|
Post by creativemind on Mar 12, 2012 16:56:23 GMT -5
totally lavetta!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 12, 2012 17:00:13 GMT -5
I was curious about how MC matin would report this visit. They state that trashy won a gold medal in the worldcup in 2002, but when you check the official lists, then her name is not there www.omegatiming.com/index_home.htm#swimming/racearchives/2002/melbourne2002/index.htm I don't think she was even there. In any case she is not in the starting lists of the competition she is supposed to have won the gold medal in. The gold medal was won by an Australian called Elka Graham. Most obviously MC press and PR are realizing how little trashy has achieved in her "carrer" that they are not above lying and making up things. Too bad for them that nowadays all sports events, rankings, times etc are official and public and posted on line. So unless they pay people to alter the records, they will always be found out as liars. And that will eventually get them back. They are probably hoping that people will just copy paste the false info and thus get it into the public, but the people who were there and the sports press knows the truth and has the possibility to out them as liars. And they will, when they find it necessary. Albert is IOC and as such he has to make sure that his wife does not claim false titles if he does not want to lose his reputation. Also athletes will not digest it well if she claims to have won medals she never came near to winning. If they continue her PR on that path, they might end up not having any athletes with a reputation wanting anything to do with MC. At present it seems that only people on the decline in their sport and those hoping to catch some scraps from the gravy train want their name linked to MC. www.monacomatin.mc/article/monaco/la-princesse-charlene-ouvre-lexposition-grace-kelly-en-australie.813982.htmlI thought this the second I read it. I didn't remember her having won a gold medal in Australia - but I didn't care enough to search for the facts. This whole thing is just a joke. I can barely read the blog any more. I read it mostly because I all you guys and it's fun reading what you all say.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 12, 2012 17:06:22 GMT -5
I was curious about how MC matin would report this visit. They state that trashy won a gold medal in the worldcup in 2002, but when you check the official lists, then her name is not there www.omegatiming.com/index_home.htm#swimming/racearchives/2002/melbourne2002/index.htm I don't think she was even there. In any case she is not in the starting lists of the competition she is supposed to have won the gold medal in. The gold medal was won by an Australian called Elka Graham. Most obviously MC press and PR are realizing how little trashy has achieved in her "carrer" that they are not above lying and making up things. Too bad for them that nowadays all sports events, rankings, times etc are official and public and posted on line. So unless they pay people to alter the records, they will always be found out as liars. And that will eventually get them back. They are probably hoping that people will just copy paste the false info and thus get it into the public, but the people who were there and the sports press knows the truth and has the possibility to out them as liars. And they will, when they find it necessary. Albert is IOC and as such he has to make sure that his wife does not claim false titles if he does not want to lose his reputation. Also athletes will not digest it well if she claims to have won medals she never came near to winning. If they continue her PR on that path, they might end up not having any athletes with a reputation wanting anything to do with MC. At present it seems that only people on the decline in their sport and those hoping to catch some scraps from the gravy train want their name linked to MC. www.monacomatin.mc/article/monaco/la-princesse-charlene-ouvre-lexposition-grace-kelly-en-australie.813982.htmlShe did place gold at the 2002 world Cup finals in Melbourne. You have to look at the finals under day two posted in your link. Here's the direct link. Also, here are the results reported on December 8, 2002 in the The Sunday Times (Perth, Australia) 100m BACKSTROKE: Charlene Wittstock (RSA) 1:00.32 1 Giaan Rooney (Qld) 1:00.37 2 Courtney Shealy (USA) 1:00.38 3. Ah. Okay.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 12, 2012 17:14:38 GMT -5
I thought this the second I read it. I didn't remember her having won a gold medal in Australia - but I didn't care enough to search for the facts. This whole thing is just a joke. I can barely read the blog any more. I read it mostly because I all you guys and it's fun reading what you all say. The gold medal was not at the 2000 Sydney Olympics which she attended, but in at the 20001 FINA World Cup in Melbourne
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 12, 2012 17:29:40 GMT -5
that's what I am thinking. Remember that her dad came up with the info that she went with her mom to Paris for a hat fitting at the time? I think we have several alibis from their side about the incident. None of them ring true and IMO they still do not know the time and date. Express surely did not reveal this until they actually go to court. And I suppose they will only reveal this in court in front of the judge without giving them the chance to bring decent proof. I bet that they have ordered several interested parties to give them affidavits for every single day about trashys whereabouts during that time, just to make sure that they have their butt covered. And that is why we have so many different versions about where she has been at that specific time. Too bad for them that they are making all of the public, spreading them in the press, at that robs them of any credibility. "Remember that her dad came up with the info that she went with her mom to Paris for a hat fitting at the time?"I remember that too. The point is, that during the nuptials I can't remember Charlene wearing a hat. Neither did she wear a hat in the weeks after the wedding if I remember correctly. She uses to have her gown designed for each event she attends directly before. So I doubt this hat was done for an event some month later. IMO this is a silly lie. A hat is no big thing - why didn't the disigner take a light little hat and go to CW to Monaco. SHE is the VIP - not the designer. Maybe someone can tell me how VIPs use to work with designers ? CM7007??? And -sorry - which man remembers accessoires and details like "hat"? Only a gay-best-friend. To me it would have sounded more natural if he said, she was 'meeting a designer', maximum 'fitting some new wardrobe'. I don't remember a hat on CW anytime near the wedding. But it really is unimportant. IF she, or her mother, or anyone else close to her, needed to have a "HAT" fitting for the WEDDING - especially THIS wedding - the designer would have come to them. The designer would have made the time - unless CW, and/or her mother, or whomever wanted an excuse to leave Monaco and go to Paris. Besides, a HAT FITTING? That sounds like something (an excuse) one might tell a man who they know would not have a clue about fashion, and would not ask a lot of questions. (He'd think, "That's a girl thing.")
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 12, 2012 17:33:50 GMT -5
the video shows how awful that dress is on her and that the woman has no clue about how to move. Honestly, I believe any guy would walk better on heels than she does. That woman has no body control. She is always all over the place. Her choice of extremely high heels and her size force her to actually have to bend down to talk to people. She would need to chose flat shoes so she doesn't look like a hunchback all the time, or at least less of a hunchback. There used to be silent moviestars who never made it to the screen after sound was introduced. Trashy might just about be ok when she doesn't move, but in motion the woman is a total nightmare. I agree, she even walks bend down which makes her look like an ape. Someone needs to tell her to keep her wide mouth closed when greeting people....everything about her is simply UNGRACEFUL. You are right Paca, they should only show her image in pictures...which they can control and alter. Agree! 100%. And the open mouth thing MUST go!!! It's so low class AND she has an exceptionally ugly mouth. Granted it's better "tooth wise" - but not enough to allow her to have that open smile she's trying to achieve, (Trying for the big KATE smile...methinks!) Just unbelievable. This entire thing (the marriage) is nothing but a bit mess IMO!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2012 17:36:32 GMT -5
Thanks for the karma. She is showing official passion to a kid half of old as her.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 12, 2012 17:37:47 GMT -5
I think you are wrong. I think WC had a speech coach and she spent weeks preparing and reading the speech someone else wrote for her. It's just that it didn't come out the way it was supposed to. ;D I agree with RP, Charlene practiced that speech a lot and that's the best she will get. She swings her arm to show emphasis to the person that she just mentioned in her speech. Think kindergartner - - point to the person for emphasis during your speech. She did the same for her Heart for Children speech. Guys, I keep telling you I've met CW. I've had, or tried to have, conversations with her. And in my opinion, I truly felt the poor thing is very intellectually challenged. And, IMO, PA must be as well - How could any man with much of anything going on upstairs spend any time with a woman who is this dumb. They wouldn't.
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 12, 2012 17:46:02 GMT -5
Another kiss - this time to a teenager who traveled from Sydney and waited for hours with his mom to see Charlene and waited afterward when he got his kiss. Read full article in Bendigo Advertiser.
First real kiss a royal occasion for lucky Sydney teenagerBRETT WORTHINGTON 13 Mar, 2012 AVID FAN: Thomas Powell travelled from Sydney to see Princess Charlene and the Grace Kelly: Style Icon exhibition in Bendigo on the weekend.
IT was the royal kiss he had waited all his life for.
Sydney’s Alicia Powell and her son Thomas, 17, travelled by plane, train and car to be in Bendigo for Princess Charlene of Monaco’s visit.
Ms Powell, a fan of Grace Kelly for more than 30 years, and Thomas have admired the royal family from afar and were determined to see the princess in the flesh.
They arrived in Bendigo on Friday and found a prime position outside the Bendigo Art Gallery before Princess Charlene’s arrival on Saturday.
“When she arrived we had been standing there for three hours lovingly chatting to Bendigo locals and the media,” Ms Powell said.
“When the princess arrived, we were competing against small children, the media and other locals and were not able to have that one-on-one experience.
“We decided to hang around and after one-and-a-half hours waiting... all the media had left and she came out.
“Thomas seized the opportunity and called out to her and she very graciously came over and very kindly accepted his flowers and said a few sweet words.
...
I don't like being mean - BUT - I have grandsons this boy's age and if either of them said he wanted to go see this exhibit - and meet any princess - let alone this one - I'd be very upset - for so many reasons. And if my daughter wanted to go see the exhibit she'd have to drag her sons kicking and screaming all the way to get them to attend. (And I seriously doubt she'd even try to get them to go.) It just seems weird to me.
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 12, 2012 18:14:13 GMT -5
"Remember that her dad came up with the info that she went with her mom to Paris for a hat fitting at the time?"I remember that too. The point is, that during the nuptials I can't remember Charlene wearing a hat. Neither did she wear a hat in the weeks after the wedding if I remember correctly. She uses to have her gown designed for each event she attends directly before. So I doubt this hat was done for an event some month later. IMO this is a silly lie. A hat is no big thing - why didn't the disigner take a light little hat and go to CW to Monaco. SHE is the VIP - not the designer. Maybe someone can tell me how VIPs use to work with designers ? CM7007??? And -sorry - which man remembers accessoires and details like "hat"? Only a gay-best-friend. To me it would have sounded more natural if he said, she was 'meeting a designer', maximum 'fitting some new wardrobe'. I don't remember a hat on CW anytime near the wedding. But it really is unimportant. IF she, or her mother, or anyone else close to her, needed to have a "HAT" fitting for the WEDDING - especially THIS wedding - the designer would have come to them. The designer would have made the time - unless CW, and/or her mother, or whomever wanted an excuse to leave Monaco and go to Paris. Besides, a HAT FITTING? That sounds like something (an excuse) one might tell a man who they know would not have a clue about fashion, and would not ask a lot of questions. (He'd think, "That's a girl thing.") Thanks cm7007
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 12, 2012 19:37:44 GMT -5
looks like quite a lot of people were not happy on Saturday www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/news/local/news/general/bendigo-art-gallery-opening-raises-some-hackles/2485375.aspxbtw I just read an article about body language from an FBI guy. He says feet don't lie with children. Children who do not want to be kissed, may lean forward, but their feet don't move. They remain in a safe position (so they can run away) This boy does not move at all when trashy moves in on him. I am sure that trashy planned to kiss a cute kid to generate press. This woman is abusing children and handicapped people for her selfpromotion. They picked grade 3 and 4 children only? Why? because that's when kids are cute in pics, you don't risk them bursting into tears which would have made bad pics and you can make them do things without too much rebellion. What on earth would 2 grades of children, about 50 kids plus parents and possibly siblings, have to do with this exhibit other then being the landscape for an overpriced hooker. So they made sure that at least 150 people would be standing outside and 600 were inside. And obviouslyonce you have a small gathering, others will stop just to see what is going on. I bet that a number of tickets inside was not going to gallery members but actually were given away by radio shows, which is what people do to promote events. I doubt that kate would have to do this for Australians to come and see her. Not mentioning that she did not have to rent a crowd for her wedding either, unlike that hooker bride of Monaco
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 12, 2012 19:47:31 GMT -5
Another kiss - this time to a teenager who traveled from Sydney and waited for hours with his mom to see Charlene and waited afterward when he got his kiss. Read full article in Bendigo Advertiser.
First real kiss a royal occasion for lucky Sydney teenagerBRETT WORTHINGTON 13 Mar, 2012 i39.tinypic.com/wld6pv.jpgAVID FAN: Thomas Powell travelled from Sydney to see Princess Charlene and the Grace Kelly: Style Icon exhibition in Bendigo on the weekend.
IT was the royal kiss he had waited all his life for.
Sydney’s Alicia Powell and her son Thomas, 17, travelled by plane, train and car to be in Bendigo for Princess Charlene of Monaco’s visit.
...
I don't like being mean - BUT - I have grandsons this boy's age and if either of them said he wanted to go see this exhibit - and meet any princess - let alone this one - I'd be very upset - for so many reasons. And if my daughter wanted to go see the exhibit she'd have to drag her sons kicking and screaming all the way to get them to attend. (And I seriously doubt she'd even try to get them to go.) It just seems weird to me. LOL the poor lad, he will be mocked in school. And probably has been before. Australia is extremely macho. They think that socer is for sissies and you have to be gay if you want to be an actor. Double gay if you start your carreer in musicals like Hugh Jackmann. What do you think his classmates will say if they find out about him going to see a tranny princess on the other end of the country. Jeez that screams Priscilla queen of the desert part 2... AdminNote: Removed display of photo and reduced quoted text
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Mar 12, 2012 21:09:50 GMT -5
she looks like a big dude in that suit. very tranny-esque. as for the pink/peach glitter dress. i think my grandma wore that in white back in like 1980 for her and my grandfather's 50th wedding anniversary. her big bogan welcome brought a tear to my eye. NOT! anyways, i hope she didn't break that kid's hand backwards when she "high pawed" her. i mean she's got some big ass manos! Here's a new video that has not been posted and it includes footage of Charlene from getting out of the car to touring the exhibit. Creative, look at Charlene in this video, everything that you mentioned above is manifested in this video. I'm starting to believe that Charlene's family and flunkies dominate the sugar boards with the same constant adulation of Charlene's perfect figure, femininity, gracefulness, style and elegance because they are not trying to convince others but themselves. I've been trying to tell everyone this for years now, and "many" people were not shy in telling me just how nuts I was ;D, and also for trying to relay the idea that the palace not only read these forums, but also participated, including that they were really reading and using the forums as a way to weigh and judge Charlene's popularity, something Charlene and her family always knew...from day one! Even here, don't bet that even with the ring on her finger, that she isn't still trying to relay to Albert and the palace of her popularity, and just how many see her as as the new embodiment of her mother-in-law. I totally agree with you Scout--I wanted to add to your post about this. I'm really going to make an effort to find Charlene'a doppleganger's very first post on Royal Blue (I still might have it on another laptop), because it REALLY "telegraphs" this and what was going on at the time and what Charlene's only real (hired help) purpose was there....what she was suppose to achieve for them and more importantly, JUST WHAT SHE HAD BEEN TOLD...she tried her very best (with over the top/extremely ridiculous posts) to convince and confirm to a certain few that she knew was reading the board, that Charlene was more than fulfilling everything they were hoping Charlene could achieve for them.... . She tried to hit every point in one post even! ;D But it was the reason for the repetition in their posts....what their agenda was, and why Charlene"was OWED THE FAIRYTALE WEDDING" . They never tried to sell a love story on the forum between Albert and Charlene as a reason why Albert should marry Charlene, becaue it was not one of the reasons she was ever told--Charlene and her family only tried to sell it when it became a problem that people were not buying it and that might be an obstacle that could prevent Charlene from getting that title and ring, but that is not what Charlene was hired to sell--she was hired to be the new Grace and to make Albert looked settled, mongamous, and like a family man (that is what she was told), like that golddigging tramp on his arm could even begin to suggest that...not even now that they're married! ;D Charlene instead has always only served to confirm the image that he was trying to avoid, that his personal life was tainted with opportunistic golddigging women that caused him nothing but trouble, Charlene only served to show that she was cheap and opportunistic like all the women in his past that he seemed to be attracted too, or at least was the kind of women that he involved himself with...I don't know who in the world, they thought they were kidding, especially when they advertised and promoted Charlene living off Albert like a whore, while doing nothing, nothing to even improve her own image, all while using Albert and Monaco as a way to promote herself, and even more creepy as being philanthropic with HIS money, by doing nothing more than using these real charities only as another means to promote herself? They have no shame or clue! How low can someone go! Charlene was the very worst and last thing anyone should have been pushing to help Albert...just one more opportunistic obnoxious woman to add to the list, and Albert's personal life is the last thing they should have been trying to highlight or PROMOTE (especially with his past trouble) in an effort to make Albert appear more like a serious Monarch, or even any serious man...Charlene would make any man look like a fool, which is probably why no one so far is rushing to claim any involvement with her...even now after her royal marriage while they are trying to promote her, still no one who has dated her has come forward with anything positive to say about her...except maybe good riddens! It's hard to say who was more delusional and insane with the idea that Charlene was the woman that could become a new Grace--they seriously they could just create a physical replica of her with Charlene, or that someone like Charlene, a girl who has looked for others to support her all her life, while she bites the hand that feeds her, would fulfill what they were looking to achieve (an awfully shallow view of the public ), but, to tell the truth outside of trying to physically turn herself into Grace, that is as much as she could, Charlene never made an ounce of effort anywhere else to actually achieve anything else they had hoped for or to actually sell herself as this to the public in any likeable or real way,--she only spent her effort in trying to convince Albert in perception that she was popular, even though she publicly admits that she has made no friends in six years...because "everyone" everyone mind you, is jeaolus of HER...as if that is a birmal emotion for everyone And they are not jeolouse of anyone who they might actually have any reason to be jealous of...Caroline or Charlotte? No only some arrogant useless golddigger that has lived off others her entire life, whose own small efforts and achievements should be an embarrassment to her, in the way they have been trumped up and promoted. I am really dumbfounded at just what it is about Charlene that Albert imagines people could be jealous of....useless arrogant obnoxious retard that uses everyone,] as a pawn, even himself for her own self centered benefit, she is maculine and not the beauty she imagines herself to be, but then even she has completely tried to remake herself (more like Grace) to the point that I think even Joan Rivers has nothing on her! People must be jeaolus of her? Sure, whatever Albert needs to tell himself Charlene knew she only had to convince Albert with a perception of her popularity, and if she wasn't, then the only reason could be that they were just jealous of her, or her situation This is where she tried to compare her situation to that of Grace in the 1950's, I have more to say about this in another post that actually is the post that belongs in this thread probably. Anyway Charlene always knew the only person she really needed to convince was a naive and insecure Albert and possibly any advisors or people that had his ear or actually influenced him ...or who would seem to already have her backing, and possibly be the very people behind the whole contrived idea of Charlene and the heavy promotion of her all those years as the woman who would invoke the memeory of Grace? All of Charlene's (and her families) effort was spent on convincing the palace and Albert with whatever it took (including threats), to get that title and ring on her finger, nothing more, actually being popular with the public didn't matter to her as long as Albert was buying it. All "their" posts confirm this. She really didn't care who in the world liked her--she was use to Albert "buying" her good press, remember Esther posts' who confirmed that Charlene could always rely on this! They would reinvent her in the press and make everything tawdry about her disappear, but she did seem worried that the questionable payments made to her might be hard to make disappear--if that magazine wanted to make some money on Charlene and exploit the fake wedding, all they need to do is reprint that article! I wish they would, maybe other mags would pick up on it! It is truly the most damaging article that the palace can't dispute because either Charlene or a family member gave it to them and that is why they never could sue for it! Only a trashy opprtunistic grifter could think that was something to brag about or impress people, instead of being shamed by it like most people would, but we see that in their posts and their behavior. So typical of Charlene and her family...wasting no time to confirm what people thought about them all along. Charlene and Co efforts were only to sell a perception to Albert, and he bought it hook, line and SINKER! I know it might seem I'm off message here, but this so goes to what they wanted to create with Charlene, what they thought they could create with Charlene. I think it is totally inappropriate for Charlene to be there on behalf of Grace, they are so obviously trying to draw a line that she is the new Grace and is using Grace's image and popularity to promote herself--so disgusting! Charlene is the very antitheseis of Grace, and I think her mother-in-law would be as disgusted as we are, by Charlene as a person, and what she and Albert is doing with her memory. The whole reason for Charlene from day one is that they thought they needed a new Grace and they thought that this creep could embody and revive the memory of her. Charlene always has thought this. In her early posts Charlene really thought she was goiong to be the new Grace Kelly, not just the princess of Monaco....that is what she always wanted to be Grace Kelly Princess of Monaco. Because Grace was one of the most beautiful and photographed women in the world, Charlene thought the Title alone would turn her into Grace Kelly--"Charlene will be waving off the balcony, as the most photographed women in the world" . Both Charlene and the idiots at the palace got it backwards, the title didn't make the women--It was the woman (that was Grace) that made the Title the Princess of Monaco mean something. Charlene has given it another meaning all together and it's not a nice one! There is no other way to say this--this really just shows what a real whore Charlene is...She has no business representing Grace's tribute, and what conceit to invite the sad sad comparison between them. Albert is off his rocker and it shows an absolute lack of respect for his mother. The only people that should be representing Grace is her own daughters or granddaughters, or Albert, but Albert just involving Charlene as a tag along in Grace's tribute is disgusting enough, but to actually be the one to soley represent her somewhere, it just shows how much Charlene is a women trying to whore off of Grace's image....I'm sorry, but Grace would have absolutely hated Charlene and she would have prevented a woman like Charlene from even just stepping foot in Monaco on her son's arm if she was alive to see it. Charlene has killed the memory of Grace and has tarnished the titled to a joke, Albert included! Also to not send someone more important that this fame seeking piece of trash is a bit of a snub to the people of Austrailia if you ask me? Absolutely they did all they could to help Charlene, all you have to do is look at her past disasters, she can't even show some grace when the camera is on her after all these years...she never has! She is too ignorant to know just how ignorant she looks when she feels she has to show everyone just how out of sorts she is... as if anyone cares about her bad mood! I agree no matter what help they give Charlene, she is only willing to make the most minimal effort and it shows!
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Mar 12, 2012 21:30:20 GMT -5
;D ;D ;D This picture is just so wrong on so many levels! A 17 year old guy traveled by plain, train (gasp) and bus with his mom ;D to meet tranvestite looking "princess" just because his mom was a fan of Grace Kelly. On this "kiss picture" WC looks like gigantic man in drag grabbing another man to kiss. And her pointed nipples...I am speechless. This woman is just unappropriated in everything she does. Have anyone seen any other Princess kissing and grabbing anyone and everyone from the crowd. They don't even kiss small children in a public, let alone a grown up young man (confused one, but still a man). ;D ;D ;D Another kiss - this time to a teenager who traveled from Sydney and waited for hours with his mom to see Charlene and waited afterward when he got his kiss. Read full article in Bendigo Advertiser.
First real kiss a royal occasion for lucky Sydney teenagerBRETT WORTHINGTON 13 Mar, 2012 i39.tinypic.com/wld6pv.jpgAVID FAN: Thomas Powell travelled from Sydney to see Princess Charlene and the Grace Kelly: Style Icon exhibition in Bendigo on the weekend.
IT was the royal kiss he had waited all his life for.
Sydney’s Alicia Powell and her son Thomas, 17, travelled by plane, train and car to be in Bendigo for Princess Charlene of Monaco’s visit.
...
AdminNote: Removed display of photo and reduced quoted text
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 13, 2012 4:58:15 GMT -5
I've been trying to tell everyone this for years now, and "many" people were not shy in telling me just how nuts I was ;D, and also for trying to relay the idea that the palace not only read these forums, but also participated, including that they were really reading and using the forums as a way to weigh and judge Charlene's popularity, something Charlene and her family always knew...from day one! Even here, don't bet that even with the ring on her finger, that she isn't still trying to relay to Albert and the palace of her popularity, and just how many see her as as the new embodiment of her mother-in-law. I totally agree with you Scout--I wanted to add to your post about this. Sandsla, I love your novella posts! keep posting. In May 2006, Charlene did an interview with a South African magazine bragging that she will be attending the Grand Prix in Monaco. She also stated that the palace reads EVERYTHING that is written about her and Albert. IT was extremely clear early on to Charlene that her future with Albert depended on how well she played in the press. Charlene was a genius in working the press and cultivating relationships with keep players that for years sang her praises to Albert begging him to marry her. After the August 2006 Red Cross Ball, Charlene thought she hit the mother load of press when she was mentioned in the American media. Charlene's doppelganger was on the former Royal Blue gloating and bragging that Charlene had sealed the deal and the engagement should be coming soon. She was too stupid to realize that Charlene only made the press in the U.S. because the Jazmin revelation story was a shock and still being talked about. In the couple's interview with Swedish TV4 Anders Kraft, Charlene made a statement that it was the press was pressuring Albert to marry her after the Swedish wedding. This statement may seem trivial, but once you realize that Albert proposed that Monday after the Saturday Swedish wedding (two days later), Charlene was really revealing her agenda and Albert's motivation in that little statement. As soon after the Saturday nights events were over, Charlene had to have spent all her time on the Internet and Television reading and viewing everything that she could about herself and sharing them with Albert. Some of Charlene's family even started posting on The royal message boards for the first time after Charlene appeared at the Swedish wedding (even though some have been members since 2004 - once Charlene was Albert's yacht girl at the Athens Olympics). Charlene and her family knew a lot was riding on Charlene getting good press and they were all over the Internet in FULL FORCE promoting Charlene at every opportunity! Their efforts along with Charlene's flunkie press efforts payed off because Albert truly believed that Charlene was extremely popular in the press which he mistakenly equated popular with an international audience. Charlene was brilliant with the press during her courtship and now she is super pissed that she cannot control them now.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 13, 2012 5:21:36 GMT -5
Charlene did an interview while in Bendigo with Australia’s Today Show cost Lisa Wilkinson, Here's the link. This woman's face looks cartoonish, which matches her cartoonish expressions, mannerism and words. I know I shouldn't be, but I actually am still amazed by the people (non-relatives) who insist that this woman's interviews are great.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 13, 2012 5:29:54 GMT -5
Charlene is fortunate to have the support of Albert's cousin because John Kelly, who is also the President of Albert's American branch of his foundation, sings her praises. Charlene's doppelganger did boast about how much Albert's American cousins just love her - and I didn't believe her. I should have because Charlene is very good - a pro - at playing the loving girlfriend/now wife/now victim. What's obvious when you hear John speak about Charlene's difficulties transitioning is that Charlene does to him what she does with Stephanie - cry on his shoulders about people not liking her. It's always other's faults which causes them not to like the pure lovable Charlene who only wants to love Albert and Monaco. What's also obvious from this interview is that John clearly did not get the spin memo that the flunkies, Albert and Charlene put out about Charlene's wedding tears (they were happy tears and they were because she was moved by the singing) and how everyone in Monaco love Charlene! (the flunkies swear to this) Can someone please explain to John that the comparison with Grace (not being liked) with Charlene is really not the same. Charlene is not liked because of specific characteristics of her actions, behavior, and attitude. John himself stated that Grace was not liked in the beginning but that soon changed, but hello John: Charlene has been living in Monaco full time for 5 entire years and people still do not like her! Thanks John for confirming what we Royal Opinioners already knew but Charlene's flunkies are still trying to deceive people in believing the opposite: Charlene is not liked in Monaco! Also, when will Charlene's excusers face the cold hard truth that there are legitimate reasons why the people in Monaco do NOT like this woman? ? Albert and the flunkies who surround him are the ones who need to wake up and see the truth not the people in Monaco. Also, can someone please tell Charlene's suckers that it is not that Charlene is having a difficult time transitioning it is that Charlene has stated herself that she will not transition (and she cannot). Good lawd people, when will you see this woman for the con artist that she is? My transcript of John's comments - which I find the best part of the video
John (1:51): She’s a difficulty transition and uh I think Charlene’s doing a wonderful job at it. Uh, I think one of the things that’s helpful is and I, I try to remind her of it is uh how difficulty it was for Grace at the beginning. Because after a couple of years, they loved her there and uh uh a great relationship
Reporter’s over voice: …and much was made of her tears on her wedding day
John (2:39): Well, it was just a lot of pressure. A lot of pressure and uh it was a you know a very big event. We all responded to pressure differently so. I just hope that people will let Charlene be who she is and she is great so
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 13, 2012 5:39:49 GMT -5
Charlene did an interview while in Bendigo with Australia’s Today Show cost Lisa Wilkinson, Here's the link. This woman's face looks cartoonish, which matches her cartoonish expressions, mannerism and words. I know I shouldn't be, but I actually am still amazed by the people (non-relatives) who insist that this woman's interviews are great. The "cool lady" (quote of the journalist by the end of the spot) is a perfect con artist who conned even the guy travelling with her (what was his name again, he is one of the Kelly's, isn't he). He said he reminds her of how difficult it has been for Grace at the beginning in Monaco. And somehow doesn't realize that Charlenes beginning in Monaco already lasts about 6 YEARS. GRACE did not live like a kept woman = official companion, FOR YEARS with no profession, no ring, no basis to build her life on IF NOT marrying a Prince. Grace learned the language as soon a she arrived in Monaco and even though she made mistakes and had an accent: SHE WAS FLUENT in French pretty soon. While Charlene took an off-time! (And still is taking off time: Posing and travelling is no work.) Grace gave birth to children very soon after marrying Rainier. Charlene is all about images and dreses, travelling in anglophone countries, doing photo shots and declsaring this to be Charity work ... ABUSING CHILDREN AND HANDICAPED PEOPLE :'(as background for her photo shots as "hard working Princess" This is soo ooooutch! And why even Alberts relative doesn't get it? He is even praising her. I mean: it is so obvious. Are they all brainwashed? Voodoo? Drugs? I don't get it!!! She is playing the perfect innocent "simple sports woman" and poor victim to make men feel like having to protect her.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Mar 13, 2012 6:42:01 GMT -5
Charlene is fortunate to have the support of Albert's cousin because John Kelly, who is also the President of Albert's American branch of his foundation, sings her praises. Charlene's doppelganger did boast about how much Albert's American cousins just love her - and I didn't believe her. I should have because Charlene is very good - a pro - at playing the loving girlfriend/now wife/now victim. What's obvious when you hear John speak about Charlene's difficulties transitioning is that Charlene does to him what she does with Stephanie - cried on his shoulders about people not liking her. It's always other's people faults which causes them, not to like the pure likable Charlene who only wants to love Albert and Monaco. What's also obvious from this interview is that John clearly did not get the memo about the spin that the flunkies and Albert and Charlene themselves put out about Charlene's wedding tears (they were happy tears and they were because she was moved by the singing) and how everyone in Monaco loved Charlene! (the flunkies swear to this) Can someone please explain to John that the comparison with Grace not being liked with Charlene not being liked is really not the same. Charlene is not liked because of specific characteristics of her actions, behavior, and attitude. John himself stated that Grace was not liked in the beginning but that soon changed, but hello John: Charlene has been living in Monaco full time for 5 entire years and people still do not like her! Thanks John for confirming what we Royal Opinioners already knew but Charlene's flunkies are still trying to deceive people in believing the opposite: Charlene is not liked in Monaco! Also, when will Charlene's excusers face the cold hard truth that there are legitimate reasons why the people in Monaco do like this woman? ? Albert and the flunkies who surround him are the ones who need to wake up and see the truth not the people in Monaco. Also, can someone please tell Charlene's suckers that it is not that Charlene is having a difficult time transitioning it is that Charlene has stated herself that she will not transition (and she cannot). Good lawd people, when will you see this woman for the con artist that she is? My transcript of John's comments - which I find the best part of the video
John (1:51): She’s a difficulty transition and uh I think Charlene’s doing a wonderful job at it. Uh, I think one of the things that’s helpful is and I, I try to remind her of it is uh how difficulty it was for Grace at the beginning. Because after a couple of years, they loved her there and uh uh a great relationship
Reporter’s over voice: …and much was made of her tears on her wedding day
John (2:39): Well, it was just a lot of pressure. A lot of pressure and uh it was a you know a very big event. We all responded to pressure differently so. I just hope that people will let Charlene be who she is and she is great so
Once again, Fat Al's "advisors" didn't distribute official Talking Points to JB Kelly. He was totally off-message ... just another debacle!
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Mar 13, 2012 9:20:17 GMT -5
Charlene is fortunate to have the support of Albert's cousin because John Kelly, who is also the President of Albert's American branch of his foundation, sings her praises. Charlene's doppelganger did boast about how much Albert's American cousins just love her - and I didn't believe her. I should have because Charlene is very good - a pro - at playing the loving girlfriend/now wife/now victim. What's obvious when you hear John speak about Charlene's difficulties transitioning is that Charlene does to him what she does with Stephanie - cried on his shoulders about people not liking her. It's always other's people faults which causes them, not to like the pure likable Charlene who only wants to love Albert and Monaco. What's also obvious from this interview is that John clearly did not get the memo about the spin that the flunkies and Albert and Charlene themselves put out about Charlene's wedding tears (they were happy tears and they were because she was moved by the singing) and how everyone in Monaco loved Charlene! (the flunkies swear to this) Can someone please explain to John that the comparison with Grace not being liked with Charlene not being liked is really not the same. Charlene is not liked because of specific characteristics of her actions, behavior, and attitude. John himself stated that Grace was not liked in the beginning but that soon changed, but hello John: Charlene has been living in Monaco full time for 5 entire years and people still do not like her! Thanks John for confirming what we Royal Opinioners already knew but Charlene's flunkies are still trying to deceive people in believing the opposite: Charlene is not liked in Monaco! Also, when will Charlene's excusers face the cold hard truth that there are legitimate reasons why the people in Monaco do like this woman? ? Albert and the flunkies who surround him are the ones who need to wake up and see the truth not the people in Monaco. Also, can someone please tell Charlene's suckers that it is not that Charlene is having a difficult time transitioning it is that Charlene has stated herself that she will not transition (and she cannot). Good lawd people, when will you see this woman for the con artist that she is? My transcript of John's comments - which I find the best part of the video
John (1:51): She’s a difficulty transition and uh I think Charlene’s doing a wonderful job at it. Uh, I think one of the things that’s helpful is and I, I try to remind her of it is uh how difficulty it was for Grace at the beginning. Because after a couple of years, they loved her there and uh uh a great relationship
Reporter’s over voice: …and much was made of her tears on her wedding day
John (2:39): Well, it was just a lot of pressure. A lot of pressure and uh it was a you know a very big event. We all responded to pressure differently so. I just hope that people will let Charlene be who she is and she is great so
Once again, Fat Al's "advisors" didn't distribute official Talking Points to JB Kelly. He was totally off-message ... just another debacle! LOL I was thinking the same thing. You beat me too it! He had no explanation and that was all he could come up with, or he was out of the loop on the whole wedding mess and hasn't a clue as to what's really going on. Then again, may be that's why they asked him to "help her" on this trip. As for the pressure comment, did he forget she went to the Olympics? The one time I will give her credit for getting somewhere and actually dealing with pressure. Sorry JK, don't buy the pressure statement. He had no reason to be there other than his last name. JK you were used!! JMO.
|
|