|
Post by MyAdia on May 3, 2011 12:11:52 GMT -5
Thanks Countess. When I read the article yesterday about the wedding, it never dawn on me the major PR fail is that Wynn did NOT have his wedding in Monaco, his new country of citizenship! It's even worse PR, especially since Monaco's Tourism Office is traveling the world promoting Monaco as a romantic fairytale wedding venue with Albert and Charlene's wedding supposedly leading the way. Besides, Wynn met his new wife while vacationing on the Riviera (of course he was still married to his first wife).
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 4, 2011 9:28:23 GMT -5
Other double-broadcasts of ARD and ZDF are not planned: "It will take a couple of decades until a similarly magnificent wedding will be celebrated," said Frey. The wedding of Prince Albert of Monaco and Charlene Wittstock on July 2nd will only be broadcast by ZDF. clapclapclap take that FatAl & chartard! ;D i doubt it can be watched live on any channel in the US, i'm just hoping i can get it over the internet like i watched vicky's. i really want to watch in real time before it's all cut up and censored of the really FUN stuff. (snort this is going to be so good
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 8, 2011 18:53:38 GMT -5
i've read on another forum that the US might not be able to see the wedding even on the internet
"it is still unknown if the two-day civil and religious ceremony...... will be broadcasted by the major cable networks in the United States (i.e. CNN, MSNBC, etc.). those who subscribe to TV5 Monde may be able to view the wedding on their television sets in the United States. Also, France24 will stream the wedding online (only to those living in France) along with Monaco Info de Ligne. For those living in Germany, the wedding will be available to watch via ZDF."
IMO it's a BIG PR FAIL, if you can't even get internet attention. i never thought CNN or any cable channel would air it live, 99.9% of US don't know or CARE who the procine prince is, much less his delusions of greatness.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on May 8, 2011 19:27:52 GMT -5
Eringer has posted an article written by Malcom Campbell from the UK Times on the fiasco of the wedding. Eringer posted it on his blog not his Q & A. IT's everything we've been saying!
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 8, 2011 20:35:18 GMT -5
Eringer has posted an article written by Malcom Campbell from the UK Times on the fiasco of the wedding. Eringer posted it on his blog not his Q & A. IT's everything we've been saying! The Times article, along with its abstract, is posted in the new thread here: Media: Problems with Albert & Charlene's wedding
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 9, 2011 12:04:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rearden on May 9, 2011 16:01:45 GMT -5
I think the list would be easier to make if we counted when they have not failed.
Please can someone tell me if they done something right?
|
|
|
Post by margarita on May 9, 2011 16:09:16 GMT -5
Sorry rearden - I don't see anything they're doing right - except of screwing it off perfectly.
BTW: someone posted on TRF that Kate& Will will be in New York EXACTLY on 2 July ....
Who will care for this made-for-tv-wedding?
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 9, 2011 16:10:53 GMT -5
nope, nothing comes to mind, everywhere they go chaos ensues, the rudeness to the queen got them more PR than the wedding itself....pathetic!
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on May 9, 2011 19:22:34 GMT -5
I hope Brazil begins to pray, Albert has been there. Well, Charlene hasn't, so maybe the damage won't be too much. I agree with Margarita, they are perfect screwing up big time everythin they do or touch!! So, if Wills and Kate are going to be on July 2nd in New York, and then in California...well, no doubt that these two are doomed and will doom Monaco too. Some days before the wedding, aren't Wills and Kate going to be in Canada?
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on May 13, 2011 10:02:57 GMT -5
Yesterday, the palace sent out a press release with the latest wedding details, including the new sponsors and Eagles concert. What's the interest across the world? Sounds of crickets - amnother bit PR FLOP!
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 13, 2011 10:13:13 GMT -5
the sponsors <<<<<>>>>>>ROLLING ON THE FLOOR LAUGHING, only the non dynamic duo would have sponsors for a wedding because they are the only ones going into this as a business. while normal in love people want a meaningful, intimate, personal wedding, these two want a street corner circus with sponsors and advertisement. AND they wonder why no one but the monkey flunkies buy into the "fairy" (of i love irony) tale.
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 19, 2011 9:56:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by suite583 on May 19, 2011 12:33:23 GMT -5
They should change once more the wedding date to get more media attention and rich people around them. They should have made the wedding in the week of September when Monaco will have its big yacht weekend.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on May 19, 2011 12:54:47 GMT -5
In a part i hear she says she wants to have a family on her own...and Albert says "I agree!" So...does anybody doubts the Bitchstock read this forum? Now suddenly she wants to have a family on her own...yeah right, Conlene.
|
|
|
Post by countess on May 19, 2011 14:15:28 GMT -5
the key words "OF MY OWN" IMO meaning those other kids are going to stay ignored. i want the press to run with the evil stepmother story and it's going to be mentioned if those kids aren't at the wedding, it's already being asked on TV shows
|
|
|
Post by paca on May 19, 2011 17:52:30 GMT -5
LOL her interrupting was her rehearsed Letizia moment. The press always goes back to this when talking about Letizia. I just watched a bit on Maxima. SHe won the Dutch press by calling her future husband dumb right after the engagement was announced and she laughed wholeheartedly. When she talks about the beginning of the relationship, she says she didn't remember her husbands face when he came to see her in NY. And she is laughing and you can tell this woman is telling the truth. ANd she loves her husband, not just the role she is playing. And he knows it, so he can laugh with her. All the other young royals married for love and you can tell that from the way they interact. trashy is the only one who is getting married for the money. And Albert is the only one who is getting for money too. Then again, that's why Rainier got married too; so at least in that respect he is like his dad.
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on May 19, 2011 18:15:35 GMT -5
the key words "OF MY OWN" IMO meaning those other kids are going to stay ignored. i want the press to run with the evil stepmother story and it's going to be mentioned if those kids aren't at the wedding, it's already being asked on TV shows Were do I start...first, she asks Albert's permission to answer that question (like a first grader who finally knows the answer to one question and is "me, me, let me answer that one!" ;D Second, she clearly said "I" and not "we". If she was interviewed alone that would be ok, but they were both there being interviewed as soon-to-be married couple. One would expect they spoke about having kids during the last year of their engagement. She should have said "WE want to have children and WE can't wait to start family of OUR own." But those are Albert and WC, normal conduct and rules do not apply. Anyway, there is still time for another interview before the wedding. By that time she should come up with a good answer.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on May 19, 2011 18:45:59 GMT -5
the key words "OF MY OWN" IMO meaning those other kids are going to stay ignored. i want the press to run with the evil stepmother story and it's going to be mentioned if those kids aren't at the wedding, it's already being asked on TV shows Were do I start...first, she asks Albert's permission to answer that question (like a first grader who finally knows the answer to one question and is "me, me, let me answer that one!" ;D Second, she clearly said "I" and not "we". If she was interviewed alone that would be ok, but they were both there being interviewed as soon-to-be married couple. One would expect they spoke about having kids during the last year of their engagement. She should have said "WE want to have children and WE can't wait to start family of OUR own." But those are Albert and WC, normal conduct and rules do not apply. Anyway, there is still time for another interview before the wedding. By that time she should come up with a good answer. Haha, i know! But sugars are more than pleased with this answer. Pathetic. I totally agree that Charlene is like "oh please, i know that one!" when she has to answer that question. This too get more pathetic with time. Just when you think they can't, they do it again!
|
|
|
Post by paca on May 20, 2011 6:10:43 GMT -5
oops got the wrong page
|
|