|
Post by paca on Jun 21, 2021 23:58:06 GMT -5
apparently, harry was angry over losing his military titles, which made him sign with Oprah. I think there is a lot of childish temper tantrums going on with Harry and his decision making. I am surprised that he was ever allowed to hold a gun. To be honest with a temper like his, I don't think he was a good soldier and had he not been QE2s grandson, he wouldn't have had a military career. One day people will dare to speak up. He seems to lack discipline and self control. But those are essential for a soldier. What if he had a tantrum in Afghanistan? he would have put peoples life at risk, maybe killed innocent civilians? Personally I never got why anyone would send a damaged person with a gun into a war zone. He had PTSD before he left and came back even worse. I wonder if those discussions about sending him to war had to do with this issue rather then the published one. Anyways if they got miffed about Archie not becoming a Prince they should have read the british press. They have been printing for years that Charles wanted a smaller BRF. So where does this obsession with titles come from? They don't want to be part of the BRF but keep the titles? For what other purpose then to monetise them? They don't seem to have much faith in their children having talents of their own to make it in the world. Just because they don't have any real talents to monetise, doesn't mean their children don't have any.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jun 22, 2021 7:49:44 GMT -5
Well he's not considered to be reliable much. This article talks about Oprah's girlfriend blabbing on morning TV. It talks about the bullying. Ultimately there's a rage for paradoxic validation with this duo. Like Trump, actually. People are not waiting for achievement first, they want adulation right away. And they go about it by burning people. At some point, they're bound to self-combust when no one wants anything to do with them. They're not that "hot" to begin with. For example, the wife says palace staff were not up to the job of working for her... when did I miss that she was some accomplished CEO anywhere?!? When has she shepherded anyone?! When was she elected to any office?? Even the UN wouldn't make her a goodwill ambassador. They can sniff a poser. The wife simply doesn't get it. And she reverted to mean girling a staffer. She proved right there and again her inadequacy at being in charge of people. Stop blaming others. www.thedailybeast.com/senior-royals-now-stay-silent-believing-anything-they-say-to-harry-will-leak-to-oprah-and-the-mediaapparently, harry was angry over losing his military titles, which made him sign with Oprah. I think there is a lot of childish temper tantrums going on with Harry and his decision making. I am surprised that he was ever allowed to hold a gun. To be honest with a temper like his, I don't think he was a good soldier and had he not been QE2s grandson, he wouldn't have had a military career. One day people will dare to speak up. He seems to lack discipline and self control. But those are essential for a soldier. What if he had a tantrum in Afghanistan? he would have put peoples life at risk, maybe killed innocent civilians? Personally I never got why anyone would send a damaged person with a gun into a war zone. He had PTSD before he left and came back even worse. I wonder if those discussions about sending him to war had to do with this issue rather then the published one. Anyways if they got miffed about Archie not becoming a Prince they should have read the british press. They have been printing for years that Charles wanted a smaller BRF. So where does this obsession with titles come from? They don't want to be part of the BRF but keep the titles? For what other purpose then to monetise them? They don't seem to have much faith in their children having talents of their own to make it in the world. Just because they don't have any real talents to monetise, doesn't mean their children don't have any.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 22, 2021 10:32:25 GMT -5
I said it before, it is rather funny how Meg loathes Trump, but behaves just like him. And neither has talent. Trump owes his money to his dad and Meg to Harrys family. On her own she never would have made it. Walking up and down an isle whilst talking and making google eyes at somemale actor, is not acting. Her acting looks like her lessons came from watching daily soaps. So does her real life performance. Todays headlines seem like she really is pushing it. I thought she was taking maternity leave. And yet everyday she is in the news. Those titles need to go. fast. Her fury with the UN is, that basically they told her she wasn't big or talented enough to be an ambassador. Emma Watson is a big name, way bigger then Meg was with her tiny little show. Emma was and is an A-lister and hence got to be ambassador, Meg was a z lister and got the lesser title. Had nothing to with her or what she did, just the system in place. A listers like Jolie want a bigger title because they have more publicity. Personally I think it is not working for the causes. It only works for the celebs. Clooney is a mediocre actor, but got more serious roles, once he found a cause. Anyone still care for Darfour? Neither does Clooney, or when did he last mention it? Jolie was a good actress, but without her antics and her UN stints she would not have been that big for so long. Too bad for her that she has not enough talent to make people forget all that rubbish. Meg didn't understand the UN and actors system and she never understood the BRF. See how many friends she will have left, when the titles are gone and the BRF publish the truth about her mobbing and people realise that her truth is a euphemism for lying. Her alternative facts.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 22, 2021 12:27:05 GMT -5
their advisers are clearly out of their depth with the BRF. buying the domain names before talking to qe2 makes their real motives clear and I believe that the queen will be briefed on this. I think Harry will have much to explain and should really be worried about that lunch. I also don't think it will be an alone lunch after all his blabbing. I believe that no family member will speak to him without a witness or recording the conversation. Apparently journalists know their PR people well, calling them bullies (funny that a self proclaimed victim of bullying would hire someone who does just that, especially when you want to put out an anti bullying message) I find it interesting that a week before the birth, they were set on lili rather than lilibet. Seems to me that lilibet was an after thought of their PR people to tie them to the queen and further their brand, not a tribute to qe2. I wonder if she would make him publicly apologize for his false claims. After all the drama he created he should. He should also need to sign rules about how to use the titles. And IMO those papers should be made public. Even if he doesn't get tax money the titles are a matter of state and the public should be informed about it.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jun 22, 2021 12:38:16 GMT -5
I was thinking the other day about Amal Clooney who was making headlines next to their nonsense, for winning a case against an ISIS bride who organized the rape of Yazidi girls, and how merit and substance should be directed to the deserving instead of tyrannically insecure people. I was looking at Jamel Debbouze on his Bday and how love has transformed him into a prince and now a king. I was even recalling while watching Lethal Weapon last night while jetlagged, that the premise was SA apartheid (now overshadowed by later Gibson antics). However, without pop culture, SA would not have changed as quickly. I digress. Harry needs to do a 180Β°. The Lilibet thing is beyond a total jerk move.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 22, 2021 15:31:00 GMT -5
Has SA really changed? a few black people have risen to fame and fortune, but the majority still lives in poverty and has no chance to get out, whereas the majority of wealth is still held by white people, who even receive lenient sentences when they kill. Nelson Mandela sold his people out for the financial benefit of his clan, of whom many are actual criminals. I don't get anyones obsession with that man. He had his ex wife execute hits on people. He only distanced himself from Winnie, when it came back to him and people started asking questions. Not pop culture changed SA, sanctions and a changing global society forced their hand. SA had no allies in its politics left, so no choice. The question was just how and how to sell it. They didn't want (white) blood spill. Countries don't change that quickly. Germany is still divided even without a wall. As to Amal Clooney, she may be taking up worthy cases now, but she also defended Gaddafis son and other not so worthy clients. Her do gooding started, after she was financially secure by marriage. I don't believe in lifting people on shields, that aren't made for them. The clooneys are just as much about money and brand as Harry and Meg. And sorry to say it, but Clooney at his age is not funny behaving like he did in his 30s. He doesn't seem to fit in anymore. He needs to accept his age. He should enjoy his kids while he still can. Given his history of drink, I give him another 5 years to dementia. See if Amal cares to care. Also I wonder how she did any proper work on the case. Language in court is German, she doesn't speak it. Apparently she was one of 3 lawyers, working for one victim. I might be wrong, but my guess is, that she provided money and picked the case, the work was done by others. She flew by from Italy to bask in the positive PR. 6,5 years is not a tough sentence for the crimes committed. A girl died. That deserves a double digit sentence. She will be out in 3 years, the victims suffer indefinitly. But Amal got her headline and wear her designer wardrobe. Sorry for being a cynic, but I am sick of people using the misery of others to make themselves look good. Also note that her client did not thank Amal, but the state prosecutor. Officially they brought in the case and tried it, not Amal.
anyways yes harry needs to change, but he won't do it until Meg shows him who she really is. And she is not ready to do that yet. Besides, that wouldn't be change, just adapting to changed circumstances. Their divorce will put the battle of the roses to shame.Think Angelina is nasty in her custody battle? Wait until you see what Meghan will do. As much as she gushes about Harrys father qualities, the more she will trash him later. Just look at Brangelina and her gushing about how supportive he always was...somehow no one ever asks when that changed or has it always been a lie?
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jun 23, 2021 8:38:02 GMT -5
It's the greedy, I think, who don't change. Economic interests are the oppressors, the subverters who turn black against black too. Then whites fear blacks but because of their loaded conscience. Western imperialism has come in many waves from Roman, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish, French, Austro-Hungarian, British, Zionist, American or Boer in this case, with their colonial managers worse among them. Rule of thumb is: you treat someone fairly and that defuses a lot of antagonism. You learn to share. Then when you run into a cupid black person, you neither should be shocked because that's colour-blind. Also, trying to control outcomes is something that influences the notion of compartmentalizing people by colour. It's that constant quest for an advantage over the Other. Ultimately, you have to have honesty - honesty about your motives and honesty about how you want to live with your conscience. Self-awareness and self-editing by way of chosing what you want to be responsible for, as well as withdrawing from situations you DON'T want to be responsible for - are key. And when some express their finite disgust at a given situation such as apartheid, you give them room. It's not because your reality is different that you can't honour their process. Having said this, those who usurp or troll the battles of the truly challenged, to fraudulently garner sympathy, deserve a verbal smackdown as is the case of this pair. Has SA really changed? a few black people have risen to fame and fortune, but the majority still lives in poverty and has no chance to get out, whereas the majority of wealth is still held by white people, who even receive lenient sentences when they kill. Nelson Mandela sold his people out for the financial benefit of his clan, of whom many are actual criminals. I don't get anyones obsession with that man. He had his ex wife execute hits on people. He only distanced himself from Winnie, when it came back to him and people started asking questions. Not pop culture changed SA, sanctions and a changing global society forced their hand. SA had no allies in its politics left, so no choice. The question was just how and how to sell it. They didn't want (white) blood spill. Countries don't change that quickly. Germany is still divided even without a wall. As to Amal Clooney, she may be taking up worthy cases now, but she also defended Gaddafis son and other not so worthy clients. Her do gooding started, after she was financially secure by marriage. I don't believe in lifting people on shields, that aren't made for them. The clooneys are just as much about money and brand as Harry and Meg. And sorry to say it, but Clooney at his age is not funny behaving like he did in his 30s. He doesn't seem to fit in anymore. He needs to accept his age. He should enjoy his kids while he still can. Given his history of drink, I give him another 5 years to dementia. See if Amal cares to care. Also I wonder how she did any proper work on the case. Language in court is German, she doesn't speak it. Apparently she was one of 3 lawyers, working for one victim. I might be wrong, but my guess is, that she provided money and picked the case, the work was done by others. She flew by from Italy to bask in the positive PR. 6,5 years is not a tough sentence for the crimes committed. A girl died. That deserves a double digit sentence. She will be out in 3 years, the victims suffer indefinitly. But Amal got her headline and wear her designer wardrobe. Sorry for being a cynic, but I am sick of people using the misery of others to make themselves look good. Also note that her client did not thank Amal, but the state prosecutor. Officially they brought in the case and tried it, not Amal. anyways yes harry needs to change, but he won't do it until Meg shows him who she really is. And she is not ready to do that yet. Besides, that wouldn't be change, just adapting to changed circumstances. Their divorce will put the battle of the roses to shame.Think Angelina is nasty in her custody battle? Wait until you see what Meghan will do. As much as she gushes about Harrys father qualities, the more she will trash him later. Just look at Brangelina and her gushing about how supportive he always was...somehow no one ever asks when that changed or has it always been a lie?
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 24, 2021 15:28:04 GMT -5
I guess that given the circus around Dumbarton, the queen doesn't have much of a choice in taking the title of them. Harry should know that there is always a scottish and an Irish title in edition to the English title. No idea why no welsh title, but maybe that is due to them being Wales. This whole public we don't care about titles, but then going balistic when they get taken away is ludicrous. I think the british public has had it with them and the queen needs to listen to her people. Obviously it has to be communicated properly and the sussexes words should be used against them. It has to be made clear that they are and will be family, but that is all their claim to the BRF. The do not represent the queen or her opinions, they have nothing to do with the institution and will never set a foot on a balcony or be invited to an official event. I am almost certain that she has already adjusted her funeral plans with regards to andrew and harry. She won't allow anyone to seek an advantage on such an event. She sees through those manoeuvers. But hopefully she will be sticking around a few more years.
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jun 25, 2021 13:07:13 GMT -5
True that because they have ceased to reflect the British, there should be a line drawn. Also, people have been pointing out that in French the word "Sussex" is enough to get them teased... π€ It's a whole new level of inaneness to protest the name Dumbarton. So low to have found a way to be doubly insulting and undeserving. I guess that given the circus around Dumbarton, the queen doesn't have much of a choice in taking the title of them. Harry should know that there is always a scottish and an Irish title in edition to the English title. No idea why no welsh title, but maybe that is due to them being Wales. This whole public we don't care about titles, but then going balistic when they get taken away is ludicrous. I think the british public has had it with them and the queen needs to listen to her people. Obviously it has to be communicated properly and the sussexes words should be used against them. It has to be made clear that they are and will be family, but that is all their claim to the BRF. The do not represent the queen or her opinions, they have nothing to do with the institution and will never set a foot on a balcony or be invited to an official event. I am almost certain that she has already adjusted her funeral plans with regards to andrew and harry. She won't allow anyone to seek an advantage on such an event. She sees through those manoeuvers. But hopefully she will be sticking around a few more years.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 25, 2021 13:55:59 GMT -5
I am sure the queen spoke to them about the titles, so if they were concerned, why not say it straight away. She could have proposed another or just gave them 2 instead of 3. And if children want to tease, they will find a way. Should Archie come to Germany, he might find his name to be pronounced Arschie... I suppose translation isn't needed. The only dumb here are the 2some. They are stumbling from one "fettnΓ€pfchen" to the next and rolling in them....
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jun 25, 2021 22:37:31 GMT -5
This is fascinating. Around the 5:30 mark, it shows that Beatrice and Edo had come up with names for their child and it was published that they were thinking Lily in honour of Lilibet, for a girl. Then in typical style, it was ripped off by the unimaginative duo.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 26, 2021 3:56:17 GMT -5
Of course she would steal the name. Wonder why the yorks remain friends with her. She always tries to steal their thunder. With those kid pics of her out there, I get the feeling that she had some surgery too. Not all changes cab be explained with age...
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jun 26, 2021 7:01:38 GMT -5
I've been trying to find the phrase that describes this type of negative mirroring whereby people mimic so closely the lives of others to the point of parallel dimensioning them and derailing their lives. It's black arts-ish. Like taking George's secret codename and appropriating it. Like stealing Beatrice's child's name. And so many times Harry's wife has stolen the narrative of others, like CC's passport story (or H"az", H"azza" and poetry, children book storytelling, etc). It's SO creepy. It's very witchy. Of course she would steal the name. Wonder why the yorks remain friends with her. She always tries to steal their thunder. With those kid pics of her out there, I get the feeling that she had some surgery too. Not all changes cab be explained with age...
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jun 26, 2021 7:44:03 GMT -5
Don't forget that Harry, like Albert, is obsessed with his dead mother. She is playing to that obsession too. Btw I have a cat who recently started to pretend to be the other cat in the house. For years she wouldn't dare to sit in a specific spot that has been exclusively used by the other cat. All cats respected that spot to be hers and hers alone. Now suddenly I keep finding her occupying it too. The other cat took it generously and made now fuss. She never does. Just moved somewhere else. Now she has found herself a completely new spot, that neither of them ever used. Next time I looked, guess who was sitting in her new spot, looking innocent?... They seem to be taking turns now, but it is interesting change of behaviour. Especially since the little one dislikes the other. But she does love to get all the cuddles for herself. She is very jealous of others getting cuddled. Even humans. She would literally try and sandwich herself between me and the kids. Maybe she needs to be renamed Meghan? Interestingly the other cat maintained her behaviour. No fighting, just taking her spot back when opportunity occured. Taking turns and being her placid self.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 2, 2021 14:48:23 GMT -5
not really liking that statue of Diana. The kids look too adult IMO and the patina is unflattering. Diana exuded warmth when with children, the statue is cold. It looks to me a bit like sth from a 3 D printer. There is no life in it. I guess it was a safe bet. You can tell that he makes coins. They are not supposed to transport emotion or attract emotion. But as a tribute to Diana I think it would have needed emotion. The woman was emotion and she was modern. I think trousers would have transported that part of her better than a skirt. She wore both, but a skirt is traditional and she was the one to break tradition, therefore trousers would have been a better choice. Or if not for her, let the girl wear trousers. Get away from those stereotypes. Diana would have been all for it. I am sure she would have been very supportive of the LGBT community, especially if you consider her choice of friends. She was acceptant and accepted there. A huge part of her work was about reaching out to those on the fringe of society, the homeless, the aids sufferers.... why not reflect that? This statue is a bit like hospital food. Palatable, nourishing, but bland and leaves you hungry for good food.
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 15, 2021 8:22:42 GMT -5
She really can't get over herself. Does she really think that she is that special? IMO this is ultimate proof of her narcissism and her lack of knowledge what children really want. What a load of tosh. And btw comparing her childhood and adult pics side by side, I do believe that she did have some surgery before she made it on screen. Not major, but some. It's not just age that made those changes to her face. She definetely had her teeth fixed and I don't just mean her over bleaching. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9791469/Meghan-Markle-named-new-Netflix-herself.html
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jul 15, 2021 14:26:40 GMT -5
You can really tell the substance of people by gauging how thinly their efforts are veiled... A suitcase-carrying picture of her where the boob and the cup don't meet is a teeny giveaway as to (bad) work she's had done. If Melania Trump was a budget Ursula Andress, I've yet to come up with a fitting subcategory here. She's like the child in a grownup woman's heels. That's what keeps coming back to mind. Still developing but really eager for womanhood. She really can't get over herself. Does she really think that she is that special? IMO this is ultimate proof of her narcissism and her lack of knowledge what children really want. What a load of tosh. And btw comparing her childhood and adult pics side by side, I do believe that she did have some surgery before she made it on screen. Not major, but some. It's not just age that made those changes to her face. She definetely had her teeth fixed and I don't just mean her over bleaching. www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9791469/Meghan-Markle-named-new-Netflix-herself.html
|
|
|
Post by paca on Jul 17, 2021 7:16:59 GMT -5
So, after some of her family has died without meeting the kids or Harry, they have had diapers donated to homeless people. Sorry, but where does their donation come in? It is the people who pay them a fortune who are doing the donating (tax deductible of course) and they are slapping their names on it to boost company image. Obviously archie and lili get free nappies... Oh, and those retired royals still demand a royal christening in front of the queen in the traditional gown. They are gracious enough to be willing to wait until circumstances allow..... Twats. those titles need to go. soon. And MEgs friends should not be allowed to benefit of the connection, given that they do lack respect...
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jul 18, 2021 5:40:45 GMT -5
I shook my head at that one, the Windsor christening and the dictating. Too funny. Then again S&S are trying to make them out to be more all the time, so the translation of that would probably read very differently. Apparently, QE2 met Harry with a bunch of lawyers and for one thing, if it happens in Windsor, it's unlikely she'll be christened Lilibet and that those websites will go online. It's part of getting them back under the fold, in a "keep your friends close but your enemies closer" effort, or something. I think they're missing the point. Why not use one of Britain's unspoken weapon: a haunted castle! to lodge them and drive them nuts right back π or use one of those acoustic thingies and play back the sound of her own voice ALL the time until she's cured. Come on, put some trickster back into it. Actually, Lady C made a point. Two can play at their game of Sussex Squadding, i.e. sending in tons of complaints to cancel stuff, like barring Priyanka Chopra from the Wimbledon royal box. Or petitioning parliament. Exercise democracy π So, after some of her family has died without meeting the kids or Harry, they have had diapers donated to homeless people. Sorry, but where does their donation come in? It is the people who pay them a fortune who are doing the donating (tax deductible of course) and they are slapping their names on it to boost company image. Obviously archie and lili get free nappies... Oh, and those retired royals still demand a royal christening in front of the queen in the traditional gown. They are gracious enough to be willing to wait until circumstances allow..... Twats. those titles need to go. soon. And MEgs friends should not be allowed to benefit of the connection, given that they do lack respect...
|
|
|
Post by agentf on Jul 20, 2021 8:04:14 GMT -5
πππππππππ
The worst kept secret is out - the revenge tell-all. Yawn. The journey from man he was to man he's become... in what? 2 years? I'm surprised that ghost-writers or publishing houses are staking professional integrity on a couple whose last TV interview claims were easily disproved. A royal aide needs a book deal too, then.
In any event, I found that "scandalous" claims of a love child recently were actually a positive, that it showed the tragic beginning of a true love affair as well as a great personal sacrifice and a clandestine attachment to the child - all things that really humanize more than they shame.
Secondly, any succession is not in jeopardy from such events as they are off the official record, if you will, and they don't preclude relationships. If Charles loses Harry by Harry's actions, you would want him to gain more children. Ones that had to do without for the sake of ungrateful children like Harry.
|
|