|
Post by sandsla on Jun 9, 2011 22:48:15 GMT -5
I think she looks like her mother a lot too--she has her father's coloring and few features....or combination of features of her dad and her mom, but she looks very much like Grace. Thank god she got her class and bother her parents had a brains--I guess she got them all, and not much was left for the other two--I hate to say that, but how can one not?
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 7, 2011 16:19:41 GMT -5
Back in 2006 she looked healthy - now like an old alien. In the pics from 2006 you see interaction between them (obviously not enough - for he dated other woman). IMO they missed the point to split up. Albert looks like dead man walking now, she like an empty plastic face and there is nothing between these two. At least she looks more youthful, her teeth were much better even if they were a little crooked, at least it gave her face some personality. Money and vanity don't mix well together!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 7, 2011 16:17:08 GMT -5
This purple number is my all time favorite - especially the way she is sitting. Let's see - how old were most of us when our mother's told us to always keep our knees together when we were sitting - especially if were in a dress! I think I was 3. Maybe even 2 and a half![/quote] Exactly, what I was thinking before I saw your post, and it's much worse than I remembered--you can see straight up her dress. I guess Albert always liked Sharon Stone, maybe that's what she's going for!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 7, 2011 16:08:32 GMT -5
<waves to Eringer: hi!> A brief warning: we're being spied upon by Eringer. He has seen the error of his ways and lurks/visits forums these days. Or at least this one. Just so you know. BTW, who is it who takes questions from this board and posts them there? I see a lot of topics from here being asked there and I suspect it's not always the poster here that goes over to the blog to ask the question there too. And here I was contemplating the possibilities of giving Eringer his own thread, because unless Albert and Eringer shared beds, this discussion has been "] for some time. Of which I take some of the blame too. Guilty! You are right on both counts! I know Eringer has posed as one of us for a long time now, and I am sure he tried to bill Albert for it too! ;D I just had to finally say my peace, as to why I have a hard time throwing this guy a bone!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 7, 2011 0:13:08 GMT -5
I think she looks good and best of all natural! I thought it was funny to read how Albert described what he wanted the food to represent....everything they are not and the farthest thing from what the two represent. Anyway I like Caroline's look, I know what you mean, but it just doesn't bother me on her,. I like her attitude--she makes a statement, and that is I'm not a fake!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 7, 2011 0:02:35 GMT -5
When I look at P Caroline and the way she conducts herself, the way she interacts with people, the causes she is interested in and the events she attends to...and then look at the Albert and WC...I always feel sad. It is interesting (and unfair at the same time) to see how "life" (sometimes) choses the most incompetent people and put them in the position of power. Many times it is a pure lottery, like in WC's case. Just think about it... Such a waste. RP, I feel exactly the same way. I was thinking the very same thing. I am always interested in reading about Caroline, because she is an interesting cultured person, and she conducts herself to fit her role in life. When I see Charlene and I think of all Albert has to work with, everything Monaco has to offer, all the different things one could do there, What a waste is exactly what I say! Albert threw it away, and for what, a cheap self serving bought and paid for skank who doesn't have a bit of interest in anything except posing as something, she is a poser in every thing she does, totally vapid!! It is a travesty and the whole thing is really upsetting to think about it. I feel sorry for Caroline because she knows how bad this is for Monaco and their name and her parents memory.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 23:27:46 GMT -5
Here is the full Paris Match article that I mentioned above. It is obvious that Chalrene is supplying all this information to reporters to keep magazines like Paris Match writing these glorifying articles about her and her relationship with Albert. The party at the palace that Kim Karsdashian attend was a party for the drivers and their wives. The article also notes that Charlene's parents are living at the Dacha in Roc Agel and they are thinking of living there permanently. Also, Charlene had lunch with both of her brothers during the Grand Prix. Hey sucker ALbert - haven't you noticed that Charlene is moving in family member to Monaco one at a time - very slowly - just as she conned you thinking that she was not interested in the trappings of your life. Please read the Swedish Folktale about The Traveler and the Stone Soup - because this is how Charlene conned you.
I cannot believe how simple minded these people are??? You know how I am always saying Albert will be forever apologizing for Charlene? Not just her for being her, but for bringing her there? I think all these articles and interviews speak to that, with their obvious retorts and denials of what they know are their huge problems, and then trying to revisit them with such ridiculous lying drivel only brings that much more focus to them. They really must think (just like Charlene) just by making some ridiculous statement in the press about what everyone knows is true....that Charlene is a simpleminded opportunist and a gold-digger! And there is not one thing that resembles love between these two,. The very fact that they need to try to sell that Charlene is not a golddigger or their love for each other, only makes it so much worse! The fact that they could actually print such a stupid thing....that Albert could make the obvious ridiculous statement? Please tell me how this woman is different when she is not just 20 years younger than him and completely void of any cultural interest or anything you might think they could have in common...that she could have in common with the prince of Monaco, being the high school drop out that she is? The big glaring fact that she has lived off of Albert for five years as a kept woman, without a pot to piss in herself, all while collecting a big hunk of money each month for her services, yes Albert people are seriously going to believe this woman is not a golddigger and opportunist when she has done nothing but use the very fact that she is sleeping with the Prince of Monaco to celebrate herself for the last five years--where she has actually posed for Magazine covers and photo shoots and did interviews for no other reason than for who she shags! The entire time she has known Albert she has done nothing but try to capitalize on being the Prince of Monaco's kept woman. Does Albert or the palace really think this escapes anyone??? . Not only that, but in the very same article the writer goes on to say just how comfortable all her relatives are getting there in Monaco....they seem to have already moved in, and if they haven't, they are already planning to? So while the writer goes on about all the glamor and superficiality that Charlene and her family are enjoying... living it up in Monaco, yes Albert tell everyone how Charlene is different when she has painted a picture of herself as the biggest OPPORTUNIST ever for the past five years! ;D ;D ;D It is too funny, and that is what makes it so pathetic! Every article and interview is nothing but a reaction to every negative problem they have and every wrong move Charlene has made, and bringing attention in the press trying to deny it or retract it only makes it look that much worse and Albert that much more foolish. These people are so simple minded they really think if they get something printed in the press, it must mean that people will think its true! Albert knows Charlene is not in love with him (it is not part of the deal), he may suspend belief that she will grow more fond of him, but Charlene has never made a secret that their relationship has anything to do with love between them, because that was never part of the business deal. Charlene does not care what Albert does privately,--that was part of the deal that she made with him before when they started the charade and the same now!) As long as Charlene gets to be the princess of Monaco, remember "She wanted the JOB bad" not Albert bad "the job" "the title", and if she ever seemed bothered by other women in Albert's life before it was only because she thought they might interfere with her dream--that it might be snatched away if Albert ever fell for someone more suitable that he actually cared for...if he ever thought he could actually marry someone else, besides her! There was something else she gave away in her past interview....how she never bothered to visit her country when she was living in Monaco living the good life, the last five years??? I liked that she gave it up exactly how much she cares for her country, and her family there. The article goes a lot further in showing what kind of opportunist Charlene and her family are, more than it convinces people that she isn't? AdminNote: Reduced length of quoted text
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 21:00:42 GMT -5
I know, I think actually seeing this girls face on the stamps there now, is going to make people in Monaco's skin crawl.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 20:46:53 GMT -5
It really pisses me off when anyone tries to sell this trashy relationship as some great love story! The French TV station M6 will be airing a documentary on the great love story of Albert and Charlene to be aired June 29, 2011. They have interviews from Albert, Charlene, relatives and friends to tell how Charlene won Albert's hearts an how Charlene won the heart of Monaco. See, it's shit like this that I wish that someone will come forward (or even the media to tell the truth) and expose this lie of a fairy tale romance. It's Albert and Charlene (mostly Charlene's) greed to be revered as some loving couple that will do them in. Charlene is NOT satisfied with scheming herself to the tiara - she wants everyone to believe that she is living a fairytale life with a man who loves her. If there is a God, which I know there is, these two will get exactly what they deserve. MYAdia, it is only a matter of time before Charlene or one of her relatives, takes their revenge and spills the beans about the whole thing being a farce. Charlene is too stupid to know how bad it would make her look, and one of her relatives won't care, after they feel like they aren't getting their fair share and decides to write a tell all. I don't think anyone will ever care enough about these two to ever read it, but it wouldn't surprise me is someone put one out soon. People already have problems with Charlen and she isn't the kind of person that grows on people, just the opposite is true. Her attitude and arrogance is going to be that much worse, no one will be able to stomach her--I think there will be people that she pisses off enough that will be looking to get her back. I think Eringer likes Charlene's, but it wouldn't surprise me if he wrote a book about there faux romance just to get back at Albert. Why don't you write one Myadia, you're great at research, you might as will make some money off of these people--plenty of other people are, and Albert seems to welcome it? AdminNote: Reduced length of quoted text
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 19:23:54 GMT -5
sandsla, the reason why Albert probably continued paying was, because Eringer held a business with the powers. They go back a long time and Eringer for some reason got into business with them. I suppose it was through them that Albert kept going for a little while longer. But I don'tthink that Eringer was worth a cent he received. A secretary could have done his job, by reading the paper and going down to the shop. Yes I guess, I think Albert has a hard time fluffing any ones feathers-directly anyway?
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 19:15:26 GMT -5
You can see how distorted her face is in the current picture of her, and in other pictures with all those strange lines on her face in weird places....it's because of all the botox where her paralyzed muscles come up against the parts that aren't. She is really looking very plastic scary especially for someone her age.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 18:51:43 GMT -5
Really a lot of media trash!!!!! Thanks for the videos Suite. It's a lot of con artist Charlene trash! This woman is good at conning people - I am so sick of hearing her say how passionate she is about the Special Olympic - yet she sat on her lazy ass for years living off of Albert and doing nothing. Shew just got involved with the Special Olympics after all these years. It's sickening to hear all these people sing her praise now about being so passionate and giving her time. In the second video, it's really sickening to see all these butt-lickers bowing to Charlene already Why? Why is this dumb-ass-a-rock bimbo wearing a long gown to a business meeting? I know, everything event for her is one big photo opp - an opportunity for her to show off her extensive and expensive wardrobe. I know it is the image everyone is trying to dial back on right now, but now Albert and Charlene, they can't spend and gloat enough about how grand their wedding is going to be? Albert really thought this was the climate to have a big showy wedding in.....with his young golddigger bride? As far as putting her with Special Olympics, it seems the only and best choice they have, where else is Charlene's own shortcomings going to be the less noticeable? I guess Albert will delegate her to events where she only has to interact with small children, or places were she can do the least damage if anyone dare ask her a question? Albert will probably continue to show up a lot of places alone, then people will wonder why they aren't together more? Albert has really cooked his goose here!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 18:27:18 GMT -5
I agree paca. I don't like the phrasing "intellectual inabilities. Some of them have learning glitches or physical problems. Not inabilities. Inabilities is so negative. These kids thrive on the positive. It just shows you that not only is she uneducated academically but uneducated in diversity. Someone needed to script this statement better. You just can't leave this woman to wing it. Or perhaps I should look at it differently, may be she has a learning glitch herself and therefore identifies with them. I'm waiting for that announcement. Something for her PR flunkies to gain sympathy with. Well, at least it would explain why she can't learn French. JMO I'm telling you - from my experience her IQ can't be more than 100! Really. I know that's supposed to be considered "average" - but it's very, very low average to say the least - basically it's just over the edge of not retarded. One may think on the surface "Well, if she's so stupid - how did she get where she did?" I'm sure she probably thinks that - but IMO - where she is, and who she's marrying, and what she's having to put up with, and God only knows what she willing to accept - very, very, very few women would agree to what IMO - I'm sure she's agreed to - no matter what was offered! I was absolutely floored when I realized it was her in her posts, because I could not believe anyone could have the level of maturity or intelligence and actually be an adult. Worse that Albert was not just dating her, but letting people know it, and actually trying to show her off! Thongs really? She thinks thongs are appropriate here? Is anyone else wearing thongs? Is anyone dressed like they just stepped off the beach? And she is the one in these pitures that is meant to be the soon to be princess? Her whole stance in these pictures are so off, everyone else looks half way professional, while she looks like she is posing for a snapshot from a friend, and that was before I saw her twisted child foot picture, also why does she look shorter than everyone in these pictures? Is she bent over or something? What I love is that she isn't even the princess yet and you can see how bored to death she is already-this girl has never been able to fake it and now she doesn't even think she has to try? Thongs!!! Did you see that girl look down at Charlene's feet? I don't know what the event entailed it does look like there is sand and I guess it is some kind of bbq, but no one else is dressed like her there? She really looks like she doesn't want to be there in that video even more than it shows in the photos, she barely glances at anyone. She sure does not look the part, out of everyone there she looks like the one out of place, like she has no idea how to handle herself....she really is a child.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 17:51:15 GMT -5
I am not so quick to dismiss him. He does have an agenda. It's obvious and it's to destroy Albert. I can't dismiss this because we all know Albert is incompetent and Eringer is out to take him down. He is a gatherer of information. He throws a line out there to see what fish he can catch. I have learned quite a bit from reading his blog. I take some of the posts and research the info they mention. Sometimes it seems pretty accurate, sometimes not, but it does get me thinking about things. I do not take what is posted there "hook, line and sinker". I look at what is said and then dig into it to see what it really is. He does not always answer questions or chooses to answer only a part of a question. I find that just as interesting. Albert as we all know needs to step down, and if Eringer makes this happen, the better for Monaco. Allbert was a fool not to get a confidentiality agreement from him. Had he done so, there would be no Eringer blog or Q & A. Well because of the nature of the work, if you could call it that...it's why there was no contract. Eringer is not the kind of guy...or the type of work he's being hired to do--it's not something that you would want a big paper trail to, for either Albert, or Eringer if he was any kind of professional. Eringer's reputation as a spymaster should be based on being someone that no one should know who he is, or knows what he does, but you'll see just the opposite is true of Eringer...he leaves a trail of trouble for anyone who has ever hired him? How anyone could hire this guy w/o doing some research on him is beyond me. I think Eringer probably got into this kind of game in the first place because he crossed someone's path who thought he would be the perfect lacky to probe someone they wanted some information from--between Eringer as a supposed writer and his huge ego, he would jump at the chance to feel important and he has no scruples about anything? People would talk to him because they would feel flattered someone is interested in them.... people like to talk about themselves, look at Eringer he wants to be the star of his story that is why he talks in a weird dramatic third person style--he fictionalizes himself. Eringer obviously is the kind of guy to take himself very seriously, so the guy who hired him probably had a good laugh and gave Eringer a little title so he could feel official, then Eringer took his little part to heart. I'm talking about the first guy that hired him to do his "Spymaster" ::)work, which in Eringer's case was probably no more than to basically pepper someone with questions while stroking their ego while telling then you are doing research for a book. Hibou, It is the way he portrays the information that is the problem, and what his own motivation is. I don't think that "the events" are always actual lies, it is "the context" that he tries to give them. I mean the fact that he writes his blog in third person I find hilarious ;D. For instance Hibou, maybe you go to the store to buy carrots (for soup), Eringer would try to imply you went to the store, because you needed to have an excuse to get out of the house, because you were having an illicit affair, and possibly meeting him in the produce aisle? You did go to the store after all, the event is true, but the context is very different. Does Albert pick up on cheap women who would meet him on a boat for a three day weekend, and have sex with them while they let another guy watch? Probably? Does this have anything to do with an unpaid bill? I don't disbelieve that Albert had sex with that woman, who claims she was raped, I have a problem with that women's story andEringer's involvement in her story? Also as intriguing as Eringer's stories might be.... true or not, I just don't think it is Eringer's business to tell them, especially with a megaphone... even more so because he took money from Albert during all of the time everything he has to say about Albert took place? And even worse, as someone who was hired to keep his confidences. On top of all that, he distorts the truth. You have to ask yourself...just in the fact that what he is doing here (his own actions)....is this a guy that anyone should trust about anything? If Nicole was on here blabbing about every personal thing about Albert or writing a book would you champion her for it, or when Charlene writes a book, are you going to support her action by buying it? I just feel like it is the very same thing? It is supporting that kind of behavior, and that is why I just don't want to support this guy, especially since it is so easy to see that he tries to mislead people and use the as his personal pawns in his own game, and that is the very thing we are all mad about Albert and the palace for right now? He is everything we despise Charlene for?
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 16:32:07 GMT -5
Just wanted to point out one thing about Eringer. He is suing for an unpaid bill, not for wrong termination and yet, he never received any termination paper. so technically he could still be employed by His Majesty.... he only had a verbal contract and received his dismissal verbally he knew that his services were no longer wanted as soon as Albert had no more time for him....It would be silly of him to claim that he was still employed by Albert, when he stated in his blog that Albert fired him. And why should he receive a termination paper, when he hasn't received a contract to begin with. He was foolish to have nothing stating that he was working for ALbert and under which conditions. How is a judge to decide whether Eringer ever provided what he claims not to have been paid for? I don't think that Eringer will get anything out of this apart from publicity. But I guess that's all he is interested anyways. Paca, I didn't see your post which answered it perfectly w/o might giant post! ;D Sorry ladies! It is just what seemed so clear to me when I saw how silly that law suit was written, which looked to be for no other purpose than to embarrass Albert and extort more money from him. Who else would write such a ridiculous diatribe that has nothing to do with what he is suing for....Eringer is the one who should have been embarrassed.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 6, 2011 16:01:59 GMT -5
Just wanted to point out one thing about Eringer. He is suing for an unpaid bill, not for wrong termination and yet, he never received any termination paper. so technically he could still be employed by His Majesty.... Eringer, wasn't paid a salary--he was paid for services rendered, like an independent contractor. he was paid for the work he did, that is why he billed him. If you read the law suit...in it and in his own words in his blog, it sounds like Eringer tried to bill him for anything under the sun, for example when he talks about trying to introduce him to Colin Powell? He wants a fee for that? Why would Albert have a need to get a few minutes with Colin Powell? Monaco is a protectorate, and if you carefully read Eringer's words you can tell he has no clout when he actually says he "might" could get what boils down to a meet and greet, a photo op type of thing, like some kind of wanna-be would do, hence Albert's reaction, who knows full well why Eringer wants to set it up--he wants to bill him for it. Albert in the law suit tells Eringer to JUST focus on what he specifically hired him to do, which basically was to find out who is foes were, who would speak behind Albert's back, or who didn't have his back! Probably by Eringer posing he was writing a book on Albert or something, just like Eringer has done before in the pasy trying to get someone to blab. In the lawsuit you can tell Albert obviously is tired of Eringer billing him for all sorts of crap he never asked him to do, or certainly doesn't need "Eringer" to do. But in Eringer's words he tries to take it all out of context and turn it around without actually saying a false word exacyly...it is what he tries to imply. You can see how arrogant Eringer is, when he actually thinks he should be one of Albert's advisers and barks orders to him, when he thinks he should be able to summon Albert to a meeting on the night of the Rose Ball, worse after the Ball! He is irritated that Albert is making a smart ass retort to him, that must have gone over his head because of his own arrogance, Albert is basically saying sorry buddy I have other plans and who exactly do you think you are? He is putting Eringer in his place with the comment--he is telling Eringer how unimportant he is, and Albert is the boss there--Eringer works for him not the other way around! Eringer is either purposely trying to imply something else there, but the statement is so arrogant, or Eringer is seriously that arrogant that he just doesn't get it! Eringer actually gets upset when Albert doesn't treat him like an adviser. It's obvious that Albert's people were trying to get rid of this guy who was nothing but a financial drain, and that he was trouble--they were formally telling him his job there is done (Albert is the prince of Monaco he does not need to personally fire Eringer (how arrogant can one be), but Eringer refuses to leave (as much as he has to say about Albert now) Eringer tries to hang on....he tries to tell Albert he is just in the middle of something, and Albert should let him finish it, so Albert throws him a bone and continues to pay him a little more. In the law suit you can see where Albert has tapered Eringer's salary off--you can see what is happening there, Albert is just doing Eringer a favor by still paying him a little when Eringer has already been told he is no longer needed. Albert is telling him his gig is over. But Eringer just continues to bill Albert for crap, bill after bill, Albert pays it, and it looks like Albert finally has had enough...he should have probably stopped paying Eringer's bill he kept sending, a year before, and it's Albert's own fault because he shouldn't have been a sucker to Eringer when his gys tried to get rid of him before, that is probably why Albert is that much more pissed off about it, because he was already doing him a favor by paying him a little more. I am sure Albert is thinking this guy has a lot of nerve. Why on earth would Albert not pay Eringer's bill, if he thought it would make him go away....the fact that he kept paying bills from Eringer when he should have balked long ago at them is why Eringer won't leave. He is just like Charlene, and all of Albert's creepy women. The money Eringer wants is a sneeze for Albert, why on earth wouldn't he pay it, even if it was just to make this guy go away....why because Eringer is what happens when you pay blackmailer....they will always come back, and want more. Charlene is going to be an even bigger problem. Anyway, to me it seems clear as day what was going on there by reading Eringer's own words in his law suit. Eringer's blog would have happened no matter what Albert payed him? Any mature PROFESSIONAL adult, if they had a problem with payment, that is what they would stick to in a lawsuit, that is all a judge cares about. Were you "contracted" (asked) to do this specific work that you are now billing for, and did you complete it...end of story! Why all the weird gossip and vindictive blog that has nothing to do with what he is actually suing him for, besides considered the nature of the work he was hired for, I would say talking about it now, would let Albert off the hook, Eringer looks like the one who didn't hold up his part of the deal by talking about it now.....not a very good spy if you tell the world about it. Paca said it well, and if Albert had paid that bill, there would just have been another one, and another one....nothing would have changed Eringer would still have some vindictive blog, like some bitter woman who won't leave when they are told it's over.
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 4, 2011 18:59:51 GMT -5
Trashy only wants to be admired for breathing without help. She has never worked, she is not working now and she has no intention of ever doing so in here entire life. The woman believes she is a gift to the world. Personally I think that woman needs treatment. Paca, the above is so true. Trashlene's comments on these message board are testimonies to that. Trashlene really does believe that unlike all the other Princess (except Mathilde) she is the only one that has no BAGGAGE (her favorite word) and being a former Olympian makes her better than anyone else. It was so funny to read her and her flunkies put down Albert and all the Grimaldis for having so much baggage, but at the same time begging Albert to marry her. The only masses that Charlene have for support are the Wittstocks and other South Africans that are riding the Village Idiot Albert of Monaco's gravy train - and expect many more passengers like the Jason Hartmans of the world. Both of you guys took the words out of my mouth, actually even Emelines quote: "Charlene is so trash, that she will humilitate herself to have access to all the jewelery and money she can have. She actually has been doing it since her relationship with Albert." I have also watched and been sickened by Charlene and her posts on these forums trying to hunt down the family jewels, Grace's personal jewels--she goes through pictures of Grace with her jewels on--especially her tiara's (of course), since for six years, all she has done on these forums, is gone on about how Charlene was going to get the "Tiara" Charlene was the originator of mentioning a Tiara. I always thought she meant it as a figure of speech, which was bad enough, but after seeing all her posts in the last year and a half, it was obvious she meant it quite literally with her six year old mentality and cold calculating character. She was always asking if anyone knew who had Grace's jewels, and then after learning Caroline had them. she expresses that she thinks they should go to Albert's wife! This girl just really turns your stomach--it is hard to believe someone like her can really exist. Then she wants to know why the Grimaldi's don't have a crown! She says Albert is rich enough he could buy one! She is dead serious! ;D She really think he should buy one! ;D Because of course that is exactly what Charlene would do! ;D Paca you are right this is a girl that has some serious issues! Anyway Myadia and Paca you could not have said it better! And MyAdia is exactly right above about reading Charlene's posts--Is that the kind of person anyone would choose to marry! They had to know it was her and her partner in crime. Those posts were ridiculously obvious-- they were meant for the express purpose to send a message to Albert to try to convince him that no one else would ever marry him but Charlene, she was the best he would or could ever do! And that Charlene's image would help him--her "superficial image" of what I don't know?--that she was tall? They went through every tactic they could think of to try to force Albert to marry Charlene, that was just one of them, but that was always the message she was sending if you read her posts-- Charlene was only worthy of marrying Albert by default! Instead of ever trying to improve herself by making any effort, it was easier to rely on Albert's own vulnerabilities and insecurities and convince him that no one better than Charlene was going to come along, she was an obstacle in Albert's way of him ever finding anyone else as long as she was living in Monaco and publicly on his arm. She counted on that Albert never had the balls to send her home and end the relationship, he would eventually give in, even though she knew if he hadn't been hoping for something better--he would have married her years ago! Just like CM said, she heard Charlene say, with her own ears, that she was never leaving Monaco! That girl dug herself in even before she arrived, that is why she talked to the press early on, Albert even recognized what she was doing (that is why he had to grab her arm and tell her to stop it, as she posed for photographs, and then go on the Today show to dial back what she was trying to get out there), but knowing what she was doing and about, he still let her elbow her way in! Charlene never expected that she would have to improve herself in anyway! Albert was a sucker and easily manipulated. Anyway, it was because of these posts of hers that it made me cringe when people would put down Albert in the same way.....it fed right into her agenda, in trying to convince Albert that he was such a big loser that he had no choice but to marry Charlene, that is why I always wanted you guys to dial back attacking his person in that way--Charlene probably wanted to kiss everyone who called him fat, a loser, etc... Anyway that is exactly what Charlene was using herself in her own posts to try to break him down to get that ring on her finger! You think she wanted Albert to lose weight or to ever feel better about himself, or to have any more confidence in himself that would send her packing! No way!Of course not! So why she was licking him like a lollipop to his face (as his supporter), twoface Charlene was ripping him to shreds on the forums trying to keep him vulnerable and insecure. The message had always been, not that there wasn't anyone out there better than Charlene....the message was that Charlene was the best "that Albert" could ever do or ever hope for, so he might as well just marry Charlene, even if they had no real relationship, or love for each other, or that she was a bought and paid for wh!@#! As Esther (Charlene or one of her relatives) said, they were counting on Albert's money to make her past and money payments go away!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 4, 2011 16:15:53 GMT -5
I have to agree, if he can't keep all these bimbo women and people like Eringer trying to blackmail him, I doubt he would have been so successful with some tidbit like this! Plus Eringer would have done his best to at least elude to that, if he thought he could. Eringer implies that there isn't much Albert hasn't done. He's very careful in how he words this stuff. The meaning is implied but never outright said. Exactly!!! He "Implies"!!!!!!For good reason! Many legal! Eringer chooses his words in the same way Charlene chooses hers! They ONLY "imply" something--they do not to prove, or state with facts something. Why not? You can't get sued if something is true! Even we try to back up what we say here with Charlene's actions and words and her past history--something that can be pointed to! Most us us all know it all by now, so it's not necessary for us to repeat it anymore to each other, but just like there are still people on other forums who have no source of reference or history or knowledge of this girl, but still are just chiming in because they read what someone says, with what "Charlene says" and they now think they have all the information they need in passing judgement....."women must be jealous if they have a problem with this poor girl!" They buy the hype of everything that is "implied" about this girl by what "Charlene says", "Charlene says" she was very involved with philanthropy before Albert, but she never states what organizations she worked for or what she did? She can't, (she chooses her word carefully) because it's not true, a nything more than what "Charlene says" can be fact checked! This is a woman who has never had a source of income ever, the idea that she could have the money or the the time to ever be philanthropic must escape people? After all she claimed she never had the time to even get a high school diploma? She is hoping people will take it at face value with what " she says" and run with it! Just like many have done with Eringer! Eringer twist words to get the reaction that he wants....he seems to be successful with that, because many seem to lap it up with a spoon, and hang on his every word of his! But who is he? Does anyone question this man's reputation, credentials, his past history and experiences, his professionalism, or his agenda! There is nothing this guy writes that could be considered good journalism. "Eringer say's" and? So, who is Eringer? Why would anyone ever hang on this man's every word? The fact that he is talking at all should tell you something about who this man is? Have you seriously done any real research on this guy? You might want to, because he certainly is not someone that anyone respects or admires or should feel comfortably quoting. Albert was nuts to ever involve himself with this guy, but he is is a magnet for scheming, blackmailing, self centered lowlifes that believes the world always owes them--people who do not have a shred of dignity or any evidence of a conscience. Eringer's own blog has made it obvious that he is not a man that has any skill or talent that is much in demand by anyone that might help to add that he has any kind of reputable reputation--his own actions would suggest the opposite? Look at the trail that he's left....is there anyone that has anything good to say about this guy? He is a man who lives in his own world and in his own mind, looking for dumb people he can manipulate, not unlike what Albert and the Palace are doing now, so I don't know why he is complaining so hard about someone or something that he seems to have so much in common with? There may be some "opinions" of Eringer's that some (myself included) might find accurate, but that still doesn't make him credible. Just on what you can already tell about his character without knowing anything about him or his history, is this really the kind of guy you want to align yourself with, or quote as a source of information? A journalist might be intrigued with something he has to say, but you know that they would first research the facts themselves to substantiate his words....their own factual research would be their source, not heresay by anyone, especially with someone who has Eringer's history and reputation. Hibou, I'm sorry, but I really think you would be better served to rely on your own good sense instead of the words of a guy with questionable character who has made no secret that he his own vindictive agenda--It is the point of his blog! I'm sorry but I jut think Eringer is trying to use these forums and the people on them as his own personal tool and I can't help but to be bothered by that. The manipulation done by Charlene and her crew worming herself in there, and then Albert and the Palace regrading this ridiculous relationship and what it is suppose to be is bad enough. Pointing to something brought up by Eringer is one thing, but to not question what is being said, or why it's being said....not questioning Eringer's motivation (as MYadia has questioned). Just like the rape thing--it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what is really going on there? There is nothing credible about that woman's story, and the fact that with Eringers' involvement that it is being revisted, is not a mystery (IMO). If he was smart he would understand that his own involvement would undermine the validity of the case, even if he was going to try to find her and put her up to it. Albert could be bi or like bi sex,, but as unlucky as this guy is, it is very odd that someone wouldn't be blackmailing him for big bucks, especially Eringer--if he had something he would use it! He has tried to spill the beans about everything else with a megaphone, so why not the one thing that he would really have him over a barrel? He wouldn't need a blog or to bring a lawsuit!
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 3, 2011 0:38:04 GMT -5
I can't believe he is going through with this marriage. He will forever be ridiculed. She has zero personality, and he can't put two words together. Both look clumsy together and there is no connection as a real couple. I feel for the people of monaco. It's going to get ugly before it gets better. IMO The fall out after he made the decision to actually marry her and make her the princess of Monaco, neither will either of those titles ever mean anything again, and the only women that will ever be interested in him after this, are the same kind of opportunistic skanks, but then I guess that is what Albert likes?
|
|
|
Post by sandsla on Jun 3, 2011 0:12:51 GMT -5
Seriously, I am convinced that Monaco is being run by a bunch of idiots. As the country is struggling financially and facing serious competition from other luxurious vacation spots, Monaco largest news magazine runs a story about the legal prostitution in Monaco. I didn't know that prostitution is legal in Monaco! The police chief and other officials are interviewed about the prostitutes in Monaco. The police chief wants us to belie that there are only 50 prostitutes in Monaco. What's really funny is that this story come out as Albert marries Charlene who lived four years completely off of Albert in Monaco as she offered her services to him. Check out the article, it is written because they opposed penalizing customers as France is thinking about doing. Hard to penalize customers in Monaco when your sovereign Prince visits prostitutes. Prostitution : Pas de sanction pour les clients (Google translation: Prostitution: No penalty for customers) Visits prostitutes--he's marrying one! ;D Charlene wasn't just kept--she was paid in cold hard cash! Actually I think it is really fitting, maybe they should have used that photo of Charlene in a bathrobe to illustrate the story!
|
|