|
|
Post by tops on Oct 6, 2013 17:13:22 GMT -5
The news that the white Fiat Uno that was reported in the tunnel was never traced is untrue. That's just what the police claim but they never bothered to check. In fact, Mohamed al Fayed's people tracked down the car to a garage to which it had been sold and its rear wing had been repaired - exactly where the fragments found by the police in the tunnel originated. Here's the car: encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQMKME08oIG27fKzhase8JsvrM371mIdRaGR--B-tlssZ9wnCAsUwIt was owned by James Andanson, a notorious French paparazzo and MI6 free-lance agent, who was eventually found dead with two bullet holes in his head inside his burnt-out car at a remote spot. He had photographed Diana and Dodi on their yacht a few days before and had started to brag about being in the tunnel when the "accident" happened. He was murdered by a Yugloslav free-lance agent code-name "T" who had worked on the billionaire Edmond Safra murder case. :-( hello madameconcorde, anything else we can know about agent code-name "T" regarding the Safra case? was he directly involved in the incident or investigation? |
|
|
|
Post by agentf on May 7, 2015 6:03:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by agentf on May 15, 2015 13:33:52 GMT -5
Apparently, douchy brothers run the gamut. Diana's has a foot-in-mouth syndrome towards... his wives!! He'd so sleep alone that guyBy the way, Canadians would know their British history more if the Brits they sent from the UK to colonize the country could read and write, if British history wasn't so screwy to begin with and if history books weren't so full of sh*t. Pardon my French  |
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on Aug 8, 2017 14:31:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Aug 8, 2017 19:37:18 GMT -5
Thanks Madame Concorde!
|
|
|
|
Post by tops on Aug 9, 2017 6:02:26 GMT -5
It's still too bad that no one sat her down and told her the reality... She was just genetically attractive breeding stock to make babies, (heir and a spare) and he already had a lover. She did sell a lot of magazines and TV shows then and will forever. |
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Aug 9, 2017 10:56:18 GMT -5
I thought Grace did, no? Besides, look at her legacy - Windsors 2.0 adapted to today's mores. Nothing is lost. People are not static, and instead evolve. A woman can come into her own after undergoing hardships. It's not just men who overcome challenges. Being a mother is not a devaluation, it's a bonus. People can lead satisfying lives, tackling the things most important to them AND accomplish their biological destinies. Nothing is impossible. We live on a perfect planet replete with everything for our subsistence, with bodies optimally adapted to our environments. It's still too bad that no one sat her down and told her the reality... She was just genetically attractive breeding stock to make babies, (heir and a spare) and he already had a lover. She did sell a lot of magazines and TV shows then and will forever. |
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Aug 24, 2017 8:27:47 GMT -5
Coming up to the anniversary, Harry is speaking his mind about the hounds that sadistically photographed his dying mom. He knows it happened, because the pictures landed on news desks back in the UK. I personally think he needs to guard against showing his own wounds. Ultimately the ones who did this to Diana want to be able to push his emotional buttons at crucial times in the future. It's a knife in the guts, it truly is. There are people who will always exploit weaknesses and try to separate the family pack to pass their agenda. Diana in my view is far more powerful than ever as a mother and as the symbol she became and that she's passing on to her sons. Never tip into the sensational, because it can trap you. On another note, with all the coverage lately I'm reminded how I cut my hair to look like her at the time of the wedding broadcast. In one form or another she dazzled. May she always rest in peace. Her tormentors will have their comeuppance one day. Society does have to change away from a spectator sport and the general hypnosis/communal hallucination it's under. God willing.
|
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Aug 25, 2017 8:51:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Aug 31, 2017 7:45:27 GMT -5
There's more on Diana's relationship with the media. It's interesting how one reporter compares that on previous tours of Africa to help feed families, he'd never been able to photograph a royal actually hugging an African, feeding them and looking them in the eye. I think that speaks well of Diana, even if she did at times kind of overdo it. On TV, another source said that her crusade against land mines was hurting the UK production of weapons... The New Age Princess 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by tops on Feb 10, 2018 9:58:55 GMT -5
Good morning, I love Saturday mornings to come across good ol' fashioned conspiracy theories. Here is a link to something interesting that Queen Elizabeth did on the day of Princess Diana's funeral: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mzhr0LoJF-kIn reading comments beneath the YouTube i found this concept: "Diana was murdered by the Special Projects team seconded to the CIA and with the help of French Intelligence, she was alive as was the driver but they were both silenced, Clinton had been under pressure over Diana and the landmine issue which lost so much money for American firms. with Diana gone Clinton withdrew his support for Diana's Landmine. MI6 had been covertly protecting Diana, one of my friends said they failed in their duty to protect her, they also knew about attempts on her life over the Landmine issue and had taken a bomb off Dodi's boat earlier without them knowing. President Clinton was the only one who could have ordered her death, the Queen knew and did try and tell us who committed the act in one of her speeches." |
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Feb 10, 2018 17:32:17 GMT -5
Anything other than a botched Syrian war to detract from wifebeaters in the White House in its ever JerrySpringerization but I'll bite. Land mines, yes. But political figures are all interchangeable as are intelligence services because they're mostly screens to veil this is a mercenary society. Ask Syrian Arab Springers if they would have taken a pass if it meant saving half a million casualties... Where was it that CIA-funded Radio One or Europe stoked a movement but let the youth be killed without reinforcement? Havel became their head of state...Hungary? Anyway. When you refuse Syrian refugees that bought into your vision of democracy, no doubt they think this is all about jingos and their toys. And its no different than sacrificing innocents. I think Lady Di emancipated herself too late to get to enjoy it, sadly. If you freeze a moment, people's actions look strange, I've learned. It becomes a rabbit hole and doesn't change the outcome. You have to trust truth will manifest itself one day, and hopefully it'll be damn inconvenient for the malfeasants. Its life! I'm sure though she wishes she were here. Good morning, I love Saturday mornings to come across good ol' fashioned conspiracy theories. Here is a link to something interesting that Queen Elizabeth did on the day of Princess Diana's funeral: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mzhr0LoJF-kIn reading comments beneath the YouTube i found this concept: "Diana was murdered by the Special Projects team seconded to the CIA and with the help of French Intelligence, she was alive as was the driver but they were both silenced, Clinton had been under pressure over Diana and the landmine issue which lost so much money for American firms. with Diana gone Clinton withdrew his support for Diana's Landmine. MI6 had been covertly protecting Diana, one of my friends said they failed in their duty to protect her, they also knew about attempts on her life over the Landmine issue and had taken a bomb off Dodi's boat earlier without them knowing. President Clinton was the only one who could have ordered her death, the Queen knew and did try and tell us who committed the act in one of her speeches." |
|
|
|
Post by agentf on May 27, 2018 9:09:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Nov 23, 2018 13:38:35 GMT -5
Kitty Spencer I'm guessing is the beautiful niece of Lady Di? www.noblesseetroyautes.com/lady-kitty-spencer-aux-british-luxury-awards/Poor Dolce & Gabbana now with the chopsticks controversy. First it was natural births or straight parents... I'd still love a full collection in my size, for a change from my dogwalking wardrobe or aging designer clothes. I'm such a charity case. Sniff. |
|
|
|
Post by refia on Nov 23, 2018 16:39:33 GMT -5
Reads what D&G did again.. So they did a video of a Chinese woman eating Italian dishes with chopsticks and its called racist? Okay, China... Meanwhile they have concentration camps for the muslims there.  Back to Kitty. She was certainly the star at Harrys wedding, such a classic beauty and nicely dressed. She also takes after her mother   |
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Nov 24, 2018 12:03:53 GMT -5
And Hermes used to lock out Chinese customers.... I find the Chinese I've known are hugely self-deprecating. They should have just had Monica slurp on ramen soup IMO or do something with Michelle Leoh From Crazy Rich Asians in a Ferrari, and we'd hear nothing. The Muslim camps as a matter a fact are indirectly referenced in the Ottoman article. It was a region the prince's father was asked to insurrect. Read below in a previous post. Everyone should just stay within their borders and head for a Common Marketization or something, as Fukuyama implied in his End of History? I keep re-reading. (See link on my blog). Reads what D&G did again.. So they did a video of a Chinese woman eating Italian dishes with chopsticks and its called racist? Okay, China... Meanwhile they have concentration camps for the muslims there. Back to Kitty. She was certainly the star at Harrys wedding, such a classic beauty and nicely dressed. She also takes after her mother |
|
|
|
Post by refia on Nov 24, 2018 13:24:42 GMT -5
I'm not the biggest fan of China, but to me it's ironic how first China was forced to open their market and now they all fear this country. A good example of What goes around comes around.
|
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Nov 26, 2018 11:39:51 GMT -5
I hate their fur trade practices, personally but I hold nothing against individuals. China derailed this "Global Plan" and stood up to a system now administered by gambling addicts who wager on the failure of national economies. If it were me, I would do a global master reset, erase debts, restore natural ressources to their proper countries to be leased if they want, and expect a 10% contribution from corporations, individuals and nations, abolish weapons smaller than those needed to shoot down asteroids and satellites spread across the planet in an order so as to catch at maximal speed any threat, move intellectual industries to dessicated lands and render back optimal arable lands to feed everyone on the planet. I could go on. But I have no desire to resurrect any Holy Empires. I'm not the biggest fan of China, but to me it's ironic how first China was forced to open their market and now they all fear this country. A good example of What goes around comes around. |
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Nov 29, 2018 10:52:53 GMT -5
Rumours of a rift between Diana's sons has me thinking they cannot afford to fall out, certainly not over wives. Both have chosen badly from a monarchic pov by marrying roturieres, such that if their filial relationship implodes, that will be sheer stupidity. Go fishing together. Take up boxing together if need be. Their lives have been under a constant overarching umbrella of female drama. Get smart. William is lucky to have Harry to bolster the family testosterones. And he's had Harry a long time mostly to himself playing third wheel. Let's not be greedy and rob Harry of asserting himself and by making him chose. There are children to consider. On the other hand, Harry shouldnt expect immediate acceptance when he didnt give anyone a chance to keep up with the breakneck romance. His wife is no stranger to professional rivalries. Girls to their corners and boys be smarter. There are only two of you and you chose to make no strong alliances. You're grounded.
|
|
|
|
Post by refia on Nov 30, 2018 1:19:37 GMT -5
Wills has his own family and the Middletons. He is very much stable and has finally peace in his life. Harry on the other hand still isnt grown up, so its natural that both drift away from each other. Kate imo is no way at fault, as I think she is a teamplayer. Meghan on the other hand.... and honestly I believe someone from her circle is ratting her out. Dont be surprised to get more leaks about her bad behaviour.
Meanwhile her husband is still not back from Zambia, while she gets almost daily bad press.
|
|
