|
Post by mrszinck on May 20, 2012 8:46:42 GMT -5
Charl’s wears an old dress of Galiano? WTF! Galliano was dismissed on his anti-Semitic statements. John Galliano's successor Raf Simons (from Jill Sander). Simons talents: great craft knowledge, sense of proportions and volume and a feeling for woman. I expect Charl’s not in the new creation… ;D Carla's entire state visit wardrobe was carefully chosen to portray her as demure and conservative because naked photos of her were released just the day before the visit. What's really funny is that Charlene wears the same dress but in a drab color on a manly body and her flunkies and suga loonies are hailing her as an innovative fashion style icon. I wouldn't be surprised if you would find some of the same loonies and flunkies criticizing the dress four years ago when Carla wore it as dowdy and drab. Sorry, but Carla wore the dress before the scandal. Not afterwards. Big difference! Carla was a top model, the nude pictures were already there, long before the visit! Char’s is really stupid, does not understand what she is doing and represent a dress from a alcoholic –who loves Hitler…
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 20, 2012 8:54:42 GMT -5
Sorry, but Carla wore the dress before the scandal. Not afterwards. Big difference! Carla was a top model, the nude pictures were already there, long before the visit! Char’s is really stupid, does not understand what she is doing and represent a dress from a alcoholic –who loves Hitler… My response to your post was not in reference o the scandal about John G. I was explaining Carla's choice in wardrobe based on her scandal. The only thing that Charlene cares about for anything she wears is that it is expensive haute couture (she criticizes Kate for wearing High Street fashion), she is photographed and praised - hopefully even worshiped as a fashion icon as the sugar loonies have done. I doubt if she even knows who the details of the scandal. Remember, this woman only reads tabloids coverage about herself - and Albert's baby mama drama
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on May 20, 2012 9:48:47 GMT -5
Ok, I do not follow Kate. So I do not know...
But if Charlie wants to be an international star, she can best start with following the local news.
If Charlie understands French, she would know this. Dior is doing everything to get away from the nightmare… (big sale on John G. clothing – and nobody buys!)
Everything Charlie does is an insult! Charlie wants to know France? Start with learning the language!!
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on May 20, 2012 10:03:39 GMT -5
Carla definitely wore the dress better...except for the wrong choice of shoes (it seems like Sarko made her change shoes the last minute and she had put on the first flats she had found in her closet ) The reason WC will never be the style/fashion icon is that that she never wears the dress, the dress wears her. She always looks like a huge billboard for an advertisement. She has no natural grace when dressed up, she is always stiff and is posing all the time, has no substance and has nothing interesting to say...no charisma. i50.tinypic.com/2rqna74.jpg
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 20, 2012 11:42:23 GMT -5
The reason WC will never be the style/fashion icon is that that she never wears the dress, the dress wears her. She always looks like a huge billboard for an advertisement. She has no natural grace when dressed up, she is always stiff and is posing all the time, has no substance and has nothing interesting to say...no charisma. i50.tinypic.com/2rqna74.jpgRoyal Pauper you summed her style and presence perfectly! Actually, two fashion editors at WWD (considered the fashion bible) had similar things to say about Charlene's style: She can tend to look stiff and slightly uncomfortable in designer duds. She needs to relax and smile more. She will be a princess, after all. We all know what New York Time's influential fashion editior Cathy Horyn had to say about Charlene's fashion style when she criticized Vanity Fair for including her on their best-dressed list - "flat as a pancake."But, Charlene doesn't listen to these people or us Royal Opiners because she believes the ratings of her team of flunkies and royal suga loonies. Below is a sample of the latest drool over Charlene's London's presence at the dinner. This drool is one of the milder ones which I only chose to show the contrast between Royal Pauper's comment about getting out of the car. Most of the suga loonies and flunkies drooling are way more over the top in anointing Charlene as a fashion icon god! Somehow I think Charlene has found her groove. It is hers and hers alone, it is not "fashionable" it is 'Charlene' the way she likes to look and feel. It has obviously given her great confidence as she handled the dinner like a pro. When she emerged so gracefully from the car the full impact of her overall "look" was stunning.
A perfect picture in pink, her gown both elegant and graceful, her hair a vision of 1950's glamour, I was amazed, so too were the photographers as they seemed to have their fingers stuck on 'flash" mode, and yet she just sort of smiled and glowed and floated effortlessly up the carpet, which considering the 5"-6" heels of her gorgeous, perfectly matched shoes, was no mean feat.
A class act from a class lady.
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on May 20, 2012 13:26:59 GMT -5
If Charlene lived in the real world instead of the flunkie bubble she created for herself, she would realize that her delusional belief that she is BETTER than Kate is just that - DELUSIONAL. Here is a short video clip about the luncheon (the media only cares about because Kate was there - no one cares about what Charlene is wearing) where the commentator compliments Charlene - saying she is gorgeous (a hollow cliche) but states, "And while Charlene is definitely gorgeous, in our opinion she can't even hold a candle to Kate." I am thinking they are even pushing it with the gorgeous cliche since there ultimate goal is to insult her! Celebrity Blog Video of the Foreign Sovereign Luncheon ;D ;D ;D It was definitely an insult to WC. That "gorgeous" was a cheek in a tongue...followed with "she obviously can't even hold a candle to Kate". ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on May 20, 2012 13:48:56 GMT -5
Those idiots praising her looks should consider amount of money that Monaco's Idiot has so far spent on her (and we are talking about HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS ), just to look presentable. Take any average looking thirty years old woman from the streets of any city in the world and put her for a few hours through a team of hairstylist, make-up artists and dress her up, and I guaranty you she will look better then WC...and without all those plastic surgeries and who knows what she did in the last four years.
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 20, 2012 14:11:46 GMT -5
the sugar loonies can drink their koolaid but the world press ignored trashy and charlotte got a big article the day after the "class act" OMG the plastic surgey alone knocks her out of that category, the flying monkey flunkies must be crying in their cornflakes this morning.....still no appreciation for princess disgrace the style icon ROFL ;D i don't think charlotte looks especially stunning (hate the color of the dress) and her posture is terrible BUT www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2146665/Cannes-Film-Festival-2012-Charlotte-Casiraghi-Monaco-dazzles-red-carpet.htmlHER ROYAL HOTNESS, yea trashy is really making an impression
|
|
|
Post by refia on May 20, 2012 14:36:05 GMT -5
Imo there is at the moment no Princess or Duchess who wows me, they are all so fluffy.
|
|
|
Post by paca on May 20, 2012 17:04:45 GMT -5
the sugar loonies can drink their koolaid but the world press ignored trashy and charlotte got a big article the day after the "class act" OMG the plastic surgey alone knocks her out of that category, the flying monkey flunkies must be crying in their cornflakes this morning.....still no appreciation for princess disgrace the style icon ROFL ;D i don't think charlotte looks especially stunning (hate the color of the dress) and her posture is terrible BUT www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2146665/Cannes-Film-Festival-2012-Charlotte-Casiraghi-Monaco-dazzles-red-carpet.htmlHER ROYAL HOTNESS, yea trashy is really making an impression I knew it was Gucci....and she claims she's not a model...btw she seems not to be wearing a bra.....
|
|
|
Post by duchesscornflower on May 20, 2012 19:53:06 GMT -5
Carla's version of this gown is perfection. There is a reason for using a dark color for this type of gown. The pale pink that Charlene wore washes out in the paparazzi's camera flash.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 20, 2012 21:12:55 GMT -5
Wonderful find MyAdia! Was Kate at the dinner or not? It seems to me that if she was there she most certainly would have been photographed. It also seems odd to me that no one in CW's camp was aware this dress was worn before - in any color - especially at an event with the Queen. She doesn't have seasoned pros working for her - or they've been told to subtly steer her in a direction towards the door.
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on May 21, 2012 4:45:33 GMT -5
Take any average looking thirty years old woman from the streets of any city in the world and put her for a few hours through a team of hairstylist, make-up artists and dress her up, and I guaranty you she will look better then WC...and without all those plastic surgeries and who knows what she did in the last four years. You are right RP. this is very true.
|
|
|
Post by paca on May 21, 2012 5:11:51 GMT -5
Wonderful find MyAdia! Was Kate at the dinner or not? It seems to me that if she was there she most certainly would have been photographed. It also seems odd to me that no one in CW's camp was aware this dress was worn before - in any color - especially at an event with the Queen. She doesn't have seasoned pros working for her - or they've been told to subtly steer her in a direction towards the door. I wonder if they chose it particularly because Carla has worn it with the Queen and got praised. Obviously they couldn't chose the same colour, because that would make it more obvious, but also because it doesn't suit her. IMO a darkhaired woman would not have looked washed out and if her hair wouldn't be so cheaply dyed, she would have looked better too. I really think that the out fit was chosen, because Carla wore it before. That way she could make sure that people wouldn't say it is inappropriate etc... I wonder though if, since it's an old dress, if it was borrowed and not bought. If it was borrowed then Gucci would have informed her about who wore it when and on what occasion.
|
|
|
Post by duchesscornflower on May 21, 2012 6:55:32 GMT -5
The gown looked tailor made for her. She has an unusual body type and the dress was fitted to her. It could not have been borrowed and the couture house Dior must have know that Carla wore it to see the same monarch that Charlene was to visit. No one said anything?
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 21, 2012 7:20:15 GMT -5
Wonderful find MyAdia! Was Kate at the dinner or not? It seems to me that if she was there she most certainly would have been photographed. It also seems odd to me that no one in CW's camp was aware this dress was worn before - in any color - especially at an event with the Queen. She doesn't have seasoned pros working for her - or they've been told to subtly steer her in a direction towards the door. As reported by the British media, here are the people who attended the dinner from the British royal family: Charles, Camilla, Andrew, Edward, Sophie (who wore a dark blue jewelled dress), the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester, the Duke of Kent, Prince and Princess Michael of Kent and Princess Alexandra, and the Honourable Lady Ogilvy. Charlene seemed to be the youngest woman there - and of course the tallest with these 5" or 6" heels. Of course Kate was not at the dinner, which is why the the dinner was only covered in a dozen articles, whereas the lunch was covered worldwide with thousands of articles and tv clips (praising Kate's pink dress). Charlene being a worldwide sensation at the dinner only exist in the parallel universe that the suga loonies and Charlene's flunkies live in. When Carla first came onto the scene, Charlene's doppelganger started posting negative things about Carla as she did with kate. In charlne's sick mind, she really believes that she matters on the worldwide stage and Carla (then the first lady of France) and Kate (the future queen of England) were much less important than her and thus stealing her limelight. for a normal person, I wouldn't think they would wan to wear the same dress that a more famous woman wore receiving worldwide praise for wearing it. But I can see narcissist like Charlene wearing it thinking that she is much more popular, more fashionable and more beautiful than Carla was and thus would receive much more praise. Basically, I think that a stylist selected it (who probably knew that Carla wore a blue version of it 4 years ago) and Charlene approved it because it was her style - drab monochrome color and boring.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 21, 2012 7:27:40 GMT -5
LOOOL some of these posts remind me of what parents would say to an unpopular child: you are not unpopular you are just so special and the other children know that and that is why they don't want to play with you. It is not because you are nasty, stupid.... they know that you are special and better then them and they only keep their distance bcause they are so in awe.... anything to not face the truth. Good thing for us: she won't change and provide us with unlimited entertainment. In case of a child, it would be sad and negligent of parents. THAT'S SO TRUE. Again, hardly no one carried photos of the dinner mainly because Kate was not there. after the dinner, Paris Match even chose to place on their fron page a picture of Kate and Will - not Charlene and Albert. Paris Match called William and Kate a Breath of Fresh Air. I wonder what they would have titled it if they showed a photo of Albert and Charlene? I'm thinking just Albert and Charlene - to be polite.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 21, 2012 7:32:16 GMT -5
The gown looked tailor made for her. She has an unusual body type and the dress was fitted to her. It could not have been borrowed and the couture house Dior must have know that Carla wore it to see the same monarch that Charlene was to visit. No one said anything? Maybe this woman really is that narcissistic and she wore it knowing that Carla wore to Buckingham palace four years before. The funny thing is that not one single member of the media even noticed her to even note that Carla wore a different color of the dress four years ago. Charlene's greatness exist only in her and her flunkies' feeble minds. This greatest she supposedly possess does not exist in the real world.
|
|
|
Post by paca on May 21, 2012 15:43:52 GMT -5
funny side note: Pippa wore Kates engagement dress to a wedding in a different colour. Even Bunte is discussing the dress. No one discusses trashys dress
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on May 22, 2012 18:42:01 GMT -5
The gown looked tailor made for her. She has an unusual body type and the dress was fitted to her. It could not have been borrowed and the couture house Dior must have know that Carla wore it to see the same monarch that Charlene was to visit. No one said anything? It was probably Charlene's idea herself, since there is never a time where she isn't trying to copy someone. It seemed Carla's visit with the Queen was talked about as a success and it got a lot of coverage in the press. This is the kind of thing Charlene salivates over and wants for herself--it's what she lives for....public adulation or rather media coverage that will claim this, whether true or not? From the beginning Charlene has always tried to copy and embody other personalities, and reading her doppelgangers posts over the years she has always confirmed this. Charlene doppelganger suggested how she should do a photo shoot on the steps like Grace, and what do you know suddenly the weird photo shoot of Charlene trying to copy those photos appear in Tatler, even down to the tulle style treatment on Grace's pink dress, and then of course Grace's wedding poses....so creepy. Charlene's doppelganger is always offering up how Charlene reminds her of someone specific, in an effort to try to draw a line between herself and whomever she is trying to impostor at that moment. It always seems to be her agenda to attach herself or become a characture of someone else, hoping to ride their fame. She wants the media to draw the line between these people and her lame lazy ass--she can't even cultivate her own identity, but that is typical in sociopaths.-
|
|