|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 26, 2012 20:43:00 GMT -5
Maybe they went there so the Kardashian's plastic surgeon could do something to her face?! Her mouth is weird so are her cheeks. It just can't all be from her biting down on her desire to scream: LOOOOOOOOOK AAAAAAAAAAAT MEEEEEEEEE!!!! Just look at this woman - a true narcissist - who really believes that America cares about her title that the biggest Sucka Jackass in Monaco wasted on her. OMG, she is not wearing a BRA. Her nipple is showing through. What kind of a "princess" shows up for the red carpet without underwear? This is the princess of a Catholic country who says she has to wear longer skirts because her subjects won't approve and she shows her breasts?!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 26, 2012 20:41:10 GMT -5
Thanks, CM for making me feel old. I thought Danny Thomas would be remembered but when I read that out loud both of my kids gave me huh look.
Is Charlene's conehead on backwards?
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 26, 2012 20:29:10 GMT -5
PEOPLE MAGAZINE just put the WEDGIE photos up next to Sexy Angelina Jolie. AHHHHHAAAAA.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 26, 2012 19:45:06 GMT -5
People magazine has totally ignored her. They passed her up and went to other real Hollywood stars like JLO. You know you're not important when the magazine that puts Kate on the cover with her dog ignores you at the Oscars in a dress by no one (Akris).
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 26, 2012 19:43:21 GMT -5
She looks like she's in god awful pain in the getty photos. Obviously Albert running off for a while didn't help her mood. Guess she also realized how unimportant she is.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 26, 2012 19:33:51 GMT -5
First pic is on getty. Her hair looks like the one she wore for Caroline's Rock n Roll ball - all teased up?!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 25, 2012 23:50:06 GMT -5
You can really tell his face is photoshopped. It looks like the engagement photo....
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 25, 2012 20:53:23 GMT -5
And look who went? Yup, star studded.
Kathy Hilton @kathyhilton Rick and I had lunch 2-day with HRH Prince Albert & princess Charlene of Monaco, such a sweet & down 2 earth couple.
---
Someone else saw her this morning.
Sherry Brooks @leangreenliving Reply Retweet Favorite · Open What a weekend. Jackie Evancho's precious concert and breakfast at the Polo lounge next to Princess Charlene of Monaco
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 25, 2012 20:46:46 GMT -5
New pictures on Getty. Exclusive lunch in LA. Charlene with Farrah Faucet hair and a grey no sleeve shirt with matching bell bottom pants.....
Getty is exclusive coverage for the event and it's obviously been photoshopped. That's only possible when you have a single photographer - it won't be possible tomorrow at the Oscars.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 25, 2012 0:17:07 GMT -5
Montblanc's Grace Kelly event for this year happened a few days ago - the Pics are on Gettyimages (linking to them becomes harder as they move down the list). Search for "Monaco". Vanity Fair was part of it and there were not a lot of "stars" there. Lots of "D list" a few much older A list like Joan Collins. You'd think they'd hold it this weekend for the dynamic duo but that would be "too much work" for Charlene. Two events two days in a row. It might strain her one event a month work ethic. She might have to smile or kiss Albert (after arriving in separate cars because he had a 'meeting')....
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 23, 2012 22:19:01 GMT -5
Here's our trashy princess in a few places the last week - well she didn't attend them (that would require a two week vacation in between) but was replicated. I'm not sure of the second one but I think it's her...the lips....she's had so many incarnations now. [a href="http://www.newscom.com/nc/displayOpenDetail.action?searchString=sipaphotosthree483658&search1String=monaco&search2String=a&dispOutput=grid&eaCurrentPageNum=1&bylinesearch=&locationsearch=&sourcesearch=&actionsearch=&postersearch=&attrsearch=&capwrisearch=&categorysearch=&scatssearch=&scodesearch=&specialsearch=&subjectsearch=&feature=sipaphotosthree&vg=false&sort=d&searchPhoto=Y&searchVideo=N&searchText=N&searchGraphics=N&searchkey=[]&searchtype=newsearch&searchSet=no&searchSetName=&searchHZ=N&searchVT=N&daterng="]http://www.newscom.com/nc/displayOpenDetail.action?searchString=sipaphotosthree483658&search1String=monaco&search2String=a&dispOutput=grid&eaCurrentPageNum=1&bylinesearch=&locationsearch=&sourcesearch=&actionsearch=&postersearch=&attrsearch=&capwrisearch=&categorysearch=&scatssearch=&scodesearch=&specialsearch=&subjectsearch=&feature=sipaphotosthree&vg=false&sort=d&searchPhoto=Y&searchVideo=N&searchText=N&searchGraphics=N&searchkey=[]&searchtype=newsearch&searchSet=no&searchSetName=&searchHZ=N&searchVT=N&daterng=[/a] www.gettyimages.com/Search/Search.aspx?contractUrl=2&language=en-US&family=editorial&assetType=image&mt=photography&p=monaco+King+of+sportI think the one in the second row toward the end is portraying her.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 23, 2012 22:04:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 23, 2012 17:49:14 GMT -5
But look how this is being played by the sugars *who by the way if you responded this way about Charlene you would be attacked*
---- I really hope Princess Charlène would have a child soon , a real Prince or Princess of Monaco, to get rid of the Casiraghi trio. -----
Agreed! I've never had a good impression of the Casiraghis.
Princess Stephanie's kids strike me as being a lot more focused and balanced. Of course, they're a lot younger, so who knows where they're headed. ---- Sure, anyone can sue anyone over anything. Mr. Hock was released without bail and I find it odd that there are no photos of Mr. Casiraghi to back up accounts of his injuries.
I feel nothing one way or the other...just observations. ----- The same person who "feels nothing one way or the other...." says I predict no trial, with all charges dropped. and In the words of the Bard: "Methinks they doth protest too much." (when Beatrice spoke out) and As for the Vogue article, it is worthless as well. One sided makes good reading, but well....
-----
Obviously the Charlene crowd is so unbiased, too. They are online trashing Pierre when the facts are that he was a victim. Anyone who says anything different is "biased". The Casiraghis consistently get much more press than Albert or Charlene combined. We've documented it time and time again. Why is that? Because they've actually been quite well behaved and have had very good reputations...and no botox or fake love. Suddenly it's all the victim's fault.
If anyone doubts that Hock is nuts, he says the video doesn't show the truth and now he saying he has to bring in a "witness" to show that someone threw a bottle at him. I wonder, was it before or after he hit Pierre so hard he flew across a room and broke a table? He actually stripped down to show a tiny bruise! Pierre has a broken jaw and large cuts on his face and the guy has a bruise?! Who got beaten up?!
Obviously, only Hock is telling the truth to Charlene, her paid flunkies, blogger friends and family. I wonder if Albert has seen what they say about his nephew and mother?!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 23, 2012 17:38:29 GMT -5
The Houston Chronicle is reporting that Lynn Wyatt is going to the Vanity Fair Oscar party so I have no doubt this is why Al and Charls think they should. Charls thinks her job is to be a socialite not a dignified head of state!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 23, 2012 7:44:51 GMT -5
And look who is making public appearances for the press - Adam Hock. Notice the arm, nice touch. He didn't get that from the police doctor. He went to another doctor after he was let out of jail. He sprained his arm punching all those guys....poor thing.
[a href="http://www.newscom.com/nc/displayOpenDetail.action?searchString=spnphotosthree810216&search1String=monaco&search2String=a&dispOutput=grid&eaCurrentPageNum=1&bylinesearch=&locationsearch=&sourcesearch=&actionsearch=&postersearch=&attrsearch=&capwrisearch=&categorysearch=&scatssearch=&scodesearch=&specialsearch=&subjectsearch=&feature=spnphotosthree&vg=false&sort=d&searchPhoto=Y&searchVideo=N&searchText=N&searchGraphics=N&searchkey=[]&searchtype=newsearch&searchSet=no&searchSetName=&searchHZ=N&searchVT=N&daterng="]http://www.newscom.com/nc/displayOpenDetail.action?searchString=spnphotosthree810216&search1String=monaco&search2String=a&dispOutput=grid&eaCurrentPageNum=1&bylinesearch=&locationsearch=&sourcesearch=&actionsearch=&postersearch=&attrsearch=&capwrisearch=&categorysearch=&scatssearch=&scodesearch=&specialsearch=&subjectsearch=&feature=spnphotosthree&vg=false&sort=d&searchPhoto=Y&searchVideo=N&searchText=N&searchGraphics=N&searchkey=[]&searchtype=newsearch&searchSet=no&searchSetName=&searchHZ=N&searchVT=N&daterng=[/a]
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 23, 2012 0:29:38 GMT -5
and it was either the fastest first labor in history or they announced it late....From the palace website.
2012-02-23 Prins Daniel möter media / Prince Daniel will meet with media Prins Daniel möter media idag den 23 februari klockan 07.00 i Karolinska sjukhusets aula Nanna Svartz. Nanna Svartz aula nås via Karolinska sjukhusets huvudentré. Presslegitimation erfordras för inpassering till aulan. In English: On the occasion of the royal birth, Prince Daniel will meet with media today at 7 am in the Nanna Svartz auditorium at Karolinska hospital, Stockholm. The Nanna Schvartz auditorium is located in the main building at Karolinska hospital, reached via the main entrance. Press ID is required in order to access the auditorium.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 22, 2012 23:36:03 GMT -5
And just to show how desperate Charlene's crowd is to get the "word" out there, they have performed their magic of inserting it somehow into "any" forum or topic. Now they've actually had the balls to hijack a thread about Prince Friso being in critical condition, along with their vitriolic comments in Pierre's thread at one forum. There is another crowd who are "crowd sourcing" emails to editors of every major magazine that Pierre is not a member of the royal family (news flash no one in Monaco is royal except maybe Alexandra and Caroline)...
Before now there have been no comments or interviews by Pierre or his crew and when someone in his crowd did speak out it was "suspect" and "we'll wait for the video..."
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 22, 2012 21:09:08 GMT -5
The CP is in labor and at the hospital according to the newspapers! Monaco hasn't had any good news but Sweden is about to!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 22, 2012 19:41:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Feb 22, 2012 14:29:32 GMT -5
Paca, the attorney is well known in the US as being a sleazy attorney. This isn't something that was made up to defend Pierre. He just IS.
Second, the way the US justice system works is VERY different from Europe. The police do an initial investigation at the scene and interview witnesses (separating them, never together). They decide to arrest someone or all at the scene. They take the person to jail. They write up a report and then call the District Attorney (known in the US as just a "DA"), who is the representative of the State. It's their call based on the evidence presented by the police to accept charges or not. If they see no evidence the person is let go.
In this case, the DA accepted charges. He presented them to a judge. Hock went before a judge at an arraignment hearing (this is what the europeans took a disgust too when we "paraded DSK" - all criminals go through it). At the arraignment hearing the judge reads the charges the DA is bringing against the person. Decides on bail or release on their own recognizance (as long as they are not a flight risk). The judge sets a hearing date for the next phase and tells them when to return. He also sets any protection orders at this phase (telling them not to contact the victims, etc).
At either phase, if they felt that Pierre had assaulted him and he was acting in his defense the case would have been dropped. The police didn't feel his actions were warranted, obviously. In the United States, it's not a defense to break someone's jaw to "defend someone's honor" if that's what happened, which I doubt now.
The investigation has already gone through two phases - the Police and the DA. They both felt there was enough to charge.
Hock spent two days in jail waiting for his hearing. He picked a well known scuzzball attorney. The attorney immediately went to the press - not the victims. He told his side of the story, making out Pierre and the guys to be wanting to be treated as a royal and "trust fund babies" because that plays well in our Press right now. The press didn't even contact the police or get the reports, they only went with Hock's attorney's view. Hock obviously hopes that the PR would get Pierre to drop the charges and refuse to testify against his client.
Pierre's attorney is the District Attorney in this case. That person is employed by the State. They don't "do" PR. Their job is to prosecute bad guys. The police don't make statements for you, either. He had no CHOICE but to hire someone to speak on his behalf. Who should he have chosen, Charlene's family? They're already online going wild and she has her friend bloggers twittering that Pierre isn't in line for the throne (inaccurate).
It's interesting that Hock immediately resigned from his position at the US-Libya Chamber of Commerce. Does someone ask for the resignation of an innocent person?
Why would the club make a statement their owner didn't approve of? The club's statement says a LOT about his feelings over what happened. He was supposedly sitting with Hock (according to the original story Hock put out).
Hock's story has now changed. He backtracked immediately and said that it was Pierre's friend, Stavros who was the instigator. He said that someone pulled on his shirt and that he swung out to first person he saw, which was Pierre who he didn't know. It's obvious that now the story is changing because the video has been shown to his attorney and it's obvious Pierre was innocent.
I see NOTHING wrong with anyone being out at a club with friends no matter the time on a Friday night. It's not an age thing. I've also been with people whose actions were a bit embarrassing. Thank goodness no one hit me simply because my friends were being 'obnoxious'. Pierre had not control over Stavros.
Why is it that people have a strong habit of blaming the victim? Violence in any form isn't a mistake it's A CRIME. You don't hit someone to break their jaw to the point of disfigurement. You don't kill someone. It doesn't matter how someone is dressed, where they are, how much money they have or who they are with.
I will admit to being very pro Caroline but Charlene and her family were online the minute the press started the reports (notice it wasn't until after Hock's attorney came forward) and are attacking Caroline's parenting and using this as a way to promote Charlene.
I don't see Caroline running to the press or asking anyone to twitter to the editors reminding them that "Pierre isn't royal, do your homework." or "Pierre isn't even in line for the throne". Caroline is too busy taking care of her son.
As far as Ernst - lots of people get into abusive relationships. It's hard to leave them. They always say that they will change. Until you have been there it's very easy to criticize. It took me 5 years to get out. Caroline should be applauded for getting out. Men and women who are addicts or abusive don't appear that way in the beginning. They don't let their true colors show until they are comfortable that you are trapped.
I certainly hope my own children aren't judged by my mistakes with their father. They didn't have a choice in the matter and it didn't make them any less of a wonderful two people. Would someone automatically take my son as less of a victim in a crime because of his father? I hope not, since he's the exact opposite of him!
|
|