|
Post by paca on Mar 16, 2021 18:52:00 GMT -5
I agree and sooner or later he will realize that. On the upside Philip is back home. So let's focus on the good news: new puppies and Phulip on the mend.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 17, 2021 9:51:34 GMT -5
And it's springtime. Obviously yoga isn't working out for the pair, who don't seem to find inner peace and silence. Preach less, I say. I agree and sooner or later he will realize that. On the upside Philip is back home. So let's focus on the good news: new puppies and Phulip on the mend.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 17, 2021 13:09:55 GMT -5
LOL maybe cbd will do the trick. Looking forward to seeing haz with dreadlocks and totally chilled...meanwhile their pet journo tries to play down megs leaks. So much for the last word. Now she takes offence that no one hasn't called yet. Why would they? She is not blood. They won't shut up the press for her and they can't, because they are not private persons and meg just doesn't get it or doesn't want to get it. The brf are not celebrities, they are not a listers so what point is there talking to her except for telling her to shut up or get a divorce. With H they may still have a chance to get through, especially since meg just creates more and more havock which may result in an all out parliamentary enquiery. He may get, that it is in his own interest to avoid one. Besides they can't get rid off him. He is always family, meg is just archies mum. Not sure if she really wants all her pettyness to come out in the open and show the world what kind of person she really is. Eventually the entire letter to her father may become part of public record and can be published forever in the tabloids. as well as her colluding with friends to leak info to the press. And yes she may have records and messages, but so do others. She has no idea what has been communicated about her by staff. She may not look so good, when all comes into the open. The brf will survive. They survived worse. But she won't. She isn't big enough nor was her reputation good enough before she dated h. She might end up like fergie with a lot less access. Also if she continues to mudd sling the brf, then she might end up with some legal problems of her own. Defamation, especially when the queen is involved, is a crime. Someone should explain that to her. The reason she is not being persecuted is that the queen has declared her still to be family. If she stops doing that, then meg is toast. And btw while they were in the uk and canada there were no security problems, in the US the same guy managed to get on their property twice....
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 18, 2021 8:20:07 GMT -5
Here's what's in the public domain as proof of bullying: LOL maybe cbd will do the trick. Looking forward to seeing haz with dreadlocks and totally chilled...meanwhile their pet journo tries to play down megs leaks. So much for the last word. Now she takes offence that no one hasn't called yet. Why would they? She is not blood. They won't shut up the press for her and they can't, because they are not private persons and meg just doesn't get it or doesn't want to get it. The brf are not celebrities, they are not a listers so what point is there talking to her except for telling her to shut up or get a divorce. With H they may still have a chance to get through, especially since meg just creates more and more havock which may result in an all out parliamentary enquiery. He may get, that it is in his own interest to avoid one. Besides they can't get rid off him. He is always family, meg is just archies mum. Not sure if she really wants all her pettyness to come out in the open and show the world what kind of person she really is. Eventually the entire letter to her father may become part of public record and can be published forever in the tabloids. as well as her colluding with friends to leak info to the press. And yes she may have records and messages, but so do others. She has no idea what has been communicated about her by staff. She may not look so good, when all comes into the open. The brf will survive. They survived worse. But she won't. She isn't big enough nor was her reputation good enough before she dated h. She might end up like fergie with a lot less access. Also if she continues to mudd sling the brf, then she might end up with some legal problems of her own. Defamation, especially when the queen is involved, is a crime. Someone should explain that to her. The reason she is not being persecuted is that the queen has declared her still to be family. If she stops doing that, then meg is toast. And btw while they were in the uk and canada there were no security problems, in the US the same guy managed to get on their property twice....
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 18, 2021 14:27:35 GMT -5
Wow, that is damning, but spot on. The second one is a bit more balanced when it comes to sharing the blame, but this constant pushing him away and insisting, she goes first is just beyond rude. Once or twice could be excused, but she has been constantly doing it. Charlie made a lot of mistakes, but I don't remember her constantly tackling Albert. She did look bored a lot and obviously didn't get a lot of things, but she also had to move in a country not only with a different culture, but also with a different language. I found it bothering as well when they went all you tell it , no you. They are adults. Behave like it. And so if H is okay with her going first, then well just stick to it and brief people. I know that Monaco is too small for megs ego, but I think that she would have managed better there. Though rightly she would have complained about racism and misogyny there, but no one would have bothered with her penchant for private planes and the cost of her wardrobe. Actually it would have been expected of her. She would probably put Albert on one of her Hollywood diets and surely she has nothing against balding men. Albert is richer then H and apparently he doesn't mind that people throw expensive gifts on his wife. He accepts them too. Corruption is sadly in Monacos DNA. So Meghan would fit right in and there wouldn't be bad press in MC, as Albert owns it.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 18, 2021 20:24:26 GMT -5
I think the pair need to be tuned out. Responding to them or showing humanity is instantly regretted. Give them rope. In no time, they'll turn against Oprah too. Wow, that is damning, but spot on. The second one is a bit more balanced when it comes to sharing the blame, but this constant pushing him away and insisting, she goes first is just beyond rude. Once or twice could be excused, but she has been constantly doing it. Charlie made a lot of mistakes, but I don't remember her constantly tackling Albert. She did look bored a lot and obviously didn't get a lot of things, but she also had to move in a country not only with a different culture, but also with a different language. I found it bothering as well when they went all you tell it , no you. They are adults. Behave like it. And so if H is okay with her going first, then well just stick to it and brief people. I know that Monaco is too small for megs ego, but I think that she would have managed better there. Though rightly she would have complained about racism and misogyny there, but no one would have bothered with her penchant for private planes and the cost of her wardrobe. Actually it would have been expected of her. She would probably put Albert on one of her Hollywood diets and surely she has nothing against balding men. Albert is richer then H and apparently he doesn't mind that people throw expensive gifts on his wife. He accepts them too. Corruption is sadly in Monacos DNA. So Meghan would fit right in and there wouldn't be bad press in MC, as Albert owns it.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 18, 2021 21:02:15 GMT -5
I think in the long run King and winfrey will regret being their mouthpieces, but I think both of them have been around long enough to distance themselves soon enough. Michelle Obama, though under contract with same agent, has to a degree defended Meg, but smartly put some distance between them about service. I think Michelle has greater influence where Meg wants to go then Oprah. So it is important to notice that she doesn't go all out for her. And those who need to know will get that message. I think Meg will soon find herself trying to go through doors that won't open. People will be polite and talk to her, but nothing will ever come out of it. The brf are also baggage, if she really wants to go into politics. How will she explain to people that she will be defending their interests and not her own? Also she decided to marry into an unelected institution, she quit because they wouldn't silence the critical press, where does she show any real appreciation of democracy, which includes a free and critical press? She couldn't handle that, because she doesn't understand, that political press does not operate like Hollywood press. If she thinks the British tabloids are bad, then try to hold your own with fox news. And even the more serious press wouldn't let her get away with her evasive allegations. They would want proof and they would do their own research. They don't just use your publicists material and do a photo op.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 19, 2021 6:50:49 GMT -5
Oprah & co might regret it if like the Lindsay Lohans of this world MM is sponsored by the same people; provided with a troll army and funds à la Trump; all to kill two birds with one stone. That would explain Trump propping her to candidate status, the "blood diamonds" as you call them and finally the race card being played because that prince would never marry a black woman. I think in the long run King and winfrey will regret being their mouthpieces, but I think both of them have been around long enough to distance themselves soon enough. Michelle Obama, though under contract with same agent, has to a degree defended Meg, but smartly put some distance between them about service. I think Michelle has greater influence where Meg wants to go then Oprah. So it is important to notice that she doesn't go all out for her. And those who need to know will get that message. I think Meg will soon find herself trying to go through doors that won't open. People will be polite and talk to her, but nothing will ever come out of it. The brf are also baggage, if she really wants to go into politics. How will she explain to people that she will be defending their interests and not her own? Also she decided to marry into an unelected institution, she quit because they wouldn't silence the critical press, where does she show any real appreciation of democracy, which includes a free and critical press? She couldn't handle that, because she doesn't understand, that political press does not operate like Hollywood press. If she thinks the British tabloids are bad, then try to hold your own with fox news. And even the more serious press wouldn't let her get away with her evasive allegations. They would want proof and they would do their own research. They don't just use your publicists material and do a photo op.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 19, 2021 8:10:58 GMT -5
well, for now she is still married to h. But I can see her accept money from all sources as long as she can keepher lifestyle. She is not very principalled, which is why IMO she can rightly be called a golddigger. I never get why men who are punching above theirleague never get that. Will and Kate area much more balanced couple. They have a similar education, they are similar in the looks department and Kate comes from a wealthy family. SHe doesn't come from nobility like Diana, but she has always been more mature and stable. Yes there was some socialclimbing by the middletons, but mostly they have been discrete. At least when it comes to privacy. Especially her dad has been an example of good behaviour. Given that there is no rulebook for the family of royal spouses, he could be writing one.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 19, 2021 11:51:18 GMT -5
Diana was a bona fide aristocrat, not just a noblewoman. The giveaway with MM is her constant attacks at the media and the suppression of free speech. well, for now she is still married to h. But I can see her accept money from all sources as long as she can keepher lifestyle. She is not very principalled, which is why IMO she can rightly be called a golddigger. I never get why men who are punching above theirleague never get that. Will and Kate area much more balanced couple. They have a similar education, they are similar in the looks department and Kate comes from a wealthy family. SHe doesn't come from nobility like Diana, but she has always been more mature and stable. Yes there was some socialclimbing by the middletons, but mostly they have been discrete. At least when it comes to privacy. Especially her dad has been an example of good behaviour. Given that there is no rulebook for the family of royal spouses, he could be writing one.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 19, 2021 14:33:23 GMT -5
didn't they say that Diana was more royal then the royals? anyways she was surely less stable then Kate. Meg surely has issues. But she is also more calculating then Diana. Diana wasn't aiming at the family, she was aiming at the aparatus behind it. And her husband and Camilla. Meg singles out particular people she has grievances with or is jealous of. She doesn't care that she ultimately hurts her husband as well, who, unlike herself, still cares for his family. the only people she leaves out are qe2 and philip and probably only because they are old and more popular and, well, you don't attack old people.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 19, 2021 16:39:40 GMT -5
I see no similarities between Diana and MM. Catherine had two very involved parents and that makes a big difference, I think. But that shouldn't become an excuse to be the lightening rod of others' discontent. MM can blame her divorced parents, but not seethe with jealousy at Catherine. Our circumstances are all different. We can only try to do better than our parents. For some it may be hard, while easy for others. Self-containment is key. didn't they say that Diana was more royal then the royals? anyways she was surely less stable then Kate. Meg surely has issues. But she is also more calculating then Diana. Diana wasn't aiming at the family, she was aiming at the aparatus behind it. And her husband and Camilla. Meg singles out particular people she has grievances with or is jealous of. She doesn't care that she ultimately hurts her husband as well, who, unlike herself, still cares for his family. the only people she leaves out are qe2 and philip and probably only because they are old and more popular and, well, you don't attack old people.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 19, 2021 18:10:42 GMT -5
Diana and MM use the press for their own purposes and both have mental health issues, though different ones. Both are way more attractive than their husbands and thus draw more attention. Diana took time to get used to it, but as she got older she knew exactly what she was doing, when using the attention she received for her own purposes. Just remember her last summer when she taunted the paps. I think there are a lot of similarities and I think the familiarity is what drew h to MM. What he doesn't notice is the differences. Diana wasn't a narcissist. She was a dramaqueen, had eating disorders etc., but she really cared for the downtrodden and wanted to shine a light on them so that people couldn't look away anymore. MM uses the poor as a picturesque backdrop. Sure Diana wore designer clothes too, but not the in your face style of mm. You don't go visit the poor wearing more than their yearly income. That is the difference that H doesn't see. The similarities with Diana are blinding H from seeing MM for who she really is.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 19, 2021 19:34:21 GMT -5
Diana was reacting, whereas the other is this undergrown predator. I can see the using the press thing, but Diana was not as rabidly litigious towards it. Diana was trying to make it work for her, but MM wants to beat it into submission and lord over it. MM looks like a child trying to play grownup in any clothes. Diana and MM use the press for their own purposes and both have mental health issues, though different ones. Both are way more attractive than their husbands and thus draw more attention. Diana took time to get used to it, but as she got older she knew exactly what she was doing, when using the attention she received for her own purposes. Just remember her last summer when she taunted the paps. I think there are a lot of similarities and I think the familiarity is what drew h to MM. What he doesn't notice is the differences. Diana wasn't a narcissist. She was a dramaqueen, had eating disorders etc., but she really cared for the downtrodden and wanted to shine a light on them so that people couldn't look away anymore. MM uses the poor as a picturesque backdrop. Sure Diana wore designer clothes too, but not the in your face style of mm. You don't go visit the poor wearing more than their yearly income. That is the difference that H doesn't see. The similarities with Diana are blinding H from seeing MM for who she really is.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 20, 2021 6:17:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 21, 2021 18:58:38 GMT -5
A Givenchy employee present at the bridal fittings has spoken up about the abuse hurled by MM and her BFF, at a child:
Pretty lame to attack a defenseless child.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 21, 2021 20:41:03 GMT -5
To be honest, if true, then Kate is admirable for letting her kids take part and putting on a brave face. I would have pulled my kids out, stayed away and had only Will attend. With Louis just being born. I am sure an excuse could have been conjured up. That would have had tongues wagging and overshadowed the wedding. No one would have talked about the wedding. I totally believe the Mulroney bullying bit. It's what she did when she lost all her jobs. Rightfully so. I actually think that she taught Meghan how to. They do look a bit like those mean girls from Hollywood movies. No wonder they got on. I actually believe while in Toronto, mulroney would take the lead, being better and longer connected, but since MM dated H, they were at first equals, with the marriage mm became the mother superior. That's why she wouldn't support JM publicly during her desaster. And Isabelle was the special girl that she then wouldn't send a birthday gift? She is her god daughter too.
Wasn't there a similar story about some mm commercial in ny, with her and her entourage making fun about everyone who wasn't part of their group? I think if she had been really honest in her interview, she would have said, that she had to leave because she couldn't find people to bitch with about others. In Hollywood it seems to be part of the landscape and in her business too. You put others down to put yourself up. It's what Weinstein did, what mm does, what her friend Ellen does and apparently most people in that business. One would think being accustomed to it, she would have been used to it. But while in Hollywood journalists play the game and remain silent when needed, the royals don't and can't do that. That is what really irks her. Racism she is used to and has probably gotten plenty more in LA then in the UK or Canada. But people actually being told by the press what she is really like and not being able to stop that, bothers her. I would not be surprised, if eventually a video or audiotape would surface. just wait until the bullying enquiery will take place. Once that is underway, people present can leak stuff without being held accountable by nda's as the leaks could come from anyone... Btw I think she only chose Givenchy, because it has a long standing reputation, is French and expensive and links with one of Hollywoods greatest and a true nobelwoman and kind lady, not mentioning style icon: Audrey Hepburn. I think MM would have loved some comparisson, but again lack of talent and Audrey wore her clothes so much better. Just saw a doc, where Givenchy said, that he didn't pick the clothes she wore, Audrey did. She really had style, sth MM lacks. I noticed that most of her outfits didn't fit well, showed underwear or creased. I don't think I ever so the queen with a creased skirt. Look at mm dress on her first outing with qe2. qe2 lokks impeckable, mm looks in bad need of an iron. Her dress was surely more expensive, but you don't want that crinkled look. Kate seems to be good at avoiding that look, though IMO she needs to make her style younger and not look like she still wears her mums clothes. She is young and has a great figure for clothes. A slight change of hairstyle and an overhaul of those momsy clothes. Accessorising better would help too. I know qe2 loves dresses, but Kate is a different generation. She seems to wear pants in private, so go for it and wear them more in public. they are practical, appropriate and fit her age group. There are still plenty of occasions for skirts and dresses, i.e. in summer, but it would do her good and she looks more comfortable and at ease. I feel that she still hasn't quite found her own style. Mms style relys on the price tag and the brand, not personal preference. She seems to be carrying a grudge there as well? Wasn't she said to be bothered because her stylist couldn't get her free clothes from designers for events? Maybe her bad behaviour with Givenchy is down to that?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 21, 2021 21:08:38 GMT -5
just noticed that even her wedding dress needed a good press after service. Kate looked crease free when she went in and when she came out. Also her hair was a mess by that time, while Kate was still fine. Considering that mm claims to be a perctionist, I am surprised that she doesn't pay attention to the material of her clothes. A dress that makes you look like an unmade bed after less than an hour, should not make the top of your list, when your picture is being taken all day.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Mar 22, 2021 11:32:55 GMT -5
Emulating dead actresses is a Toronto thing, or at least was when I first arrived there and my agent was trying to typecast me. I thought it was the single most bizarre thing I'd ever heard, to willingly obliterate your originality to fit into some anachronistic mold. I hadn't gotten into fashion to be somebody else. (I got into it because of hats on the runway, and Emmanuel Ungaro mismatched tailleurs). (I also didn't know how to model 😄 since I had only seen models in my art classes). I digress. Meahwhile I watched the terrible two's engagement video for the 1st time, and segued with Wills & Kate's. I thought Will kept peeking at Kate's décolleté, actually. Their physical attraction was palpable. The other two was fairly benign, other than the manic hand holding. Style-wise in the UK, I miss Daphne Guinness. Where has she gone?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 22, 2021 19:30:35 GMT -5
and another employee bites the dust. And it is a woman. again. a blond, white woman. again. Could megan be a mysogynst racist?
|
|