|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 20, 2011 16:30:16 GMT -5
Here's the video. www.france5.fr/c-dans-l-air/index-fr.php?page=resume&id_rubrique=1763Maître Lacoste says that there is no truth in rumors about Charlene trying to go back in SA as the french magazine l'Express wrote. a and C are in love, we can see it. Charlene was cowed because of cameras. During CIO meetings there are always no families so they were in different hotels. Thanks so much Lilae for the video and information about the guest! I am so glad that L'Express editor was there to again reiterate that their sources are sound - and show again what a liar Albert's attorney is. So, the worst ever attorney has laid out Albert and Charlene's strategy - they are happily in love and anyone who thinks differently is blind - this is what I predicted that they would do. this is going to be great because eventually as more truth comes out - this strategy will make Albert and Monaco even more of a laughing stock.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 20, 2011 16:32:16 GMT -5
Here's the video. www.france5.fr/c-dans-l-air/index-fr.php?page=resume&id_rubrique=1763Maître Lacoste says that there is no truth in rumors about Charlene trying to go back in SA as the french magazine l'Express wrote. a and C are in love, we can see it. Charlene was cowed because of cameras. During CIO meetings there are always no families so they were in different hotels. Thanks so much Lilae for the video and information about the guest! I am so glad that L'Express editor was there to again reiterate that their sources are sound - and show again what a liar Albert's attorney is. So, the worst ever attorney has laid out Albert and Charlene's strategy - they are happily in love and anyone who thinks differently is blind - this is what I predicted that they would do. this is going to be great because eventually as more truth comes out - this strategy will make Albert and Monaco even more of a laughing stock. I'm waiting for LaCoste to sue these news agencies so they can prove they are right and then sue LaCoste and Albert for every dime they own. JMO
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 20, 2011 16:39:13 GMT -5
Les Grimaldi seraient-ils victimes d’une malédiction amoureuse ?the grimaldis are not the victims of a curse when it comes to love! they're victims of their own stupid decisions when they choose their partners. LOL Yep! You said it!
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 20, 2011 21:17:34 GMT -5
regarding the guest list! i think whoever posted that is a lying sack of shit! you can check demi moore's twitter account "mrskutcher" and she's posting about being home and watching stuff on tv that saturday of the circus event! Maybe they were invited but seems she was at home! I wonder how many ended up not showing.
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 20, 2011 21:21:50 GMT -5
LOL Oh that is good ! They are inflating the guest list! Good find!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 20, 2011 21:50:47 GMT -5
i can't see the video....hmmm
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 20, 2011 21:57:24 GMT -5
LOL Oh that is good ! They are inflating the guest list! Good find! axelle -- take a look, would you, make sure i'm not seeing things?
|
|
|
Post by haakon on Jul 20, 2011 23:04:45 GMT -5
I can't see the video either, MrPlowfan. I'm on a mac, are you? I was hoping it would be on TV 5 Monde, but it isn't listed, at least in Chicago.
Pierre is listed twice on the guest list, once under family and again under 'celebrities and other' with Beatrice.
|
|
|
Post by creativemind on Jul 20, 2011 23:14:47 GMT -5
i noticed that too about pierre. weird? trying to "up" the number of attendees? strange, but, oh well.
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 21, 2011 0:29:29 GMT -5
I can't see the video either, MrPlowfan. I'm on a mac, are you? I was hoping it would be on TV 5 Monde, but it isn't listed, at least in Chicago. Pierre is listed twice on the guest list, once under family and again under 'celebrities and other' with Beatrice. Yes, also a Mac and I tried Firefox, too.
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 21, 2011 1:22:00 GMT -5
You need flash player...
|
|
|
Post by margarita on Jul 21, 2011 7:21:53 GMT -5
Just checked the german tabloids at the grocery store: NEUE WOCHE has a big TITLE comparing Charlene and Kate: She will never be as happy as Kate. The article mentions all the rumors and -considering the reported contract according to which Charlene can only get divorced after producing an heir- stated, that the word "birthing machine" comes into ones mind. They compare the couple to Will&Kate who seem genuinely in love. Another tabloid DIE WOCHE (or similiar) has a little title: Charlene: did her mother push her into that marriage. The article reports about Charlenes sad eyes and stiff face at her wedding while her mother was proud and all smiles, speculating that her mother didn't want her to leave Albert because of the money. (It is starting - the speculations: "married Albert only for money?" ;D) A third tabloid (I don't remember the title) has a little title "What more Albert has to commit?" with a big article about the son of Bea Fidler who WAS IN MONACO IN JUNE. They have pics with him in Monaco in front of the Palace and he even was in the Palace to write his best wishes in the book with gratulations for the wedding He claims to be a son of Albert and that a paternity test was done many years ago under ridicolous circumstances - he now demands a real legal test. And -last but not least- one tabloid (I forgot the name but can check it tomorrow) titles: Albert and Charlene: already going seperate ways?As we predicted: 1) the will compare Kate & Charlene. Charlene can only loose. 2) They media will have the "happy Princess (Kate)" versus "the tragic Princess (Charlene)" - she won't get out of this. NIX capital of romance... 3) They don't get rid of the run-away-bride-story and the mysterious contract. If she gets pregnant she will be compared with a birth machine and people will always wonder, if she gave birth to a child to get out of Monaco. It is totally catch 22. The best was to keep VERY quit for a couple of month weeks - not get pregnant and then separate saying that the pressure for the freedom loving Charlene was too much.
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 21, 2011 7:51:34 GMT -5
LOL Oh that is good ! They are inflating the guest list! Good find! axelle -- take a look, would you, make sure i'm not seeing things? You are right on! Good work on the above findings too in the press. Is the great palace PR machine still there?
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jul 21, 2011 8:17:15 GMT -5
(It is starting - the speculations: "married Albert only for money?" WELL DUH, why would anybody marry porcine FatAl, he's a fool and an egotist.....no way to work around that kind of stupid. did anybody see wendi defend rupurt when the guy went with him with the pie betcha $50 trashlene wouldn't do that JMO
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 21, 2011 10:14:40 GMT -5
(It is starting - the speculations: "married Albert only for money?" WELL DUH, why would anybody marry porcine FatAl, he's a fool and an egotist.....no way to work around that kind of stupid. did anybody see wendi defend rupurt when the guy went with him with the pie betcha $50 trashlene wouldn't do that JMO I saw it. Pretty impressive. She moved faster than his people did. I thought she married him for the money, but after seeing that, I've changed my mind (well, a little bit anyway). She actually nailed the guy in the face! Charlene would just sit there and smile vacantly. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by khillaree on Jul 21, 2011 11:14:51 GMT -5
www.france5.fr/c-dans-l-air/index-fr.php?page=resume&id_rubrique=1763&date=2011-07-20Malgré les démentis et apparitions du couple princier, les rumeurs courent toujours sur cette union scellée au début du mois. Après un voyage de noces qui n’aura pas convaincu les plus suspicieux, le prince Albert et sa jeune épouse Charlène sont de retour sur le Rocher. Les Grimaldi seraient-ils victimes d’une malédiction amoureuse ? La vie sentimentale de la famille régnante en principauté de Monaco est depuis toujours l’objet de l’attention de la presse people. Déjà en son temps, le prince Rainier III avait été un célibataire endurci aux multiples conquêtes avant son "mariage du siècle" avec l’actrice hollywoodienne Grace Kelly. Un chemin que son fils, le prince Albert II a longtemps suivi, au grand désespoir de ses sujets. Et si, tout comme ses sœurs, on lui connaît quelques aventures, il n’avait jusque-là jamais officialisé, à l’inverse d’elles. Son aînée, Caroline, après avoir fait annuler son mariage avec un play-boy, devient la veuve d’un industriel italien, dont elle a eu trois enfants, puis mère d’une fille avec le prince allemand Ernst-August de Hanovre, dont elle se sépare au bout de dix ans de mariage. Quant à sa cadette, Stéphanie, un temps chanteuse à succès puis styliste, elle aussi mère - de trois enfants -, après avoir défrayé la chronique au bras de différents petits amis, elle divorce de son ex-garde du corps suite à un scandale, devient la compagne d’un gendarme puis l’épouse, durant un an, d’un acrobate portugais. Et si pendant longtemps, la vie amoureuse du prince monégasque reste voilée du sceau du secret, il fait une reconnaissance en paternité pour deux enfants naturels : l’une Californienne née en 1992, l’autre né en 2003 d’une hôtesse de l’air française d’origine togolaise. En 2010, il annonce enfin ses fiançailles avec l’ancienne nageuse sud-africaine Charlène Wittstock, qu’il fréquente depuis 2006. Invités : Christophe Barbier Directeur de la rédaction et chef du service Politique de L’Express. www.france5.fr/c-dans-l-air/IMG/arton72.jpgColombe Pringle www.france5.fr/c-dans-l-air/IMG/arton3220.jpgDirectrice de la rédaction de l’hebdomadaire Point de vue. Pierre Abramovici www.france5.fr/c-dans-l-air/IMG/arton5891.jpgJournaliste et historien And... Maître Lacoste. suite du texte: Et si pendant longtemps, la vie amoureuse du prince monégasque reste voilée du sceau du secret, il fait une reconnaissance en paternité pour deux enfants naturels : l’une Californienne née en 1992, l’autre né en 2003 d’une hôtesse de l’air française d’origine togolaise. En 2010, il annonce enfin ses fiançailles avec l’ancienne nageuse sud-africaine Charlène Wittstock, qu’il fréquente depuis 2006. Et le 1er juillet 2011 a lieu le mariage. Une union en grands pompes, en présence des Monégasques et de nombreux chefs d’Etat, notamment Nicolas Sarkozy, mais que ne fait pas taire la rumeur qui circule depuis quelques jours. Des bruits sur de possibles infidélités du prince qui, selon certaines sources, auraient fait envisager à la future mariée de prendre la fuite quelques jours avant la cérémonie. Relayée par la presse et démentie par le Palais, cette supposée mésentente dans le couple serait étayée par le peu d’entrain à montrer leur affection en public et par une phrase prononcée par le jeune marié lors de son discours au dîner de gala : "Charlène, merci de supporter mon emploi du temps très serré, mes absences parfois, mes inconstances et mes particularités"."mes absences parfois" with other women? "mes inconstances" = "infidélities" "mes particularités" = " And July 1st, 2011 takes place the marriage. An union in big pump, in the presence of the Monegasques and of the numerous heads of state, in particular Nicolas Sarkozy, but whom does not silence the rumour which circulates since a few days. Rumours on possible infidelities of the prince which, according to certain sources, would have made envisage to the future bride to flee a few days before the ceremony. Relieved by the press and denied(contradicted) by the Palace, this supposed disagreement in the couple would be supported by little of spirit to show their affection in public and by a sentence pronounced by the bridegroom during its speech in the gala dinner: [ b ] " Charlène, thank you for supporting my very tight timetable, my absences sometimes, my inconstancies and my peculiarities ". [/b] " My absences sometimes " with other women? " My inconstancies " = " infidelities " " my peculiarities " = " that he loves men " ohhh my god,The magazine the closer appealed to a deaf woman to read on lips during the marriage. Stéphanie asks her sister: they are obliged to wear the alliance(wedding ring)? someone has this closer ?
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 21, 2011 12:35:19 GMT -5
Holy crap! Eringer just posted an excerpt from a magazine called Taki's Magazine (what ever that is?) go read is all I can say. It's on his regular blog not his Q & A. OMG!!!
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 21, 2011 12:35:38 GMT -5
Taki Theodoracopulos - a close friend of the Greek and Spanish royal family (and gossip columnist) has posted a scathing report on the wedding/Albert. Eringer is also reporting it, of course. ;D takimag.com/article/inappropriate_touching_among_the_untouchables INAPPROPRIATE TOUCHING AMONG THE UNTOUCHABLES
We all know that the rich and powerful are seldom held accountable. Take, for example, the recent case of Albert II, the Prince of Monaco, and his new wife, Charlene Wittstock. Rumors that Charlene was first kidnapped, drugged, and then forced to abide by the agreement she had signed with the Principality of Monaco—or else—went almost entirely unnoticed by the media once the runaway bride had been brought back to the palace and was allegedly sedated heavily. Her father was also reportedly held hostage and threatened unless he played ball and helped palace courtiers convince Charlene to stay put.
I have known the Monegasque royal family for more than thirty years. Some of my closest friends are just as close with Monaco’s ruling family, and unpleasant details have a tendency to slip out.
From what I’ve been told, Albert is into rough sex with both men and women.
Charlene is not, and the two have not been intimate in months. I’m told the deal is that she will one day produce an heir, and with a very generous allowance she will be allowed to return to South Africa away from the sweaty hell that is Monte Carlo. Money has allegedly already been paid upfront. The lack of intimacy between Albert and Charlene is neither here nor there.
Albert is said to have already fathered two and perhaps as many as four children—all of them after a night of rough sex with multiple people of both sexes present.
For Charlene to become pregnant will not raise eyebrows even among those in the know.
If what I’ve been told is true, what baffles me is how Monaco got away with it.
Doping a bride and having her walk down the aisle in the movies is easy. But in real life? And for three days? How do you take one’s passport away on the whim of the ruler of a musical operetta state? Think of the amounts of moolah that may have changed hands. Buying someone’s silence is very expensive, especially in the grimy world of the place that Somerset Maugham described as “a sunny place for shady people."
|
|
|
Post by dolcevita on Jul 21, 2011 12:40:03 GMT -5
Oh wow... well, it seems Taki isn't the least bit afraid of being sued or threatened...hmmm....
|
|
|
Post by mrplowfan on Jul 21, 2011 12:41:57 GMT -5
Taki is pretty wealthy and very high up in social circles. I'm sure they'll sue. Albert has no choice after that one.
|
|