|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 3, 2012 6:00:32 GMT -5
What I don't get is: on the one hand they want to make the world believe that they are a loving couple, they show up at events and pose for pics. ... and on the other they spend their anniversary apart, Charlene "flew" to Malibu right before Even if they fake - they should fake straight and not sending these contradict signals and then wonder why not even one single sober fool buys this "love story"!!! Margarita, I'll tell you why - Albert and Charlene really truly belie that EVERYONE is as stupid as they apparently are. Seriously. Albert and Charlene are used to dealing with people on their same shallow (and non-existence for Charlene) intellect. They submitted to the press a posed 1st anniversary photo with the statement the below statement. Only the sugah loonie toons are beyond themselves with glee that this photo and statement is absolutely proof of their undying love and happiness. Seriously, they are used to dealing with these type of silly shallow stupid people. In the meantime, we are reading the opinions from serious news magazines about what people with a lick of common sense and more than three brain cells think of this couple and this marriage. FAKE and PATHETIC! Albert is too stupid to realize that real happy and proud people don't have to keep telling people how happy they are - it shows! We are really happy and I have the feeling that it happened yesterday.
I am very proud of what my wife has accomplished this past year, creating her foundation dedicated to children and sport, and being so involved in her new role in Monaco.
She is fulfilling a difficult mission in a perfect way and I thank her for that.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 3, 2012 6:12:59 GMT -5
In the meantime, here's more of what the serious press thinks of this marriage - again look at the photo that they chose. The article rehashes the same "runaway bride" story that everyone else has - this was a ruin marriage from the beginning. Everyone can see that but Stupid Al who seriously believe that he can litigate people's believe in buying the fairy tale love story crap that he manufactured. From the German newspaper Abendblatt:
PRINCE ALBERT II AND CHARLENE Monaco royal offspring is not in sightby Patricia Czarkowski 06.29.2012 The Monaco still waiting impatiently for that Charlene is pregnant, so that the principality gets the long awaited offspring.Long faces at Prince Albert II and Charlene: Where is the royal baby?
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 3, 2012 6:22:36 GMT -5
Albert is upset because he cannot control the media as he does in his country where there is no freedom of speech. Just the headline alone of the Monaco Matin article says it all - pure bullshit - which is what Albert loves to read. I have to stop at the lie about there being more than a thousand journalists in Monaco to cover the wedding.
Royal wedding: one year of loveby Joelle Deviras Monday, July 2, 2012 at 9:11 At the end of the religious ceremony, thousands of rose petals are dropped to the passage of the royal couple.
After the civil union, Prince Albert II and Princess Charlene united before God.The highlight of the wedding festivities, this day is remembered. For the best ...
This marriage pleases us , threw Monsignor Bernard Barsi, Archbishop of Monaco, in the courtyard transformed such an open-air cathedral. May God enable them to live happily together until their old age . "
Monegasques and friends Monaco were millions live live the religious union of the Prince Albert II and Princess Charlene.
More than a million journalists
...
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 3, 2012 6:46:48 GMT -5
The Abendblatt article has to be an agency article as it is exactly the same as has been published in other papers. They didn't even bother to have one of their volunteers rewrite the article. They credited instead the dapd writer. I think that says it all. Papers consider them a waste of time and money.
|
|
|
Post by vamilkshake on Jul 3, 2012 8:19:42 GMT -5
US Media paying attention to the Anniversary & the fact that Charlene was in Paris. Alone. That her anniversary gift was "a trip to Paris without him".Lol. They also post photos with Albert's arm around Charlene, remarking that she looks like she "is going to vom" (vomit). LOL. Then, of course, the inevitable comparison to the marriage of Katie Holmes & Tom Cruise. Marvelous press for the anniversary (heavy sarcasm). See link below. www.celebitchy.com/237359/did_princess_charlene_spend_her_first_wedding_anniversary_alone_in_paris_/
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on Jul 3, 2012 9:53:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 3, 2012 13:02:07 GMT -5
What I don't get is: on the one hand they want to make the world believe that they are a loving couple, they show up at events and pose for pics. ... and on the other they spend their anniversary apart, Charlene "flew" to Malibu right before Even if they fake - they should fake straight and not sending these contradict signals and then wonder why not even one single sober fool buys this "love story"!!! Margarita, I'll tell you why - Albert and Charlene really truly belie that EVERYONE is as stupid as they apparently are. Seriously. Albert and Charlene are used to dealing with people on their same shallow (and non-existence for Charlene) intellect. They submitted to the press a posed 1st anniversary photo with the statement the below statement. Only the sugah loonie toons are beyond themselves with glee that this photo and statement is absolutely proof of their undying love and happiness. Seriously, they are used to dealing with these type of silly shallow stupid people. In the meantime, we are reading the opinions from serious news magazines about what people with a lick of common sense and more than three brain cells think of this couple and this marriage. FAKE and PATHETIC! Albert is too stupid to realize that real happy and proud people don't have to keep telling people how happy they are - it shows! We are really happy and I have the feeling that it happened yesterday.
I am very proud of what my wife has accomplished this past year, creating her foundation dedicated to children and sport, and being so involved in her new role in Monaco.
She is fulfilling a difficult mission in a perfect way and I thank her for that. The fact that he has to issue a statement at all is pretty sad. William and Kate didn't need to issue a statement about their status a year latter. The palace simply said they would be celebrating it in a low key way. Also the way the statement is written sounds like he's talking about one of his staff, not his wife. Very stiff and artificial if you ask me. Where's the love Albert? JMO.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 3, 2012 13:33:16 GMT -5
anyone notice that after initial surgeries attempting to make her look like Grace, she is now resembling more and more her mom? Including Lynettes tarty look... there just is no way to get the gutter out of the Wittstocks, no matter how much surgery and how many expensive clothes they use.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 3, 2012 13:36:13 GMT -5
interesting that she is staying in a hotel rather then their appartement. Seems like she wants to be noticed rather then prefering the privacy of an appartement.
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Jul 3, 2012 16:01:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 3, 2012 18:13:02 GMT -5
Here's another from a Swiss news agency (excerpt below) - 24 HeuresCOTTON WEDDING Still no heir to Albert of Monaco
By Christine Talos 07/03/2012 A year after the wedding in style with Prince Charlene Wittstock, the couple still has not announced the pregnancy on the Rock. The question of succession arises already. Since their marriage, all Monegasques now expect official heir to Albert II.
2 July 2011, Prince Albert and Charlene Wittstock were united in Monaco at a wedding in style followed live by millions of viewers. A year later, when all the people of Monaco - and the paparazzi - now hope a happy event, the belly of the great South African, aged 34, remains flat.
Water in the gas in the royal wedding? This is not the latest rumors going to pretend otherwise. Indeed, the couple celebrated their wedding separately since Mrs. Cotton was Monday night in Paris for the Dior fashion show while Mr. remained in Monaco, reports the tabloids ...
Recall that the newspaper L'Express revealed that shortly before the wedding, Charlene had failed to flee the Rock by learning that Albert had a child hidden as he was leaving with her already. But the press service of the Palace of Monaco had strongly denied the report. And Albert had to refute a few weeks later the sounds of stubborn disagreement that ran on his marriage.
...
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 4, 2012 1:50:39 GMT -5
Yawn - the fairy tale gets ever harder to sell... what will they think of next? Did he go to Paris to take her out to dinner even?
I would be mad if on my 1st anniv my new husband wasn't even around.
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 4, 2012 1:51:17 GMT -5
interesting that she is staying in a hotel rather then their appartement. Seems like she wants to be noticed rather then prefering the privacy of an appartement. Good point!
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 7, 2012 13:38:02 GMT -5
So did they ever do anything? Anyone know? This just seems lamer by the second....
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 7, 2012 14:12:48 GMT -5
LOL yes, trashy ran to paris match to complain that people say their marriage is in the ditch because she was in Paris and he was elsewhere. Were they actually seen together since she got drunk at the market? And Albert went dancing with real girls in the Bretagne.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jul 7, 2012 19:12:25 GMT -5
;D When you're down to folk dancing on your wedding anniversary, you've kind of fast forwarded to being a senior who's senile and forgot his wife somewhere.
(my late aunt is hitting me behind the head right now, she liked folk dancing - sorry!!)
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 7, 2012 19:23:54 GMT -5
Here's another cover story celebrating their first anniversary. I think the "separation" is about how they spent the two days of their wedding anniversary - SEPARATELY France Dimanche, July 6, 2012, A very sad wedding anniversary. Albert and Charlene separated!
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 7, 2012 19:32:04 GMT -5
Although this story is about Charlene's California vacation, they published it on the week of their anniversary - of course on purpose. i ma not sure of the translation for "revit" Voici, July 7, 2012, Charlene, her vacation without Albert. To Los Angeles without him, she relives!
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 7, 2012 19:55:54 GMT -5
yes the first one is about the seperate anniversary, but it attracts more attention to say seperated. They did put the anniersary on the title too though, to make sure they don't get sued.
Revit is pretty much what people say about Katie Holmes at present. Without him she becomes alive...
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jul 7, 2012 21:53:34 GMT -5
Speaking of which, Cruise & Holmes are in settlement talks.
|
|