|
Post by taz on Jul 22, 2011 11:45:59 GMT -5
Kate is IMO a well programmed robot, I don´t see anything special on her. But the BRF likes this I guess. I agree, Refia. She just looks better than Trashlene but she didn't do much in her life neither other than waiting for William to propose.
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 22, 2011 11:49:08 GMT -5
^That's true. At least, Kate does her new job (being the duchess) veyr well. And they don't have any scandals...yet.
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jul 22, 2011 14:39:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 22, 2011 15:09:04 GMT -5
Albert realized that he made a fool of himself yesterday is now he is getting everyone in Monaco to join him. Good lawd, this is such a big mistake!
|
|
|
Post by mrszinck on Jul 22, 2011 15:10:59 GMT -5
thanks countess! LOL ---
explained by the Minister of State! ‘she is no run a way bride! She accompanied the Monegasque delegation at the Olympic Games’
rumor on a supposed third child that prince Albert had while he was already with Charlène, ‘there is evidence that it is false,’ stated Michel Roger.
Michel Roger also raised against the remarks, on France 5, last Wednesday dedicated to Monaco, by the editorial of the journal, and the site Director, Christophe Barbier, who advocated the "annexation" of the Principality by France on behalf of "modernity" and "the interests of the France". "I condemn these remarks, I deeply regret them given the emotion aroused in the Monegasque population", it is moved Michel Roger. "Monaco is a sovereign State" and "the last treaty with the France, which dates from 2002, reaffirms the sovereignty of Monaco in the community of destiny which binds Monaco and the France," said the official, himself French.
He is afraid to lose his job! ;D
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 22, 2011 15:25:35 GMT -5
thanks countess! LOL --- explained by the Minister of State! ‘she is no run a way bride! She accompanied the Monegasque delegation at the Olympic Games’ rumor on a supposed third child that prince Albert had while he was already with Charlène, ‘there is evidence that it is false,’ stated Michel Roger. Michel Roger also raised against the remarks, on France 5, last Wednesday dedicated to Monaco, by the editorial of the journal, and the site Director, Christophe Barbier, who advocated the "annexation" of the Principality by France on behalf of "modernity" and "the interests of the France". "I condemn these remarks, I deeply regret them given the emotion aroused in the Monegasque population", it is moved Michel Roger. "Monaco is a sovereign State" and "the last treaty with the France, which dates from 2002, reaffirms the sovereignty of Monaco in the community of destiny which binds Monaco and the France," said the official, himself French. He is afraid to lose his job! ;D Of course Michel Roger and all the other flunkies are afraid to lose their jobs, but Roger does not even has its fact correct about what L'Express actually stated. L'express article was published on Tuesday, June 28, 201 and stated the week prior that Charlene tried to flee. So, Roger's claim about Charlene going to Athens was not the airport trip that L'Express is referring to. Also, L'Express never mentioned anything about more children by Albert. Actually L'Express just stated that Chalrene fled because of information that she found out about Albert's non-exemplary private life and they specifically stated that they would leave it to the tabloids to state and discuss why. Also, notice how Roger is mincing and qualifying words to states that Albert didn't have a child during the engagement. Perhaps Roger should READ what L'Express wrote before he calls them lirs. When L'Express defends itself ALL OF MONACO will be laughing stocks. All of Monaco.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 22, 2011 15:36:12 GMT -5
Here's a Google translation of the L'Express articlethat Countess posted.
The Monegasque authorities Express The all-out attack
By LEXPRESS.fr 22/07/2011
Albert of Monaco and Charlene will file a complaint against L'Express after the publication of an article on their marital tensions , while the National Council of Monaco is indignant about "neo-colonialists" Christophe Barbier.
The head of government of Monaco, Michel Roger, railed against the "rumors" to Albert II of Monaco and Charlene. He confirmed that the couple would continue LEXPRESS.fr - which keeps its information . These rumors have been formally denied by the Palace and the royal couple's lawyer , Albert II and then by himself - while being accredited by sources close to the organization of marriage.
"They are all wrong ... the ones I know anyway," insisted Roger Michel, adding that all this was "very distressing". And mentioned in particular the article which revealed that LEXPRESS.fr Charlene Wittstock had tried to escape a few days before her marriage from the Nice airport to return to South Africa.
"She starts in Greece together with the delegation of Monaco Olympics" special, a competition for the mentally handicapped which began in Athens on June 25, said Minister of State. "She left alone (without Albert, Ed), so we actually saw one this weekend at the airport in Nice. (...) If we had published the photo of Charlene scrolling with the delegation immediately we may have opportunities to stop the rumor," he added.
As for the persistent rumor of a supposed third illegitimate child that Prince Albert would have been when he was already engaged to Charlene, "there is evidence that this is wrong," said Michel Roger.
"But the condemnation of L'Express will put an end to" all those sounds, said Minister of State, confirming that "the Prince and Princess assign" the substance of the magazine, because it is his website "which gave credibility to these unfounded rumors by publishing" June 28
Roger Michel has also protested against the remarks during the program C in the air on France 5, spent last Wednesday in Monaco, the managing editor of the newspaper and website, Christophe Barbier , who advocated the "annexation" of the Principality by France on behalf of "modernity" and "the interests of France".
"I condemn these comments, I deeply regret given the emotion aroused in the population of Monaco," Roger Michel has moved."Monaco is a sovereign state" and "the last treaty with France, which dates from 2002, reaffirms the sovereignty of Monaco as part of the common destiny that binds Monaco and France," said the official, he even French.
In a statement , the president of the National Council (Parliament), Jean-François Robillon, sought even more virulent, talking about the "neo-colonialist vocabulary" which he described as "irresponsible." He called on "all (the) residents (in the Principality)" to express "strong dissatisfaction" with The Express.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 22, 2011 16:18:15 GMT -5
It sounds like one huge temper tantrum. Not to mention that they are stirring up the controversy. If they had just let it die and moved on, everyone would eventually forget about it. Now they have upped the ante. L'Express stands behind it's story. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Albert's people admit she fled? Didn't officials at the airport admit she fled? It sounds like the winds of war against the sovereign have become quite hot with L'Express opining that Monaco should become a part of France. The compromise position, should France decide, will be a constitutional democracy which in essence removes Albert from power. Should get interesting.
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 22, 2011 16:19:35 GMT -5
Since Christophe Barbier, the editor of L'Express, made the statement that Monaco should be annexed by France, Monaco is using this to rally behind their precious Prince and Princess. In reality, these are two separate issues. But, people are not seeing it that way. From Monaco Matin:
Monaco: Rumours, allegations, the Minister of State respondsby Joëlle Deviras Friday, July 22, 2011
After the television show "It's in the air" broadcast Wednesday, the Minister of State Michel Roger strongly condemned the words of Christophe Barbier, editor of the Express has requested "annexation" of Monaco by France. "Monaco is a sovereign state since 1297. The terms of Mr. Barber are surreal, unfounded. "
In addition, the Minister confirmed that "the prince and princess have assigned the Express for invasion of privacy and spreading false information." Regarding the rumor that Charlene Wittstock Monaco would have tried to flee before her marriage to the prince? Michel Roger says: "We have conclusive evidence that this is wrong."
So today, the only thing I claim all Monaco is their union around the prince. Unit to the front media onslaught.
Find more information in your edition of Monaco-Saturday Morning
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 22, 2011 17:29:32 GMT -5
A Serious Question: Do you believe that Charlene is telling the truth and the airport story NEVER happened and it is all "categorical lies"? I have always called Charlene a pathological liar - because she is one! But, do you really feel that she will lie about something as SERIOUS as this and about something that several others can actually verify - if indeed she went to the airport? Monaco is really going to war about the L'Express article (read the article here)which stated that Charlene bought a one-way ticket to South Africa and she was stopped from flying. The Minister of State Michel Roger has his facts wrong about what L'Express actually wrote - which is really scary when governmental officials are asking hthe entire country to rally behind their Prince and Princess. The key thing is that on Tuesday, June 28th, L'Express stated that htis incident happened a week ago. Yet, Roger is strongly believing that L'Express is referencing Charlene's Saturday trip to Greece on that Saturday June 25th. The level of ineptness of Monaco's officials are truly scary. Really scary. From L'Express on Tuesday June 28th: It all begins, a week ago, with the hasty departure of the future princess to Nice airport where she had decided to board a flight to South Africa. A flight with no return. Shaken, Charlene Wittstock had just learned a few hours earlier, that the privacy of the man she is about to marry and who had publicly confessed in September 2005, the existence of an illegitimate child with Nicole Coste , was not as exemplary as she imagined.
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 22, 2011 17:43:33 GMT -5
A Serious Question: Do you believe that Charlene is telling the truth and the airport story NEVER happened and it is all "categorical lies"? I have always called Charlene a pathological liar - because she is one! But, do you really feel that she will lie about something as SERIOUS as this and about something that several others can actually verify - if indeed she went to the airport? Monaco is really going to war about the L'Express article (read the article here)which stated that Charlene bought a one-way ticket to South Africa and she was stopped from flying. The Minister of State Michel Roger has his facts wrong about what L'Express actually wrote - which is really scary when governmental officials are asking hthe entire country to rally behind their Prince and Princess. The key thing is that on Tuesday, June 28th, L'Express stated that htis incident happened a week ago. Yet, Roger is strongly believing that L'Express is referencing Charlene's Saturday trip to Greece on that Saturday June 25th. The level of ineptness of Monaco's officials are truly scary. Really scary. From L'Express on Tuesday June 28th: It all begins, a week ago, with the hasty departure of the future princess to Nice airport where she had decided to board a flight to South Africa. A flight with no return. Shaken, Charlene Wittstock had just learned a few hours earlier, that the privacy of the man she is about to marry and who had publicly confessed in September 2005, the existence of an illegitimate child with Nicole Coste , was not as exemplary as she imagined. L'Express stands behind their story. They did not publish it without taking into consideration the consequences. Charlene is a puppet. She has been bought and paid for, therefore she will do as she is told. What I noticed in their interview is that she basically said NOTHING because if she had talked, she would have opened herself up to questions. Let's look at all the stories the palace and LaCoste have made up to cover their tracks on this. I believe something happened. I believe she did leave for the airport and was detained (I don't believe they confiscated her passport)long enough for Albert's people to get there and bring her back. Something set her off and upset her enough that she tried to leave. Albert is on thin ice here because if it goes to trial and L'Express is the type to go forward with it, then the witnesses called will either have to lie or tell the truth. I think French authorities will tell the truth and Albert's people will lie. Albert cannot win this one. She was in a public place not a private one, therefore their privacy was not invaded. I have been reading the comments on Eringer and this runs deep inside Monaco. It's more about people afraid for their jobs than it is about Albert and Charlene. I believe Albert will eventually have to step down. Neither Caroline nor Stephanie have come to their defense. They have disappeared to leave Albert to clean up his own mess. JMO
|
|
|
Post by axelle on Jul 22, 2011 21:28:35 GMT -5
Good on you MyAdia! Keep digging up the truth! Probably France is just fed up with Moronaco too.
|
|
|
Post by countess on Jul 22, 2011 22:24:09 GMT -5
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/neocolonialism: the economic and political policies by which a great power indirectly maintains or extends its influence over other areas or people so i'm reading that comment as a shot across the bow of France. geez he's really pitching a hissy fit, he doesn't care who he's pissing off. he's cut his own throat, i doubt the tabs will let up now, it's only going to get more fun. my worry is "trashlene as the victim" seems to becoming an undercurrent to the stories and that's not good BUT it does set her up for the monkey flunkies throw her under the bus to save FatAl's big butt....we'll see, this is better than a soap opera it just shows how stupid he is stirring this all up again, ESPEciallY since he must be desperate to change the narrative but yet he's going to sue a paper that is going to stand by it's story and fight them to the wall, THERE"S no up side keeping this in the papers, but because he's not getting his way, he's just making it a million times worse. dragging the IMO drugged out whorelene dressed tits up, stumbling through the museum, staring vancantly, looking miserable and BAD B.A.D. bad bad bad OMG disgustingly, dirty bad (or the more lady like "unkept" is just feeding the beast! ISn't IT GREAT!!
|
|
|
Post by cm7007 on Jul 23, 2011 1:52:18 GMT -5
"Oh the tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive."
IMO - There are so many lies told here by so many people it's hard to tell who's who and what's what. I'd like to know who the impeccable source is. There are only a few people who a publication like L'Express would believe. Charlene herself. Albert. Caroline (Never Stephanie). The General. Maybe Virginia Gallaco (but I don't think she'd do something like that.) The Chief of Police in France ...? If it's NOT true, why would any of these people lie about something like this? CW is the only one who might - maybe to get attention and it backfired. (But huh?) And why would she go to L'Express and not one of the tabloids? But I wouldn't put anything past her - ever.
IMO - I believe something most definitely happened and now they are covering up. They are also using this to distract from the real question - DNA!? Who, where, when, why? They THINK they'll create such a big smoke screen the real question will fall thought the cracks. (Not a change in hell it will!!! But look at the morons we are dealing with.)
|
|
|
Post by MyAdia on Jul 23, 2011 7:45:28 GMT -5
To Monaco’s minister of State Michel Roger” Please READ the L’Express article before you claim what is written is a lie. Your so-called EVIDENCE that L’Express is lying in NOT EVIDENCE, but just your straw man argument – which of course makes no sense L’Express is NOT referring to Charlene’s Saturday trip to Nice as the airport incidence. Charlene actually took this flight, so the L’Express journalist Renaud Revel who wrote the article is not a moron as it seems everyone in Monaco is. Also, Revel stated that he and L’Express editor Christophe Barbier discussed for days the story before they decided to publish it (see this post). Most in the press are not as stupid as the flunkies in Monaco’s media seem to be. Real journalists do NOT accept any thing that Albert, now Charlene, the palace or any Monaco government official tells them as the truth! Here’s another Monaco media, the Monte Carlo Carlo News (in Italian) just reporting what Michel stated with no whatsoever commentary and worse reporting as if Roger’s PROOF that the L’Express article is a lie and now everyone will STOP talking about it. Oh, Roger states that there is PROOF that” the third alleged illegitimate son of the Sovereign” is false. What kind of proof could he have and I didn’t know that the child was a son. So, has Sucker Albie taken another paternity test and it came back negative or is he lying to his Minister of State? Are these morons now trying to say that Albie NEVER cheated on the gold digger Charlene – that’s what it seems in their attempt to promote this wedding and now marriage as some fairy tale union.
Principles gossip becomes an "affair of state" but finally it is the terminus
By Sara Contestabile Friday, July 22, 2011
The Minister of State Michel Roger made it clear to the press against the positions taken by the Principles Express "for the attack on the privacy and spreads lies (...)". But not only explains why they are all false
In this wave of gossip that has long troubled for weeks not only principles but also a potential summer of great celebration in Monaco, has fallen in the field today also the Minister of State Michel Roger , which has received some members of the French press ( the homologous AFP ANSA French, Nice Matin and a TV journalist Monaco Monaco Info) confirming the positions taken by the torque of the Princes: the pursuit Express " for the attack on the privacy of information lying ee spreads false claims to follow and without any foundation and spread on the Internet. "
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity ... or maybe it's all due to jealousy French?Monegasque Minister has intervened in particular against the measure decided by the Director of Express Christophe Barbier reaction in the telecast of France 5 " C dans l ' air '(E' in the air) that would definitely last Wednesday talking about the uproar that "annexation of Monaco to France, in the name of modernity and the interests of France" (the video transmission on this link:www.france5. fr / c-dans-the-air / index-fr.php? id_rubrique & page = resume = 1763 & date = 20/07/2011 ). Statements obvious, unacceptable and inappropriate for the Minister Roger has sottilneato " Monaco is an independent sovereign state, recognized by the international community for a long time . "
Finally, the end seems to appear all'orizzone media in this tangle of lies and innuendo. The Minister of State Roger has also moved to speak of the alleged escape of the Princess Charlene and the third alleged illegitimate son of the Sovereign. All false and there is evidence. As the AFP reports that today was the meeting with the Minister (the French article can be read
In short, seems to have unraveled the tangle: that the Express has been deemed an attempted escape, was nothing more than a trip to Greece for the Special Olympics in HSH Princess Charlene is an ambassador. Comprehensive statement of the Minister Roger also: - If it had been published once the photo of Charlene with the delegation could have been given the opportunity to stop immediately the gossip - told AFP.
Perhaps now the heat will return in August to shine on Monaco also the serenity and the festive atmosphere is needed.
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Jul 23, 2011 10:42:20 GMT -5
I would like to ask Michel Roger; how many years the Palace and people like him had denied that Albert fathered a little Californian girl for? A little girl named Jazmin? Was it a couple of years, five years, ten years....? What happened at the end? Was that little girl (Jazmin) acknowledged as Albert's daughter or not? Also, I would like to ask him how many years took for Albert to publicly announce that HE is the father of a little boy named Alex? Just asking....
|
|
|
Post by royalpauper on Jul 23, 2011 10:51:44 GMT -5
Another question for Mr. Roger...He said that rumors of "the third alleged illegitimate son of the Sovereign" are false. I thought that Albert only had ONE son, Alex. If the one from the rumor is the " third son of the Sovereign", then who is the SECOND? Or is Mr. Roger saying that Alex is second, the latest one from the rumor is the third...which means that the one from Germany (teenager) was indeed his first son?! Can you Mr. Roger clarify...because now I am confused....
|
|
|
Post by hibou on Jul 23, 2011 11:06:57 GMT -5
Another question for Mr. Roger...He said that rumors of "the third alleged illegitimate son of the Sovereign" are false. I thought that Albert only had ONE son, Alex. If the one from the rumor is the " third son of the Sovereign", then who is the SECOND? Or is Mr. Roger saying that Alex is second, the latest one from the rumor is the third...which means that the one from Germany (teenager) was indeed his first son?! Can you Mr. Roger clarify...because now I am confused.... BINGO! Nicely done!
|
|
|
Post by emmeline on Jul 23, 2011 11:10:28 GMT -5
^I AGREE!!! God, Albert is really surrounded by morons. They don't check their words before speaking!
|
|
|
Post by scout on Jul 23, 2011 11:16:49 GMT -5
^I AGREE!!! God, Albert is really surrounded by morons. They don't check their words before speaking! Or they are accidently speaking the truth. Sometimes liars forget how much of the truth is out there and tell too much. This is a country that we are talking about. How can it interact with other countries when you can't believe a word these people say?
|
|