|
Post by emmeline on Apr 30, 2011 19:31:02 GMT -5
Btw, i love the comparison between the crowd of Kate's presence in the Balcony and Charlene's presence in hers.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Apr 30, 2011 21:11:41 GMT -5
Everyone loved Charlene's outfit - NOT! Even the French were unimpressed. Charlene's pissing on Armani will bite her. translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.plurielles.fr%2Fmode%2Fmode-stars%2Fflop-mode-la-robe-de-charlene-wittstock-au-mariage-de-will-et-kate-6429300-402.htmlFlop fashion: dress Charlene Wittstock at the marriage of Will and KateAt the wedding of Prince William and Princess Catherine, the parade of outfits to ... caused a few flops, including that of the future wife of Prince Albert of Monaco. Bland and too graphic.The future princess of Monaco, Charlene Wittstock has a proud carriage and shoulders of South African swimmer ... Not easy to appear thin and graceful when you have spent part of his life in the basins is the perpetual care of the one who married Prince Albert in July. Catherine's wedding and Prince William, Charlene chose to hide her figure under a long coat with wide neck. Unfortunately, it was his [her - Charlene, bad translation] big hat that attracted the attention and enhanced the magnitude of his shoulders. Matched with his Prince all in gray, the pretty blonde wore a pale blue overall color reminiscent of a heavy sky. A little bland and all ...
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Apr 30, 2011 21:59:25 GMT -5
hahahaha! brilliant! great find.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 1, 2011 3:48:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on May 1, 2011 5:46:00 GMT -5
On TRF someone wrote that they were late for dinner because there was a problem with the car that was given to them and the Queen was informed about them being late. She/he? writes that this information was given by a radio station this morning. Wondering if this is true... But it doesn't change anything about CW's behaviour: when you are late 30 ! minutes and know the Queen is waiting for you DON'T POSE FOR PICS... Huge mistake... There was no car problem. I know someone ---
|
|
|
Post by margarita on May 1, 2011 6:27:33 GMT -5
Thanks CM!!! These car problems sounded not real for me . Now this huge faux pas could be turned into a huge chance Posing for pics while being late (not due to technical reasons) for a dinner with the Queen. Albert must have been furious . CW had show evidently -IMO- that she is unable to be an accaptable Princess. And media were watching it. Even with all the help and support and positive media coverage she got so far she is simply incapable. (Can you imagine what happens when the media turn against her??? She should leave the scene before. Which is: now.)
|
|
|
Post by Elektra on May 1, 2011 8:44:10 GMT -5
I spent a week away from my computer. Quite enjoyed the days. I watched the wedding of Will and Catherine on German TV. I noticed one comment about Albert and Carlene walking into the church "The grey mice - next couple to marry". From then on I did not see them or heard anyone talking about them. I wonder how much coverage their wedding will get. Hopefully not that much at least not in Germany. I hate to have my fees I have to pay for TV are spent on such a trivial event.
|
|
|
Post by margarita on May 1, 2011 8:53:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on May 1, 2011 11:02:34 GMT -5
Haha, i love how karma chases her everywhere!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on May 1, 2011 12:16:47 GMT -5
cm, Karma for the truth. Sadly, Albert and his team go on these boards and don't tell the truth and people eat it up.
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 1, 2011 12:32:03 GMT -5
i'm confused, the dress is strapless but there's a sleeve on one arm WTH, have we seen this dress on a model not a tranny? does she wear a sleeve like a glove?? is it attached? will this dress get uglier and uglier everytime i see it? it certainly is a horror IMO
|
|
|
Post by ladybug on May 1, 2011 12:50:16 GMT -5
That mystery sleeve looks like some sort of "wardrobe malfunction"..... I can't see any purpose for that sleeve.... Wonder if she kept tugging at it throughout dinner.....
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on May 1, 2011 15:46:38 GMT -5
Fashion experts didn't even show any interest in her: "Expertos en la Moda dan una Clasificación a Famosas Personalidades invitadas a la Boda Real del Príncipe William & Kate Middleton: Wilnelia Merced Forsyth & Sir Bruce Forsyth = A- Princess Anne = B Duke & Duchess of Cambridge = A- Queen Elizabeth = B David Beckham & Victoria Beckham = B Tara Palmer-Tomkinson = A Chelsy Davy = B Las damitas y los pajecitos = A Joss Stone = B+ Queen Sofia of Spain, Prince Felipe of Asturias & Princess Letizia of Asturias = B Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall = B- Princesses Beatrice & Eugenie = D Prince Charles = B Sir Elton John & David Furnish = B+ Carole Middleton = A- James Middleton = B Pippa Middleton = A Guy Ritchie = B+ Prince Harry= A Lady Helen Taylor= C www.cotilleando.com/showthread.php?t=53118&p=1210695&viewfull=1#post1210695
|
|
|
Post by refia on May 1, 2011 15:50:36 GMT -5
whaat?
Joss Stone was better dressed than Chelsy.
|
|
|
Post by donna on May 2, 2011 4:39:44 GMT -5
i'm confused, the dress is strapless but there's a sleeve on one arm WTH, have we seen this dress on a model not a tranny? does she wear a sleeve like a glove?? is it attached? will this dress get uglier and uglier everytime i see it? it certainly is a horror IMO I liked it. At one end of the shawl was a sleeve, or a sleeve turned a shawl.
|
|
|
Post by donna on May 2, 2011 4:42:31 GMT -5
On TRF someone wrote that they were late for dinner because there was a problem with the car that was given to them and the Queen was informed about them being late. She/he? writes that this information was given by a radio station this morning. Wondering if this is true... But it doesn't change anything about CW's behaviour: when you are late 30 ! minutes and know the Queen is waiting for you DON'T POSE FOR PICS... Huge mistake... There was no car problem. I know someone --- Yes ...
|
|
|
Post by hibou on May 2, 2011 6:35:49 GMT -5
Having a car problem is the equivalent of saying the dog age my homework. I do not believe there was a car problem because the hotel that they were staying at could produce a fleet of cars at a moments notice. I don't know where they stayed but I'm sure they could have produced another car quickly. Plus the security they had around them could have produced another car. Just bad manners. Poor Grace and Rainier to have raised such a disaster. Having said that, there is a point that one can no longer blame the parents for the child's mistake. At 52, Albert can no longer blame them for his bad behavior. JMO
|
|
|
Post by donna on May 2, 2011 9:16:24 GMT -5
Bad manners, Hibou! It is way beyond that. She's getting sloppy about her "habit". Can't say more, or my post will be deleted.
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 2, 2011 9:27:00 GMT -5
i never believed the car trouble...HELLO cell phone >call a taxi. or better yet, act like mature adults leave early enough to NEVER BE LATE even with car trouble. i'm not royal, but i was raised correctly AND retained my manners! geez this trainwreck is so predictably arrogant, I LOVE no one was paying attention, par for the course they arrive late to seem "special" and only a few photographers knew OR CARED to take a picture. ROFL another PR FAIL IMO
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 2, 2011 9:36:49 GMT -5
Bad manners, Hibou! It is way beyond that. She's getting sloppy about her "habit". Can't say more, or my post will be deleted. Donna, as stated in earlier today in another post, I have not deleted one post since Royal Opinions started - I do not believe in censoring opinions. Each member can discern for themselves what they want to believe about anyone's opinions. Eringer has already alluded to a snowy recreational activity posted on his blog) om 13 March 2010. Having difficult time believing that Albert will condone such a behavior, I questioned the veracity of Eringer's information and the quality of his source through a question on his Formspring blog. Eringer firmly stands by his source as someone who was a first hand witness. Notice that the snow blog entry was not one of the 13 entries that Albert sued in a French Court to have Eringer remove due to what they believed was defamation. So, posters are free to opine here about information that they read or hear. Likewise, posters are also free to challenge any such information. Note, Eringer stated that the relationship was going nowhere, but now Lulu and Tubby are due to marry in just two months. So, believe what yo want and opine away on Royal Opinions. SATURDAY, MARCH 13, 2010
SUNDAY FUNNIES
As director of the Monaco Intelligence Service, part of Robert Eringer’s job was to cultivate a strong network of trustworthy assets and informants. That network still exists.
One of Eringer’s sources in Monaco has provided astonishing information that sheds light on why Prince Albert’s relationship with Charlene Wittstock seems to be going nowhere.
It harkens back to Albert’s Antarctica expedition in January 2009--and a trail of snow to Charlene’s 30th birthday party in South Africa on 25 January.
Tension ruptured over refreshment from Argentina (and how it traveled to Cape Town).
POSTED BY ROBERT ERINGER AT 8:32 AM
|
|