|
Post by mrplowfan on Jan 27, 2012 14:54:58 GMT -5
Caroline has attended the burning boat event for the last several years, at least. I'm not sure about Alexandra. Stephanie has also previously attended.
As far as the mass goes, I'm wondering if this is the first time Caroline HAS NOT gone....usually they all show up for the mass, I thought. I guess not. Never mind, I guess she's not attended this mass in a while.
Charlene is recycling the coat AGAIN *how many times is that now* to try to get attention that she recycles like Kate. Unfortunately, no one cares when you wear the same color all the time. Of course, the flunkies are all on their "crystal balls" and "six sense" about her being pregnant because she wears it. Obviously they can't see the pics from the night before with her in brown *yes they were brown* boots and black leather.
Too bad she couldn't be bothered to wear a hat or a veil as she's supposed to do. Her hair looks very sick.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jan 21, 2012 13:49:19 GMT -5
Charlene is desperate to get the "anglo saxon" media to take to her. We haven't and won't. When she gets to the Oscars there isn't a person who won't call her a media whore. Why? Think about it. If Kate Middleton went people would scratch their heads and ask, why? Kate's attendance at the Bafta awards was part of a British trip. Charlene wants the same attention Kate got. It won't happen. Albert married someone we don't care about. The fake lips, the whole wicked step mother angle. We are rooting for the kids, Caroline, anyone but not her.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jan 11, 2012 15:15:05 GMT -5
Often, women seek out father figures when they have lost theirs. I think this is just a rebound thing, personally. Charlotte has a bit of an excuse. She lost her father at an early age. She certainly isn't a gold digger - unlike someone else we know who 'sacrificed' herself as a womb.
Has anyone noticed that suddenly the age thing is a big deal. When all of us brought up the difference in age for Charlene and Albert the sugars kept saying it was nothing. Now the SAME people who are in love with Charlene and Albert are swearing all over the boards that Charlotte is too YOUNG for the guy...25 to 40 isn't so bad considering Albert is Charlene's Mom's age.
These sugars are the worst hypocrites. They want to see pictures of Charlene's vacation (and hope she didn't notice the paparazzi -- like she didn't see or call them) but talk about Albert's kids or Caroline's kids is off limits because they are "private".
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 20, 2011 17:44:21 GMT -5
OMG, she ONLY spoke in ENGLISH with the kids. This idiot hasn't even learned the language YET. Truly they think this is the best she can do? www.monacomatin.mc/article/monaco/charlene-«-je-suis-fiere-detre-votre-princesse-».716362.htmlYou can hear her in the video. She doesn't even TRY to speak English. Yet her flunkies at the forums SWEAR she speaks perfect French and spoke the the kids in French. It wasn't true! Also, has anyone noticed that the new "Facebook Fanpage" of the COUPLE only features events with Charlene? Albert's done four times the events she has and they aren't even there. Only Charlene...WTH is wrong with Albert?
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 18, 2011 20:43:22 GMT -5
Some of the conversation for posterity.
Flunkie (in entirety): Charlene had not time enough to be more concret, It was a tv show and she had to make a resume. We well know soon more about this. I like the tribute of Franziska von Almsick.She was her friend yes, she knows her more than us. It is why Zdf wanted Franziska made the speech.They met when they were swimmers, they run for the special olimpics at the midemare. Charlene was stunning, she made a good speech with a little stress, she is an emotional woman.
Moderator: I stick to it that Franziska van Almsick's speech has been absurd and that she shouldn't have been given a platform for her own (friendship) agenda.
As to your question, rosana, I also think that the price has been premature. I wanted to see the show first before conceiving an opinion. (edit)
But - she should not have been given an award. Instead of a hymn of praise and a speech of her own (although that one has been good), a live interview would have been so much better. A chance to talk with the moderator of the show about what she has done so far and what she plans for the future. She could then have been invited again and awarded in 5 years or so.
flunkie: it is your advice, not the advice of the persons who decided to give the price to princess Charlene. It is done and it is unusufully to come back on it
(IE don't question the great Charlene!)
It goes on. No one can question or answer without being attacked and disagreed with. They actually have NO PROOF and admit that she padded her resume. WTH is wrong with these people?
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 18, 2011 20:35:14 GMT -5
Even some of the moderators of forums have agreed that Charlene did nothing to deserve this award and instead her favorite sugar (who says no one else has a life) goes on and swears she does and how we should consider the others who were awarded. Of course, they've lost because this woman allows no one else to voice an opinion to stop others from seeing the truth. It's sad because they certainly allow those opinions about others, like Mary.
Charlene has DONE NOTHING to deserve this. Let's be real. A TABLOID put this show on. Bilde. She has admitted that she emails with their reporters and from the beginning did interviews with them. This was a tit for tat. They had special admission to the wedding and even converse with her famous blogger flunkie.
I say this again. This is where the sugars have created their own problem with her publicity. Instead of letting Charlene earn the award, as the Sister did. They swear she deserves it for "her future" work - the foundation - in one breath and then swear it's her past when she's helped people less than a dozen times and only when cameras where around. This is more than LUDICROUS. It's the reason why the other royals know Monaco's rulers are VULGAR.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 10, 2011 20:01:09 GMT -5
Drinking alcohol? How will the sugars deal with this? She's not pregnant, then that means all these pictures and refusing to go to events and do her "job" means she's just LAZY?! What excuse will they bring up next?
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 8, 2011 11:22:55 GMT -5
MyAdia - consider doing it as a blog, not a forum. Those are kept in Google Cache for ever.
As far as the photos. It's illegal for someone to "claim" they are the copyright holder in question. If someone told pro boards they are the copyright holder and they are not (they were instead say a certain sugar loonie) than there is a case for so many days in jail and a fine per picture. Youtube actually has prosecuted someone who went along and did this. You might challenge pro boards to make sure the person IS the copyright holder.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 7, 2011 22:14:15 GMT -5
My opinion only, but this has much more to do with the thread about all the real pictures of Charlene. Charlene can't stand it when reality gets online. It hurts her and the flunkies to think the press might see it. I wish we could edit our own posts. I'd go back and make them links. I hate to think that they'll be lost to the public WHO NEEDS TO SEE THEM.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 7, 2011 20:04:31 GMT -5
Is that ANOTHER one armed dress? WTH is wrong with this girl that she can't wear two sleeves?
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 1, 2011 15:33:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 1, 2011 14:19:58 GMT -5
Anyone have the hot tub shots?
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 1, 2011 14:19:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 1, 2011 13:57:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 1, 2011 13:54:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Dec 1, 2011 13:46:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Nov 20, 2011 14:42:22 GMT -5
Charlene's "trust" is a joke. Like Albert she has an ego that Grace never had. Grace would never have put her name in the title of a foundation.
The Princess Grace foundation was started after Grace's death by Rainier and the kids. Grace started AMADE to help children while she was alive (notice her name was not in the title).
Charlene claims to dislike being compared to Grace but she obviously seeks to compete with her through this new charity. (One sugar claimed it was because no one would know Grace in a few years just Charlene *They wish*).
She's starting a trust to do the EXACT same thing as Grace but can't be seen to support Grace's charity. She can't get herself off the couch to attend events in Monaco or learn the National Anthem. She manages to keep her mouth open like a fish in all other photographs...couldn't she pretend or was her posing too much?
Is anyone else not seeing a pregnancy? I don't care what anyone else says but Pregnant women work. Charlene can make it to "high profile" events but can't be bothered to attend others? This is one strange relationship.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Nov 20, 2011 14:35:26 GMT -5
So this is Charlene's new style? One armed clothing? Why can't she pay to have BOTH arms?
Then there's the Raccoon eyes, bangs from the 80s and hair slicked like Elvis?
Charlene didn't get the order of St. Charles. Albert thinks so highly of her. Caroline and Stephanie made a point to wear theirs earlier in the day.
I'll bet the no tiara decision was Charlene's way of complaining and making a point she didn't get the Order or Grace's jewelry. Notice Albert hasn't spent any money on jewelry other than tiaras? I bet he figures she spends enough on clothes....that's her reward.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Nov 17, 2011 17:10:23 GMT -5
It is VERY interesting that a reporter comes HERE to defend his opinion about Charlene. I wonder how he came to be acquainted with the forum. Did Charlene, her flunkies or family alert him to ask him to come to her "rescue" again? This is really too much.
If Albert's people expected him to marry someone blonde and blue-eyed in lieu of a colored individual it says the same thing. It's almost racist. A perfect princess should be someone who earns the title - works daily, is not only a womb. Someone who loves her husband and learns the language and isn't engaged in an online publicity stunt for HERSELF. It shouldn't matter how they look or dress.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Nov 15, 2011 20:53:17 GMT -5
The fact that someone has to argue this point publicly says a TON. An editorial - one man's way of trying to push their point on those who DISAGREE. This is YET ANOTHER attempt by Charlene and her personal publicity machine of family, paid bloggers and the few granted "special access" in exchange for pushing her agenda. The few trying to control the many, too George Orwellian for me (look that up Wittstocks, I know you have no idea).
|
|