|
Post by countess on Mar 21, 2012 8:51:45 GMT -5
ROFL another BIG PR FAIL!!!! geez
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Mar 21, 2012 9:07:23 GMT -5
My favorite part of the interview is where he was told to give her a little bow. Oh for God sake they are NOT ROYAL. Talk about being a laughing stock among the real royals. Charlene wants it soooo badly. I get the feeling per his comment about behaving, that this article was his idea of behaving. I can't help but wonder what he would have written. There are so many telling things like the children bused in and taken around the back. Of course Kate always makes her entrances from the front for maximum press. He certainly points out the pretentiousness of her behavior and confirms her lack of facial expressions. John Kelly is just tooting the company line about her being a lot of fun. There isn't much more he could say about her because she's pretty much of a vacuum in terms of content. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 21, 2012 9:09:54 GMT -5
John Kelly's praises of Charlene's compassion when his sister died is another example of how good a Con Artist Charlene is (confidence artist is someone who is excellent at winning people's confidence through flattery). To the average person, Charlene's gesture may seem thoughtful and compassionate, but if you really think about it - her gesture really is over the top and thus a clever attempt at winning these people's confidence - and since John is retelling this story as proof of Charlene's goodness, Charlene has clearly succeeded. Maura Kelly Casey died October 21, 2010 and Charlene supposedly named a flower at the palace in her honor at the palace, in which she didn't have any claims to at that time (just 4 months after the engagement announcement). It is so over the top and these people are too stupid to see this woman for the con artist that she really is. This is the same woman who couldn't bother to see her own parents and grandmother because of fear that Albert would replace her, yet she is naming flowers for members of Albert's family that she barely knew. Trust me, it is a clever ruse and she has succeeded in accomplishing what she set out to do - win the confidence of people whom's opinions Albert seems to trust. Before the engagement, Charlene's doppelganger used to boast on the message board how Albert's cousin just love her and thought that she was so good for Albert since she made him happy. He also mentions that Charlene, like Grace, is a person of great thoughtfulness and compassion. During the lead up to Charlene's wedding, John's sister Maura died. He says Charlene took the time to call and let him know she had commissioned a special rose for the palace garden in Maura's name. "It was a wonderful gesture, very touching ... that in the midst of getting ready for the wedding, she took the time to think of that and think of Albert's cousin and include us in her thoughts. I just find her to be a pretty special person."
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 21, 2012 9:44:20 GMT -5
Was John Kelly ever wondering why social Charlene lived in Monaco for YEARS without seeing her own family very often or communicating with her own parents???
It was Charlene's father who said in an interview some years before the engagement something that indicated he doesn't hear about or from his wonderful social daughter for a couple of time and is basicly informed ONLY via media what his dauther does and how she lives.
That was posted in one of our forums that was closed, can't remember where.
Could someone remember and re-post the interview?? That would be great!
I mean, did Albert and his trusted friends never thought about that or noticed???
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Mar 21, 2012 14:04:45 GMT -5
I mentioned in an earlier post about how school children were bussed in, thanks to Duchess1's first hand accounts that she shared with us. I also mentioned how much Duchess1 seemed to admire the exhibit and the woman that was Grace and to compare it to what she had to say about Charlene. I wanted to repost her posts again here (in case someone missed them), since she is someone that attended the event and posted about it before anyone could reshape the story. Here is the first one where she tells there is no one there. I'll find her second post. Well, I am here in Bendigo for the long weekend and I have tickets for the exhibition tomorrow, and I am very excited about that. I went to to Art Gallery this afternoon and the red carpet is already in place and security guards have blocked off view street between corners, so no cars are allowed through. I went for a walk past the gallery and although they have erected barriers I counted possibly 15 people waiting there. It is now 5.30pm and I was told that the VIP event kicks off at 6pm but Charlene is expected soon after. So I am heading there in afew minutes and I will be interested to see how many people are there now and see whether I can get a glimpse of her. Also I want to see whether photographers are in full force. Anyway I will post later again this evening.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Mar 21, 2012 14:17:19 GMT -5
I thought this was the one, but I don't see it here, but it gives you an idea of who she admires and why she is there. I'll try to find the post where it said a couple of buses of school children was bussed in. Myadia I just saw those photos, again it seem like Charlene is the charity, which of course she is? If Albert wants to support her, fine, but asking others to....good luck, I'm sure people will favor other hard luck cases more worthy than Charlene wittstock and her family. Why would Albert think people want to dig in their own pockets to support his taker wife. I went to the exhibition afew hours ago now and I enjoyed it all thoroughly especially the gowns. Some of my favourites were the wedding dress replica the design was regal yet beautiful. Loved seeing the purple tafetta dress she wore to the UK in 1981 when she met the then lady diana spencer and charles. Also the 2 piece outfit she wore on the day of her engagement. Also the floral dress she wore the day she actually met Prince Rainer for the media. The accessories such as some of her evening bags and even afew of her sun glasses were there, and afew pairs of shoes. Some pieces of jewellery too. I loved the the ruby brooch of monte carlo, and the ruby ring with matching earings too. The Diamond Tiara which I think belonged initially to Rainer's sister and then given to Grace was there and it looked stunning. Overall lots of dresses and we sat through a 30 minute tribute and saw some lovely home movies that the Grimaldi family have allowed people to see. Lots of gowns, and I even saw her Oscar award there too. I actually felt wonderful seeing all this but at the same time it also dawned on me how enormously privileged Charlene is to have all this history to see at her leisure at the palace. The jewellry this woman could have access to now is mind boggling and disappointing that this legacy has gone to a woman who does not deserve this privilege. Hope it makes sense but I also felt alittle sad that Charlene will most probably be forever linked with Princess Grace of Monaco as it's current princess. Anyway I was happy to see it today and many people I spoke to were rather happy and excited too. My family is disappointed though cause we were not allowed to take photos or video from our mobiles...
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Mar 21, 2012 14:30:05 GMT -5
sandsla she said that her foundation was going to promote women on 5 continents. She was using pluralis majestatis as she has only the intention of promoting one woman and that one doesn't even resemble one.... And for once it is not Merkel ;D Absolutely! Just saw this post. ;D
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Mar 21, 2012 15:21:29 GMT -5
John Kelly's praises of Charlene's compassion when his sister died is another example of how good a Con Artist Charlene is (confidence artist is someone who is excellent at winning people's confidence through flattery). To the average person, Charlene's gesture may seem thoughtful and compassionate, but if you really think about it - her gesture really is over the top and thus a clever attempt at winning these people's confidence - and since John is retelling this story as proof of Charlene's goodness, Charlene has clearly succeeded. Maura Kelly Casey died October 21, 2010 and Charlene supposedly named a flower at the palace in her honor at the palace, in which she didn't have any claims to at that time (just 4 months after the engagement announcement). It is so over the top and these people are too stupid to see this woman for the con artist that she really is. This is the same woman who couldn't bother to see her own parents and grandmother because of fear that Albert would replace her, yet she is naming flowers for members of Albert's family that she barely knew. Trust me, it is a clever ruse and she has succeeded in accomplishing what she set out to do - win the confidence of people whom's opinions Albert seems to trust. Before the engagement, Charlene's doppelganger used to boast on the message board how Albert's cousin just love her and thought that she was so good for Albert since she made him happy. He also mentions that Charlene, like Grace, is a person of great thoughtfulness and compassion. During the lead up to Charlene's wedding, John's sister Maura died. He says Charlene took the time to call and let him know she had commissioned a special rose for the palace garden in Maura's name. "It was a wonderful gesture, very touching ... that in the midst of getting ready for the wedding, she took the time to think of that and think of Albert's cousin and include us in her thoughts. I just find her to be a pretty special person." OMG, these people are so stupid....please...please read the definition of a psychopath. Isn't this one of the claims about how Charlene hooked up with Albert after Rainier died? How will did she know Albert then.....this was suppose to be how many years after one date with him? Yes myadia that isn't just over the top, she is using someones death for her own agenda, just like she is doing again with John Kelly....how well does she know him....."She" "is commissioning" a rose in her name? Does his sister have anything to do with Monaco where something like this would be appropriate. Is it not more appropriate for Albert to be the one sending the condolences or making the gesture? Once again it's about Charlene....John Kelly lets his sister's death become a story to promote Charlene?? Psychopaths are not capable of compassion, only cunning agendas to put their own cause which is always about putting themselves front and center, and that is exactly what she did? Did I miss something else that might have been said about his sister, like even her name? Yes Charlene was really paying respect for his sister , whose own brother is using her death to pay respect to another woman.....are all the Kelly's this stupid? Not only is the gesture inapporopriate, exspecially coming from Charlene, it was not only to win favor with a Kelly, lloking for someone else to promote her, but it was a gesture also to show her own self importance, which is exactly the way it looks. I said they would forever be apologizing for her, and that is what all of them seem to be doing, and they will forever be spending all of their enrgy and money on a woman who brought and continues to bring nothing but trouble for them.
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 21, 2012 15:48:22 GMT -5
"I said they would forever be apologizing for her, and that is what all of them seem to be doing, and they will forever be spending all of their enrgy and money on a woman who brought and continues to bring nothing but trouble for them."
You hit the nail on the head!!! If she has any talent - it is to suck energy of people in any possible way and make THEM feel like needing to protect HER.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Mar 21, 2012 16:11:18 GMT -5
Was John Kelly ever wondering why social Charlene lived in Monaco for YEARS without seeing her own family very often or communicating with her own parents??? It was Charlene's father who said in an interview some years before the engagement something that indicated he doesn't hear about or from his wonderful social daughter for a couple of time and is basicly informed ONLY via media what his dauther does and how she lives. That was posted in one of our forums that was closed, can't remember where. Could someone remember and re-post the interview?? That would be great! I mean, did Albert and his trusted friends never thought about that or noticed??? I thought the same thing when I was reading the Tatler interview, and she basically put down the people of MOnaco that don't like her, while she says all she needs is her mother and brothers....since when? ;D I guess she spoke to them through the forums....maybe her dad was the only one that didn't participate.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 21, 2012 16:17:09 GMT -5
The award for the funniest and biggest lie from Charlene I asked if the discipline of swim training had helped her adjust to a public life as an ambassadorial princess where there is always the demand to be on. "We do have a demanding schedule. When we do have to time to relax with friends, that's great ... but really, I've never known anything different. That's just the way it is." ;D My exact reaction!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 21, 2012 16:20:17 GMT -5
And here we have the uncle injury again. (Wasn't it cm7007 who met her in high heels in that period of time?) At the time of her retirement papers wrote she had a shoulder injury. And as far as I remember her former coach said the same in any interview. Or didn't she even state a shoulder injury herself??? I don't get this!!! Yes it was. And she sure didn't want to talk about her shoulder injury - not with me for sure!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 21, 2012 16:30:11 GMT -5
John Kelly's praises of Charlene's compassion when his sister died is another example of how good a Con Artist Charlene is (confidence artist is someone who is excellent at winning people's confidence through flattery). To the average person, Charlene's gesture may seem thoughtful and compassionate, but if you really think about it - her gesture really is over the top and thus a clever attempt at winning these people's confidence - and since John is retelling this story as proof of Charlene's goodness, Charlene has clearly succeeded. Maura Kelly Casey died October 21, 2010 and Charlene supposedly named a flower at the palace in her honor at the palace, in which she didn't have any claims to at that time (just 4 months after the engagement announcement). It is so over the top and these people are too stupid to see this woman for the con artist that she really is. This is the same woman who couldn't bother to see her own parents and grandmother because of fear that Albert would replace her, yet she is naming flowers for members of Albert's family that she barely knew. Trust me, it is a clever ruse and she has succeeded in accomplishing what she set out to do - win the confidence of people whom's opinions Albert seems to trust. Before the engagement, Charlene's doppelganger used to boast on the message board how Albert's cousin just love her and thought that she was so good for Albert since she made him happy. He also mentions that Charlene, like Grace, is a person of great thoughtfulness and compassion. During the lead up to Charlene's wedding, John's sister Maura died. He says Charlene took the time to call and let him know she had commissioned a special rose for the palace garden in Maura's name. "It was a wonderful gesture, very touching ... that in the midst of getting ready for the wedding, she took the time to think of that and think of Albert's cousin and include us in her thoughts. I just find her to be a pretty special person." OMG, these people are so stupid....please...please read the definition of a psychopath. Isn't this one of the claims about how Charlene hooked up with Albert after Rainier died? How will did she know Albert then.....this was suppose to be how many years after one date with him? Yes myadia that isn't just over the top, she is using someones death for her own agenda, just like she is doing again with John Kelly....how well does she know him....."She" "is commissioning" a rose in her name? Does his sister have anything to do with Monaco where something like this would be appropriate. Is it not more appropriate for Albert to be the one sending the condolences or making the gesture? Once again it's about Charlene....John Kelly lets his sister's death become a story to promote Charlene?? Psychopaths are not capable of compassion, only cunning agendas to put their own cause which is always about putting themselves front and center, and that is exactly what she did? Did I miss something else that might have been said about his sister, like even her name? Yes Charlene was really paying respect for his sister , whose own brother is using her death to pay respect to another woman.....are all the Kelly's this stupid? Not only is the gesture inapporopriate, exspecially coming from Charlene, it was not only to win favor with a Kelly, lloking for someone else to promote her, but it was a gesture also to show her own self importance, which is exactly the way it looks. I said they would forever be apologizing for her, and that is what all of them seem to be doing, and they will forever be spending all of their enrgy and money on a woman who brought and continues to bring nothing but trouble for them. I'm sooooo glad you said this!!! Now I don't have to go on and on about the same thing! I couldn't believe my eyes when I read this. IMO - It's really looking like all these Kelly's are really STUPID, or naive. or just plain whores. How tacky on everyone's part to mention this at all in any public circumstance, and then for CW to have done this - OH PLEASE! This is just HORRIBLE! And oh so OBVIOUS!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2012 16:43:30 GMT -5
I think it is the first time Trashy talks about her retierment and it was 2007. The same year when she moved to Monaco.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2012 16:50:31 GMT -5
sandsla she said that her foundation was going to promote women on 5 continents. She was using pluralis majestatis as she has only the intention of promoting one woman and that one doesn't even resemble one.... And for once it is not Merkel ;D Absolutely! Just saw this post. ;D As a sarcastic note to CC would she help us with a financial contribution for we are working on five continents.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 21, 2012 20:19:00 GMT -5
Did anyone notice the comment that Elder makes about Charlene's Bendigo visit being a secret because of the small crowd. The Melbourne portion of the visit was a secret, but we all know that the Bendigo visit was heavily publicized by both Monaco and the Bendigo media. No one else in Australia cared because contrary to what the palace has been promoting for the last six years, Charlene does not have international (or even Monaco) appeal. The following day, Charlene and party drove to Bendigo, where she was opening the Grace Kelly exhibition. The word of her visit was kept so quiet that, outside the official party that included the Victorian Premier Ted Baillieu and his wife, and dozens of schoolchildren waving flags, there was only a small scrum of regular folk who gathered over the hour beforehand to see what was happening. It was an almost nostalgically country setting, and a weirdly magical one in which Charlene appeared out of nowhere after the drumming pageant of Chinese dragons was done parading back and forth. Contrary to what Charlene's flunkies are promoting over the Internet, John Elder who was there got it right - there was only a small scrum of regular folk who gathered (behind the barricade) well that's pretty much what the crowd was like at their wedding. Apart from those who were ordered there, the number of people behind the barriers was scarce. She simply doesn't draw any crowds and never will. She didn't pay attention to them either.She only wants the rent a crowd that has been told how and when to cheer. Someone please explain to me what that Chinese dragon stuff has to do with MC or the exhibit. I know in China they have this sort of thing on festive occasions, but please this is Australia. Why would they do that? I would get if they had sth typical Australian, but Chinese dragons? unless of course that they were reminded by trashy of dragons.....
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 22, 2012 1:27:04 GMT -5
I think it is the first time Trashy talks about her retierment and it was 2007. The same year when she moved to Monaco. Wait ... ok - she retired in 2007 - but reading this one gets teh feeling that she almost admits to have FIRST retired and THEN moved to Monaco. While -moving to Monaco- she told Albert and the media and everyone that she is focused on the Olympics (and not on marrying a Prince). And only the shoulder injury or uncle injury had put and end to her career The wording is wrong in this interview. And I don't think it is because of the journalist. The Palace (=Charlene) control everything, so they would have "corrected" this version if wrong. But they don't get their lies straight. While we remember...
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 22, 2012 4:44:08 GMT -5
I'm sooooo glad you said this!!! Now I don't have to go on and on about the same thing! I couldn't believe my eyes when I read this. IMO - It's really looking like all these Kelly's are really STUPID, or naive. or just plain whores. How tacky on everyone's part to mention this at all in any public circumstance, and then for CW to have done this - OH PLEASE! This is just HORRIBLE! And oh so OBVIOUS! Charlene is a con artist and a necessary special skill of a con artist is to be able to read people's strengths, weaknesses and desires - and then play on those weaknesses and desires. Charlene has given the Kellys something that they haven't had as much since Grace died - more accessibility to the happenings in Monaco. John and his sister Susan accompanied Albert and Charlene on the Ireland trip. Susan was quoted several times singing Charlene praises about how good she is for Albert and the family. I will bet you anything that it was Charlene's idea to invite them on the trip. Charlene "worked" these people and they are too stupid to realize this. Any bets on whether Charlene commissioned a flower in the name of Princess Antoinette at the palace? My bet is hell no. Charlene does not need to garner favors with Antoinette's family because most likely Albert doesn't value their opinions and besides they are dependent on Albert's generosities for their livelihood (unlike the Kellys). Also, I will bet anything that Antoinette did not like Charlene and Charlene knew this. Charlene's fake over-the-top grief performance at the funeral repulsed me and was the first time I really truly believed that Albert actually deserved Charlene. Charlene only cared about her first funeral photo opp and making sure she had the right posing face and everyone notice her designer matching gloves and mantilla. Charlene is a sociopath and once day she will be hugely publicly exposed.
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Mar 22, 2012 10:22:49 GMT -5
Amen!
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Mar 22, 2012 12:09:34 GMT -5
I think my biggest frustration is the question, when will the media put 2 and 2 together like we have and stack up all her lies one right after the other so people can see what BS it all is. Why can't just one of them take a few moments to look up her past interviews? It's all right there. We have no problem seeing right through her, why can't others?
|
|