|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 16, 2011 15:48:44 GMT -5
Yeah baby! ;D Let the world see a natural beauty WC is today. She is lucky to marry an old and rich guy to pay for her "natural transformation". Does anyone on this board think that these pea brains who are surrounding PA truly think, or thought, that if they took a girl who had absolutely nothing - in any department - and "re-created her" - re made her face and body - put her in expensive designer clothes - made up a CV for her - that they could then sell her as as "fairytale - dream come true" story. You know turn the "ugly duckling" into "the swan" type of thing. Do you suppose PA and company thought this sort of "story" would work in this market place today? Apparently there are many people who just don't see what is obvious to others. I remember when Madonna's video "Material Girl" came out. She did her 'version" of Marilyn Monroe's "Diamonds are a Girls Best Friend" scene - I can't tell you how many people said to me that Madonna looked "exactly like Marilyn" - They "looked like twins" - "no one can tell the difference" . I was floored by these comments - but really truly many people saw no difference between Madonna and Marilyn. Maybe PA is like one of these people - maybe so are his advisers! Maybe they really don't see the difference between Grace and Charlene - on any level. Maybe they really think what they have created is wonderful. Pathetic, I know - but a possibility. I'm just trying to figure out what the hell are ans were these people thinking?!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 16, 2011 15:03:40 GMT -5
If this is true, then I don´t see a rosy future for Albert. Which Royal wants to be friendly with a pervert?[/quote]
None! This guy is hopeless.
He - and CW - are going to get a very polite cold shoulder at the Royal Wedding of WM & Kate. (Of course she won't know it - she'll be told by PA that everyone is jealous and that's why the cold shoulder!) The wives will warn their husbands to be politely distant if nothing else!
One of the reasons PA is marrying CW is to try and show everyone he's "serious" and all "grown up". This new charge certainly isn't going to convince everyone how "deeply in love" he is with CW, and how "grown up" he's finally become!
A normal woman would be so outraged by this behavior, so hurt, feel so deeply betrayed she'd call of the wedding and never speak with the guy again! (If true - and my guess it is.) But then we're talking about the desperate, freak of nature Charlene.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 15, 2011 22:44:54 GMT -5
[/quote] I actually know a few of the invited guests quite well and of the ones who have already had the pleasure, generally their assessment of CW is And, she has done nothing to help rid PA of the "gay" rumors - if anything she has made them worse.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 15, 2011 21:48:18 GMT -5
One was slightly noticable, something like Charlene not wanting to be like Grace. According to this magazine, the Italian Corriere Della Sera has recently published an article exposing Grace. Talking about her exes, her not so clean past and that she wasn't the angel people think she was. So now clean and blemish free Charlene cringes at every comparison with Grace Kelly since that means that they insinuate that she isn't a lily white virgin either.
[/quote]
Grace wasn't an ICON because she was a "Lily White virginal goddess" - She became an ICON because of her beauty, style and "grace" - because she was a world class movie star who had been wined, dined and romanced on and off screen by the worlds most fascinating men - because woman all over the world wanted to be like her - copy her . No one care really if she truly was pure as the morning snow. And nearly 30 years after her death, no amount of "Grace bashing" will make CW seem more "appropriate" even if Grace is proven to have been less then a "virginal goddess" when she married, or after she was married. I've said it before - Grace is done Charlene. She made her mark. She is what she is, and there's nothing you do to change that, so stop hoping, and trying to tear her down so you look better. It ain't gonna happen.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 15, 2011 15:38:24 GMT -5
Emmeline the title is great! The list is so extensive, I cannot think of anything to add right now. I like Caroline, but I was never part of the "Camp Caroline to over throw Albert." But now, I truly believe an Albert rule with Charlene as the Princess of Monaco is the kiss of death for Monaco. His choice in Charlene shows without a doubt this man really doesn't care about Monaco's best interest or perhaps just doesn't know what is Monaco's best interest. Seriously. Monaco will go down hill faster than Fat Albert in a bobsleigh. And double DITTO!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 15, 2011 15:37:47 GMT -5
Hello! I was thinking that in this thread we could share opinions about why Caroline should take the throne of Monaco. I was thinking in calling the thread "100 reasons for Caroline to rule Monaco" but i guess there are many more reasons than just 100, lol. But if MyaAdia wants to change the title, there's no problem Here are my reasons: *Because she is the older sister of the Grimaldis siblings *Because monegasques love her *Because she is smarter than Albert, and she knows it (and Albert knows it too) *Because she already has heirs, two males and two females, and the 3 olders are in the right age to inherit in any time. *Because she has to come accross difficult times (her second husband's death, her mother's death) and she always made it with dignity. *Because she is the heir, and Albert the spare *Because she knows how to speak french (not like Trashy) and speaks 4 more languages *Because her male heirs have potential wives already *Because she is the image of glamour in Monaco *Because she is the only good thing that has Monaco right now. *Because she cares for her country *Because she is very intelligent and very cultured, and every foreign dignitary has been impressed by her *Because she is been "the first Lady of Monaco" for almost 30 years *Because is not fair that a high school drop out that can't say two words in a proper french (or even english) has to replace her. *Because she was born to rule (or that's what i've been told it says in her astrological chart) And there are many more, but i can't think of anything else. What do you think? DITTO!!!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 15, 2011 15:04:20 GMT -5
Well, it seems the future Princess of Monaco is a Hollywood starlet now - something she always wanted. Why can't the Village Idiot of Monaco see this woman for who she really is. according to this tidbit in the New York Post, Charlene had a bridal shower in New Yor. What's her connection with New York? Is she really trying to sk (not in Hollywood as I originally posted) in Grace's shoes by hub nosing with Hollywood stars? Is Charlene the golden ticket to attract more Hollywood stars to visit Monaco as Grace did? Bridal delight Last Updated: 2:48 AM, April 15, 2011
Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher popped by a bridal shower at The Lion on Wednesday night for Prince Albert of Monaco's fiancée, Charlene Wittstock. The Hollywood power couple arrived at the celebration after seeing Moore's daughter, Rumer Willis, in "Love, Loss and What I Wore" on Broadway. A spy reports Moore couldn't stop gushing about her daughter's acting chops to guests including Yehuda Berg, the son of Kabbalah Centre founder Philip Berg and Karolina Kurkova.
These are the biggest names they could come up with. Demi was there just to promote her daughters play - and is CW now involved with the Kabbalah? Wouldn't that be rich - with all the stuff Eringer has mentioned about hidden Nazi gold in Monaco! This mess gets worse by the second.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 15, 2011 14:55:08 GMT -5
[/quote] I noticed the hands in the pocket pose also, She did it a lot, I'm telling you Charlene is a man in drag. [/quote]
Well, it wouldn't be a first for the Kelly family! PA's Uncle Jack Kelly, whom he adored, was embroiled in a huge scandal in between his marriages because he was involved and dating a well known transvestite named Harlow!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 15, 2011 14:46:31 GMT -5
It's wealthy CRIMINALS - not legit wealthy people of which there are many - that are trying to hide who and what they are. The criminals are the ones who are keeping legit wealthy people away from Monaco! It didn't have to be like this. There was always an element of it there - but now it seems to be the prerequisite!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 14, 2011 5:35:20 GMT -5
The Point de Vue cover photo I'm speaking of. OMG, I finally see what you were talking about. Her eyes are looking in different directions. But, didn't you say before that was so she could keep a better eye on Albert. ;D i55.tinypic.com/254x9ow.jpgTry having a conversation with this nit wit in person!!! (In her defense - I think many people are put off and a bit insulted when talking with her because she looks like she's really not paying attention to the person she's talking to. One eye is always looking slightly somewhere else. Then add to that her total inability to carry on an intelligent conversation about anything and she's in trouble.) Edited to remove direct photo posted above.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 14, 2011 5:25:50 GMT -5
.[/quote]
I remember reading, what I thought was the new version of the Constitution several years ago - maybe it was something else - but what??? Anyway, whatever it was it said the marriage had to be a Catholic marriage and the children had to be Catholic - and I thought it said the spouse had to be Catholic - I may be wrong on that last part - but the rest was definite. Somewhere I have a copy of whatever it was I read. I'll try and find it.
In the meantime, I think several others read this as well which is why we seem to think it was written in the Constitution. Anybody know what I'm referring to?
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 14, 2011 5:08:58 GMT -5
No, no! He bought the ticket for Charlene! It's his wedding gift to her!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 13, 2011 22:48:53 GMT -5
Great posting all I go for the PR-thing... It's too much discussed at the France television. Although the discussion was no great drama… (I lost link. It was on RD=Delete) All I can say is that Barsi better watch his step. This new Pope doesn't play games. He's very strict and he does it by the book. He's already come out and announced that it's going to be much harder for Catholics to get "annulments" from now on. Watch it Albert.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 13, 2011 22:30:36 GMT -5
I have to admit that I knew this all along and was hoping the wedding would proceed without her converting so it would be illegitimate -so I never said anything. Why help these morons any. That would have been such a big laugh on them!
Edited to fix quote.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 13, 2011 22:18:47 GMT -5
Look at her eyes! Her right eye is looking in a totally different direction as the left. It's very clear in this photo. It's jarring in person![/quote] The Point de Vue cover photo I'm speaking of.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 13, 2011 22:16:26 GMT -5
[/quote]
Look at her eyes! Her right eye is looking in a totally different direction as the left. It's very clear in this photo. It's jarring in person!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 13, 2011 22:12:07 GMT -5
I've often wondered if maybe PC knows CW can't conceive, and that is the only reason she is allowing this joke to take place. It would take away the "threat"- the possibility, of PA finding another bimbo to actually have a child with. Just a thought (and hope!)
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 12, 2011 21:42:34 GMT -5
I will start positive. Her body has not yet changed (pic. 2). But something is missing … Somebody please post her before and after BODY shots. I don't know how yet. Her breasts have been enlarged tremendously since that photo was taken!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 12, 2011 21:07:22 GMT -5
www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272639228.shtmlstory in the national enquirer "Trouble brewed between the beauties when rumblings reached Kate’s soon-to-be-royal ears from mutual upper-crusty friends that Charlene “intends to top Kate in every way,” says a source. “I’m glad Kate’s wedding is first,” water babe Charlene told Buckingham Palace pals. “That way, I’ll learn from her mistakes! I’ll still have ample time to make necessary changes and be sure my dress, jewels - everything - will be perfect.” The source added: “When Kate got wind of this, she was really upset, but Prince William told her to ignore it. ‘She’s just jealous...They all are,’ Wills told her - then joked that Charlene’s crabby ‘cause she’s marrying a much older man, while Kate’s marrying a handsome young prince.” ROFL i don't really believe the story but it's amusing just the same You know, lately the National Enquirer has been getting their stuff pretty straight. Even if the story isn't true, doesn't sound like the stuff we've heard Charlene say? And doesn't sound just like her to try and upstage Kate, and doesn't it sound just like her competitiveness? What I found amusing, is the statement about what Kate got wrong. Oh please, the team working with Kate are professionals. This girl has never missed her mark so to speak. The firm does not allow for mistakes in events such as these. Whose jealous now? Just sayin" JMO Only a nitwit twit like CW would think for a nano-second that anyone marrying into the House of Grimaldi could ever compare to someone marrying into the House of Windsor. I don't care WHO they are or what they have or have not done! There is absolutely no comparison to the importance - to the entire World - of the British Royal Family and their History, and this little Principality called Monaco and what it has contributed to the World. Please! It's a joke to even think about comparing them! And as I said - only an uneducated, ignorant, unsophisticated TWIT like CW would even think to utter her name in the same breath as someone like Kate. It's absurd! I wonder - does she think this is a swimming meet? That is all she knows. (And I don't think Kate, for one minute, is giving CW a second thought - at all - she's going to be THE QUEEN of ENGLAND someday - and her future GRANDMOTHER-in-law ALREADY IS THE QUEEN! PLEASE - CW GO AWAY! You're embarrassing yourself in front of the entire world!)
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Apr 12, 2011 20:47:14 GMT -5
Thank you so much for the insight Creative! Clearly, Albert's PR is not run by professional who ever did any of the type of analysis that you just explained. Stahl called Charlene the flagship of Monaco and Albert supposedly expert media consult stated that Albert and Charlene would make the world forget their troubles. Albert and his PR people based Charlene's popularity on how many covers she received on Paris Match, Gala, Point de Vue, and Bunte. I doubt if they even researched the magazine sales of these covers when Charlene was on it. Charlene even mentioned in the beginning in a SA interviw in May 2006 that the palace reads everything about them - so all Charlene cared about was that the sycophantic press continued to promote her to Albert and the palace. I have to disagree with one thing that you stated - Charlene blew it for Monaco, but not for herself! Charlene is the only person that Charlene cares about. she exposed herself to the media so that they would continue to promote ger to Albert and pressure him into marrying her. Charlene knew who and what she was dealing with in Albert and the palace PR department - amatuer idiots who only read sycophantic press. These are the cards that Chalrene has played - and she has won. She hasn't won anything. She may THINK she has, but she hasn't. Just await - and not very long. Unfortunately she's not only going to bring herself down - she going to bring the entire House of Grimaldi down with her - it's sad - but that's life in the fast lane - and it's their own fault.
|
|