|
Post by mrszinck on May 8, 2019 7:35:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on May 8, 2019 9:59:56 GMT -5
Thank you. I was just going to post my own find. Royal baby FIRST PICTURE: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry release adorable photo MEGHAN Markle and Prince Harry have proudly showed off their royal baby boy to the world for the very first time. Baby Sussex made his first public debut cradled in the arms of his beaming father and alongside his glowing mother Meghan after his first days at home in Frogmore Cottage, Windsor. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex could not hide their delight as they posed for pictures with their newborn son in St George's Hall in Windsor Castle, just two days after he was born. Royal fans across the world expressed their delight at the first pictures of Baby Sussex after Harry and Meghan took the unprecedented step not to release details about their newborn son until after they have had “the opportunity to celebrate privately”. -50% read more here: www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1123678/Royal-baby-first-picture-meghan-markle-prince-harry-official-photos-birthSomething's definitely odd. It was a 10 month pregnancy, so yes, the "newborn" is a month old. They are still hush hush about where the baby was born? Too much secrecy in all of this, but we can see why.
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on May 8, 2019 10:04:49 GMT -5
I am back! The Daily Fail has it. Fans are convinced Baby Sussex was born a FORTNIGHT ago after Harry 'slipped up' while discussing the 'last two weeks' with his son Harry, 34, and Meghan, 37, introduced their much anticipated newborn today Prince Harry exclaimed 'everyone says babies change so much over two weeks' Said he would be keeping a close eye on the little one over the next month However fans misunderstood and claimed Harry said the baby was 2 weeks old Fans have gone wild with theories that Prince Harry 'slipped up' during his touching speech on Wednesday, as he introduced Baby Sussex to the world. A proud Harry, 34, and Meghan, 37, introduced their much-anticipated newborn to the world from Windsor Castle on Wednesday. Lots of pics +++ www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7005947/Harry-Meghans-baby-Fans-wild-theories-Prince-Harry-slipped-speech.html#comments
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on May 8, 2019 10:58:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MadameConcorde on May 8, 2019 11:48:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on May 8, 2019 14:12:44 GMT -5
LOL
I have to get used to it...
Archie is from Archie Bunker? American series? 'all in the family' and Harrison is 'Harry his son'. They've thought about it ... for now. What about later? an adult man named Archie? Prince Archie?
I'm trying to pronounce it right... is it like archive?
|
|
|
Post by agentf on May 9, 2019 10:56:39 GMT -5
Archie is super cute. I love it. Having said that, on paper I wish it were not truncated to nickname form. As per Harrison, it's fine if you don't overread into it; Ben Harrison was a signator of the Act of Independence presented to King George, QE2's ancestor. But! It could be intentional in a reconciliatory kind of way. First, race then gender fluidity and all. Why not politics? I'm not sure how many issues you can glue into a little creature. Nobody consulted him and that could be too loaded. LOL I have to get used to it... Archie is from Archie Bunker? American series? 'all in the family' and Harrison is 'Harry his son'. They've thought about it ... for now. What about later? an adult man named Archie? Prince Archie? I'm trying to pronounce it right... is it like archive?
|
|
|
Post by agentf on May 18, 2019 6:34:47 GMT -5
Harry did the honours and filed Archie's birth certificate. It's funny how they say husbands tend to not remember the date they got married. www.bbc.com/news/uk-48315300He was delivered at the same place as some other royals, so he was in good hands.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on May 30, 2019 22:21:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Sept 3, 2019 9:31:53 GMT -5
oh, Harry you are really going down - fast. What a nightmare. Nobody forgets this anymore ... as if there is no end to you and your wife's behavior. People are not stupid!! This is all so bad! So wrong...
You can best move to the USA, JMO. You don't fit with royals - whatever that may be. But certainly not this... booohooo
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Sept 4, 2019 7:57:18 GMT -5
I think they're aiming for Africa. It was clumsy, to be sure, and having Elton John as your defender is no calling card to detract from excess, I'm afraid. It's a tough wave to ride at the moment. Nothing that more baby pics can't fix, and sway the short attention span of the Googlerized generation. Maybe they'll learn in the interim. oh, Harry you are really going down - fast. What a nightmare. Nobody forgets this anymore ... as if there is no end to you and your wife's behavior. People are not stupid!! This is all so bad! So wrong... You can best move to the USA, JMO. You don't fit with royals - whatever that may be. But certainly not this... booohooo
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Sept 15, 2019 7:04:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Oct 21, 2019 8:50:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Oct 21, 2019 9:05:52 GMT -5
Angola, South Africa are poor countries with rape and poverty. The location of the documentary was totally wrong to talk about their problems. Shame on H& M. JMO I try to understand why they destroy themselves so quickly, JMO. I don't understand. This podcast was interesting: Princess Diana’s death 22 years ago still matters... about Harry. www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p07q4pt4
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Oct 21, 2019 9:16:54 GMT -5
The link is not working for me. It's not to the podcast. As per the whole mediatization (sic), it may not indeed be constructive because it's self-perpetuating but I try to remember Meghan's family support circle is the reason she's in the position to have to reach out. There seems to be a tendency to overshadow their causes with news headlines, first with the timing of the lawsuit news - but when you're fighting the media, it's possible to have to resort to their tactics for maximum impact. Angola, South Africa are poor countries with rape and poverty. The location of the documentary was totally wrong to talk about their problems. Shame on H& M. JMO I try to understand why they destroy themselves so quickly, JMO. I don't understand. This podcast was interesting: Princess Diana’s death 22 years ago still matters... about Harry. royalopinions.proboards.com/thread/107/british-royal-news?page=11&scrollTo=41288
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Oct 21, 2019 10:05:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by donna on Oct 21, 2019 16:52:04 GMT -5
I think it is Harry definitely, wanting to protect his woman. Just think about how his mom died and it is very understandable that he wants to prevent it from happening again.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Oct 23, 2019 10:07:03 GMT -5
I agree. He's trying to be chivalrous however it's likely to be interpreted as a Markle family move though. There's a need to regroup, I think. Harry and William need some time together imo. www.bbc.com/news/uk-50154033 I think it is Harry definitely, wanting to protect his woman. Just think about how his mom died and it is very understandable that he wants to prevent it from happening again.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Oct 23, 2019 14:35:05 GMT -5
Okay, so I thought I would go off the beaten path to see what the deal was about this hostile press business, and came upon this 60 Minutes Australia video. I don't suggest showing it to Meghan at the moment though Andrew Morton seems to be a solid supporter. youtu.be/_D5xF_MX9yIThe bottom line is that her case is not such an isolated one, that public opinion is fickle and there is some good advice in there. She should have a stiff drink handy if she's going to watch this.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Oct 23, 2019 15:19:37 GMT -5
I'm going to try again to make the point I wrote last week and deleted. I'm putting it in this separate post in case it meets the same fate too 😄
It's not funny though. The media thinks of (Meghan) as a commodity, as their creation, of themselves as the ones who have built her up or historically laid the groundwork to make people like her come up the food chain by strategic lip service. They therefore think they own her so they can do whatever they want, to get a return on their investment, even if it means making her cry or getting any reaction out of her by herding public opinion. They'll make her scream, take her to brinks. They'll exacerbate her natural impulses and they'll track how she tries to cope and poison that well too. When there's nothing left natural out of her and she becomes a depleted, denatured creature then they will move on to what's next to her. To reverse that process, one must be so strong and transcend everything to see that anyone making a living off of/transacting with your life is simply not you the subject and is not in your shoes, living your life. Therefore that life of yours is for you alone to author and is confirmed as indeed a precious life to lead and certainly not to be wasted by benefitting only the wrong people who are in essence not those who you chose to have benefit off of your care, your actions, your love. One must take back ownership in the true sense, of their lives.
I hope I'm clearer this time. If it's helpful, even better.
|
|