverly Hills with Hollywood stars, including Jennifer Lopez, Barbra Streisand, Nicole Kidman and Tom Hanks?
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 7, 2012 6:43:51 GMT -5
Thanks MyAdia for finding and reporting on these articles.
Just in case he gets his head out of the sand he knows whom he has to fire - those who were sucking up to Cashlene.
IMO Caroline or whoever is close to him and cares for Monaco and the family should already start to search new staff...
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 7, 2012 7:13:38 GMT -5
The lack of free press attributes to Monaco's demise because there is no mechanism to publicly question Albert's ineptness. Everyone accepts what he dishes out - actually the media in Monaco just eat the crap Albert feeds to them and regurgitate it to the people of Monaco. The supposedly serious news magazine in Monaco is the Monaco Hebdo. Clearly, the people of Moanco were whispering the same as everyone else - "Why is Albert and Charlene attedning the Oscars?" To explain the editors of Monaco Hebdo just regurgitated the Palace PR's ridiculous childish response. Do they go to all and any events they are invited to - of course not! Albert was not contradicting the Palace's response of why he was at the Oscar, he was actually trying to give a reason of why he was there because at least he has the sense enough to know that stating that you were invited by someone you have an agreement with is NOT an adequate explanation of WHY you are attending an event. Everyone has to have an invitation to attend the Academy Awards. So, Albert came up with the ridiculous reason of being there to honor his mother's death or academy ward - I forget which stupid lie. I will bet you anything, we will eventually find out that Albert and Charlene went to the Oscars and all the parties associated with it because the Narcissistic Con Artist of Monaco ALWAYS wanted to attend and she thought it would be a good idea to show case herself (but she most likely told the Jackass to showcase Monaco). Notice how the Monaco Hebdo tried to imply that attending the Oscars was an afterthought after attending their Grace's jewelry line. also notice that the editors did not mentioned all the other parties that Charlene and Albert attended. So far, we know of two additional ones on Saturday and three after the Oscars. That's not to mention Charlene's dinner date with Charlize or their rugby game watching date with Russell Crowe - and probably many more parties and dinners. When will the Monaco media start holding Albert and Charlene accountable to the people of Monaco instead of their insatiable appetite to pleasure themselves?
The princely couple at the Oscars
By The Editors Friday, March 2, 2012 A major event was held on the night of Sunday to Monday in the U.S.. The 84th edition of the Oscars the film took place in Los Angeles, in the presence of a host of stars, as well as Prince Albert and Princess Charlene. The main reason for their presence was an invitation by Robert I. Iger, CEO of Walt Disney. To recap, an agreement was signed in 2010 between American society and the Albert II Foundation to raise awareness about the environment through the production of films. On the sidelines of the Oscars, a brunch was held on February 25, given by the jeweler who presented his collection Montblanc Princess Grace. One of the jewels was presented elsewhere worn by the Princess Charlene. The royal couple was then able to attend the Oscar ceremony, which saw the triumph of The Artist. Left with no less than five statuettes, including the French film with Jean Dujardin won the top award for best actor, and Michel Hazanavicius Best Director. The director raid and a second title in three days after his coronation at Caesars, February 24. Jean Dujardin became the first French player to win the Oscar for best actor.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Mar 7, 2012 9:47:47 GMT -5
You know, he might have been better off just stating the truth. We were invited by Disney. Charlene wanted to go and it seemed like a fun idea. That's why we're here.
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 7, 2012 10:11:06 GMT -5
You know, he might have been better off just stating the truth. We were invited by Disney. Charlene wanted to go and it seemed like a fun idea. That's why we're here. Yes! Yes! Yes! But they are not reacting naturally and authentic ... because they seem sooo fake and got used to act fake. That's their downfall. And Monaco's
|
|
|
Post by smt on Mar 7, 2012 10:14:25 GMT -5
You know, he might have been better off just stating the truth. We were invited by Disney. Charlene wanted to go and it seemed like a fun idea. That's why we're here. A normal, well-adjusted person would have said this. However, we're dealing with Prince and Princess Plastic ... not a clue!
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Mar 7, 2012 10:14:51 GMT -5
You know, he might have been better off just stating the truth. We were invited by Disney. Charlene wanted to go and it seemed like a fun idea. That's why we're here. I agree, he could have said that that was her birthday gift from him ...showing that he is ready to make a fool of himself just to please the woman he loves would make people have more sympathy for him and his stupidities.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 8, 2012 12:47:26 GMT -5
You know, he might have been better off just stating the truth. We were invited by Disney. Charlene wanted to go and it seemed like a fun idea. That's why we're here. A normal, well-adjusted person would have said this. However, we're dealing with Prince and Princess Plastic ... not a clue! Personally I don't think they ought to say that they were invited as surely they invited themselves. But he could have mentioned the ties with Disney and that trashy wanted to go. The truth is always better, but since they are so full of themselves they always think that there needs to be a higher reason why they do the things they do. They probably receive personal invites from the toilet to justify them using it. They are fake to the core. They do not do anything because it should be done or is natural to do, but because someone has given them a valid pretext. It is all about image and not about content. I wonder if they have huge amounts of nicely packed presents under the xmas tree with nothing inside, just so it seems that they got heaps of presents. And they probably employ or pay people to send them seasons greetings just so they can pretend that so many people are caring about them.
|
|
|
Post by refia on Apr 18, 2012 13:17:16 GMT -5
This is from an other forum, where they speak about occultism etc. The poster wrote an interesting obsvervation of Charlene at the Oscars. You don´t have to believe in occultism, but I agree with him or her that Charlene is evil.
|
|
|
Post by countess on Apr 18, 2012 15:58:50 GMT -5
great find!! and not too out there, i believe trashy is evil and i wouldn't be surprised what kind of sick, kinky stuff she's into and participates with EVIL EVIL EVIL
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Apr 18, 2012 19:45:52 GMT -5
Wow, very interesting read. I wouldn't mind this person stopping by here to join us. The perspective is just fascinating. Not sure about all the Wiccan stuff but none the less the observation has hit many of the observations we have seen. Ste. Devote must be one powerful lady! May she win! JMO.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 18, 2012 21:40:38 GMT -5
Wow, very interesting read. I wouldn't mind this person stopping by here to join us. The perspective is just fascinating. Not sure about all the Wiccan stuff but none the less the observation has hit many of the observations we have seen. Ste. Devote must be one powerful lady! May she win! JMO. Well I think it's just plain creepy! Interesting, but creepy. I also think Ms. Charlene is really too stupid to even learn about witchcraft, or any other discipline for that matter. But then perhaps that's what happens to her - she screws up some spell because she's so stupid, and ultimately kills herself in the process! ;D
|
|
|
Post by grimnir on Apr 19, 2012 11:45:59 GMT -5
Funny Freudian typo: persons. Plural. The many faces and personalities of cw. Though personalities is too much of a compliment, so far cw has been too boring to name it a personality. In my logical deduction the writer doesn't know much about Monaco and Ste. Devote. She's the patron saint of both country and princely family and thus the most obvious to "sacrifice" to or to honour. No choice of saint for cw to sacrifice to and no channelling of saintly energy either. Is this a grammatical error or is the writer saying that Devote was a satanist?
|
|