|
Post by mrplowfan on Mar 5, 2012 21:50:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Mar 5, 2012 21:59:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Mar 6, 2012 4:02:07 GMT -5
Thanks for that link! Here is what I found very amusing about it. ;D Charlene is just too silly. She warms the run-away-story up herself... ;D: "Princess Charlene was most entertaining. ‘I did NOT run away on the eve of my wedding!’ she exclaimed at one stage, adding with inarguable logic: ‘Why on earth would I do that? I was about to marry my prince!’Later, she made an offer few could refuse. ‘Albert and I are going to watch the rugby in a pub in the morning with Russell Crowe – want to come?’ ‘I’d love to, Your Royal Highness, but I’ll be watching Arsenal-Spurs, I’m afraid.’"
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 6, 2012 4:55:29 GMT -5
As always Charlene blabbed everything to her other flunkie at Bunte who also writes only glowing things about her - which Charlene promptly reminds and thanks her as she blabs some more. Summary: Albert returned that Monday after the Oscars while Charlene was going to stay and shop and vacation (what else does this woman do); Charlene had dinner with Charlize Theron as soon as she got there; Charlize parents and Charlene's parents - who live around the corner from each other - are good friends (according to Charlene); Charlene named all the parties they were going to including meeting Elton John; and they came with 16 pieces of luggage and six other travel companion/staff. What are the odds that a Bunte reporter just happened to be ther as soon as Albert and Charlene entered the lobby? Zero. Charlene has these people on speed dial. After reading this article, I am even more convinced than ever that Albert is a willing participant in his and Monaco's demise for allowing Charlene's manufactured press to convince him that marrying this woman was going to be a big boom for his country. The only person who benefited from this marriage is Charlene and her entire immediate family. The article is very long; I am only posting the paragraphs with info about Albert and Charlene. I will post the original German article in the next post.
OSCAR 2012; Series: DC begins the night of the nights ...
by Marie Waldenburg in collaboration with Simone Vollmer 1 March 2012
16 pieces of luggage? For a weekend trip - maybe a few days beyond? Please - especially given the outfits we saw her in! Well - I suppose at least 3 of them maybe contained filler for her face! But still - 16 pieces of luggage? Even if a few were his. How pretentious and ridiculous. Also, I don't recall being able to see the SKYLINE of Los Angeles from the 4th floor of The Beverly Hills Hotel. Seems to me I'd remember that. The Hotel isn't perched up high on a hill or anything. I remember seeing lots of trees and grass - and the pool - very pretty - but no skyline. Most people (Stars, Politicians, me, etc.) prefer to stay in one of the secluded, very private and fabulous bungalow's to one of the rooms or suites. But to each his own. Again - these two and their whole team are just weird and amateurish - IMO. And, the woman in the white suit - who was supposed to be accompanying them - maybe her lady in waiting ...? IMO looks very masculine to me. AdminNote: Reduced length of quoted text
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 6, 2012 5:46:12 GMT -5
LOL Charlize only has a mother left. Her mom murdered her father and Charlize was a witness to this. So which one of the parents are they friends with? The violent father or the murderous mother? and where were these friends when needed?
AdminNote: Removed quoted text
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Mar 6, 2012 7:34:27 GMT -5
She just looks stiff and out of place...
|
|
|
Post by smt on Mar 6, 2012 8:00:30 GMT -5
Thanks for that link! Here is what I found very amusing about it. ;D Charlene is just too silly. She warms the run-away-story up herself... ;D: "Princess Charlene was most entertaining. ‘I did NOT run away on the eve of my wedding!’ she exclaimed at one stage, adding with inarguable logic: ‘Why on earth would I do that? I was about to marry my prince!’Later, she made an offer few could refuse. ‘Albert and I are going to watch the rugby in a pub in the morning with Russell Crowe – want to come?’ ‘I’d love to, Your Royal Highness, but I’ll be watching Arsenal-Spurs, I’m afraid.’" I don't know what's worse .. the fact that this "royal" couple was hanging out at the bar hoping that someone like Piers Morgan would give a rat's ass about them OR the fact that Trampolina keeps perpetuating the "runaway" story. Just make it STOP!!!!
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 6, 2012 8:27:04 GMT -5
A posting from one of her flunkies on the Sugah board ... completely dillusional and written because they read our posts and the newspapers and now understand that Trampolina was a flop on the red carpet ... Funny, most of what I read here in the States, seemed to find them charming and her beautiful and elegant. In fact, she made the pages of the best dressed at the awards in several magazines, including People. Where did you dig up your news from? I would tell them I get my news from the actual publication and not some scheming made up source as they do. Why should someone prove a negative, isn't it easier for them to provide the links to all those places they claim Charlene was on the best-dressed list. I wouldn't waste my breathe trying to reason with these people - it really is The Royal Fantasies forum for the true royal fans and most of the others are Charlene's flunkies who deliberate try to mislead people from what they know the facts to be. For the true royal fans, there is nothing you can post that will make them believe the TRUTH that Albert and Charlene were NOT a big sensation in America, that were NOT covered in all the media but by a bare respectful mention in a handful of places, and Charlene was NOT mentioned on NO American publication as one of the best-dressed - NOT ONE (however there photos were published in various places as being there). The flunkies know this but they know the mentality of a sugar loonie, so all they have to do is just mention that she was and all the sugar loonies will gladly acceopt it as fact. People magazine's site always get the most traffic the day after the Oscars because of its best-dressed list. Why lie about something that is so easily verifiable. Oh wait, lying about her past and accomplishment is what Charlene is used to doing and she has NEVER been called upon her lies. If Charlene was really listed in People magazine's best dressed list (WHICH SHE IS NOT) or on any other top magazines her flunkies would be posting it all over the Internet. Charlene was mentioned in one article of well-dressed people and that was the British Telegraph - and her flunkies have been posting it everywhere. They know at the Royal Fantasy Forums the admins and mods really do not care to hear the truth so they will support their lies and shut down any further postings where people prove otherwise. Albert made the mistake of believing Charlene's manufactured press and he and his country will pay for it dearly. You can do a search of "Oscar 2012 best dressed" and you will NOT find Charlene's name on any of these American list. Here are links to some of the more popular ones. [url=http://www.peoplestylewatch.com/people/stylewatch/package/gallery/0,,20552373_20568781,00.html#21125636 ]People Magazine[/url] Brad Goreski (People magazine did an article on his selection)VogueE! OnlineE!'s Fashion Police CNN's Instyle.comLA Times Forbes
|
|
|
Post by paca on Mar 6, 2012 8:50:14 GMT -5
As always Charlene blabbed everything to her other flunkie at Bunte who also writes only glowing things about her - which Charlene promptly reminds and thanks her as she blabs some more. Summary: Albert returned that Monday after the Oscars while Charlene was going to stay and shop and vacation (what else does this woman do); Charlene had dinner with Charlize Theron as soon as she got there; Charlize parents and Charlene's parents - who live around the corner from each other - are good friends (according to Charlene); Charlene named all the parties they were going to including meeting Elton John; and they came with 16 pieces of luggage and six other travel companion/staff. What are the odds that a Bunte reporter just happened to be ther as soon as Albert and Charlene entered the lobby? Zero. Charlene has these people on speed dial. After reading this article, I am even more convinced than ever that Albert is a willing participant in his and Monaco's demise for allowing Charlene's manufactured press to convince him that marrying this woman was going to be a big boom for his country. The only person who benefited from this marriage is Charlene and her entire immediate family. The article is very long; I am only posting the paragraphs with info about Albert and Charlene. I will post the original German article in the next post.
OSCAR 2012; Series: DC begins the night of the nights ...
by Marie Waldenburg in collaboration with Simone Vollmer 1 March 2012
16 pieces of luggage? For a weekend trip - maybe a few days beyond? Please - especially given the outfits we saw her in! Well - I suppose at least 3 of them maybe contained filler for her face! But still - 16 pieces of luggage? Even if a few were his. How pretentious and ridiculous. Also, I don't recall being able to see the SKYLINE of Los Angeles from the 4th floor of The Beverly Hills Hotel. Seems to me I'd remember that. The Hotel isn't perched up high on a hill or anything. I remember seeing lots of trees and grass - and the pool - very pretty - but no skyline. Most people (Stars, Politicians, me, etc.) prefer to stay in one of the secluded, very private and fabulous bungalow's to one of the rooms or suites. But to each his own. Again - these two and their whole team are just weird and amateurish - IMO. And, the woman in the white suit - who was supposed to be accompanying them - maybe her lady in waiting ...? IMO looks very masculine to me. AdminNote: Reduced length of quoted textLOOOOL that pretty much shows that Bunte is counting on writing for readers who do not know the locations and that way they think they can get away with making things up. I have noticed on many occasions that Bunte really is making up stories. When they reported on events I had actually attended, like the dinner for volunteers at the little games, National Holiday and St Devote etc. whatever they reported seemed to be a different event entirely. Nothing in their articles on those occasions went with what I personally witnessed. Bunte and their looney tunes are really making up their own phantasy world in which trashy is their star.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Mar 6, 2012 9:03:33 GMT -5
Thanks for that link! Here is what I found very amusing about it. ;D Charlene is just too silly. She warms the run-away-story up herself... ;D: "Princess Charlene was most entertaining. ‘I did NOT run away on the eve of my wedding!’ she exclaimed at one stage, adding with inarguable logic: ‘Why on earth would I do that? I was about to marry my prince!’Later, she made an offer few could refuse. ‘Albert and I are going to watch the rugby in a pub in the morning with Russell Crowe – want to come?’ ‘I’d love to, Your Royal Highness, but I’ll be watching Arsenal-Spurs, I’m afraid.’" I don't know what's worse .. the fact that this "royal" couple was hanging out at the bar hoping that someone like Piers Morgan would give a rat's ass about them OR the fact that Trampolina keeps perpetuating the "runaway" story. Just make it STOP!!!! I was thinking the same thing. Also if one has to state "I did not run away" it's usually proof positive that she did. If it didn't happen, all she had to do is laugh and say I guess it was a slow news day and they needed something entertaining. Pretty ridiculous story, don't you think? and make Piers have to agree. A week or so before, the unflappable Chris Christy told Piers off in an interview I didn't see it but I heard he put him into a corner pretty quickly. It was apparently no contest. These two get handed a softball and can't even answer it. She is so full of herself name dropping. How embarrassing and desperate. I would like to have been a fly on the wall of Charlene and Charlize having a meal together. What on earth would they talk about? Charlize has been in control of her life from a very young age and made something of herself. Plus Charlize is intelligent and shrewd. Charlene well..... enough said.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 6, 2012 9:18:52 GMT -5
The New York Times has a fashion article about the Oscars, Tradition Reigns on the Red Carpet and they have a slide show, Red Carpet at the Oscars featuring 80 people plus ending with Sasha Cohen and his two side kicks. Albert and Charlene are not mentioned in the article (which the critic discuss some good and bad choices which are all included in the slideshow), but Charlene is included among the photos of 83 people in Red Carpet slide show in the white dress category (no one cared to find out who made her dress). How much do you want to bet the sugar loonies and Charlene's flunkies will now claim (after reading us of course) that the New York Times stated that Charlene was one of the best dressed at the Oscars? Any bets on how long it will take them to spread this lie?
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 6, 2012 9:49:43 GMT -5
You really have to be stone on crack to think that this woman made a sensation on the red carpet and People magazine and all the top American media thought so - pure stoned on crack delusional thinking. Honestly, I think the lack of judgment in the American media about Charlene's gown choice really is out of politeness because she is a princess and her husband is a head of state. For example, The New York Times actually did rate the red carpet choices - here in this interactive link called Tour the Red Carpet. You can see who the NYT chose in each of these categories - "boring", "chic," "missed the mark" and "risky" - and they actually include all the people in their slideshow - but Charlene. Why not Charlene? My guess - they are being polite because clearly she would belong in the boring or missed the mark category. But, I am sure the sugar loonies and the flunkies will not distribute this link in their propaganda "Princes Charlene is a style icon" campaign.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2012 11:55:44 GMT -5
The royals was playing clowns there. Our plastic princess made her first entry to her ad hoc film star role and her body was so transparent that we saw her bones thru her plastic skin. She was imaging as usual!!
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Mar 6, 2012 13:05:24 GMT -5
I live in LA and had watched Oscars and after parties coverage on TV. Albert and WC were only shown for a couple of minutes on the red carpet where she looked stiff and confused flashing a fake and crooked smile when directed by Albert...and once sitting in the audience where she pretended to be the Queen of England. For the next few days after the Oscars no one EVER talked about them, neither good nor bad...no one cared enough. As for the commotion they caused in the Beverly Hills Hotel during their stay, it is a pure BS and Bunte's fabrication. I have a friend who is a hairstylist in the hotel, and she is all about celebrities and who is who and she gave me a full report of who was there and the way they looked, dress, their hair...but never mentioned WC, so I had to ask her. The only think she said was that she had heard that they were in the hotel...I guess no one really talked much about them. Wonder why? As for the 16 pieces of luggage...Albert, WC and 8 people in their entourage, well that's about right number of luggage.
|
|
|
Post by smt on Mar 6, 2012 13:46:21 GMT -5
I don't know what's worse .. the fact that this "royal" couple was hanging out at the bar hoping that someone like Piers Morgan would give a rat's ass about them OR the fact that Trampolina keeps perpetuating the "runaway" story. Just make it STOP!!!! I was thinking the same thing. Also if one has to state "I did not run away" it's usually proof positive that she did. If it didn't happen, all she had to do is laugh and say I guess it was a slow news day and they needed something entertaining. Pretty ridiculous story, don't you think? and make Piers have to agree. A week or so before, the unflappable Chris Christy told Piers off in an interview I didn't see it but I heard he put him into a corner pretty quickly. It was apparently no contest. These two get handed a softball and can't even answer it. She is so full of herself name dropping. How embarrassing and desperate. I would like to have been a fly on the wall of Charlene and Charlize having a meal together. What on earth would they talk about? Charlize has been in control of her life from a very young age and made something of herself. Plus Charlize is intelligent and shrewd. Charlene well..... enough said. Yup!
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Mar 6, 2012 14:09:23 GMT -5
This is so sad and desperate. It is clear that Piers couln't care less for either one of them. So pathetic...the princely couple hopping around Hollywood and pulling on people's sleeves ("I was stopped in my tracks by Prince Albert of Monaco, standing with his new bride, Princess Charlene"...how embarrassing ) just to get noticed. Piers was supposed to be the one "running into them" and not vice versa. "Piers, great to see you again,’ he smiled, deploying words rarely used by the British Royals when they clap eyes on me." - Piers was being polite here, but in truth he wanted to say "the British Royals would NEVER approach me like that begging for my attention. "Princess Charlene was most entertaining." - read..."most ridiculous". "I did NOT run away on the eve of my wedding!’ she exclaimed at one stage, adding with inarguable logic: ‘Why on earth would I do that? I was about to marry my prince!" - this is WC's failed attempt to score an interview with Piers. He of course saw right through her and just ignored her. ;D I bet he was thinking "Who cares...you are yesterday's news, darling" "Later, she made an offer few could refuse." - but he (Piers) DID refuse! ;D "Sir Elton John appeared." - read "Sir Elton John appeared and saved me"...and that was the end of his conversation with the "princely couple"! ;D ;D ;D If the only reason Albert married WC was to bring media attention to his country, he should have thought harder. He would have brought more media attention (especially US, which he is desperately trying to) by marring Snooki. She was available and for sure would have been willing. But everything is not yet lost....Albert should claim to be Snooki's baby daddy. That would for sure put him and Monaco on the front pages. JMO ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Mar 6, 2012 17:50:48 GMT -5
This is so sad and desperate. It is clear that Piers couln't care less for either one of them. So pathetic...the princely couple hopping around Hollywood and pulling on people's sleeves ("I was stopped in my tracks by Prince Albert of Monaco, standing with his new bride, Princess Charlene"...how embarrassing ) just to get noticed. Piers was supposed to be the one "running into them" and not vice versa. "Piers, great to see you again,’ he smiled, deploying words rarely used by the British Royals when they clap eyes on me." - Piers was being polite here, but in truth he wanted to say "the British Royals would NEVER approach me like that begging for my attention. "Princess Charlene was most entertaining." - read..."most ridiculous". "I did NOT run away on the eve of my wedding!’ she exclaimed at one stage, adding with inarguable logic: ‘Why on earth would I do that? I was about to marry my prince!" - this is WC's failed attempt to score an interview with Piers. He of course saw right through her and just ignored her. ;D I bet he was thinking "Who cares...you are yesterday's news, darling" "Later, she made an offer few could refuse." - but he (Piers) DID refuse! ;D "Sir Elton John appeared." - read "Sir Elton John appeared and saved me"...and that was the end of his conversation with the "princely couple"! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D RP, I agree with everything that you wrote! After reading this article, I honestly ALMOST felt sorry for ALbert. Normally, people like Piers woulkd be sucking up to Albert for an interview, but ALbert and Charlene were clearly sucking up to Piers BIG TIME with the hopes of being on his show. They appear really desperate. Rainier and Grace would have NEVER EVER in a million years acted like these two. I felt embarrassed for them just reading the article. Please read the entire article and you will see that it was Piers who was sucking up to all the stars and begging them to do an interview for his show. Albert and Charlene are the only ones who came across as needy for attention and it was very obvious to me that Piers was glad that Elton John came and saved him. I would not be surprised to find out that Albert and Charlene have been doing this at all the parties and that they are the butt of jokes with others having to come to rescue them from these two fame-whores.
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Mar 6, 2012 18:48:23 GMT -5
You know MyAdia, I do feel sorry for Albert and even WC to a some degree. Poor babies, they don't have it easy at all. Yes, they live in a luxury (or so they want us to believe), they fly with private jets, stay in best hotels, dine in expansive restaurants, dress designer clothing....but they must pay a huge price for it, especially WC who will always be seen as an outsider and someone that was basically hired to do PR for Monaco. I remember an interview with Sarah Ferguson not long ago where she described life in the Palace like a pure hell. She couldn't even decide when to put the heat inside her quarters on or take something to eat when hungry. Lets not talk about privacy or freedom to go somewhere without clearance from the Palace. I can almost feel WC's frustration for not succeeding in her role of a new Princess and failing to be the new attraction (positive one) for Monaco. Her job is to perform and to travel around the world (with and without her husband) and promote Monaco. It must feel terrible to put so much effort and hopes, fly around the globe fake and smile to people you have nothing in common with, just to find out that no one cares about you or your husband and that you are the one who needs to kiss other people ass (or in the best case scenario where kissing of butts is mutual like the one she is going to give and get in Australia ) Unfortunately in the USA she and her husband were the only ones kissing butts. ;D As I said before, it is not going to be easy for them...it is clear that what they do right now is not something they would have chosen to do otherwise, THEY HAVE TO DO IT! This is a pure solicitation...The people/celebrities that used to bring fame and glamor to Monaco are dying off. Grace has been dead for a long time, as well as her famous friends. People who still remember her and the glory of Monaco during her days are dying off as well. It is on Albert and WC to bring the new life and new "famous and glamorous friends" to Monaco. This is what is all this trotting around the world and ass kissing about. They need to cultivate and produce "new famous friends", celebrities which they will invite to Monaco and who will hopefully return the favor and come to one of their Balls. I bet that is their job and agenda for the next couple of years before they "start family", if that was ever part of the plan and business deal between WC and the Palace. WC can play Princess as much as she wants or even act happy and trow parties for her "Olympian friends" (so they would keep kissing her butt), or have Akris (vomit) to make dress specially for her...but at the end of the day her eyes will stay empty because she knows that everything is just a business deal...the very well paid one but the one that leaves you with a bitter taste in your mouth. JMO
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Mar 6, 2012 20:27:00 GMT -5
LOL Charlize only has a mother left. Her mom murdered her father and Charlize was a witness to this. So which one of the parents are they friends with? The violent father or the murderous mother? and where were these friends when needed? AdminNote: Removed quoted text ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Love it!
|
|
|
Post by dolcevita on Mar 6, 2012 21:56:27 GMT -5
OMG, well hi there, "Princess Common"-- what royal tells other people about the number of luggage pieces, or the floor of their hotel, or names drops Hollywood celebrities? Umm, Will and Kate went to Hollywood, but didn't project this type of common image, like they were some boring couple from Wisconsin who won a tv contest to the Oscars! That's exactly what these two idiots looked and sounded like! If you want to name drop, then make it some brilliant economist, scientist or doctor!! Geez... how clueless can you be?? Oh wait, nevermind.... just answered my own question.
|
|